Controversial Fatwas from Indonesian Ulema Council: A Study of the Legal Sociology Perspective
Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) as a fatwa provider in Indonesia has produced many fatwas, and not all fatwas can be received by the public, some fatwas such as celebrating Christmas together, SMS with prizes, and abstentions. This research is sourced from MUI fatwas which are considered controversia...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 2022-09, Vol.11 (5), p.242 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 242 |
container_title | Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Ansori, Ansori |
description | Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) as a fatwa provider in Indonesia has produced many fatwas, and not all fatwas can be received by the public, some fatwas such as celebrating Christmas together, SMS with prizes, and abstentions. This research is sourced from MUI fatwas which are considered controversial. The results of the study indicate that there are various factors that cause controversial MUI fatwas in the community. First, in the input process, there were several cases that generated controversy in the community before being issued a fatwa. Second, the performance process of legal discovery in the MUI institution itself, which has various opinions from scholars, so controversy becomes something that is unavoidable. Third, in the output process, several MUI fatwas invited controversy due to the low level of socialization and public acceptance of MUI.
Received: 2 July 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 2 September 2022 |
doi_str_mv | 10.36941/ajis-2022-0139 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_36941_ajis_2022_0139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_36941_ajis_2022_0139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c110t-c6e6fdd4c1f0c263846e8540b49c2b739e74ec9b1086d7bdc0e0f278d9b028483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1PAjEYhBujiQQ5e-0fWOkX3dYb2YiSkGiCXN1027dYs2xJu2D49y7IaSaTmTk8CD1S8sSlFnRqfkIuGGGsIJTrGzRiTNFCSMpur55rze_RJOfQDBVFZkyLEfqqYteneISUg2nxwvS_JmOf4g4vOxc7GOIOb1rYGVzFQ2dD-4zneN0f3AlHj_tvwCvYDtN1tCG2cXvCH8PZHmwfjvCA7rxpM0yuOkabxctn9Vas3l-X1XxVWEpJX1gJ0jsnLPXEMsmVkKBmgjRCW9aUXEMpwOqGEiVd2ThLgHhWKqcbwpRQfIym_782xZwT-Hqfws6kU01JfSFUnwnVZ0L1mRD_A1twWsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Controversial Fatwas from Indonesian Ulema Council: A Study of the Legal Sociology Perspective</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ansori, Ansori</creator><creatorcontrib>Ansori, Ansori</creatorcontrib><description>Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) as a fatwa provider in Indonesia has produced many fatwas, and not all fatwas can be received by the public, some fatwas such as celebrating Christmas together, SMS with prizes, and abstentions. This research is sourced from MUI fatwas which are considered controversial. The results of the study indicate that there are various factors that cause controversial MUI fatwas in the community. First, in the input process, there were several cases that generated controversy in the community before being issued a fatwa. Second, the performance process of legal discovery in the MUI institution itself, which has various opinions from scholars, so controversy becomes something that is unavoidable. Third, in the output process, several MUI fatwas invited controversy due to the low level of socialization and public acceptance of MUI.
Received: 2 July 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 2 September 2022</description><identifier>ISSN: 2281-3993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2281-4612</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.36941/ajis-2022-0139</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2022-09, Vol.11 (5), p.242</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ansori, Ansori</creatorcontrib><title>Controversial Fatwas from Indonesian Ulema Council: A Study of the Legal Sociology Perspective</title><title>Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies</title><description>Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) as a fatwa provider in Indonesia has produced many fatwas, and not all fatwas can be received by the public, some fatwas such as celebrating Christmas together, SMS with prizes, and abstentions. This research is sourced from MUI fatwas which are considered controversial. The results of the study indicate that there are various factors that cause controversial MUI fatwas in the community. First, in the input process, there were several cases that generated controversy in the community before being issued a fatwa. Second, the performance process of legal discovery in the MUI institution itself, which has various opinions from scholars, so controversy becomes something that is unavoidable. Third, in the output process, several MUI fatwas invited controversy due to the low level of socialization and public acceptance of MUI.
Received: 2 July 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 2 September 2022</description><issn>2281-3993</issn><issn>2281-4612</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1PAjEYhBujiQQ5e-0fWOkX3dYb2YiSkGiCXN1027dYs2xJu2D49y7IaSaTmTk8CD1S8sSlFnRqfkIuGGGsIJTrGzRiTNFCSMpur55rze_RJOfQDBVFZkyLEfqqYteneISUg2nxwvS_JmOf4g4vOxc7GOIOb1rYGVzFQ2dD-4zneN0f3AlHj_tvwCvYDtN1tCG2cXvCH8PZHmwfjvCA7rxpM0yuOkabxctn9Vas3l-X1XxVWEpJX1gJ0jsnLPXEMsmVkKBmgjRCW9aUXEMpwOqGEiVd2ThLgHhWKqcbwpRQfIym_782xZwT-Hqfws6kU01JfSFUnwnVZ0L1mRD_A1twWsA</recordid><startdate>20220902</startdate><enddate>20220902</enddate><creator>Ansori, Ansori</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220902</creationdate><title>Controversial Fatwas from Indonesian Ulema Council: A Study of the Legal Sociology Perspective</title><author>Ansori, Ansori</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c110t-c6e6fdd4c1f0c263846e8540b49c2b739e74ec9b1086d7bdc0e0f278d9b028483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ansori, Ansori</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ansori, Ansori</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Controversial Fatwas from Indonesian Ulema Council: A Study of the Legal Sociology Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies</jtitle><date>2022-09-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>242</spage><pages>242-</pages><issn>2281-3993</issn><eissn>2281-4612</eissn><abstract>Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) as a fatwa provider in Indonesia has produced many fatwas, and not all fatwas can be received by the public, some fatwas such as celebrating Christmas together, SMS with prizes, and abstentions. This research is sourced from MUI fatwas which are considered controversial. The results of the study indicate that there are various factors that cause controversial MUI fatwas in the community. First, in the input process, there were several cases that generated controversy in the community before being issued a fatwa. Second, the performance process of legal discovery in the MUI institution itself, which has various opinions from scholars, so controversy becomes something that is unavoidable. Third, in the output process, several MUI fatwas invited controversy due to the low level of socialization and public acceptance of MUI.
Received: 2 July 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 2 September 2022</abstract><doi>10.36941/ajis-2022-0139</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2281-3993 |
ispartof | Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2022-09, Vol.11 (5), p.242 |
issn | 2281-3993 2281-4612 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_36941_ajis_2022_0139 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
title | Controversial Fatwas from Indonesian Ulema Council: A Study of the Legal Sociology Perspective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T12%3A38%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Controversial%20Fatwas%20from%20Indonesian%20Ulema%20Council:%20A%20Study%20of%20the%20Legal%20Sociology%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Academic%20Journal%20of%20Interdisciplinary%20Studies&rft.au=Ansori,%20Ansori&rft.date=2022-09-02&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=242&rft.pages=242-&rft.issn=2281-3993&rft.eissn=2281-4612&rft_id=info:doi/10.36941/ajis-2022-0139&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_36941_ajis_2022_0139%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |