Орфизм в «Мусагете
Orphism was highly popular both among the artists and scholars at the turn of the nineteenth century. Recent research on the history of scholarhip on orphism has demonstrated that in the case of historians and philologists this popularity owed much to the contemporaneous discussions concerning the r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revue des études slaves 2018-01, Vol.89 (4), p.599-606 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; rus |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 606 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 599 |
container_title | Revue des études slaves |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Светликова, Илона |
description | Orphism was highly popular both among the artists and scholars at the turn of the nineteenth century. Recent research on the history of scholarhip on orphism has demonstrated that in the case of historians and philologists this popularity owed much to the contemporaneous discussions concerning the relationship of the church and the state which rised questions bearing on the roots of Christianity. In our article we consider ideas of the participants of the Moscow editing house Musaget publishing a special mystical series ‘Orpheus’. Because of the fact that scholars studying classical philology were among them makes one looks for a correspondence between the scholarly and artistic treatment of orphism. The emphasis on the liberating nature of orphism, which one finds in the writings of Andrey Belyj, is characteristic for a general tendency to oppose the teaching of orphics and the state religion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4000/res.2341 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4000_res_2341</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26648527</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26648527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1251-b7dc6ecbc5306c05e1a6d05cff8d18dd0340bc584ad9ccd132961c0ceed8af6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj81KAzEURoMoONSCLyAUV4JMvTcz-elSilah4EbB3ZAmGWmpjCQquFPrY4gv0I0oRReufILMG5nSUlff4hwOfIRsI7RzADhw1rdpluMaSSiiSAXKy3WSAEhIKWNikzS9H0UTGKeAIiG74a1-rF_Cd_gKP63w0fqdhtd6Uj-F9_AZZvVzmG2RjVKNvW0ut0Eujo_Ouydp_6x32j3spxopw3QgjOZWDzTLgGtgFhU3wHRZSoPSGMhyiFDmynS0NpjRDkcN2lojVclN1iB7i652lffOlsWNG14r91AgFPN7RbxXzO9FdWehjvxt5VYe5TyXjIrI95epsa1WuFLDmLi_i5XKXf3X_gAO3WZr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Орфизм в «Мусагете</title><source>OpenEdition Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Светликова, Илона</creator><creatorcontrib>Светликова, Илона</creatorcontrib><description>Orphism was highly popular both among the artists and scholars at the turn of the nineteenth century. Recent research on the history of scholarhip on orphism has demonstrated that in the case of historians and philologists this popularity owed much to the contemporaneous discussions concerning the relationship of the church and the state which rised questions bearing on the roots of Christianity. In our article we consider ideas of the participants of the Moscow editing house Musaget publishing a special mystical series ‘Orpheus’. Because of the fact that scholars studying classical philology were among them makes one looks for a correspondence between the scholarly and artistic treatment of orphism. The emphasis on the liberating nature of orphism, which one finds in the writings of Andrey Belyj, is characteristic for a general tendency to oppose the teaching of orphics and the state religion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0080-2557</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2117-718X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4000/res.2341</identifier><language>eng ; rus</language><publisher>Institut d'études slaves</publisher><ispartof>Revue des études slaves, 2018-01, Vol.89 (4), p.599-606</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26648527$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26648527$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,11582,27911,27912,58004,58237</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Светликова, Илона</creatorcontrib><title>Орфизм в «Мусагете</title><title>Revue des études slaves</title><description>Orphism was highly popular both among the artists and scholars at the turn of the nineteenth century. Recent research on the history of scholarhip on orphism has demonstrated that in the case of historians and philologists this popularity owed much to the contemporaneous discussions concerning the relationship of the church and the state which rised questions bearing on the roots of Christianity. In our article we consider ideas of the participants of the Moscow editing house Musaget publishing a special mystical series ‘Orpheus’. Because of the fact that scholars studying classical philology were among them makes one looks for a correspondence between the scholarly and artistic treatment of orphism. The emphasis on the liberating nature of orphism, which one finds in the writings of Andrey Belyj, is characteristic for a general tendency to oppose the teaching of orphics and the state religion.</description><issn>0080-2557</issn><issn>2117-718X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFj81KAzEURoMoONSCLyAUV4JMvTcz-elSilah4EbB3ZAmGWmpjCQquFPrY4gv0I0oRReufILMG5nSUlff4hwOfIRsI7RzADhw1rdpluMaSSiiSAXKy3WSAEhIKWNikzS9H0UTGKeAIiG74a1-rF_Cd_gKP63w0fqdhtd6Uj-F9_AZZvVzmG2RjVKNvW0ut0Eujo_Ouydp_6x32j3spxopw3QgjOZWDzTLgGtgFhU3wHRZSoPSGMhyiFDmynS0NpjRDkcN2lojVclN1iB7i652lffOlsWNG14r91AgFPN7RbxXzO9FdWehjvxt5VYe5TyXjIrI95epsa1WuFLDmLi_i5XKXf3X_gAO3WZr</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Светликова, Илона</creator><general>Institut d'études slaves</general><general>Institut d’études slaves</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Орфизм в «Мусагете</title><author>Светликова, Илона</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1251-b7dc6ecbc5306c05e1a6d05cff8d18dd0340bc584ad9ccd132961c0ceed8af6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; rus</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Светликова, Илона</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Revue des études slaves</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Светликова, Илона</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Орфизм в «Мусагете</atitle><jtitle>Revue des études slaves</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>606</epage><pages>599-606</pages><issn>0080-2557</issn><eissn>2117-718X</eissn><abstract>Orphism was highly popular both among the artists and scholars at the turn of the nineteenth century. Recent research on the history of scholarhip on orphism has demonstrated that in the case of historians and philologists this popularity owed much to the contemporaneous discussions concerning the relationship of the church and the state which rised questions bearing on the roots of Christianity. In our article we consider ideas of the participants of the Moscow editing house Musaget publishing a special mystical series ‘Orpheus’. Because of the fact that scholars studying classical philology were among them makes one looks for a correspondence between the scholarly and artistic treatment of orphism. The emphasis on the liberating nature of orphism, which one finds in the writings of Andrey Belyj, is characteristic for a general tendency to oppose the teaching of orphics and the state religion.</abstract><pub>Institut d'études slaves</pub><doi>10.4000/res.2341</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0080-2557 |
ispartof | Revue des études slaves, 2018-01, Vol.89 (4), p.599-606 |
issn | 0080-2557 2117-718X |
language | eng ; rus |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_4000_res_2341 |
source | OpenEdition Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy |
title | Орфизм в «Мусагете |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T14%3A52%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%D0%9E%D1%80%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BC%20%D0%B2%20%C2%AB%D0%9C%D1%83%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5&rft.jtitle=Revue%20des%20%C3%A9tudes%20slaves&rft.au=%D0%A1%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0,%20%D0%98%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=606&rft.pages=599-606&rft.issn=0080-2557&rft.eissn=2117-718X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4000/res.2341&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26648527%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26648527&rfr_iscdi=true |