Developments in Labor and Employment Law In the United States (September 2018 - January 2019)

I - United States Supreme Court In New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an employer trucking company could not compel its drivers to arbitrate their wage claims, rather than litigating the claims in court. This case is an unusual win for workers, given the long line of Supre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale 2019-12 (4), p.208-209
1. Verfasser: Lieberwitz, Risa L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 209
container_issue 4
container_start_page 208
container_title Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale
container_volume
creator Lieberwitz, Risa L
description I - United States Supreme Court In New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an employer trucking company could not compel its drivers to arbitrate their wage claims, rather than litigating the claims in court. This case is an unusual win for workers, given the long line of Supreme Court precedents since 2001 that have established that mandatory agreements to arbitrate employment–related disputes are enforceable in non-union workplaces. Under such agreements, as a conditio...
doi_str_mv 10.4000/rdctss.1435
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_cleo_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4000_rdctss_1435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_4000_rdctss_1435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1125-77c4ea8a1362628fd7f997b83011c7112d6c6c4ec86c6181ff4032f379889f203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE9LAzEQxYMoWGpPfoEcFdmayf5J9ii11UrBQ-1RQnZ3ogu7myXZVvrtzdIieJqZN78ZHo-QW2DzhDH26Kpy8H4OSZxekAnnGY9yCell6AFEFGR2TWbe1wVLmUhlBvGEfD7jARvbt9gNntYd3ejCOqq7ii7bvrHHcRHEH7ru6PCNdNfVA1Z0O-gBPb3bYj9gW6CjnIGkEX3T3V674zjm9zfkyujG4-xcp2S3Wn4sXqPN-8t68bSJSgCeRkKUCWqpIc6Ca2kqYfJcFDJmAKUISJWVWUBKGSpIMCZhMTexyKXMDWfxlDyc_pbOeu_QqN7VbbChgKkxHHUKR43hBHp-phu0f6TVtXJ42KNX1n39O_gF4Xdm9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developments in Labor and Employment Law In the United States (September 2018 - January 2019)</title><source>OpenEdition Journals</source><creator>Lieberwitz, Risa L</creator><creatorcontrib>Lieberwitz, Risa L</creatorcontrib><description>I - United States Supreme Court In New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an employer trucking company could not compel its drivers to arbitrate their wage claims, rather than litigating the claims in court. This case is an unusual win for workers, given the long line of Supreme Court precedents since 2001 that have established that mandatory agreements to arbitrate employment–related disputes are enforceable in non-union workplaces. Under such agreements, as a conditio...</description><identifier>ISSN: 2117-4350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2262-9815</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4000/rdctss.1435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Centre de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale</publisher><ispartof>Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale, 2019-12 (4), p.208-209</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,11604,27933,27934</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lieberwitz, Risa L</creatorcontrib><title>Developments in Labor and Employment Law In the United States (September 2018 - January 2019)</title><title>Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale</title><description>I - United States Supreme Court In New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an employer trucking company could not compel its drivers to arbitrate their wage claims, rather than litigating the claims in court. This case is an unusual win for workers, given the long line of Supreme Court precedents since 2001 that have established that mandatory agreements to arbitrate employment–related disputes are enforceable in non-union workplaces. Under such agreements, as a conditio...</description><issn>2117-4350</issn><issn>2262-9815</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE9LAzEQxYMoWGpPfoEcFdmayf5J9ii11UrBQ-1RQnZ3ogu7myXZVvrtzdIieJqZN78ZHo-QW2DzhDH26Kpy8H4OSZxekAnnGY9yCell6AFEFGR2TWbe1wVLmUhlBvGEfD7jARvbt9gNntYd3ejCOqq7ii7bvrHHcRHEH7ru6PCNdNfVA1Z0O-gBPb3bYj9gW6CjnIGkEX3T3V674zjm9zfkyujG4-xcp2S3Wn4sXqPN-8t68bSJSgCeRkKUCWqpIc6Ca2kqYfJcFDJmAKUISJWVWUBKGSpIMCZhMTexyKXMDWfxlDyc_pbOeu_QqN7VbbChgKkxHHUKR43hBHp-phu0f6TVtXJ42KNX1n39O_gF4Xdm9Q</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Lieberwitz, Risa L</creator><general>Centre de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Developments in Labor and Employment Law In the United States (September 2018 - January 2019)</title><author>Lieberwitz, Risa L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1125-77c4ea8a1362628fd7f997b83011c7112d6c6c4ec86c6181ff4032f379889f203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lieberwitz, Risa L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lieberwitz, Risa L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developments in Labor and Employment Law In the United States (September 2018 - January 2019)</atitle><jtitle>Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale</jtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><issue>4</issue><spage>208</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>208-209</pages><issn>2117-4350</issn><eissn>2262-9815</eissn><abstract>I - United States Supreme Court In New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an employer trucking company could not compel its drivers to arbitrate their wage claims, rather than litigating the claims in court. This case is an unusual win for workers, given the long line of Supreme Court precedents since 2001 that have established that mandatory agreements to arbitrate employment–related disputes are enforceable in non-union workplaces. Under such agreements, as a conditio...</abstract><pub>Centre de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale</pub><doi>10.4000/rdctss.1435</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2117-4350
ispartof Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale, 2019-12 (4), p.208-209
issn 2117-4350
2262-9815
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_4000_rdctss_1435
source OpenEdition Journals
title Developments in Labor and Employment Law In the United States (September 2018 - January 2019)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T13%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_cleo_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developments%20in%20Labor%20and%20Employment%20Law%20In%20the%20United%20States%20(September%202018%20-%20January%202019)&rft.jtitle=Revue%20de%20droit%20compar%C3%A9%20du%20travail%20et%20de%20la%20s%C3%A9curit%C3%A9%20sociale&rft.au=Lieberwitz,%20Risa%20L&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=208&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=208-209&rft.issn=2117-4350&rft.eissn=2262-9815&rft_id=info:doi/10.4000/rdctss.1435&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_cleo_%3E10_4000_rdctss_1435%3C/crossref_cleo_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true