Anesthesia Approaches in the Interventional Radiology Unit: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Anesthesia Approaches in the Interventional Radiology Unit: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Objective: This study aimed to examine the anesthesia management in patients who underwent radiological intervention in the interventional radiology unit. Materials and Methods: 536 patients who underwent intervention in the interventional radiology unit between 2015-2021 were evaluated retrospectiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical Science and Discovery 2023-02, Vol.10 (2), p.45-51
Hauptverfasser: Balkaya, Ayşe Neslihan, Yılmaz, Canan, Kurtarangil, Aycan, Ata, Filiz, Karaca, İmran, Eminoğlu, Şermin, Setayeshi, Tirdat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue 2
container_start_page 45
container_title Medical Science and Discovery
container_volume 10
creator Balkaya, Ayşe Neslihan
Yılmaz, Canan
Kurtarangil, Aycan
Ata, Filiz
Karaca, İmran
Eminoğlu, Şermin
Setayeshi, Tirdat
description Objective: This study aimed to examine the anesthesia management in patients who underwent radiological intervention in the interventional radiology unit. Materials and Methods: 536 patients who underwent intervention in the interventional radiology unit between 2015-2021 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, American Society of Anesthesiology classification, diagnoses, interventional procedure, anesthesia method, anesthesia and interventional procedure times, anesthetic agents, intraoperative complications and postoperative hospitalization areas were recorded. Results: Of 536 patients with a mean age of 60.06±18.19, 4.3% were
doi_str_mv 10.36472/msd.v10i2.866
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_36472_msd_v10i2_866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_36472_msd_v10i2_866</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_36472_msd_v10i2_8663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj7tuwjAUhi1UJFBhZT4vkNRxgglsEaJqVy6zZZIDHCnYkW0i5e1xUYeunf6L9A0fY4uMp7ksVuLj7pu0zziJtJRyxKYiK8pElrl4-9MnbO49nXkhpeDr9XLKVGXQhxt60lB1nbO6jgPIQDzh2wR0PZpA1ugW9roh29rrACdDYQMV7DE46zusA_UIBzLXFpMt_mBwCI9mmLHxRbce57_5ztLP3XH7ldSR8w4vqnN0125QGVcvExVN1MtERZP838ATy81Tyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anesthesia Approaches in the Interventional Radiology Unit: A Retrospective Single-Center Study</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Balkaya, Ayşe Neslihan ; Yılmaz, Canan ; Kurtarangil, Aycan ; Ata, Filiz ; Karaca, İmran ; Eminoğlu, Şermin ; Setayeshi, Tirdat</creator><creatorcontrib>Balkaya, Ayşe Neslihan ; Yılmaz, Canan ; Kurtarangil, Aycan ; Ata, Filiz ; Karaca, İmran ; Eminoğlu, Şermin ; Setayeshi, Tirdat</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study aimed to examine the anesthesia management in patients who underwent radiological intervention in the interventional radiology unit. Materials and Methods: 536 patients who underwent intervention in the interventional radiology unit between 2015-2021 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, American Society of Anesthesiology classification, diagnoses, interventional procedure, anesthesia method, anesthesia and interventional procedure times, anesthetic agents, intraoperative complications and postoperative hospitalization areas were recorded. Results: Of 536 patients with a mean age of 60.06±18.19, 4.3% were &lt;18 years old, and 53.4% were male. 397 (74.1%) patients were admitted under emergency conditions, and ASA III (54.5%) was most commonly admitted. The most common intervention was thrombectomy (66%). General anesthesia (GA) (63.6%) was the most preferred anesthesia method in interventions, sedoanalgesia at 34.1% and monitored anesthesia care at 2.3%. Propofol was the most frequently preferred iv anesthetic in GA induction (79.5%), and sevoflurane, one of the inhaled agents, was used at a rate of 81.2%. The intubation exit rate of cases was 46.4%. The intensive care unit and postoperative care unit exit rate was 89.9% (n=482). The most common complication was hypotension (15.3%). Conclusion: The most appropriate anesthesia method should be selected for the patient's general condition, and the interventional procedure to improve the treatment results of patients,</description><identifier>ISSN: 2148-6832</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2148-6832</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.36472/msd.v10i2.866</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Medical Science and Discovery, 2023-02, Vol.10 (2), p.45-51</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balkaya, Ayşe Neslihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yılmaz, Canan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurtarangil, Aycan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ata, Filiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karaca, İmran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eminoğlu, Şermin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setayeshi, Tirdat</creatorcontrib><title>Anesthesia Approaches in the Interventional Radiology Unit: A Retrospective Single-Center Study</title><title>Medical Science and Discovery</title><description>Objective: This study aimed to examine the anesthesia management in patients who underwent radiological intervention in the interventional radiology unit. Materials and Methods: 536 patients who underwent intervention in the interventional radiology unit between 2015-2021 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, American Society of Anesthesiology classification, diagnoses, interventional procedure, anesthesia method, anesthesia and interventional