Le « champ littéraire » japonais en lutte : l’après-guerre et le discours sur la responsabilité des écrivains
Two debates arose in postwar Japan over the wartime responsibility of Japanese intellectuals. The first broke out in 1946 between two groups dominating the literary field at the time: the Orthodox-Marxist Shin Nihon bungakukai (New Japan Literary Association) and the “modernist” Kindai bungakukai (M...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ebisu : etudes japonaises 2017-12, Vol.54 (54), p.79-111 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | fre |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 111 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 54 |
| container_start_page | 79 |
| container_title | Ebisu : etudes japonaises |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Müller, Simone |
| description | Two debates arose in postwar Japan over the wartime responsibility of Japanese intellectuals. The first broke out in 1946 between two groups dominating the literary field at the time: the Orthodox-Marxist Shin Nihon bungakukai (New Japan Literary Association) and the “modernist” Kindai bungakukai (Modern Literature Association). The second arose in 1956 between members of the New Japan Literary Association and a group of New Left sympathisers organised around the journal Arechi (Waste Land). These two debates reflect the tensions affecting the literary field at the time and the “battle for symbolic capital”. By examining the socio-political context surrounding the debates, this article highlights the different positions of each group and reveals the fragmentation and infighting that characterized the intellectual field of postwar Japan. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4000/ebisu.2038 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_4000_ebisu_2038</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cef629d18ec6402ea9de5b1a865cd492</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_cef629d18ec6402ea9de5b1a865cd492</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1012-19b27f24853b641397af2fa2946687dc17583515f789da7de770d01c37a0b6c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kctKw0AUhgdRsKgbn2DWQurcMpO4k-KlUHCj63Ayc1KnpE2ZSUR3voY7lxYfwV37Jj6JaRUXhwM___k48BFyytlQMcbOsfSxGwomsz0yEDzLk37kPhlwqVgidaoPyUmMs77LRaqZkgPyPEG6_ly_20eYL2nt23azCuADrt_XX3QGy2YBPlJc0Lpr2z69oPX36xssw-YjJtMOQ0CKLa2ROh9t04VIYxdoDTRg7K8jlL7HblbUYaSblQ3-CfwiHpODCuqIJ3_7iDxcX92PbpPJ3c14dDlJLO-_THheClMJlaWy1IrL3EAlKhC50jozznKTZjLlaWWy3IFxaAxzjFtpgJXaKnlExr9c18CsWAY_h_BSNOCLXdCEaQGh9bbGwmKlRe54hlYrJhByh2nJIdOpdSoXPevsl2VDE2PA6p_HWbFVUOwUFFsF8geLyoH7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Le « champ littéraire » japonais en lutte : l’après-guerre et le discours sur la responsabilité des écrivains</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>OpenEdition Journals</source><source>Freely Accessible Japanese Titles</source><creator>Müller, Simone</creator><creatorcontrib>Müller, Simone</creatorcontrib><description>Two debates arose in postwar Japan over the wartime responsibility of Japanese intellectuals. The first broke out in 1946 between two groups dominating the literary field at the time: the Orthodox-Marxist Shin Nihon bungakukai (New Japan Literary Association) and the “modernist” Kindai bungakukai (Modern Literature Association). The second arose in 1956 between members of the New Japan Literary Association and a group of New Left sympathisers organised around the journal Arechi (Waste Land). These two debates reflect the tensions affecting the literary field at the time and the “battle for symbolic capital”. By examining the socio-political context surrounding the debates, this article highlights the different positions of each group and reveals the fragmentation and infighting that characterized the intellectual field of postwar Japan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1340-3656</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2189-1893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4000/ebisu.2038</identifier><language>fre</language><publisher>Institut français de recherche sur le Japon à la Maison franco-japonaise</publisher><subject>Arechi ; Intellectuals’ wartime responsibility ; Kindai bungakukai ; Literary Debates ; Literary field ; Shin Nihon bungakukai</subject><ispartof>Ebisu : etudes japonaises, 2017-12, Vol.54 (54), p.79-111</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1012-19b27f24853b641397af2fa2946687dc17583515f789da7de770d01c37a0b6c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Müller, Simone</creatorcontrib><title>Le « champ littéraire » japonais en lutte : l’après-guerre et le discours sur la responsabilité des écrivains</title><title>Ebisu : etudes japonaises</title><description>Two debates arose in postwar Japan over the wartime responsibility of Japanese intellectuals. The first broke out in 1946 between two groups dominating the literary field at the time: the Orthodox-Marxist Shin Nihon bungakukai (New Japan Literary Association) and the “modernist” Kindai bungakukai (Modern Literature Association). The second arose in 1956 between members of the New Japan Literary Association and a group of New Left sympathisers organised around the journal Arechi (Waste Land). These two debates reflect the tensions affecting the literary field at the time and the “battle for symbolic capital”. By examining the socio-political context surrounding the debates, this article highlights the different positions of each group and reveals the fragmentation and infighting that characterized the intellectual field of postwar Japan.