Black Hole Mass Scaling Relations for Spiral Galaxies. II. M BH –M ,tot and M BH –M ,disk
Black hole mass ( M BH ) scaling relations are typically derived using the properties of a galaxy’s bulge and samples dominated by (high-mass) early-type galaxies. Studying late-type galaxies should provide greater insight into the mutual growth of black holes and galaxies in more gas-rich environme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Astrophysical journal 2018-12, Vol.869 (2), p.113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 113 |
container_title | The Astrophysical journal |
container_volume | 869 |
creator | Davis, Benjamin L. Graham, Alister W. Cameron, Ewan |
description | Black hole mass (
M
BH
) scaling relations are typically derived using the properties of a galaxy’s bulge and samples dominated by (high-mass) early-type galaxies. Studying late-type galaxies should provide greater insight into the mutual growth of black holes and galaxies in more gas-rich environments. We have used 40 spiral galaxies to establish how
M
BH
scales with both the total stellar mass (
M
*
,
tot
) and the disk’s stellar mass, having measured the spheroid (bulge) stellar mass (
M
*
,
sph
) and presented the
M
BH
–
M
*
,
sph
relation in Paper I. The relation involving
M
*
,
tot
may be beneficial for estimating
M
BH
either from pipeline data or at higher redshift, conditions that are not ideal for the accurate isolation of the bulge. A symmetric Bayesian analysis finds
log
(
M
BH
/
M
⊙
)
=
(
3.05
−
0.49
+
0.57
)
log
{
M
*
,
tot
/
[
υ
(
6.37
×
10
10
M
⊙
)
]
}
+
(
7.25
−
0.14
+
0.13
)
. The scatter from the regression of
M
BH
on
M
*
,
tot
is 0.66 dex; compare 0.56 dex for
M
BH
on
M
*
,
sph
and 0.57 dex for
M
BH
on
σ
*
. The slope is >2 times that obtained using core-Sérsic early-type galaxies, echoing a similar result involving
M
*
,
sph
, and supporting a varied growth mechanism among different morphological types. This steeper relation has consequences for galaxy/black hole formation theories, simulations, and predicting black hole masses. We caution that (i) an
M
BH
–
M
*
,
tot
relation built from a mixture of early- and late-type galaxies will find an arbitrary slope of approximately 1–3, with no physical meaning beyond one’s sample selection, and (ii) evolutionary studies of the
M
BH
–
M
*
,
tot
relation need to be mindful of the galaxy types included at each epoch. We additionally update the
M
*
,
tot
–(
face-on
spiral arm pitch angle) relation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3847/1538-4357/aae820 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3847_1538_4357_aae820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_3847_1538_4357_aae820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c158t-d24ff6ebe560651c4ed4688feea1c857e0e49a68929889268a09659748cbe8113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkLFOwzAURS0EEqGwM74PIK2d2I490gqaSK2QKEgsKHp1XlCoaao4A2z9B_6QL4GoCLHcq3uGOxzGLgUfp0ZmE6FSE8tUZRNEMgk_YtEfOmYR51zGOs2eTtlZCK_DTKyN2PPUo9tA3nqCJYYAK4e-2b7APXnsm3YboG47WO2aDj3M0eN7Q2EMRTGGJUxz-Np_LuGqb3vAbfUfVU3YnLOTGn2gi98escfbm4dZHi_u5sXsehE7oUwfV4msa01rUpprJZykSmpjaiIUzqiMOEmL2tjEmp_QBrnVymbSuDUZIdIR44df17UhdFSXu655w-6jFLwc9JSDi3JwUR70pN-uKlcl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Black Hole Mass Scaling Relations for Spiral Galaxies. II. M BH –M ,tot and M BH –M ,disk</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Davis, Benjamin L. ; Graham, Alister W. ; Cameron, Ewan</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Benjamin L. ; Graham, Alister W. ; Cameron, Ewan</creatorcontrib><description>Black hole mass (
M
BH
) scaling relations are typically derived using the properties of a galaxy’s bulge and samples dominated by (high-mass) early-type galaxies. Studying late-type galaxies should provide greater insight into the mutual growth of black holes and galaxies in more gas-rich environments. We have used 40 spiral galaxies to establish how
M
BH
scales with both the total stellar mass (
M
*
,
tot
) and the disk’s stellar mass, having measured the spheroid (bulge) stellar mass (
M
*
,
sph
) and presented the
M
BH
–
M
*
,
sph
relation in Paper I. The relation involving
M
*
,
tot
may be beneficial for estimating
M
BH
