Introduction : Pensée et représentation de l’optimum au temps des Lumières (1680-1789)

Optimum thinking and its representation in the Age of Enlightenment (1680-1789) is the follow-up to a symposium held at the University of Basel in spring 2021. The aim was to examine the notion of optimum in eighteenth-century discourse, i.e., at its emergence. However, there was no univocal theoriz...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Etudes epistémè 2023-12, Vol.44 (44)
Hauptverfasser: Bourdely, Sarah Diane, Paschoud, Adrien, Waelti, Slaven
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 44
container_start_page
container_title Etudes epistémè
container_volume 44
creator Bourdely, Sarah Diane
Paschoud, Adrien
Waelti, Slaven
description Optimum thinking and its representation in the Age of Enlightenment (1680-1789) is the follow-up to a symposium held at the University of Basel in spring 2021. The aim was to examine the notion of optimum in eighteenth-century discourse, i.e., at its emergence. However, there was no univocal theorization of the concept at this time. Instead, it has quietly established itself as a "discourse operator" rather than a theoretical notion. This is why the optimum remains largely underexplored today, although central to many fields of knowledge. This introduction aims to show how different discursive constructs developed in the eighteenth century due to preconceptions of the optimum rather than the notion of the optimum itself. Without claiming exhaustiveness or to exhaust any of the domains covered, the introduction reviews specific fields of knowledge that all involve optima: engineering in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries stands out as an exemplary field to seek the best possible relationship between effort and effect. In the natural sciences, following the development of Newtonian physics, the question arose as to whether the whole of nature was not an optimal machine. The theology of Leibniz and Pope posed the same question about the metaphysical issues of evil, divine justice, and human happiness. Finally, the political and social thinking of the Enlightenment, from Mandeville to Smith via Montesquieu, raised the question of the economy of passions and the best way to organize the State. Finally, the Physiocrats, having discovered the proper laws of nature, had only to promulgate the optimal form of government. Through these different fields, we highlight the cross-disciplinary dimension of the notion of the optimum and how it informs various discourse operations whose forms extend into the 21st century.
doi_str_mv 10.4000/episteme.16965
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4000_episteme_16965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5e7233bbc2754c629dadd68d4ea37b70</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_5e7233bbc2754c629dadd68d4ea37b70</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1050-d0d5f1a5e34545bf1877045eb79e343bf3bc7e51bb95d182948e160a8af1b35d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkL1OwzAUhS0EEhV0ZfYIQ4od_4YNVfxUqgQDbEiWHd-gVM2P7GRg4zXYGOlr0DfhSUhbQEz36Nyr7x4dhE4omXBCyDm0ZeygggmVmRR7aEQl4wnhguz_04doHONiuCcsk1SREXqa1V1ofJ93ZVN_vl_ge6jjegUYOhygDetVhLqzmy32gJdfr29N25VVX2Hb4-FjGwc_4nlfleuPMKhTKjVJqNLZ2TE6KOwywvhnHqHH66uH6W0yv7uZTS_nSU6JIIknXhTUCmBccOEKqpUa0oJT2WAxVzCXKxDUuUx4qtOMa6CSWG0L6pjw7AjNdlzf2IVpQ1nZ8GIaW5qt0YRnY0NX5kswAlTKmHN5qgTPZZp5673UnoNlyikysCY7Vh6aGAMUfzxKzKZq81u12VbNvgEv2nW8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Introduction : Pensée et représentation de l’optimum au temps des Lumières (1680-1789)</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>OpenEdition Freemium for Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>OpenEdition Journals</source><creator>Bourdely, Sarah Diane ; Paschoud, Adrien ; Waelti, Slaven</creator><creatorcontrib>Bourdely, Sarah Diane ; Paschoud, Adrien ; Waelti, Slaven</creatorcontrib><description>Optimum thinking and its representation in the Age of Enlightenment (1680-1789) is the follow-up to a symposium held at the University of Basel in spring 2021. The aim was to examine the notion of optimum in eighteenth-century discourse, i.e., at its emergence. However, there was no univocal theorization of the concept at this time. Instead, it has quietly established itself as a "discourse operator" rather than a theoretical notion. This is why the optimum remains largely underexplored today, although central to many fields of knowledge. This introduction aims to show how different discursive constructs developed in the eighteenth