</description><subject>Arechi</subject><subject>Intellectuals’ wartime responsibility</subject><subject>Kindai bungakukai</subject><subject>Literary Debates</subject><subject>Literary field</subject><subject>Shin Nihon bungakukai</subject><issn>1340-3656</issn><issn>2189-1893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kctKw0AUhgdRsKgbn2DWQurcMpO4k-KlUHCj63Ayc1KnpE2ZSUR3voY7lxYfwV37Jj6JaRUXhwM___k48BFyytlQMcbOsfSxGwomsz0yEDzLk37kPhlwqVgidaoPyUmMs77LRaqZkgPyPEG6_ly_20eYL2nt23azCuADrt_XX3QGy2YBPlJc0Lpr2z69oPX36xssw-YjJtMOQ0CKLa2ROh9t04VIYxdoDTRg7K8jlL7HblbUYaSblQ3-CfwiHpODCuqIJ3_7iDxcX92PbpPJ3c14dDlJLO-_THheClMJlaWy1IrL3EAlKhC50jozznKTZjLlaWWy3IFxaAxzjFtpgJXaKnlExr9c18CsWAY_h_BSNOCLXdCEaQGh9bbGwmKlRe54hlYrJhByh2nJIdOpdSoXPevsl2VDE2PA6p_HWbFVUOwUFFsF8geLyoH7</recordid><startdate>20171219</startdate><enddate>20171219</enddate><creator>Müller, Simone</creator><general>Institut français de recherche sur le Japon à la Maison franco-japonaise</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171219</creationdate><title>Le « champ littéraire » japonais en lutte : l’après-guerre et le discours sur la responsabilité des écrivains</title><author>Müller, Simone</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1012-19b27f24853b641397af2fa2946687dc17583515f789da7de770d01c37a0b6c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Arechi</topic><topic>Intellectuals’ wartime responsibility</topic><topic>Kindai bungakukai</topic><topic>Literary Debates</topic><topic>Literary field</topic><topic>Shin Nihon bungakukai</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Müller, Simone</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ebisu : etudes japonaises</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Müller, Simone</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Le « champ littéraire » japonais en lutte : l’après-guerre et le discours sur la responsabilité des écrivains</atitle><jtitle>Ebisu : etudes japonaises</jtitle><date>2017-12-19</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>54</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>79-111</pages><issn>1340-3656</issn><eissn>2189-1893</eissn><abstract>Two debates arose in postwar Japan over the wartime responsibility of Japanese intellectuals. The first broke out in 1946 between two groups dominating the literary field at the time: the Orthodox-Marxist Shin Nihon bungakukai (New Japan Literary Association) and the “modernist” Kindai bungakukai (Modern Literature Association). The second arose in 1956 between members of the New Japan Literary Association and a group of New Left sympathisers organised around the journal Arechi (Waste Land). These two debates reflect the tensions affecting the literary field at the time and the “battle for symbolic capital”. By examining the socio-political context surrounding the debates, this article highlights the different positions of each group and reveals the fragmentation and infighting that characterized the intellectual field of postwar Japan.</abstract><pub>Institut français de recherche sur le Japon à la Maison franco-japonaise</pub><doi>10.4000/ebisu.2038</doi><tpages>33</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1340-3656 |
| ispartof | Ebisu : etudes japonaises, 2017-12, Vol.54 (54), p.79-111 |
| issn | 1340-3656 2189-1893 |
| language | fre |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_4000_ebisu_2038 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; OpenEdition Journals; Freely Accessible Japanese Titles |
| subjects | Arechi Intellectuals’ wartime responsibility Kindai bungakukai Literary Debates Literary field Shin Nihon bungakukai |
| title | Le « champ littéraire » japonais en lutte : l’après-guerre et le discours sur la responsabilité des écrivains |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T09%3A23%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Le%20%C2%AB%C2%A0champ%20litt%C3%A9raire%C2%A0%C2%BB%20japonais%20en%20lutte%C2%A0:%20l%E2%80%99apr%C3%A8s-guerre%20et%20le%20discours%20sur%20la%20responsabilit%C3%A9%20des%20%C3%A9crivains&rft.jtitle=Ebisu%20:%20etudes%20japonaises&rft.au=M%C3%BCller,%20Simone&rft.date=2017-12-19&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=54&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=79-111&rft.issn=1340-3656&rft.eissn=2189-1893&rft_id=info:doi/10.4000/ebisu.2038&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_cef629d18ec6402ea9de5b1a865cd492%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_cef629d18ec6402ea9de5b1a865cd492&rfr_iscdi=true |