Diagnosis and Management of Microcalcification Associated with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast

Twenty-two cases of microcalcification (MC) associated with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) between 1988 and 1995 were reviewed and analyzed. The ratio of MC among all DCIS was 32.9%. The most frequent patient group was 4150 years of age and most of the lesions were situated in the upper lateral reg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening 1997/03/10, Vol.6(1), pp.57-63
Hauptverfasser: Mitsuyama, Shoshu, Ono, Minoru, Hatada, Toshikazu, Ikeda, Yumie, Toyoshima, Satoshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 63
container_issue 1
container_start_page 57
container_title Journal of Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening
container_volume 6
creator Mitsuyama, Shoshu
Ono, Minoru
Hatada, Toshikazu
Ikeda, Yumie
Toyoshima, Satoshi
description Twenty-two cases of microcalcification (MC) associated with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) between 1988 and 1995 were reviewed and analyzed. The ratio of MC among all DCIS was 32.9%. The most frequent patient group was 4150 years of age and most of the lesions were situated in the upper lateral region. On mammography (MMG), malignancy was easily diagnosed because of its characteristic findings of MC, but it was difficult to differentiate between invasive carcinoma and DCIS. Four types of MC associated with DCIS were proposed as follows : 1) solitary cluster type ; 2) multiple solitary cluster type ; 3) numerous scattered type ; 4) diffuse type. Additionally, the findings of ultrasonography (US) were helpful for diagnosis of DCIS when there were no discrete mass shadows but many echogenic patterns thought to be MC. However, US was not effective for detection of abnormal lesions among the solitary cluster and multiple solitary cluster types. Histopathologically, many cases of the solitary cluster type did not have ductal spread (57%), and some were the non-comedo type (29%). Also, no axillary metastasis was recognized in DCIS with MC. We recommend core needle biopsy or open biopsy for suspected MC associated with DCIS on MMG and/or US, and propose that solitary cluster type is a better candidate for breast-conserving surgery without axillary dissection. For the other three types total mastectomy is mandatory, but no axillary dissection is recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.3804/jjabcs.6.57
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3804_jjabcs_6_57</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_jjabcs1992_6_1_6_1_57_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c153n-3be0336f5b901bc8082dcf25c052ef493d1832ab0ca6c363ec7983b93e5048f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhC0EElXpiT_gO0rxI07sY0l5Sa04AOdos3FaV6mDbFeIf0-gVQ-rOew3q50h5JazudQsv9_toME4L-aqvCATrrXICl3KSzJhhuuMlcJck1mMrmFMCFEKnk-IXTrY-CG6SMG3dA0eNnZvfaJDR9cOw4DQo-scQnKDp4sYB3SQbEu_XdrS5QET9LSCgM4Pe6DO03eXDn_2tLX0IViI6YZcddBHOzvplHw-PX5UL9nq7fm1Wqwy5Er6TDaWSVl0qjGMN6iZFi12QiFTwna5kS3XUkDDEAqUhbRYGi0bI61iue6EnJK7493x7xiD7eqv4PYQfmrO6r-S6mNJdVGrcqSrI72LaUx9ZiEkh709sdwYMfL8f1R53uIWQm29_AW7anSb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosis and Management of Microcalcification Associated with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mitsuyama, Shoshu ; Ono, Minoru ; Hatada, Toshikazu ; Ikeda, Yumie ; Toyoshima, Satoshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Mitsuyama, Shoshu ; Ono, Minoru ; Hatada, Toshikazu ; Ikeda, Yumie ; Toyoshima, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><description>Twenty-two cases of microcalcification (MC) associated with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) between 1988 and 1995 were reviewed and analyzed. The ratio of MC among all DCIS was 32.9%. The most frequent patient group was 4150 years of age and most of the lesions were situated in the upper lateral region. On mammography (MMG), malignancy was easily diagnosed because of its characteristic findings of MC, but it was difficult to differentiate between invasive carcinoma and DCIS. Four types of MC associated with DCIS were proposed as follows : 1) solitary cluster type ; 2) multiple solitary cluster type ; 3) numerous scattered type ; 4) diffuse type. Additionally, the findings of ultrasonography (US) were helpful for diagnosis of DCIS when there were no discrete mass shadows but many echogenic patterns thought to be MC. However, US was not effective for detection of abnormal lesions among the solitary cluster and multiple solitary cluster types. Histopathologically, many cases of the solitary cluster type did not have ductal spread (57%), and some were the non-comedo type (29%). Also, no axillary metastasis was recognized in DCIS with MC. We recommend core needle biopsy or open biopsy for suspected MC associated with DCIS on MMG and/or US, and propose that solitary cluster type is a better candidate for breast-conserving surgery without axillary dissection. For the other three types total mastectomy is mandatory, but no axillary dissection is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0918-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1882-6873</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3804/jjabcs.6.57</identifier><language>jpn</language><publisher>Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening</publisher><subject>axillary dissection ; breast-conserving surgery ; ductal carcinoma in situ ; mammography ; microcalcification</subject><ispartof>Nihon Nyugan Kenshin Gakkaishi (Journal of Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening), 1997/03/10, Vol.6(1), pp.57-63</ispartof><rights>Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mitsuyama, Shoshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ono, Minoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatada, Toshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Yumie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toyoshima, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosis and Management of Microcalcification Associated with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast</title><title>Journal of Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening</title><addtitle>J.Jpn. Assoc.Breast Cancer Screen.