Introduction : Pensée et représentation de l’optimum au temps des Lumières (1680-1789)
Optimum thinking and its representation in the Age of Enlightenment (1680-1789) is the follow-up to a symposium held at the University of Basel in spring 2021. The aim was to examine the notion of optimum in eighteenth-century discourse, i.e., at its emergence. However, there was no univocal theoriz...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Etudes epistémè 2023-12, Vol.44 (44) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 44 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Etudes epistémè |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Bourdely, Sarah Diane Paschoud, Adrien Waelti, Slaven |
description | Optimum thinking and its representation in the Age of Enlightenment (1680-1789) is the follow-up to a symposium held at the University of Basel in spring 2021. The aim was to examine the notion of optimum in eighteenth-century discourse, i.e., at its emergence. However, there was no univocal theorization of the concept at this time. Instead, it has quietly established itself as a "discourse operator" rather than a theoretical notion. This is why the optimum remains largely underexplored today, although central to many fields of knowledge. This introduction aims to show how different discursive constructs developed in the eighteenth century due to preconceptions of the optimum rather than the notion of the optimum itself. Without claiming exhaustiveness or to exhaust any of the domains covered, the introduction reviews specific fields of knowledge that all involve optima: engineering in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries stands out as an exemplary field to seek the best possible relationship between effort and effect. In the natural sciences, following the development of Newtonian physics, the question arose as to whether the whole of nature was not an optimal machine. The theology of Leibniz and Pope posed the same question about the metaphysical issues of evil, divine justice, and human happiness. Finally, the political and social thinking of the Enlightenment, from Mandeville to Smith via Montesquieu, raised the question of the economy of passions and the best way to organize the State. Finally, the Physiocrats, having discovered the proper laws of nature, had only to promulgate the optimal form of government. Through these different fields, we highlight the cross-disciplinary dimension of the notion of the optimum and how it informs various discourse operations whose forms extend into the 21st century. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4000/episteme.16965 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4000_episteme_16965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5e7233bbc2754c629dadd68d4ea37b70</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_5e7233bbc2754c629dadd68d4ea37b70</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1050-d0d5f1a5e34545bf1877045eb79e343bf3bc7e51bb95d182948e160a8af1b35d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkL1OwzAUhS0EEhV0ZfYIQ4od_4YNVfxUqgQDbEiWHd-gVM2P7GRg4zXYGOlr0DfhSUhbQEz36Nyr7x4dhE4omXBCyDm0ZeygggmVmRR7aEQl4wnhguz_04doHONiuCcsk1SREXqa1V1ofJ93ZVN_vl_ge6jjegUYOhygDetVhLqzmy32gJdfr29N25VVX2Hb4-FjGwc_4nlfleuPMKhTKjVJqNLZ2TE6KOwywvhnHqHH66uH6W0yv7uZTS_nSU6JIIknXhTUCmBccOEKqpUa0oJT2WAxVzCXKxDUuUx4qtOMa6CSWG0L6pjw7AjNdlzf2IVpQ1nZ8GIaW5qt0YRnY0NX5kswAlTKmHN5qgTPZZp5673UnoNlyikysCY7Vh6aGAMUfzxKzKZq81u12VbNvgEv2nW8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Introduction : Pensée et représentation de l’optimum au temps des Lumières (1680-1789)</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>OpenEdition Freemium for Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>OpenEdition Journals</source><creator>Bourdely, Sarah Diane ; Paschoud, Adrien ; Waelti, Slaven</creator><creatorcontrib>Bourdely, Sarah Diane ; Paschoud, Adrien ; Waelti, Slaven</creatorcontrib><description>Optimum thinking and its representation in the Age of Enlightenment (1680-1789) is the follow-up to a symposium held at the University of Basel in spring 2021. The aim was to examine the notion of optimum in eighteenth-century discourse, i.e., at its emergence. However, there was no univocal theorization of the concept at this time. Instead, it has quietly established itself as a "discourse operator" rather than a theoretical notion. This is why the optimum remains largely underexplored today, although central to many fields of knowledge. This introduction aims to show how different discursive constructs developed in the eighteenth