Exploring the mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK composites in cervical spinal cages

In this study, our goal was to assess the suitability of a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and silicon nitride (Si3N4) polymer composite for antimicrobial three-dimensional (3D)-printed cervical cages. Generic cage designs (PEEK and 15 vol.% Si3N4-PEEK) were 3D-printed, including solid and porous cage...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of bioprinting 2024-02, Vol.10 (2), p.2124
Hauptverfasser: Basgul, Cemile, DeSantis, Paul, Derr, Tabitha, J. Hickok, Noreen, M. Bock, Ryan, M. Kurtz, Steven
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 2124
container_title International journal of bioprinting
container_volume 10
creator Basgul, Cemile
DeSantis, Paul
Derr, Tabitha
J. Hickok, Noreen
M. Bock, Ryan
M. Kurtz, Steven
description In this study, our goal was to assess the suitability of a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and silicon nitride (Si3N4) polymer composite for antimicrobial three-dimensional (3D)-printed cervical cages. Generic cage designs (PEEK and 15 vol.% Si3N4-PEEK) were 3D-printed, including solid and porous cage designs. Cages were tested in static compression, compression shear, and torsion per ASTM F2077. For antibacterial testing, virgin and composite filament samples were inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli. In vitro cell testing was conducted using MC3T3-E1 mouse preosteoblasts, where cell proliferation, cumulative mineralization, and osteogenic activity were measured. The 3D-printed PEEK and Si3N4-PEEK cages exhibited adequate mechanical strength for all designs, exceeding 14.7 kN in compression and 6.9 kN in compression shear. Si3N4-PEEK exhibited significantly lower bacterial adhesion levels, with a 93.9% reduction (1.21 log), and enhanced cell proliferation when compared to PEEK. Si3N4-PEEK would allow for custom fabrication of 3D-printed spinal implants that reduce the risk of infection compared to unfilled PEEK or metallic alloys.
doi_str_mv 10.36922/ijb.2124
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_36922_ijb_2124</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_36922_ijb_2124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c194t-af7a95692cdbf20b3ae05d4fbfe42f69fa27250ed548624d378169fd6bd6149c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGoX_oNsBacmmcxrKXV8YEEXuh4yebS3zCRDEor9H_5gU9vVuXwXzr3nIHRLyTIvG8YeYNcvGWX8As0YZzyrCWGX57mqWH6NFiHsSKI1JTSvZ-i3_ZkG58FucNxqPGq5FRakGHCIXttN3N5jYSOMIL3rIfFJe-P8KKzUx5XCPTghI-whHrAzOH_KpuQXtcIBBpDOYgvRg9LZZ9u-Y-nGyQWIOmCwWGq_P52bwCaRYqPDDboyYgh6cdY5-n5uv1av2frj5W31uM4kbXjMhKlEU6TgUvWGkT4XmhSKm95ozkzZGMEqVhCtCl6XjKu8qmmiquxVSXkj8zm6O_mmbCF4bbr0-Sj8oaOk-2-0S412x0bzP59KbI0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring the mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK composites in cervical spinal cages</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Basgul, Cemile ; DeSantis, Paul ; Derr, Tabitha ; J. Hickok, Noreen ; M. Bock, Ryan ; M. Kurtz, Steven</creator><creatorcontrib>Basgul, Cemile ; DeSantis, Paul ; Derr, Tabitha ; J. Hickok, Noreen ; M. Bock, Ryan ; M. Kurtz, Steven</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, our goal was to assess the suitability of a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and silicon nitride (Si3N4) polymer composite for antimicrobial three-dimensional (3D)-printed cervical cages. Generic cage designs (PEEK and 15 vol.% Si3N4-PEEK) were 3D-printed, including solid and porous cage designs. Cages were tested in static compression, compression shear, and torsion per ASTM F2077. For antibacterial testing, virgin and composite filament samples were inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli. In vitro cell testing was conducted using MC3T3-E1 mouse preosteoblasts, where cell proliferation, cumulative mineralization, and osteogenic activity were measured. The 3D-printed PEEK and Si3N4-PEEK cages exhibited adequate mechanical strength for all designs, exceeding 14.7 kN in compression and 6.9 kN in compression shear. Si3N4-PEEK exhibited significantly lower bacterial adhesion levels, with a 93.9% reduction (1.21 log), and enhanced cell proliferation when compared to PEEK. Si3N4-PEEK would allow for custom fabrication of 3D-printed spinal implants that reduce the risk of infection compared to unfilled PEEK or metallic alloys.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2424-7723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2424-8002</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.36922/ijb.2124</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International journal of bioprinting, 2024-02, Vol.10 (2), p.2124</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c194t-af7a95692cdbf20b3ae05d4fbfe42f69fa27250ed548624d378169fd6bd6149c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Basgul, Cemile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeSantis, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derr, Tabitha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J. Hickok, Noreen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M. Bock, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M. Kurtz, Steven</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring the mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK composites in cervical spinal cages</title><title>International journal of bioprinting</title><description>In this study, our goal was to assess the suitability of a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and silicon nitride (Si3N4) polymer composite for antimicrobial three-dimensional (3D)-printed cervical cages. Generic cage designs (PEEK and 15 vol.