Key Performance Indicators to Benchmark Hospital Information Systems – A Delphi Study

Objectives: To identify the key performance indicators for hospital information systems (HIS) that can be used for HIS benchmarking. Methods: A Delphi survey with one qualitative and two quantitative rounds. Forty-four HIS experts from health care IT practice and academia participated in all three r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Methods of information in medicine 2009-01, Vol.48 (6), p.508-518
Hauptverfasser: Hübner-Bloder, G., Ammenwerth, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 518
container_issue 6
container_start_page 508
container_title Methods of information in medicine
container_volume 48
creator Hübner-Bloder, G.
Ammenwerth, E.
description Objectives: To identify the key performance indicators for hospital information systems (HIS) that can be used for HIS benchmarking. Methods: A Delphi survey with one qualitative and two quantitative rounds. Forty-four HIS experts from health care IT practice and academia participated in all three rounds. Results: Seventy-seven performance indicators were identified and organized into eight categories: technical quality, software quality, architecture and interface quality, IT vendor quality, IT support and IT department quality, workflow support quality, IT outcome quality, and IT costs. The highest ranked indicators are related to clinical workflow support and user satisfaction. Isolated technical indicators or cost indicators were not seen as useful. The experts favored an interdisciplinary group of all the stakeholders, led by hospital management, to conduct the HIS benchmarking. They proposed benchmarking activities both in regular (annual) intervals as well as at defined events (for example after IT introduction). Most of the experts stated that in their institutions no HIS benchmarking activities are being performed at the moment. Conclusion: In the context of IT governance, IT benchmarking is gaining importance in the healthcare area. The found indicators reflect the view of health care IT professionals and researchers. Research is needed to further validate and operationalize key performance indicators, to provide an IT benchmarking framework, and to provide open repositories for a comparison of the HIS benchmarks of different hospitals.
doi_str_mv 10.3414/ME09-01-0044
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3414_ME09_01_0044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734176645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-ec10d4f3bebd9b58147c77441a784959d126af54ac4117d8c5d7e423474bef683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrFkMFu1DAQhiNERZfCjTPKjQOk2IkTJ8e2FFpRBFJBcLMce0JcEjt4HFa7p75DT9x4Np4EL7sCJMQZaSRL40-__vmS5AElhwWj7OmrU9JkhGaEMHYrWeQlpRkn5YfbyYKQvMpozsl-chfxihBS14TdSfZpUzdFXbJF8v4lrNI34DvnR2kVpOdWGyWD85gGlx6DVf0o_af0zOFkghwi8JMNxtn0coUBRky_X9-kR-kzGKbepJdh1qt7yV4nB4T7u_cgeff89O3JWXbx-sX5ydFFpqq8DBkoSjTrihZa3bRlTRlXnDNGJa9ZUzaa5pXsSiYVo5TrWpWaA8sLxlkLXVUXB8mjbe7k3ecZMIjRoIJhkBbcjIJHR7yqWBnJJ1tSeYfooROTN_G0laBEbEyKjUlBqNiYjPjDXfDcjqB_wzt1EXi8BUJvYARx5WZv46n_ivu2pVH1MgQ5g_8V2YcwieVyKf7407CZUX6Ua2NBzNCCR6P6INZgQgS96QJYIcVajBB6p1EoZ-MqoJBe9eZLlCGtll4LgzhD7EWKmGhnVN5MQdC8oFRg75axwTjEil__d0WcQBk5_NWy-AFhrPoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734176645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Key Performance Indicators to Benchmark Hospital Information Systems – A Delphi Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Hübner-Bloder, G. ; Ammenwerth, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hübner-Bloder, G. ; Ammenwerth, E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To identify the key performance indicators for hospital information systems (HIS) that can be used for HIS benchmarking. Methods: A Delphi survey with one qualitative and two quantitative rounds. Forty-four HIS experts from health care IT practice and academia participated in all three rounds. Results: Seventy-seven performance indicators were identified and organized into eight categories: technical quality, software quality, architecture and interface quality, IT vendor quality, IT support and IT department quality, workflow support quality, IT outcome quality, and IT costs. The highest ranked indicators are related to clinical workflow support and user satisfaction. Isolated technical indicators or cost indicators were not seen as useful. The experts favored an interdisciplinary group of all the stakeholders, led by hospital management, to conduct the HIS benchmarking. They proposed benchmarking activities both in regular (annual) intervals as well as at defined events (for example after IT introduction). Most of the experts stated that in their institutions no HIS benchmarking activities are being performed