procedure times, anesthetic agents, intraoperative complications and postoperative hospitalization areas were recorded. Results: Of 536 patients with a mean age of 60.06±18.19, 4.3% were &lt;18 years old, and 53.4% were male. 397 (74.1%) patients were admitted under emergency conditions, and ASA III (54.5%) was most commonly admitted. The most common intervention was thrombectomy (66%). General anesthesia (GA) (63.6%) was the most preferred anesthesia method in interventions, sedoanalgesia at 34.1% and monitored anesthesia care at 2.3%. Propofol was the most frequently preferred iv anesthetic in GA induction (79.5%), and sevoflurane, one of the inhaled agents, was used at a rate of 81.2%. The intubation exit rate of cases was 46.4%. The intensive care unit and postoperative care unit exit rate was 89.9% (n=482). The most common complication was hypotension (15.3%). Conclusion: The most appropriate anesthesia method should be selected for the patient's general condition, and the interventional procedure to improve the treatment results of patients,</description><issn>2148-6832</issn><issn>2148-6832</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVj7tuwjAUhi1UJFBhZT4vkNRxgglsEaJqVy6zZZIDHCnYkW0i5e1xUYeunf6L9A0fY4uMp7ksVuLj7pu0zziJtJRyxKYiK8pElrl4-9MnbO49nXkhpeDr9XLKVGXQhxt60lB1nbO6jgPIQDzh2wR0PZpA1ugW9roh29rrACdDYQMV7DE46zusA_UIBzLXFpMt_mBwCI9mmLHxRbce57_5ztLP3XH7ldSR8w4vqnN0125QGVcvExVN1MtERZP838ATy81Tyw</recordid><startdate>20230208</startdate><enddate>20230208</enddate><creator>Balkaya, Ayşe Neslihan</creator><creator>Yılmaz, Canan</creator><creator>Kurtarangil, Aycan</creator><creator>Ata, Filiz</creator><creator>Karaca, İmran</creator><creator>Eminoğlu, Şermin</creator><creator>Setayeshi, Tirdat</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230208</creationdate><title>Anesthesia Approaches in the Interventional Radiology Unit: A Retrospective Single-Center Study</title><author>Balkaya, Ayşe Neslihan ; Yılmaz, Canan ; Kurtarangil, Aycan ; Ata, Filiz ; Karaca, İmran ; Eminoğlu, Şermin ; Setayeshi, Tirdat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_36472_msd_v10i2_8663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balkaya, Ayşe Neslihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yılmaz, Canan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurtarangil, Aycan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ata, Filiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karaca, İmran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eminoğlu, Şermin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setayeshi, Tirdat</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical Science and Discovery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balkaya, Ayşe Neslihan</au><au>Yılmaz, Canan</au><au>Kurtarangil, Aycan</au><au>Ata, Filiz</au><au>Karaca, İmran</au><au>Eminoğlu, Şermin</au><au>Setayeshi, Tirdat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anesthesia Approaches in the Interventional Radiology Unit: A Retrospective Single-Center Study</atitle><jtitle>Medical Science and Discovery</jtitle><date>2023-02-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>45-51</pages><issn>2148-6832</issn><eissn>2148-6832</eissn><abstract>Objective: This study aimed to examine the anesthesia management in patients who underwent radiological intervention in the interventional radiology unit. Materials and Methods: 536 patients who underwent intervention in the interventional radiology unit between 2015-2021 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, American Society of Anesthesiology classification, diagnoses, interventional procedure, anesthesia method, anesthesia and interventional procedure times, anesthetic agents, intraoperative complications and postoperative hospitalization areas were recorded. Results: Of 536 patients with a mean age of 60.06±18.19, 4.3% were &lt;18 years old, and 53.4% were male. 397 (74.1%) patients were admitted under emergency conditions, and ASA III (54.5%) was most commonly admitted. The most common intervention was thrombectomy (66%). General anesthesia (GA) (63.6%) was the most preferred anesthesia method in interventions, sedoanalgesia at 34.1% and monitored anesthesia care at 2.3%. Propofol was the most frequently preferred iv anesthetic in GA induction (79.5%), and sevoflurane, one of the inhaled agents, was used at a rate of 81.2%. The intubation exit rate of cases was 46.4%. The intensive care unit and postoperative care unit exit rate was 89.9% (n=482). The most common complication was hypotension (15.3%). Conclusion: The most appropriate anesthesia method should be selected for the patient's general condition, and the interventional procedure to improve the treatment results of patients,</abstract><doi>10.36472/msd.v10i2.866</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2148-6832
ispartof Medical Science and Discovery, 2023-02, Vol.10 (2), p.45-51
issn 2148-6832
2148-6832
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_36472_msd_v10i2_866
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Anesthesia Approaches in the Interventional Radiology Unit: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A55%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anesthesia%20Approaches%20in%20the%20Interventional%20Radiology%20Unit:%20A%20Retrospective%20Single-Center%20Study&rft.jtitle=Medical%20Science%20and%20Discovery&rft.au=Balkaya,%20Ay%C5%9Fe%20Neslihan&rft.date=2023-02-08&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=45-51&rft.issn=2148-6832&rft.eissn=2148-6832&rft_id=info:doi/10.36472/msd.v10i2.866&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_36472_msd_v10i2_866%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true