century due to preconceptions of the optimum rather than the notion of the optimum itself. Without claiming exhaustiveness or to exhaust any of the domains covered, the introduction reviews specific fields of knowledge that all involve optima: engineering in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries stands out as an exemplary field to seek the best possible relationship between effort and effect. In the natural sciences, following the development of Newtonian physics, the question arose as to whether the whole of nature was not an optimal machine. The theology of Leibniz and Pope posed the same question about the metaphysical issues of evil, divine justice, and human happiness. Finally, the political and social thinking of the Enlightenment, from Mandeville to Smith via Montesquieu, raised the question of the economy of passions and the best way to organize the State. Finally, the Physiocrats, having discovered the proper laws of nature, had only to promulgate the optimal form of government. Through these different fields, we highlight the cross-disciplinary dimension of the notion of the optimum and how it informs various discourse operations whose forms extend into the 21st century.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1634-0450</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1634-0450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4000/episteme.16965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Institut du Monde Anglophone</publisher><subject>discourse operator ; Enlightenment ; fields of knowledge ; optimum ; transdisciplinarity</subject><ispartof>Etudes epistémè, 2023-12, Vol.44 (44)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bourdely, Sarah Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paschoud, Adrien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waelti, Slaven</creatorcontrib><title>Introduction : Pensée et représentation de l’optimum au temps des Lumières (1680-1789)</title><title>Etudes epistémè</title><description>Optimum thinking and its representation in the Age of Enlightenment (1680-1789) is the follow-up to a symposium held at the University of Basel in spring 2021. The aim was to examine the notion of optimum in eighteenth-century discourse, i.e., at its emergence. However, there was no univocal theorization of the concept at this time. Instead, it has quietly established itself as a "discourse operator" rather than a theoretical notion. This is why the optimum remains largely underexplored today, although central to many fields of knowledge. This introduction aims to show how different discursive constructs developed in the eighteenth century due to preconceptions of the optimum rather than the notion of the optimum itself. Without claiming exhaustiveness or to exhaust any of the domains covered, the introduction reviews specific fields of knowledge that all involve optima: engineering in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries stands out as an exemplary field to seek the best possible relationship between effort and effect. In the natural sciences, following the development of Newtonian physics, the question arose as to whether the whole of nature was not an optimal machine. The theology of Leibniz and Pope posed the same question about the metaphysical issues of evil, divine justice, and human happiness. Finally, the political and social thinking of the Enlightenment, from Mandeville to Smith via Montesquieu, raised the question of the economy of passions and the best way to organize the State. Finally, the Physiocrats, having discovered the proper laws of nature, had only to promulgate the optimal form of government. Through these different fields, we highlight the cross-disciplinary dimension of the notion of the optimum and how it informs various discourse operations whose forms extend into the 21st century.</description><subject>discourse operator</subject><subject>Enlightenment</subject><subject>fields of knowledge</subject><subject>optimum</subject><subject>transdisciplinarity</subject><issn>1634-0450</issn><issn>1634-0450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkL1OwzAUhS0EEhV0ZfYIQ4od_4YNVfxUqgQDbEiWHd-gVM2P7GRg4zXYGOlr0DfhSUhbQEz36Nyr7x4dhE4omXBCyDm0ZeygggmVmRR7aEQl4wnhguz_04doHONiuCcsk1SREXqa1V1ofJ93ZVN_vl_ge6jjegUYOhygDetVhLqzmy32gJdfr29N25VVX2Hb4-FjGwc_4nlfleuPMKhTKjVJqNLZ2TE6KOwywvhnHqHH66uH6W0yv7uZTS_nSU6JIIknXhTUCmBccOEKqpUa0oJT2WAxVzCXKxDUuUx4qtOMa6CSWG0L6pjw7AjNdlzf2IVpQ1nZ8GIaW5qt0YRnY0NX5kswAlTKmHN5qgTPZZp5673UnoNlyikysCY7Vh6aGAMUfzxKzKZq81u12VbNvgEv2nW8</recordid><startdate>20231230</startdate><enddate>20231230</enddate><creator>Bourdely, Sarah