either from pipeline data or at higher redshift, conditions that are not ideal for the accurate isolation of the bulge. A symmetric Bayesian analysis finds
log
(
M
BH
/
M
⊙
)
=
(
3.05
−
0.49
+
0.57
)
log
{
M
*
,
tot
/
[
υ
(
6.37
×
10
10
M
⊙
)
]
}
+
(
7.25
−
0.14
+
0.13
)
. The scatter from the regression of
M
BH
on
M
*
,
tot
is 0.66 dex; compare 0.56 dex for
M
BH
on
M
*
,
sph
and 0.57 dex for
M
BH
on
σ
*
. The slope is >2 times that obtained using core-Sérsic early-type galaxies, echoing a similar result involving
M
*
,
sph
, and supporting a varied growth mechanism among different morphological types. This steeper relation has consequences for galaxy/black hole formation theories, simulations, and predicting black hole masses. We caution that (i) an
M
BH
–
M
*
,
tot
relation built from a mixture of early- and late-type galaxies will find an arbitrary slope of approximately 1–3, with no physical meaning beyond one’s sample selection, and (ii) evolutionary studies of the
M
BH
–
M
*
,
tot
relation need to be mindful of the galaxy types included at each epoch. We additionally update the
M
*
,
tot
–(
face-on
spiral arm pitch angle) relation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-637X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae820</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Astrophysical journal, 2018-12, Vol.869 (2), p.113</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c158t-d24ff6ebe560651c4ed4688feea1c857e0e49a68929889268a09659748cbe8113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c158t-d24ff6ebe560651c4ed4688feea1c857e0e49a68929889268a09659748cbe8113</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4306-5950 ; 0000-0002-6496-9414</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Benjamin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Alister W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Ewan</creatorcontrib><title>Black Hole Mass Scaling Relations for Spiral Galaxies. II. M BH –M ,tot and M BH –M ,disk</title><title>The Astrophysical journal</title><description>Black hole mass (
M
BH
) scaling relations are typically derived using the properties of a galaxy’s bulge and samples dominated by (high-mass) early-type galaxies. Studying late-type galaxies should provide greater insight into the mutual growth of black holes and galaxies in more gas-rich environments. We have used 40 spiral galaxies to establish how
M
BH
scales with both the total stellar mass (
M
*
,
tot
) and the disk’s stellar mass, having measured the spheroid (bulge) stellar mass (
M
*
,
sph
) and presented the
M
BH
–
M
*
,
sph
relation in Paper I. The relation involving
M
*
,
tot
may be beneficial for estimating
M
BH
either from pipeline data or at higher redshift, conditions that are not ideal for the accurate isolation of the bulge. A symmetric Bayesian analysis finds
log
(
M
BH
/
M
⊙
)
=
(
3.05
−
0.49
+
0.57
)
log
{
M
*
,
tot
/
[
υ
(
6.37
×
10
10
M
⊙
)
]
}
+
(
7.25
−
0.14
+
0.13
)
. The scatter from the regression of
M
BH
on
M
*
,
tot
is 0.66 dex; compare 0.56 dex for
M
BH
on
M
*
,
sph
and 0.57 dex for
M
BH
on
σ
*
. The slope is >2 times that obtained using core-Sérsic early-type galaxies, echoing a similar result involving
M
*
,
sph
, and supporting a varied growth mechanism among different morphological types. This steeper relation has consequences for galaxy/black hole formation theories, simulations, and predicting black hole masses. We caution that (i) an
M
BH
–
M
*
,
tot
relation built from a mixture of early- and late-type galaxies will find an arbitrary slope of approximately 1–3, with no physical meaning beyond one’s sample selection, and (ii) evolutionary studies of the
M
BH
–
M
*
,
tot
relation need to be mindful of the galaxy types included at each epoch. We additionally update the
M
*
,
tot
–(
face-on
