Bad Concepts, Bilateral Contents

Bad Concepts, Bilateral Contents

I argue that one need not be an inferentialist in order to model inconsistent concepts, contrary to what some have thought. Representationalists can do so by adopting a form of bilateralism about contents. It remains unclear, however, why conceptual inconsistency would constitute a defect to be elim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ergo (Ann Arbor, Mich.) Mich.), 2022-12, Vol.8
1. Verfasser: Deigan, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Ergo (Ann Arbor, Mich.)
container_volume 8
creator Deigan, Michael
description I argue that one need not be an inferentialist in order to model inconsistent concepts, contrary to what some have thought. Representationalists can do so by adopting a form of bilateralism about contents. It remains unclear, however, why conceptual inconsistency would constitute a defect to be eliminated, rather than a vindication of dialetheism to be embraced. I suggest some answers to explore that involve accepting a descriptive form of dialetheism but denying its normative forms.
doi_str_mv 10.3998/ergo.2247
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3998_ergo_2247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_3998_ergo_2247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c154t-9bc68a4dc7b86d1511c82a0cf5780d5a7ebb3cbe9fe21aac420ec2599ad48433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNz0tLAzEUBeAgFiy1i_6D2QpOvTePTrK0gy8ouOk-3CR3pDJ2SpKN_14GXbg6h7M48AmxQdgq5-wD549pK6XursRSKgWtBtTX__qNWJfyCQBolHEIS9HsKTX9dI58qeW-2Z9GqpxpnLfK51puxWKgsfD6L1fi-Px07F_bw_vLW_94aCMaXVsX4s6STrELdpfQIEYrCeJgOgvJUMchqBjYDSyRKGoJHKVxjpK2WqmVuPu9jXkqJfPgL_n0RfnbI_gZ52ecn3HqB4eHQU8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bad Concepts, Bilateral Contents</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Deigan, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Deigan, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>I argue that one need not be an inferentialist in order to model inconsistent concepts, contrary to what some have thought. Representationalists can do so by adopting a form of bilateralism about contents. It remains unclear, however, why conceptual inconsistency would constitute a defect to be eliminated, rather than a vindication of dialetheism to be embraced. I suggest some answers to explore that involve accepting a descriptive form of dialetheism but denying its normative forms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2330-4014</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2330-4014</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3998/ergo.2247</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Ergo (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022-12, Vol.8</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deigan, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Bad Concepts, Bilateral Contents</title><title>Ergo (Ann Arbor, Mich.)</title><description>I argue that one need not be an inferentialist in order to model inconsistent concepts, contrary to what some have thought. Representationalists can do so by adopting a form of bilateralism about contents. It remains unclear, however, why conceptual inconsistency would constitute a defect to be eliminated, rather than a vindication of dialetheism to be embraced. I suggest some answers to explore that involve accepting a descriptive form of dialetheism but denying its normative forms.</description><issn>2330-4014</issn><issn>2330-4014</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNz0tLAzEUBeAgFiy1i_6D2QpOvTePTrK0gy8ouOk-3CR3pDJ2SpKN_14GXbg6h7M48AmxQdgq5-wD549pK6XursRSKgWtBtTX__qNWJfyCQBolHEIS9HsKTX9dI58qeW-2Z9GqpxpnLfK51puxWKgsfD6L1fi-Px07F_bw_vLW_94aCMaXVsX4s6STrELdpfQIEYrCeJgOgvJUMchqBjYDSyRKGoJHKVxjpK2WqmVuPu9jXkqJfPgL_n0RfnbI_gZ52ecn3HqB4eHQU8</recordid><startdate>20221228</startdate><enddate>20221228</enddate><creator>Deigan, Michael</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221228</creationdate><title>Bad Concepts, Bilateral Contents</title><author>Deigan, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c154t-9bc68a4dc7b86d1511c82a0cf5780d5a7ebb3cbe9fe21aac420ec2599ad48433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deigan, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Ergo (Ann Arbor, Mich.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deigan, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bad Concepts, Bilateral Contents</atitle><jtitle>Ergo (Ann Arbor, Mich.)</jtitle><date>2022-12-28</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>8</volume><issn>2330-4014</issn><eissn>2330-4014</eissn><abstract>I argue that one need not be an inferentialist in order to model inconsistent concepts, contrary to what some have thought. Representationalists can do so by adopting a form of bilateralism about contents. It remains unclear, however, why conceptual inconsistency would constitute a defect to be eliminated, rather than a vindication of dialetheism to be embraced. I suggest some answers to explore that involve accepting a descriptive form of dialetheism but denying its normative forms.</abstract><doi>10.3998/ergo.2247</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2330-4014
ispartof Ergo (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022-12, Vol.8
issn 2330-4014
2330-4014
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3998_ergo_2247
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Bad Concepts, Bilateral Contents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T21%3A35%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bad%20Concepts,%20Bilateral%20Contents&rft.jtitle=Ergo%20(Ann%20Arbor,%20Mich.)&rft.au=Deigan,%20Michael&rft.date=2022-12-28&rft.volume=8&rft.issn=2330-4014&rft.eissn=2330-4014&rft_id=info:doi/10.3998/ergo.2247&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_3998_ergo_2247%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true