Usefulness of peak systolic velocity for evaluating stenotic vascular access lesions

[Background and Purpose]Ultrasound evaluations of vascular access (VA) stenosis are generally based on the diameter of the stenotic lesion (SL diameter), but in Europe and the United States evaluations based on peak systolic velocity (PSV) are performed. In this study, we investigated the usefulness...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi 2022, Vol.55(4), pp.243-247
Hauptverfasser: Yamamoto, Yuya, Okawa, Hirohisa, Nishikawa, Hiroyuki, Morio, Masato, Okawa, Hiromi, Masuda, Naoki, Sumitomo, Keiko, Akagi, Yuki, Takamoto, Kaori, Tsuji, Junko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 247
container_issue 4
container_start_page 243
container_title Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
container_volume 55
creator Yamamoto, Yuya
Okawa, Hirohisa
Nishikawa, Hiroyuki
Morio, Masato
Okawa, Hiromi
Masuda, Naoki
Sumitomo, Keiko
Akagi, Yuki
Takamoto, Kaori
Tsuji, Junko
description [Background and Purpose]Ultrasound evaluations of vascular access (VA) stenosis are generally based on the diameter of the stenotic lesion (SL diameter), but in Europe and the United States evaluations based on peak systolic velocity (PSV) are performed. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of quantitative evaluations of PSV for assessing VA stenosis. [Method]The subjects were 179 patients with arteriovenous fistulas. The SL diameter and PSV were measured on long‒axis cross sections, and the cross‒sectional area was measured on short‒axis cross sections. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the diagnostic ability of each item for blood removal failure. We also performed a PSV correlation analysis. [Results]In the ROC analysis, the SL diameter and cross‒sectional area exhibited high diagnostic ability for poor blood removal, and there was no difference between the two, but the diagnostic ability of PSV was significantly low. Furthermore, PSV displayed weak correlations with cross‒sectional area and SL diameter. [Conclusion]PSV was not found to be useful in a quantitative evaluation of VA stenosis based on ultrasound.
doi_str_mv 10.4009/jsdt.55.243
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4009_jsdt_55_243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_jsdt_55_4_55_243_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1283-f68730b31d2cd72672a7c95269797c1be18d5e90f344157fa8d8c3702fa9993e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsn_0DusjUfm01yEaT4BQUvLXhb0uykbo2bktkK_ffu0tLTDMwzLzMPIfeczUrG7OMWm36m1EyU8oJMuDGyYEZ8XQ69LFkhS8WvyQ3ilrHKKs4mZLlCCPvYASJNge7A_VA8YJ9i6-kfxOTb_kBDyhT-XNy7vu02FHvoUj8CDv0-ukyd92NCBGxTh7fkKriIcHeqU7J6fVnO34vF59vH_HlReC6G00JltGRryRvhGy0qLZz2VonKaqs9XwM3jQLLgixLrnRwpjFeaiaCs9ZKkFPycMz1OSFmCPUut78uH2rO6lFIPQqplaoHIQP9dKS32LsNnFmXh1cinNnytHAe-G-Xa-jkP5sEbFU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Usefulness of peak systolic velocity for evaluating stenotic vascular access lesions</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><creator>Yamamoto, Yuya ; Okawa, Hirohisa ; Nishikawa, Hiroyuki ; Morio, Masato ; Okawa, Hiromi ; Masuda, Naoki ; Sumitomo, Keiko ; Akagi, Yuki ; Takamoto, Kaori ; Tsuji, Junko</creator><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yuya ; Okawa, Hirohisa ; Nishikawa, Hiroyuki ; Morio, Masato ; Okawa, Hiromi ; Masuda, Naoki ; Sumitomo, Keiko ; Akagi, Yuki ; Takamoto, Kaori ; Tsuji, Junko</creatorcontrib><description>[Background and Purpose]Ultrasound evaluations of vascular access (VA) stenosis are generally based on the diameter of the stenotic lesion (SL diameter), but in Europe and the United States evaluations based on peak systolic velocity (PSV) are performed. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of quantitative evaluations of PSV for assessing VA stenosis. [Method]The subjects were 179 patients with arteriovenous fistulas. The SL diameter and PSV were measured on long‒axis cross sections, and the cross‒sectional area was measured on short‒axis cross sections. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the diagnostic ability of each item for blood removal failure. We also performed a PSV correlation analysis. [Results]In the ROC analysis, the SL diameter and cross‒sectional area exhibited high diagnostic ability for poor blood removal, and there was no difference between the two, but the diagnostic ability of PSV was significantly low. Furthermore, PSV displayed weak correlations with cross‒sectional area and SL diameter. [Conclusion]PSV was not found to be useful in a quantitative evaluation of VA stenosis based on ultrasound.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1340-3451</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1883-082X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4009/jsdt.55.243</identifier><language>eng ; jpn</language><publisher>The Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy</publisher><subject>peak systolic velocity ; stenotic lesion ; ultrasonography ; vascular access</subject><ispartof>Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi, 2022, Vol.55(4), pp.243-247</ispartof><rights>2022 The Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1283-f68730b31d2cd72672a7c95269797c1be18d5e90f344157fa8d8c3702fa9993e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1877,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, Hirohisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishikawa, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morio, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, Hiromi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masuda, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumitomo, Keiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akagi, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takamoto, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, Junko</creatorcontrib><title>Usefulness of peak systolic velocity for evaluating stenotic vascular access lesions</title><title>Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi</title><addtitle>Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi</addtitle><description>[Background and Purpose]Ultrasound evaluations of vascular access (VA) stenosis are generally based on the diameter of the stenotic lesion (SL diameter), but in Europe and the United States evaluations based on peak systolic velocity (PSV) are performed. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of quantitative evaluations of PSV for assessing VA stenosis. [Method]The subjects were 179 patients with arteriovenous fistulas. The SL diameter and PSV were measured on long‒axis cross sections, and the cross‒sectional area was measured on short‒axis cross sections. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the diagnostic ability of each item for blood removal failure. We also performed a PSV correlation analysis. [Results]In the ROC analysis, the SL diameter and cross‒sectional area exhibited high diagnostic ability for poor blood removal, and there was no difference between the two, but the diagnostic ability of PSV was significantly low. Furthermore, PSV displayed weak correlations with cross‒sectional area and SL diameter. [Conclusion]PSV was not found to be useful in a quantitative evaluation of VA stenosis based on ultrasound.</description><subject>peak systolic velocity</subject><subject>stenotic lesion</subject><subject>ultrasonography</subject><subject>vascular access</subject><issn>1340-3451</issn><issn>1883-082X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsn_0DusjUfm01yEaT4BQUvLXhb0uykbo2bktkK_ffu0tLTDMwzLzMPIfeczUrG7OMWm36m1EyU8oJMuDGyYEZ8XQ69LFkhS8WvyQ3ilrHKKs4mZLlCCPvYASJNge7A_VA8YJ9i6-kfxOTb_kBDyhT-XNy7vu02FHvoUj8CDv0-ukyd92NCBGxTh7fkKriIcHeqU7J6fVnO34vF59vH_HlReC6G00JltGRryRvhGy0qLZz2VonKaqs9XwM3jQLLgixLrnRwpjFeaiaCs9ZKkFPycMz1OSFmCPUut78uH2rO6lFIPQqplaoHIQP9dKS32LsNnFmXh1cinNnytHAe-G-Xa-jkP5sEbFU</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Yamamoto, Yuya</creator><creator>Okawa, Hirohisa</creator><creator>Nishikawa, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Morio, Masato</creator><creator>Okawa, Hiromi</creator><creator>Masuda, Naoki</creator><creator>Sumitomo, Keiko</creator><creator>Akagi, Yuki</creator><creator>Takamoto, Kaori</creator><creator>Tsuji, Junko</creator><general>The Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Usefulness of peak systolic velocity for evaluating stenotic vascular access lesions</title><author>Yamamoto, Yuya ; Okawa, Hirohisa ; Nishikawa, Hiroyuki ; Morio, Masato ; Okawa, Hiromi ; Masuda, Naoki ; Sumitomo, Keiko ; Akagi, Yuki ; Takamoto, Kaori ; Tsuji, Junko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1283-f68730b31d2cd72672a7c95269797c1be18d5e90f344157fa8d8c3702fa9993e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; jpn</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>peak systolic velocity</topic><topic>stenotic lesion</topic><topic>ultrasonography</topic><topic>vascular access</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, Hirohisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishikawa, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morio, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, Hiromi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masuda, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumitomo, Keiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akagi, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takamoto, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, Junko</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yamamoto, Yuya</au><au>Okawa, Hirohisa</au><au>Nishikawa, Hiroyuki</au><au>Morio, Masato</au><au>Okawa, Hiromi</au><au>Masuda, Naoki</au><au>Sumitomo, Keiko</au><au>Akagi, Yuki</au><au>Takamoto, Kaori</au><au>Tsuji, Junko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Usefulness of peak systolic velocity for evaluating stenotic vascular access lesions</atitle><jtitle>Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi</jtitle><addtitle>Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>247</epage><pages>243-247</pages><issn>1340-3451</issn><eissn>1883-082X</eissn><abstract>[Background and Purpose]Ultrasound evaluations of vascular access (VA) stenosis are generally based on the diameter of the stenotic lesion (SL diameter), but in Europe and the United States evaluations based on peak systolic velocity (PSV) are performed. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of quantitative evaluations of PSV for assessing VA stenosis. [Method]The subjects were 179 patients with arteriovenous fistulas. The SL diameter and PSV were measured on long‒axis cross sections, and the cross‒sectional area was measured on short‒axis cross sections. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the diagnostic ability of each item for blood removal failure. We also performed a PSV correlation analysis. [Results]In the ROC analysis, the SL diameter and cross‒sectional area exhibited high diagnostic ability for poor blood removal, and there was no difference between the two, but the diagnostic ability of PSV was significantly low. Furthermore, PSV displayed weak correlations with cross‒sectional area and SL diameter. [Conclusion]PSV was not found to be useful in a quantitative evaluation of VA stenosis based on ultrasound.</abstract><pub>The Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy</pub><doi>10.4009/jsdt.55.243</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1340-3451
ispartof Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi, 2022, Vol.55(4), pp.243-247
issn 1340-3451
1883-082X
language eng ; jpn
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_4009_jsdt_55_243
source J-STAGE Free
subjects peak systolic velocity
stenotic lesion
ultrasonography
vascular access
title Usefulness of peak systolic velocity for evaluating stenotic vascular access lesions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A55%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usefulness%20of%20peak%20systolic%20velocity%20for%20evaluating%20stenotic%20vascular%20access%20lesions&rft.jtitle=Nihon%20Toseki%20Igakkai%20Zasshi&rft.au=Yamamoto,%20Yuya&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=247&rft.pages=243-247&rft.issn=1340-3451&rft.eissn=1883-082X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4009/jsdt.55.243&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_cross%3Earticle_jsdt_55_4_55_243_article_char_en%3C/jstage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true