Sustainability Assessment and Benchmarking in Higher Education Institutions-A Critical Reflection

Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in implementing practices for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). This implementation should be done in different dimensions according to a holistic and whole-school approach. Different tools have been adapted and developed to assess...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2020-01, Vol.12 (2), p.543, Article 543
Hauptverfasser: Caeiro, Sandra, Sandoval Hamon, Leyla Angelica, Martins, Rute, Bayas Aldaz, Cecilia Elizabeth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 543
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 12
creator Caeiro, Sandra
Sandoval Hamon, Leyla Angelica
Martins, Rute
Bayas Aldaz, Cecilia Elizabeth
description Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in implementing practices for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). This implementation should be done in different dimensions according to a holistic and whole-school approach. Different tools have been adapted and developed to assess this integrated approach. The aim of this research is to critically reflect the existing tools to assess and benchmark ESD implementation and to discuss their applicability in two case studies. Two public Universities in Southern Europe, with headquarters in the capitals of Portugal and Spain were selected to assess and compare the integration of ESD according to a whole-school approach-Universidade Aberta in Portugal and Universidad Autonoma de Madrid in Spain. After a critical analysis of the existing tools based on literature review and a list of criteria classified by experts, two tools were selected to be applied in the case studies. The online Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System Reporting Tool was used in Universidade Aberta and Green Metrics tool was used in Universidad Autonoma de Madrid. The tools were complemented with focus group with key-actors in both universities. The results obtained allowed to identify the need to define a common objective of the assessment tools and limitations they still have. The tools need improvements on their development namely to integrate the external impact of Higher Education Institutions on sustainability, to integrate participatory processes and to assess non-traditional aspects of sustainability. This research hopes to contribute to the continuous research about the usefulness of these assessment and benchmarking tools as drivers to HEIs improve their sustainability performance and their role as agents of changes.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su12020543
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3390_su12020543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2443212444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-734fe739cf01ea35a8ff6d91ff52edd9840ab798b6ae4cbaec2340652f5c86a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWGov_oKAN2U1X_t1rIvaQkHw47xks5M2dZutSRbpvze1oh6dw8wwvO8M8yB0Tsk15yW58QNlhJFU8CM0YiSnCSUpOf7Tn6KJ92sSg3Na0myE5PPggzRWNqYzYYen3oP3G7ABS9viW7BqtZHuzdglNhbPzHIFDt-1g5LB9BbPrQ8mDPveJ1NcOROMkh1-At2B2o_P0ImWnYfJdx2j1_u7l2qWLB4f5tV0kSjOeEhyLjTkvFSaUJA8lYXWWVtSrVMGbVsWgsgmL4smkyBUI0ExLkiWMp2qIpOUj9HFYe_W9e8D-FCv-8HZeLJmQnBGYxZRdXlQKdd770DXW2fig7uaknpPsf6lGMXFQfwBTa-9MpEG_BgixZRmBRMZIZTQyoQvJFU_2BCtV_-38k-sjIZS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2443212444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainability Assessment and Benchmarking in Higher Education Institutions-A Critical Reflection</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Caeiro, Sandra ; Sandoval Hamon, Leyla Angelica ; Martins, Rute ; Bayas Aldaz, Cecilia Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Caeiro, Sandra ; Sandoval Hamon, Leyla Angelica ; Martins, Rute ; Bayas Aldaz, Cecilia Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in implementing practices for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). This implementation should be done in different dimensions according to a holistic and whole-school approach. Different tools have been adapted and developed to assess this integrated approach. The aim of this research is to critically reflect the existing tools to assess and benchmark ESD implementation and to discuss their applicability in two case studies. Two public Universities in Southern Europe, with headquarters in the capitals of Portugal and Spain were selected to assess and compare the integration of ESD according to a whole-school approach-Universidade Aberta in Portugal and Universidad Autonoma de Madrid in Spain. After a critical analysis of the existing tools based on literature review and a list of criteria classified by experts, two tools were selected to be applied in the case studies. The online Sustainability Tracking, Assessment &amp; Rating System Reporting Tool was used in Universidade Aberta and Green Metrics tool was used in Universidad Autonoma de Madrid. The tools were complemented with focus group with key-actors in both universities. The results obtained allowed to identify the need to define a common objective of the assessment tools and limitations they still have. The tools need improvements on their development namely to integrate