century due to preconceptions of the optimum rather than the notion of the optimum itself. Without claiming exhaustiveness or to exhaust any of the domains covered, the introduction reviews specific fields of knowledge that all involve optima: engineering in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries stands out as an exemplary field to seek the best possible relationship between effort and effect. In the natural sciences, following the development of Newtonian physics, the question arose as to whether the whole of nature was not an optimal machine. The theology of Leibniz and Pope posed the same question about the metaphysical issues of evil, divine justice, and human happiness. Finally, the political and social thinking of the Enlightenment, from Mandeville to Smith via Montesquieu, raised the question of the economy of passions and the best way to organize the State. Finally, the Physiocrats, having discovered the proper laws of nature, had only to promulgate the optimal form of government. Through these different fields, we highlight the cross-disciplinary dimension of the notion of the optimum and how it informs various discourse operations whose forms extend into the 21st century.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1634-0450</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1634-0450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4000/episteme.16965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Institut du Monde Anglophone</publisher><subject>discourse operator ; Enlightenment ; fields of knowledge ; optimum ; transdisciplinarity</subject><ispartof>Etudes epistémè, 2023-12, Vol.44 (44)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bourdely, Sarah Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paschoud, Adrien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waelti, Slaven</creatorcontrib><title>Introduction : Pensée et représentation de l’optimum au temps des Lumières (1680-1789)</title><title>Etudes epistémè</title><description>Optimum thinking and its representation in the Age of Enlightenment (1680-1789) is the follow-up to a symposium held at the University of Basel in spring 2021. The aim was to examine the notion of optimum in eighteenth-century discourse, i.e., at its emergence. However, there was no univocal theorization of the concept at this time. Instead, it has quietly established itself as a "discourse operator" rather than a theoretical notion. This is why the optimum remains largely underexplored today, although central to many fields of knowledge. This introduction aims to show how different discursive constructs developed in the eighteenth century due to preconceptions of the optimum rather than the notion of the optimum itself. Without claiming exhaustiveness or to exhaust any of the domains covered, the introduction reviews specific fields of knowledge that all involve optima: engineering in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries stands out as an exemplary field to seek the best possible relationship between effort and effect. In the natural sciences, following the development of Newtonian physics, the question arose as to whether the whole of nature was not an optimal machine. The theology of Leibniz and Pope posed the same question about the metaphysical issues of evil, divine justice, and human happiness. Finally, the political and social thinking of the Enlightenment, from Mandeville to Smith via Montesquieu, raised the question of the economy of passions and the best way to organize the State. Finally, the Physiocrats, having discovered the proper laws of nature, had only to promulgate the optimal form of government. Through these different fields, we highlight the cross-disciplinary dimension of the notion of the optimum and how it informs various discourse operations whose forms extend into the 21st century.</description><subject>discourse operator</subject><subject>Enlightenment</subject><subject>fields of knowledge</subject><subject>optimum</subject><subject>transdisciplinarity</subject><issn>1634-0450</issn><issn>1634-0450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkL1OwzAUhS0EEhV0ZfYIQ4od_4YNVfxUqgQDbEiWHd-gVM2P7GRg4zXYGOlr0DfhSUhbQEz36Nyr7x4dhE4omXBCyDm0ZeygggmVmRR7aEQl4wnhguz_04doHONiuCcsk1SREXqa1V1ofJ93ZVN_vl_ge6jjegUYOhygDetVhLqzmy32gJdfr29N25VVX2Hb4-FjGwc_4nlfleuPMKhTKjVJqNLZ2TE6KOwywvhnHqHH66uH6W0yv7uZTS_nSU6JIIknXhTUCmBccOEKqpUa0oJT2WAxVzCXKxDUuUx4qtOMa6CSWG0L6pjw7AjNdlzf2IVpQ1nZ8GIaW5qt0YRnY0NX5kswAlTKmHN5qgTPZZp5673UnoNlyikysCY7Vh6aGAMUfzxKzKZq81u12VbNvgEv2nW8</recordid><startdate>20231230</startdate><enddate>20231230</enddate><creator>Bourdely, Sarah Diane</creator><creator>Paschoud, Adrien</creator><creator>Waelti, Slaven</creator><general>Institut du Monde Anglophone</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231230</creationdate><title>Introduction : Pensée et représentation de l’optimum au temps des Lumières (1680-1789)</title><author>Bourdely, Sarah Diane ; Paschoud, Adrien ; Waelti, Slaven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1050-d0d5f1a5e34545bf1877045eb79e343bf3bc7e51bb95d182948e160a8af1b35d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>discourse operator</topic><topic>Enlightenment</topic><topic>fields of knowledge</topic><topic>optimum</topic><topic>transdisciplinarity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bourdely, Sarah Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paschoud, Adrien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waelti, Slaven</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Etudes epistémè</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bourdely, Sarah Diane</au><au>Paschoud, Adrien</au><au>Waelti, Slaven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Introduction : Pensée et représentation de l’optimum au temps des Lumières (1680-1789)</atitle><jtitle>Etudes epistémè</jtitle><date>2023-12-30</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>44</issue><issn>1634-0450</issn><eissn>1634-0450</eissn><abstract>Optimum thinking and its representation in the Age of Enlightenment (1680-1789) is the follow-up to a symposium held at the University of Basel in spring 2021. The aim was to examine the notion of optimum in eighteenth-century discourse, i.e., at its emergence. However, there was no univocal theorization of the concept at this time. Instead, it has quietly established itself as a "discourse operator" rather than a theoretical notion. This is why the optimum remains largely underexplored today, although central to many fields of knowledge. This introduction aims to show how different discursive constructs developed in the eighteenth century due to preconceptions of the optimum rather than the notion of the optimum itself. Without claiming exhaustiveness or to exhaust any of the domains covered, the introduction reviews specific fields of knowledge that all involve optima: engineering in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries stands out as an exemplary field to seek the best possible relationship between effort and effect. In the natural sciences, following the development of Newtonian physics, the question arose as to whether the whole of nature was not an optimal machine. The theology of Leibniz and Pope posed the same question about the metaphysical issues of evil, divine justice, and human happiness. Finally, the political and social thinking of the Enlightenment, from Mandeville to Smith via Montesquieu, raised the question of the economy of passions and the best way to organize the State. Finally, the Physiocrats, having discovered the proper laws of nature, had only to promulgate the optimal form of government. Through these different fields, we highlight the cross-disciplinary dimension of the notion of the optimum and how it informs various discourse operations whose forms extend into the 21st century.</abstract><pub>Institut du Monde Anglophone</pub><doi>10.4000/episteme.16965</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1634-0450 |
ispartof | Etudes epistémè, 2023-12, Vol.44 (44) |
issn | 1634-0450 1634-0450 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_4000_episteme_16965 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; OpenEdition Freemium for Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; OpenEdition Journals |
subjects | discourse operator Enlightenment fields of knowledge optimum transdisciplinarity |
title | Introduction : Pensée et représentation de l’optimum au temps des Lumières (1680-1789) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T16%3A17%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Introduction%C2%A0:%20Pens%C3%A9e%20et%20repr%C3%A9sentation%20de%20l%E2%80%99optimum%20au%20temps%20des%20Lumi%C3%A8res%20(1680-1789)&rft.jtitle=Etudes%20epist%C3%A9m%C3%A8&rft.au=Bourdely,%20Sarah%20Diane&rft.date=2023-12-30&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=44&rft.issn=1634-0450&rft.eissn=1634-0450&rft_id=info:doi/10.4000/episteme.16965&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_5e7233bbc2754c629dadd68d4ea37b70%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5e7233bbc2754c629dadd68d4ea37b70&rfr_iscdi=true |