</addtitle><description>Twenty-two cases of microcalcification (MC) associated with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) between 1988 and 1995 were reviewed and analyzed. The ratio of MC among all DCIS was 32.9%. The most frequent patient group was 4150 years of age and most of the lesions were situated in the upper lateral region. On mammography (MMG), malignancy was easily diagnosed because of its characteristic findings of MC, but it was difficult to differentiate between invasive carcinoma and DCIS. Four types of MC associated with DCIS were proposed as follows : 1) solitary cluster type ; 2) multiple solitary cluster type ; 3) numerous scattered type ; 4) diffuse type. Additionally, the findings of ultrasonography (US) were helpful for diagnosis of DCIS when there were no discrete mass shadows but many echogenic patterns thought to be MC. However, US was not effective for detection of abnormal lesions among the solitary cluster and multiple solitary cluster types. Histopathologically, many cases of the solitary cluster type did not have ductal spread (57%), and some were the non-comedo type (29%). Also, no axillary metastasis was recognized in DCIS with MC. We recommend core needle biopsy or open biopsy for suspected MC associated with DCIS on MMG and/or US, and propose that solitary cluster type is a better candidate for breast-conserving surgery without axillary dissection. For the other three types total mastectomy is mandatory, but no axillary dissection is recommended.</description><subject>axillary dissection</subject><subject>breast-conserving surgery</subject><subject>ductal carcinoma in situ</subject><subject>mammography</subject><subject>microcalcification</subject><issn>0918-0729</issn><issn>1882-6873</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhC0EElXpiT_gO0rxI07sY0l5Sa04AOdos3FaV6mDbFeIf0-gVQ-rOew3q50h5JazudQsv9_toME4L-aqvCATrrXICl3KSzJhhuuMlcJck1mMrmFMCFEKnk-IXTrY-CG6SMG3dA0eNnZvfaJDR9cOw4DQo-scQnKDp4sYB3SQbEu_XdrS5QET9LSCgM4Pe6DO03eXDn_2tLX0IViI6YZcddBHOzvplHw-PX5UL9nq7fm1Wqwy5Er6TDaWSVl0qjGMN6iZFi12QiFTwna5kS3XUkDDEAqUhbRYGi0bI61iue6EnJK7493x7xiD7eqv4PYQfmrO6r-S6mNJdVGrcqSrI72LaUx9ZiEkh709sdwYMfL8f1R53uIWQm29_AW7anSb</recordid><startdate>1997</startdate><enddate>1997</enddate><creator>Mitsuyama, Shoshu</creator><creator>Ono, Minoru</creator><creator>Hatada, Toshikazu</creator><creator>Ikeda, Yumie</creator><creator>Toyoshima, Satoshi</creator><general>Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1997</creationdate><title>Diagnosis and Management of Microcalcification Associated with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast</title><author>Mitsuyama, Shoshu ; Ono, Minoru ; Hatada, Toshikazu ; Ikeda, Yumie ; Toyoshima, Satoshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c153n-3be0336f5b901bc8082dcf25c052ef493d1832ab0ca6c363ec7983b93e5048f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>jpn</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>axillary dissection</topic><topic>breast-conserving surgery</topic><topic>ductal carcinoma in situ</topic><topic>mammography</topic><topic>microcalcification</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mitsuyama, Shoshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ono, Minoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatada, Toshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Yumie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toyoshima, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mitsuyama, Shoshu</au><au>Ono, Minoru</au><au>Hatada, Toshikazu</au><au>Ikeda, Yumie</au><au>Toyoshima, Satoshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosis and Management of Microcalcification Associated with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening</jtitle><addtitle>J.Jpn. Assoc.Breast Cancer Screen.</addtitle><date>1997</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>57-63</pages><issn>0918-0729</issn><eissn>1882-6873</eissn><abstract>Twenty-two cases of microcalcification (MC) associated with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) between 1988 and 1995 were reviewed and analyzed. The ratio of MC among all DCIS was 32.9%. The most frequent patient group was 4150 years of age and most of the lesions were situated in the upper lateral region. On mammography (MMG), malignancy was easily diagnosed because of its characteristic findings of MC, but it was difficult to differentiate between invasive carcinoma and DCIS. Four types of MC associated with DCIS were proposed as follows : 1) solitary cluster type ; 2) multiple solitary cluster type ; 3) numerous scattered type ; 4) diffuse type. Additionally, the findings of ultrasonography (US) were helpful for diagnosis of DCIS when there were no discrete mass shadows but many echogenic patterns thought to be MC. However, US was not effective for detection of abnormal lesions among the solitary cluster and multiple solitary cluster types. Histopathologically, many cases of the solitary cluster type did not have ductal spread (57%), and some were the non-comedo type (29%). Also, no axillary metastasis was recognized in DCIS with MC. We recommend core needle biopsy or open biopsy for suspected MC associated with DCIS on MMG and/or US, and propose that solitary cluster type is a better candidate for breast-conserving surgery without axillary dissection. For the other three types total mastectomy is mandatory, but no axillary dissection is recommended.</abstract><pub>Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening</pub><doi>10.3804/jjabcs.6.57</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0918-0729
ispartof Nihon Nyugan Kenshin Gakkaishi (Journal of Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening), 1997/03/10, Vol.6(1), pp.57-63
issn 0918-0729
1882-6873
language jpn
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3804_jjabcs_6_57
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects axillary dissection
breast-conserving surgery
ductal carcinoma in situ
mammography
microcalcification
title Diagnosis and Management of Microcalcification Associated with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A48%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosis%20and%20Management%20of%20Microcalcification%20Associated%20with%20Ductal%20Carcinoma%20in%20Situ%20of%20the%20Breast&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Japan%20Association%20of%20Breast%20Cancer%20Screening&rft.au=Mitsuyama,%20Shoshu&rft.date=1997&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=57-63&rft.issn=0918-0729&rft.eissn=1882-6873&rft_id=info:doi/10.3804/jjabcs.6.57&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_cross%3Earticle_jjabcs1992_6_1_6_1_57_article_char_en%3C/jstage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true