the external impact of Higher Education Institutions on sustainability, to integrate participatory processes and to assess non-traditional aspects of sustainability. This research hopes to contribute to the continuous research about the usefulness of these assessment and benchmarking tools as drivers to HEIs improve their sustainability performance and their role as agents of changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12020543</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BASEL: Mdpi</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Benchmarks ; Case studies ; College campuses ; Communication ; Core curriculum ; Distance learning ; Education ; Environmental education ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Environmental Studies ; Green & Sustainable Science & Technology ; Higher education ; Higher education institutions ; Institutions ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Literature reviews ; Science & Technology ; Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development]]></subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-01, Vol.12 (2), p.543, Article 543</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>71</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000516824600101</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-734fe739cf01ea35a8ff6d91ff52edd9840ab798b6ae4cbaec2340652f5c86a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-734fe739cf01ea35a8ff6d91ff52edd9840ab798b6ae4cbaec2340652f5c86a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1080-2974 ; 0000-0003-1213-8990 ; 0000-0001-5868-2778 ; 0000-0002-6079-3554</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,28253,28254</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caeiro, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandoval Hamon, Leyla Angelica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Rute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayas Aldaz, Cecilia Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainability Assessment and Benchmarking in Higher Education Institutions-A Critical Reflection</title><title>Sustainability</title><addtitle>SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL</addtitle><description>Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in implementing practices for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). This implementation should be done in different dimensions according to a holistic and whole-school approach. Different tools have been adapted and developed to assess this integrated approach. The aim of this research is to critically reflect the existing tools to assess and benchmark ESD implementation and to discuss their applicability in two case studies. Two public Universities in Southern Europe, with headquarters in the capitals of Portugal and Spain were selected to assess and compare the integration of ESD according to a whole-school approach-Universidade Aberta in Portugal and Universidad Autonoma de Madrid in Spain. After a critical analysis of the existing tools based on literature review and a list of criteria classified by experts, two tools were selected to be applied in the case studies. The online Sustainability Tracking, Assessment &amp; Rating System Reporting Tool was used in Universidade Aberta and Green Metrics tool was used in Universidad Autonoma de Madrid. The tools were complemented with focus group with key-actors in both universities. The results obtained allowed to identify the need to define a common objective of the assessment tools and limitations they still have. The tools need improvements on their development namely to integrate the external impact of Higher Education Institutions on sustainability, to integrate participatory processes and to assess non-traditional aspects of sustainability. This research hopes to contribute to the continuous research about the usefulness of these assessment and benchmarking tools as drivers to HEIs improve their sustainability performance and their role as agents of changes.</description><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>College campuses</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Core curriculum</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Environmental education</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Studies</subject><subject>Green &amp; Sustainable Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Higher education institutions</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWGov_oKAN2U1X_t1rIvaQkHw47xks5M2dZutSRbpvze1oh6dw8wwvO8M8yB0Tsk15yW58QNlhJFU8CM0YiSnCSUpOf7Tn6KJ92sSg3Na0myE5PPggzRWNqYzYYen3oP3G7ABS9viW7BqtZHuzdglNhbPzHIFDt-1g5LB9BbPrQ8mDPveJ1NcOROMkh1-At2B2o_P0ImWnYfJdx2j1_u7l2qWLB4f5tV0kSjOeEhyLjTkvFSaUJA8lYXWWVtSrVMGbVsWgsgmL4smkyBUI0ExLkiWMp2qIpOUj9HFYe_W9e8D-FCv-8HZeLJmQnBGYxZRdXlQKdd770DXW2fig7uaknpPsf6lGMXFQfwBTa-9MpEG_BgixZRmBRMZIZTQyoQvJFU_2BCtV_-38k-sjIZS</recordid><startdate>20200110</startdate><enddate>20200110</enddate><creator>Caeiro, Sandra</creator><creator>Sandoval Hamon, Leyla Angelica</creator><creator>Martins, Rute</creator><creator>Bayas Aldaz, Cecilia