% Si3N4-PEEK) were 3D-printed, including solid and porous cage designs. Cages were tested in static compression, compression shear, and torsion per ASTM F2077. For antibacterial testing, virgin and composite filament samples were inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli. In vitro cell testing was conducted using MC3T3-E1 mouse preosteoblasts, where cell proliferation, cumulative mineralization, and osteogenic activity were measured. The 3D-printed PEEK and Si3N4-PEEK cages exhibited adequate mechanical strength for all designs, exceeding 14.7 kN in compression and 6.9 kN in compression shear. Si3N4-PEEK exhibited significantly lower bacterial adhesion levels, with a 93.9% reduction (1.21 log), and enhanced cell proliferation when compared to PEEK. Si3N4-PEEK would allow for custom fabrication of 3D-printed spinal implants that reduce the risk of infection compared to unfilled PEEK or metallic alloys.</description><issn>2424-7723</issn><issn>2424-8002</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGoX_oNsBacmmcxrKXV8YEEXuh4yebS3zCRDEor9H_5gU9vVuXwXzr3nIHRLyTIvG8YeYNcvGWX8As0YZzyrCWGX57mqWH6NFiHsSKI1JTSvZ-i3_ZkG58FucNxqPGq5FRakGHCIXttN3N5jYSOMIL3rIfFJe-P8KKzUx5XCPTghI-whHrAzOH_KpuQXtcIBBpDOYgvRg9LZZ9u-Y-nGyQWIOmCwWGq_P52bwCaRYqPDDboyYgh6cdY5-n5uv1av2frj5W31uM4kbXjMhKlEU6TgUvWGkT4XmhSKm95ozkzZGMEqVhCtCl6XjKu8qmmiquxVSXkj8zm6O_mmbCF4bbr0-Sj8oaOk-2-0S412x0bzP59KbI0</recordid><startdate>20240226</startdate><enddate>20240226</enddate><creator>Basgul, Cemile</creator><creator>DeSantis, Paul</creator><creator>Derr, Tabitha</creator><creator>J. Hickok, Noreen</creator><creator>M. Bock, Ryan</creator><creator>M. Kurtz, Steven</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240226</creationdate><title>Exploring the mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK composites in cervical spinal cages</title><author>Basgul, Cemile ; DeSantis, Paul ; Derr, Tabitha ; J. Hickok, Noreen ; M. Bock, Ryan ; M. Kurtz, Steven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c194t-af7a95692cdbf20b3ae05d4fbfe42f69fa27250ed548624d378169fd6bd6149c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Basgul, Cemile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeSantis, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derr, Tabitha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J. Hickok, Noreen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M. Bock, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M. Kurtz, Steven</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of bioprinting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Basgul, Cemile</au><au>DeSantis, Paul</au><au>Derr, Tabitha</au><au>J. Hickok, Noreen</au><au>M. Bock, Ryan</au><au>M. Kurtz, Steven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring the mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK composites in cervical spinal cages</atitle><jtitle>International journal of bioprinting</jtitle><date>2024-02-26</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>2124</spage><pages>2124-</pages><issn>2424-7723</issn><eissn>2424-8002</eissn><abstract>In this study, our goal was to assess the suitability of a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and silicon nitride (Si3N4) polymer composite for antimicrobial three-dimensional (3D)-printed cervical cages. Generic cage designs (PEEK and 15 vol.% Si3N4-PEEK) were 3D-printed, including solid and porous cage designs. Cages were tested in static compression, compression shear, and torsion per ASTM F2077. For antibacterial testing, virgin and composite filament samples were inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli. In vitro cell testing was conducted using MC3T3-E1 mouse preosteoblasts, where cell proliferation, cumulative mineralization, and osteogenic activity were measured. The 3D-printed PEEK and Si3N4-PEEK cages exhibited adequate mechanical strength for all designs, exceeding 14.7 kN in compression and 6.9 kN in compression shear. Si3N4-PEEK exhibited significantly lower bacterial adhesion levels, with a 93.9% reduction (1.21 log), and enhanced cell proliferation when compared to PEEK. Si3N4-PEEK would allow for custom fabrication of 3D-printed spinal implants that reduce the risk of infection compared to unfilled PEEK or metallic alloys.</abstract><doi>10.36922/ijb.2124</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2424-7723
ispartof International journal of bioprinting, 2024-02, Vol.10 (2), p.2124
issn 2424-7723
2424-8002
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_36922_ijb_2124
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
title Exploring the mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK composites in cervical spinal cages
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T12%3A11%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20the%20mechanical%20strength,%20antimicrobial%20performance,%20and%20bioactivity%20of%203D-printed%20silicon%20nitride-PEEK%20composites%20in%20cervical%20spinal%20cages&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20bioprinting&rft.au=Basgul,%20Cemile&rft.date=2024-02-26&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=2124&rft.pages=2124-&rft.issn=2424-7723&rft.eissn=2424-8002&rft_id=info:doi/10.36922/ijb.2124&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_36922_ijb_2124%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true