at the moment. Conclusion: In the context of IT governance, IT benchmarking is gaining importance in the healthcare area. The found indicators reflect the view of health care IT professionals and researchers. Research is needed to further validate and operationalize key performance indicators, to provide an IT benchmarking framework, and to provide open repositories for a comparison of the HIS benchmarks of different hospitals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-1270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2511-705X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3414/ME09-01-0044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19893854</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</publisher><subject>Austria ; Benchmarking ; Benchmarking - organization &amp; administration ; Delphi Technique ; Hospital Information Systems ; Hospital Information Systems - standards ; key performance indicators ; Medical Informatics ; Original Articles ; Quality indicators ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; user satisfaction</subject><ispartof>Methods of information in medicine, 2009-01, Vol.48 (6), p.508-518</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-ec10d4f3bebd9b58147c77441a784959d126af54ac4117d8c5d7e423474bef683</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.schattauer.de/typo3temp/pics/cover-1003_fc41f19545.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.3414/ME09-01-0044.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.3414/ME09-01-0044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3005,27901,27902,54534,54535</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19893854$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hübner-Bloder, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammenwerth, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Key Performance Indicators to Benchmark Hospital Information Systems – A Delphi Study</title><title>Methods of information in medicine</title><addtitle>Methods Inf Med</addtitle><description>Objectives: To identify the key performance indicators for hospital information systems (HIS) that can be used for HIS benchmarking. Methods: A Delphi survey with one qualitative and two quantitative rounds. Forty-four HIS experts from health care IT practice and academia participated in all three rounds. Results: Seventy-seven performance indicators were identified and organized into eight categories: technical quality, software quality, architecture and interface quality, IT vendor quality, IT support and IT department quality, workflow support quality, IT outcome quality, and IT costs. The highest ranked indicators are related to clinical workflow support and user satisfaction. Isolated technical indicators or cost indicators were not seen as useful. The experts favored an interdisciplinary group of all the stakeholders, led by hospital management, to conduct the HIS benchmarking. They proposed benchmarking activities both in regular (annual) intervals as well as at defined events (for example after IT introduction). Most of the experts stated that in their institutions no HIS benchmarking activities are being performed at the moment. Conclusion: In the context of IT governance, IT benchmarking is gaining importance in the healthcare area. The found indicators reflect the view of health care IT professionals and researchers. Research is needed to further validate and operationalize key performance indicators, to provide an IT benchmarking framework, and to provide open repositories for a comparison of the HIS benchmarks of different hospitals.</description><subject>Austria</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Benchmarking - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Hospital Information Systems</subject><subject>Hospital Information Systems - standards</subject><subject>key performance indicators</subject><subject>Medical Informatics</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Quality indicators</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>user satisfaction</subject><issn>0026-1270</issn><issn>2511-705X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNrFkMFu1DAQhiNERZfCjTPKjQOk2IkTJ8e2FFpRBFJBcLMce0JcEjt4HFa7p75DT9x4Np4EL7sCJMQZaSRL40-__vmS5AElhwWj7OmrU9JkhGaEMHYrWeQlpRkn5YfbyYKQvMpozsl-chfxihBS14TdSfZpUzdFXbJF8v4lrNI34DvnR2kVpOdWGyWD85gGlx6DVf0o_af0zOFkghwi8JMNxtn0coUBRky_X9-kR-kzGKbepJdh1qt7yV4nB4T7u_cgeff89O3JWXbx-sX5ydFFpqq8DBkoSjTrihZa3bRlTRlXnDNGJa9ZUzaa5pXsSiYVo5TrWpWaA8sLxlkLXVUXB8mjbe7k3ecZMIjRoIJhkBbcjIJHR7yqWBnJJ1tSeYfooROTN_G0laBEbEyKjUlBqNiYjPjDXfDcjqB_wzt1EXi8BUJvYARx5WZv46n_ivu2pVH1MgQ5g_8V2YcwieVyKf7407CZUX6Ua2NBzNCCR6P6INZgQgS96QJYIcVajBB6p1EoZ-MqoJBe9eZLlCGtll4LgzhD7EWKmGhnVN5MQdC8oFRg75axwTjEil__d0WcQBk5_NWy-AFhrPoQ</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Hübner-Bloder, G.