Орфизм в «Мусагете

Orphism was highly popular both among the artists and scholars at the turn of the nineteenth century. Recent research on the history of scholarhip on orphism has demonstrated that in the case of historians and philologists this popularity owed much to the contemporaneous discussions concerning the r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revue des études slaves 2018-01, Vol.89 (4), p.599-606
1. Verfasser: Светликова, Илона
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; rus
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 606
container_issue 4
container_start_page 599
container_title Revue des études slaves
container_volume 89
creator Светликова, Илона
description Orphism was highly popular both among the artists and scholars at the turn of the nineteenth century. Recent research on the history of scholarhip on orphism has demonstrated that in the case of historians and philologists this popularity owed much to the contemporaneous discussions concerning the relationship of the church and the state which rised questions bearing on the roots of Christianity. In our article we consider ideas of the participants of the Moscow editing house Musaget publishing a special mystical series ‘Orpheus’. Because of the fact that scholars studying classical philology were among them makes one looks for a correspondence between the scholarly and artistic treatment of orphism. The emphasis on the liberating nature of orphism, which one finds in the writings of Andrey Belyj, is characteristic for a general tendency to oppose the teaching of orphics and the state religion.
doi_str_mv 10.4000/res.2341
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4000_res_2341</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26648527</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26648527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1251-b7dc6ecbc5306c05e1a6d05cff8d18dd0340bc584ad9ccd132961c0ceed8af6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj81KAzEURoMoONSCLyAUV4JMvTcz-elSilah4EbB3ZAmGWmpjCQquFPrY4gv0I0oRReufILMG5nSUlff4hwOfIRsI7RzADhw1rdpluMaSSiiSAXKy3WSAEhIKWNikzS9H0UTGKeAIiG74a1-rF_Cd_gKP63w0fqdhtd6Uj-F9_AZZvVzmG2RjVKNvW0ut0Eujo_Ouydp_6x32j3spxopw3QgjOZWDzTLgGtgFhU3wHRZSoPSGMhyiFDmynS0NpjRDkcN2lojVclN1iB7i652lffOlsWNG14r91AgFPN7RbxXzO9FdWehjvxt5VYe5TyXjIrI95epsa1WuFLDmLi_i5XKXf3X_gAO3WZr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Орфизм в «Мусагете</title><source>OpenEdition Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Светликова, Илона</creator><creatorcontrib>Светликова, Илона</creatorcontrib><description>Orphism was highly popular both among the artists and scholars at the turn of the nineteenth century. Recent research on the history of scholarhip on orphism has demonstrated that in the case of historians and philologists this popularity owed much to the contemporaneous discussions concerning the relationship of the church and the state which rised questions bearing on the roots of Christianity. In our article we consider ideas of the participants of the Moscow editing house Musaget publishing a special mystical series ‘Orpheus’. Because of the fact that scholars studying classical philology were among them makes one looks for a correspondence between the scholarly and artistic treatment of orphism. The emphasis on the liberating nature of orphism, which one finds in the writings of Andrey Belyj, is characteristic for a general tendency to oppose the teaching of orphics and the state religion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0080-2557</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2117-718X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4000/res.2341</identifier><language>eng ; rus</language><publisher>Institut d'études slaves</publisher><ispartof>Revue des études slaves, 2018-01, Vol.89 (4), p.599-606</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26648527$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26648527$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,11582,27911,27912,58004,58237</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Светликова, Илона</creatorcontrib><title>Орфизм в «Мусагете</title><title>Revue des études slaves</title><description>Orphism was highly popular both among the artists and scholars at the turn of the nineteenth century. Recent research on the history of scholarhip on orphism has demonstrated that in the case of historians and philologists this popularity owed much to the contemporaneous discussions concerning the relationship of the church and the state which rised questions bearing on the roots of Christianity. In our article we consider ideas of the participants of the Moscow editing house Musaget publishing a special mystical series ‘Orpheus’. Because of the fact that scholars studying classical philology were among them makes one looks for a correspondence between the scholarly and artistic treatment of orphism. The emphasis on the liberating nature of orphism, which one finds in the writings of Andrey Belyj, is characteristic for a general tendency to oppose the teaching of orphics and the state religion.</description><issn>0080-2557</issn><issn>2117-718X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFj81KAzEURoMoONSCLyAUV4JMvTcz-elSilah4EbB3ZAmGWmpjCQquFPrY4gv0I0oRReufILMG5nSUlff4hwOfIRsI7RzADhw1rdpluMaSSiiSAXKy3WSAEhIKWNikzS9H0UTGKeAIiG74a1-rF_Cd_gKP63w0fqdhtd6Uj-F9_AZZvVzmG2RjVKNvW0ut0Eujo_Ouydp_6x32j3spxopw3QgjOZWDzTLgGtgFhU3wHRZSoPSGMhyiFDmynS0NpjRDkcN2lojVclN1iB7i652lffOlsWNG14r91AgFPN7RbxXzO9FdWehjvxt5VYe5TyXjIrI95epsa1WuFLDmLi_i5XKXf3X_gAO3WZr</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Светликова, Илона</creator><general>Institut d'études slaves</general><general>Institut d’études slaves</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Орфизм в «Мусагете</title><author>Светликова, Илона</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1251-b7dc6ecbc5306c05e1a6d05cff8d18dd0340bc584ad9ccd132961c0ceed8af6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; rus</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Светликова, Илона</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Revue des études slaves</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Светликова, Илона</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Орфизм в «Мусагете</atitle><jtitle>Revue des études slaves</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>606</epage><pages>599-606</pages><issn>0080-2557</issn><eissn>2117-718X</eissn><abstract>Orphism was highly popular both among the artists and scholars at the turn of the nineteenth century. Recent research on the history of scholarhip on orphism has demonstrated that in the case of historians and philologists this popularity owed much to the contemporaneous discussions concerning the relationship of the church and the state which rised questions bearing on the roots of Christianity. In our article we consider ideas of the participants of the Moscow editing house Musaget publishing a special mystical series ‘Orpheus’. Because of the fact that scholars studying classical philology were among them makes one looks for a correspondence between the scholarly and artistic treatment of orphism. The emphasis on the liberating nature of orphism, which one finds in the writings of Andrey Belyj, is characteristic for a general tendency to oppose the teaching of orphics and the state religion.</abstract><pub>Institut d'études slaves</pub><doi>10.4000/res.2341</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0080-2557
ispartof Revue des études slaves, 2018-01, Vol.89 (4), p.599-606
issn 0080-2557
2117-718X
language eng ; rus
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_4000_res_2341
source OpenEdition Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy
title Орфизм в «Мусагете
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T14%3A52%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%D0%9E%D1%80%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BC%20%D0%B2%20%C2%AB%D0%9C%D1%83%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5&rft.jtitle=Revue%20des%20%C3%A9tudes%20slaves&rft.au=%D0%A1%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0,%20%D0%98%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=606&rft.pages=599-606&rft.issn=0080-2557&rft.eissn=2117-718X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4000/res.2341&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26648527%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26648527&rfr_iscdi=true