spiral arm pitch angle) relation.</description><issn>0004-637X</issn><issn>1538-4357</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkLFOwzAURS0EEqGwM74PIK2d2I490gqaSK2QKEgsKHp1XlCoaao4A2z9B_6QL4GoCLHcq3uGOxzGLgUfp0ZmE6FSE8tUZRNEMgk_YtEfOmYR51zGOs2eTtlZCK_DTKyN2PPUo9tA3nqCJYYAK4e-2b7APXnsm3YboG47WO2aDj3M0eN7Q2EMRTGGJUxz-Np_LuGqb3vAbfUfVU3YnLOTGn2gi98escfbm4dZHi_u5sXsehE7oUwfV4msa01rUpprJZykSmpjaiIUzqiMOEmL2tjEmp_QBrnVymbSuDUZIdIR44df17UhdFSXu655w-6jFLwc9JSDi3JwUR70pN-uKlcl</recordid><startdate>20181220</startdate><enddate>20181220</enddate><creator>Davis, Benjamin L.</creator><creator>Graham, Alister W.</creator><creator>Cameron, Ewan</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4306-5950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6496-9414</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181220</creationdate><title>Black Hole Mass Scaling Relations for Spiral Galaxies. II. M BH –M ,tot and M BH –M ,disk</title><author>Davis, Benjamin L. ; Graham, Alister W. ; Cameron, Ewan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c158t-d24ff6ebe560651c4ed4688feea1c857e0e49a68929889268a09659748cbe8113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Benjamin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Alister W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Ewan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Benjamin L.</au><au>Graham, Alister W.</au><au>Cameron, Ewan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Black Hole Mass Scaling Relations for Spiral Galaxies. II. M BH –M ,tot and M BH –M ,disk</atitle><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle><date>2018-12-20</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>869</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>113</spage><pages>113-</pages><issn>0004-637X</issn><eissn>1538-4357</eissn><abstract>Black hole mass (
M
BH
) scaling relations are typically derived using the properties of a galaxy’s bulge and samples dominated by (high-mass) early-type galaxies. Studying late-type galaxies should provide greater insight into the mutual growth of black holes and galaxies in more gas-rich environments. We have used 40 spiral galaxies to establish how
M
BH
scales with both the total stellar mass (
M
*
,
tot
) and the disk’s stellar mass, having measured the spheroid (bulge) stellar mass (
M
*
,
sph
) and presented the
M
BH
–
M
*
,
sph
relation in Paper I. The relation involving
M
*
,
tot
may be beneficial for estimating
M
BH
either from pipeline data or at higher redshift, conditions that are not ideal for the accurate isolation of the bulge. A symmetric Bayesian analysis finds
log
(
M
BH
/
M
⊙
)
=
(
3.05
−
0.49
+
0.57
)
log
{
M
*
,
tot
/
[
υ
(
6.37
×
10
10
M
⊙
)
]
}
+
(
7.25
−
0.14
+
0.13
)
. The scatter from the regression of
M
BH
on
M
*
,
tot
is 0.66 dex; compare 0.56 dex for
M
BH
on
M
*
,
sph
and 0.57 dex for
M
BH
on
σ
*
. The slope is >2 times that obtained using core-Sérsic early-type galaxies, echoing a similar result involving
M
*
,
sph
, and supporting a varied growth mechanism among different morphological types. This steeper relation has consequences for galaxy/black hole formation theories, simulations, and predicting black hole masses. We caution that (i) an
M
BH
–
M
*
,
tot
relation built from a mixture of early- and late-type galaxies will find an arbitrary slope of approximately 1–3, with no physical meaning beyond one’s sample selection, and (ii) evolutionary studies of the
M
BH
–
M
*
,
tot
relation need to be mindful of the galaxy types included at each epoch. We additionally update the
M
*
,
tot
–(
face-on
spiral arm pitch angle) relation.</abstract><doi>10.3847/1538-4357/aae820</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4306-5950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6496-9414</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-637X |
ispartof | The Astrophysical journal, 2018-12, Vol.869 (2), p.113 |
issn | 0004-637X 1538-4357 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_3847_1538_4357_aae820 |
source | IOP Publishing Free Content; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Black Hole Mass Scaling Relations for Spiral Galaxies. II. M BH –M ,tot and M BH –M ,disk |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T15%3A21%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Black%20Hole%20Mass%20Scaling%20Relations%20for%20Spiral%20Galaxies.%20II.%20M%20BH%20%E2%80%93M%20,tot%20and%20M%20BH%20%E2%80%93M%20,disk&rft.jtitle=The%20Astrophysical%20journal&rft.au=Davis,%20Benjamin%20L.&rft.date=2018-12-20&rft.volume=869&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=113&rft.pages=113-&rft.issn=0004-637X&rft.eissn=1538-4357&rft_id=info:doi/10.3847/1538-4357/aae820&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_3847_1538_4357_aae820%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |