Can Kosovo be a Precedent for South Ossetia and Abkhazia: Recognizing Differences in Dynamics of Recognition

The issue of whether the recognition of Kosovo as an independent state might serve as a precedent for former autonomous republics of Georgia, South Ossetia and Abkhazia has been often debated. This paper aims at comparing the processes of recognition of these three entities. It illustrates that the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cornell international affairs review 2009-05, Vol.2 (2)
1. Verfasser: Dolidze, Anna V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Cornell international affairs review
container_volume 2
creator Dolidze, Anna V.
description The issue of whether the recognition of Kosovo as an independent state might serve as a precedent for former autonomous republics of Georgia, South Ossetia and Abkhazia has been often debated. This paper aims at comparing the processes of recognition of these three entities. It illustrates that the international community has been gradually recognizing Kosovo as a State while South Ossetia/Abkhazia have been subjected to the policy of non-recognition. It argues that because the dynamics of recognition of Kosovo and South Ossetia/Abkhazia have been very different, it is less likely that the establishment of Kosovo as a viable state will serve as a precedent for South Ossetia/Abkhazia. Although the secession of Kosovo from FRY and of South Ossetia/Abkhazia from Georgia has been studied in many respects, the character of the recognition process of the three entities has hardly been compared. But the question arises - is it at all worthwhile to compare who have recognized Kosovo and South Ossetia/Abkhazia and if so, what could we learn from such comparison?
doi_str_mv 10.37513/ciar.v2i2.370
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_37513_ciar_v2i2_370</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_37513_ciar_v2i2_370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_37513_ciar_v2i2_3703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjj0LwjAURYMoWLSr8_sDrUnbxK5SFMFBQffw2qY0fjSS1IL-equIu3e59wwXDiEzRsN4wVk8LzTasIt01DMdEC9iXASUx2L421E6Jr5zJ9pHUJ4kwiNphg1sjTOdgVwBwt6qQpWqaaEyFg7m3tawc061GgGbEpb5ucanxikZVXhxyv_2hITr1THbBIU1zllVyZvVV7QPyaj8KMq3onwr9kzjvw8vNaxEOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Kosovo be a Precedent for South Ossetia and Abkhazia: Recognizing Differences in Dynamics of Recognition</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Dolidze, Anna V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dolidze, Anna V.</creatorcontrib><description>The issue of whether the recognition of Kosovo as an independent state might serve as a precedent for former autonomous republics of Georgia, South Ossetia and Abkhazia has been often debated. This paper aims at comparing the processes of recognition of these three entities. It illustrates that the international community has been gradually recognizing Kosovo as a State while South Ossetia/Abkhazia have been subjected to the policy of non-recognition. It argues that because the dynamics of recognition of Kosovo and South Ossetia/Abkhazia have been very different, it is less likely that the establishment of Kosovo as a viable state will serve as a precedent for South Ossetia/Abkhazia. Although the secession of Kosovo from FRY and of South Ossetia/Abkhazia from Georgia has been studied in many respects, the character of the recognition process of the three entities has hardly been compared. But the question arises - is it at all worthwhile to compare who have recognized Kosovo and South Ossetia/Abkhazia and if so, what could we learn from such comparison?</description><identifier>ISSN: 2156-0528</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-0536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.37513/ciar.v2i2.370</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Cornell international affairs review, 2009-05, Vol.2 (2)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dolidze, Anna V.</creatorcontrib><title>Can Kosovo be a Precedent for South Ossetia and Abkhazia: Recognizing Differences in Dynamics of Recognition</title><title>Cornell international affairs review</title><description>The issue of whether the recognition of Kosovo as an independent state might serve as a precedent for former autonomous republics of Georgia, South Ossetia and Abkhazia has been often debated. This paper aims at comparing the processes of recognition of these three entities. It illustrates that the international community has been gradually recognizing Kosovo as a State while South Ossetia/Abkhazia have been subjected to the policy of non-recognition. It argues that because the dynamics of recognition of Kosovo and South Ossetia/Abkhazia have been very different, it is less likely that the establishment of Kosovo as a viable state will serve as a precedent for South Ossetia/Abkhazia. Although the secession of Kosovo from FRY and of South Ossetia/Abkhazia from Georgia has been studied in many respects, the character of the recognition process of the three entities has hardly been compared. But the question arises - is it at all worthwhile to compare who have recognized Kosovo and South Ossetia/Abkhazia and if so, what could we learn from such comparison?</description><issn>2156-0528</issn><issn>2156-0536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjj0LwjAURYMoWLSr8_sDrUnbxK5SFMFBQffw2qY0fjSS1IL-equIu3e59wwXDiEzRsN4wVk8LzTasIt01DMdEC9iXASUx2L421E6Jr5zJ9pHUJ4kwiNphg1sjTOdgVwBwt6qQpWqaaEyFg7m3tawc061GgGbEpb5ucanxikZVXhxyv_2hITr1THbBIU1zllVyZvVV7QPyaj8KMq3onwr9kzjvw8vNaxEOA</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Dolidze, Anna V.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Can Kosovo be a Precedent for South Ossetia and Abkhazia</title><author>Dolidze, Anna V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_37513_ciar_v2i2_3703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dolidze, Anna V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cornell international affairs review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dolidze, Anna V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Kosovo be a Precedent for South Ossetia and Abkhazia: Recognizing Differences in Dynamics of Recognition</atitle><jtitle>Cornell international affairs review</jtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>2156-0528</issn><eissn>2156-0536</eissn><abstract>The issue of whether the recognition of Kosovo as an independent state might serve as a precedent for former autonomous republics of Georgia, South Ossetia and Abkhazia has been often debated. This paper aims at comparing the processes of recognition of these three entities. It illustrates that the international community has been gradually recognizing Kosovo as a State while South Ossetia/Abkhazia have been subjected to the policy of non-recognition. It argues that because the dynamics of recognition of Kosovo and South Ossetia/Abkhazia have been very different, it is less likely that the establishment of Kosovo as a viable state will serve as a precedent for South Ossetia/Abkhazia. Although the secession of Kosovo from FRY and of South Ossetia/Abkhazia from Georgia has been studied in many respects, the character of the recognition process of the three entities has hardly been compared. But the question arises - is it at all worthwhile to compare who have recognized Kosovo and South Ossetia/Abkhazia and if so, what could we learn from such comparison?</abstract><doi>10.37513/ciar.v2i2.370</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2156-0528
ispartof Cornell international affairs review, 2009-05, Vol.2 (2)
issn 2156-0528
2156-0536
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_37513_ciar_v2i2_370
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Can Kosovo be a Precedent for South Ossetia and Abkhazia: Recognizing Differences in Dynamics of Recognition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A21%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Kosovo%20be%20a%20Precedent%20for%20South%20Ossetia%20and%20Abkhazia:%20Recognizing%20Differences%20in%20Dynamics%20of%20Recognition&rft.jtitle=Cornell%20international%20affairs%20review&rft.au=Dolidze,%20Anna%20V.&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=2156-0528&rft.eissn=2156-0536&rft_id=info:doi/10.37513/ciar.v2i2.370&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_37513_ciar_v2i2_370%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true