</creator><creator>Ammenwerth, E.</creator><general>Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</general><general>Schattauer GmbH</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Key Performance Indicators to Benchmark Hospital Information Systems – A Delphi Study</title><author>Hübner-Bloder, G. ; Ammenwerth, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-ec10d4f3bebd9b58147c77441a784959d126af54ac4117d8c5d7e423474bef683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Austria</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Benchmarking - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Hospital Information Systems</topic><topic>Hospital Information Systems - standards</topic><topic>key performance indicators</topic><topic>Medical Informatics</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Quality indicators</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>user satisfaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hübner-Bloder, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammenwerth, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Methods of information in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hübner-Bloder, G.</au><au>Ammenwerth, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Key Performance Indicators to Benchmark Hospital Information Systems – A Delphi Study</atitle><jtitle>Methods of information in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Methods Inf Med</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>508</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>508-518</pages><issn>0026-1270</issn><eissn>2511-705X</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To identify the key performance indicators for hospital information systems (HIS) that can be used for HIS benchmarking. Methods: A Delphi survey with one qualitative and two quantitative rounds. Forty-four HIS experts from health care IT practice and academia participated in all three rounds. Results: Seventy-seven performance indicators were identified and organized into eight categories: technical quality, software quality, architecture and interface quality, IT vendor quality, IT support and IT department quality, workflow support quality, IT outcome quality, and IT costs. The highest ranked indicators are related to clinical workflow support and user satisfaction. Isolated technical indicators or cost indicators were not seen as useful. The experts favored an interdisciplinary group of all the stakeholders, led by hospital management, to conduct the HIS benchmarking. They proposed benchmarking activities both in regular (annual) intervals as well as at defined events (for example after IT introduction). Most of the experts stated that in their institutions no HIS benchmarking activities are being performed at the moment. Conclusion: In the context of IT governance, IT benchmarking is gaining importance in the healthcare area. The found indicators reflect the view of health care IT professionals and researchers. Research is needed to further validate and operationalize key performance indicators, to provide an IT benchmarking framework, and to provide open repositories for a comparison of the HIS benchmarks of different hospitals.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</pub><pmid>19893854</pmid><doi>10.3414/ME09-01-0044</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-1270
ispartof Methods of information in medicine, 2009-01, Vol.48 (6), p.508-518
issn 0026-1270
2511-705X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3414_ME09_01_0044
source MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals
subjects Austria
Benchmarking
Benchmarking - organization & administration
Delphi Technique
Hospital Information Systems
Hospital Information Systems - standards
key performance indicators
Medical Informatics
Original Articles
Quality indicators
Surveys and Questionnaires
user satisfaction
title Key Performance Indicators to Benchmark Hospital Information Systems – A Delphi Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T10%3A15%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Key%20Performance%20Indicators%20to%20Benchmark%20Hospital%20Information%20Systems%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Delphi%20Study&rft.jtitle=Methods%20of%20information%20in%20medicine&rft.au=H%C3%BCbner-Bloder,%20G.&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=508&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=508-518&rft.issn=0026-1270&rft.eissn=2511-705X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3414/ME09-01-0044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734176645%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734176645&rft_id=info:pmid/19893854&rfr_iscdi=true