Diane</creator><creator>Paschoud, Adrien</creator><creator>Waelti, Slaven</creator><general>Institut du Monde Anglophone</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231230</creationdate><title>Introduction : Pensée et représentation de l’optimum au temps des Lumières (1680-1789)</title><author>Bourdely, Sarah Diane ; Paschoud, Adrien ; Waelti, Slaven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1050-d0d5f1a5e34545bf1877045eb79e343bf3bc7e51bb95d182948e160a8af1b35d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>discourse operator</topic><topic>Enlightenment</topic><topic>fields of knowledge</topic><topic>optimum</topic><topic>transdisciplinarity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bourdely, Sarah Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paschoud, Adrien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waelti, Slaven</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Etudes epistémè</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bourdely, Sarah Diane</au><au>Paschoud, Adrien</au><au>Waelti, Slaven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Introduction : Pensée et représentation de l’optimum au temps des Lumières (1680-1789)</atitle><jtitle>Etudes epistémè</jtitle><date>2023-12-30</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>44</issue><issn>1634-0450</issn><eissn>1634-0450</eissn><abstract>Optimum thinking and its representation in the Age of Enlightenment (1680-1789) is the follow-up to a symposium held at the University of Basel in spring 2021. The aim was to examine the notion of optimum in eighteenth-century discourse, i.e., at its emergence. However, there was no univocal theorization of the concept at this time. Instead, it has quietly established itself as a "discourse operator" rather than a theoretical notion. This is why the optimum remains largely underexplored today, although central to many fields of knowledge. This introduction aims to show how different discursive constructs developed in the eighteenth century due to preconceptions of the optimum rather than the notion of the optimum itself. Without claiming exhaustiveness or to exhaust any of the domains covered, the introduction reviews specific fields of knowledge that all involve optima: engineering in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries stands out as an exemplary field to seek the best possible relationship between effort and effect. In the natural sciences, following the development of Newtonian physics, the question arose as to whether the whole of nature was not an optimal machine. The theology of Leibniz and Pope posed the same question about the metaphysical issues of evil, divine justice, and human happiness. Finally, the political and social thinking of the Enlightenment, from Mandeville to Smith via Montesquieu, raised the question of the economy of passions and the best way to organize the State. Finally, the Physiocrats, having discovered the proper laws of nature, had only to promulgate the optimal form of government. Through these different fields, we highlight the cross-disciplinary dimension of the notion of the optimum and how it informs various discourse operations whose forms extend into the 21st century.</abstract><pub>Institut du Monde Anglophone</pub><doi>10.4000/episteme.16965</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1634-0450
ispartof Etudes epistémè, 2023-12, Vol.44 (44)
issn 1634-0450
1634-0450
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_4000_episteme_16965
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; OpenEdition Freemium for Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; OpenEdition Journals
subjects discourse operator
Enlightenment
fields of knowledge
optimum
transdisciplinarity
title Introduction : Pensée et représentation de l’optimum au temps des Lumières (1680-1789)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T16%3A17%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Introduction%C2%A0:%20Pens%C3%A9e%20et%20repr%C3%A9sentation%20de%20l%E2%80%99optimum%20au%20temps%20des%20Lumi%C3%A8res%20(1680-1789)&rft.jtitle=Etudes%20epist%C3%A9m%C3%A8&rft.au=Bourdely,%20Sarah%20Diane&rft.date=2023-12-30&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=44&rft.issn=1634-0450&rft.eissn=1634-0450&rft_id=info:doi/10.4000/episteme.16965&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_5e7233bbc2754c629dadd68d4ea37b70%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5e7233bbc2754c629dadd68d4ea37b70&rfr_iscdi=true