Elizabeth</creator><general>Mdpi</general><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1080-2974</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1213-8990</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5868-2778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6079-3554</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200110</creationdate><title>Sustainability Assessment and Benchmarking in Higher Education Institutions-A Critical Reflection</title><author>Caeiro, Sandra ; Sandoval Hamon, Leyla Angelica ; Martins, Rute ; Bayas Aldaz, Cecilia Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-734fe739cf01ea35a8ff6d91ff52edd9840ab798b6ae4cbaec2340652f5c86a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>College campuses</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Core curriculum</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Environmental education</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Studies</topic><topic>Green &amp; Sustainable Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Higher education institutions</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caeiro, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandoval Hamon, Leyla Angelica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Rute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayas Aldaz, Cecilia Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caeiro, Sandra</au><au>Sandoval Hamon, Leyla Angelica</au><au>Martins, Rute</au><au>Bayas Aldaz, Cecilia Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainability Assessment and Benchmarking in Higher Education Institutions-A Critical Reflection</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><stitle>SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL</stitle><date>2020-01-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>543</spage><pages>543-</pages><artnum>543</artnum><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in implementing practices for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). This implementation should be done in different dimensions according to a holistic and whole-school approach. Different tools have been adapted and developed to assess this integrated approach. The aim of this research is to critically reflect the existing tools to assess and benchmark ESD implementation and to discuss their applicability in two case studies. Two public Universities in Southern Europe, with headquarters in the capitals of Portugal and Spain were selected to assess and compare the integration of ESD according to a whole-school approach-Universidade Aberta in Portugal and Universidad Autonoma de Madrid in Spain. After a critical analysis of the existing tools based on literature review and a list of criteria classified by experts, two tools were selected to be applied in the case studies. The online Sustainability Tracking, Assessment &amp; Rating System Reporting Tool was used in Universidade Aberta and Green Metrics tool was used in Universidad Autonoma de Madrid. The tools were complemented with focus group with key-actors in both universities. The results obtained allowed to identify the need to define a common objective of the assessment tools and limitations they still have. The tools need improvements on their development namely to integrate the external impact of Higher Education Institutions on sustainability, to integrate participatory processes and to assess non-traditional aspects of sustainability. This research hopes to contribute to the continuous research about the usefulness of these assessment and benchmarking tools as drivers to HEIs improve their sustainability performance and their role as agents of changes.</abstract><cop>BASEL</cop><pub>Mdpi</pub><doi>10.3390/su12020543</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1080-2974</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1213-8990</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5868-2778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6079-3554</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2020-01, Vol.12 (2), p.543, Article 543
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3390_su12020543
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Benchmarks
Case studies
College campuses
Communication
Core curriculum
Distance learning
Education
Environmental education
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Environmental Studies
Green & Sustainable Science & Technology
Higher education
Higher education institutions
Institutions
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Literature reviews
Science & Technology
Science & Technology - Other Topics
Stakeholders
Sustainability
Sustainable development
title Sustainability Assessment and Benchmarking in Higher Education Institutions-A Critical Reflection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T09%3A04%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainability%20Assessment%20and%20Benchmarking%20in%20Higher%20Education%20Institutions-A%20Critical%20Reflection&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Caeiro,%20Sandra&rft.date=2020-01-10&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=543&rft.pages=543-&rft.artnum=543&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12020543&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2443212444%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2443212444&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true