Old and New Approaches in Rock Art: Using Animal Motifs to Identify Palaeohabitats
Humans are well known to have made paintings and engravings on rock surfaces, both geometric motifs with an unclear representation, and representative motifs that refer to their activities and aspects of their environment. This kind of art is widespread across time and space and has throughout histo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quaternary 2024-11, Vol.7 (4), p.48 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 48 |
container_title | Quaternary |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Korpershoek, Mirte Reynolds, Sally C. Budka, Marcin Riris, Philip |
description | Humans are well known to have made paintings and engravings on rock surfaces, both geometric motifs with an unclear representation, and representative motifs that refer to their activities and aspects of their environment. This kind of art is widespread across time and space and has throughout history been subjected to various kinds of approaches. Typically, rock art research focuses on its role in the development of the hominin brain and the capability of abstract thinking, as well as on interpreting representative and non-representative motifs. Ethnography and cognitive research have often stressed that rock art is the result of ritual practises and the expression of a shamanic belief system. However, representative motifs may also shed light on a region’s ecological and human prehistory. Here, we give an overview of the general development of rock art study: we highlight the development of artistic behaviour in humans by discussing aesthetic preferences, and the creation of simple geometric motifs and eventually representative motifs, before describing the theories that developed from the earliest study of rock art. These have largely focused on classification and interpretation of the motifs, and often centred on Palaeolithic material from Europe. We then move on to discuss how ethnography among rock art creating communities often suggests important relationships between specific animals in both the realms of spiritual belief systems and within the local environment. Lastly, we highlight how rock art reflects the local penecontemporaneous environment when it comes to depictions of animals, plants, technologies, humans and their activities. We argue that animal depictions are a useful subject to study on a large scale, as it is the most widespread representative motif, and the most appropriate subject to study when the goal is to draw conclusions on environmental changes. Rock art can fill gaps in the local archaeological record and generate new questions of it, but also offer new insights into the history of local human–animal interaction: animal species depicted and/or referred to in rock art are likely to have been a selection of spiritually important animals and a comparison to known information on human interactions with local species may reveal patterns among which animals are selected for local rock art depictions and which are not. Interregional comparison can in turn shed light on whether humans in general tend to ascribe meaning to the same ty |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/quat7040048 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3390_quat7040048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b461f70fa91d48df86b18e88cb081157</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3149723625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1678-a61c290820965d97c635eded8849f38ccacced8345ad0ca422829be9ccf8fca53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUdtKAzEUXETBUvvkDwR8lGoum2ziWyleCtVKseBbOJtLu3XdtMkW6d-7tSI-nTmHw8wwk2WXBN8wpvDtdgdtgXOMc3mS9SgvyJBz_H76D59ng5TWGGMquRC46GXzWW0RNBa9uC802mxiALNyCVUNmgfzgUaxvUOLVDVLNGqqT6jRc2grn1Ab0MS6psN79Ao1uLCCsmqhTRfZmYc6ucHv7GeLh_u38dNwOnucjEfToSGikEMQxFCFJcVKcKsKIxh31lkpc-WZNAaM6TaWc7DYQE6ppKp0yhgvvQHO-tnkyGsDrPUmdu7iXgeo9M8hxKWG2FamdrrMBfEF9qCIzaX1UpREOilNiSUhvOi4ro5cXQDbnUutXoddbDr7mpFcFZQJelC8Pn6ZGFKKzv-pEqwPHeh_HbBv0hx4nQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149723625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Old and New Approaches in Rock Art: Using Animal Motifs to Identify Palaeohabitats</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Korpershoek, Mirte ; Reynolds, Sally C. ; Budka, Marcin ; Riris, Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Korpershoek, Mirte ; Reynolds, Sally C. ; Budka, Marcin ; Riris, Philip</creatorcontrib><description>Humans are well known to have made paintings and engravings on rock surfaces, both geometric motifs with an unclear representation, and representative motifs that refer to their activities and aspects of their environment. This kind of art is widespread across time and space and has throughout history been subjected to various kinds of approaches. Typically, rock art research focuses on its role in the development of the hominin brain and the capability of abstract thinking, as well as on interpreting representative and non-representative motifs. Ethnography and cognitive research have often stressed that rock art is the result of ritual practises and the expression of a shamanic belief system. However, representative motifs may also shed light on a region’s ecological and human prehistory. Here, we give an overview of the general development of rock art study: we highlight the development of artistic behaviour in humans by discussing aesthetic preferences, and the creation of simple geometric motifs and eventually representative motifs, before describing the theories that developed from the earliest study of rock art. These have largely focused on classification and interpretation of the motifs, and often centred on Palaeolithic material from Europe. We then move on to discuss how ethnography among rock art creating communities often suggests important relationships between specific animals in both the realms of spiritual belief systems and within the local environment. Lastly, we highlight how rock art reflects the local penecontemporaneous environment when it comes to depictions of animals, plants, technologies, humans and their activities. We argue that animal depictions are a useful subject to study on a large scale, as it is the most widespread representative motif, and the most appropriate subject to study when the goal is to draw conclusions on environmental changes. Rock art can fill gaps in the local archaeological record and generate new questions of it, but also offer new insights into the history of local human–animal interaction: animal species depicted and/or referred to in rock art are likely to have been a selection of spiritually important animals and a comparison to known information on human interactions with local species may reveal patterns among which animals are selected for local rock art depictions and which are not. Interregional comparison can in turn shed light on whether humans in general tend to ascribe meaning to the same types of animals. We end the review with suggestions for future study, with a special role for computational methods, which are suitable for the analysis of large databases of visual imagery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2571-550X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2571-550X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/quat7040048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Aesthetics ; animal depictions ; Animal human relations ; Animal species ; Animals ; Cave art ; Engraving ; environmental change ; Environmental changes ; environmental studies ; Ethnography ; Hominids ; Mental task performance ; Petroglyphs ; rock art ; Rocks ; shamanism ; Visual system</subject><ispartof>Quaternary, 2024-11, Vol.7 (4), p.48</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1678-a61c290820965d97c635eded8849f38ccacced8345ad0ca422829be9ccf8fca53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6313-6405 ; 0000-0003-0158-6309</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korpershoek, Mirte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Sally C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budka, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riris, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Old and New Approaches in Rock Art: Using Animal Motifs to Identify Palaeohabitats</title><title>Quaternary</title><description>Humans are well known to have made paintings and engravings on rock surfaces, both geometric motifs with an unclear representation, and representative motifs that refer to their activities and aspects of their environment. This kind of art is widespread across time and space and has throughout history been subjected to various kinds of approaches. Typically, rock art research focuses on its role in the development of the hominin brain and the capability of abstract thinking, as well as on interpreting representative and non-representative motifs. Ethnography and cognitive research have often stressed that rock art is the result of ritual practises and the expression of a shamanic belief system. However, representative motifs may also shed light on a region’s ecological and human prehistory. Here, we give an overview of the general development of rock art study: we highlight the development of artistic behaviour in humans by discussing aesthetic preferences, and the creation of simple geometric motifs and eventually representative motifs, before describing the theories that developed from the earliest study of rock art. These have largely focused on classification and interpretation of the motifs, and often centred on Palaeolithic material from Europe. We then move on to discuss how ethnography among rock art creating communities often suggests important relationships between specific animals in both the realms of spiritual belief systems and within the local environment. Lastly, we highlight how rock art reflects the local penecontemporaneous environment when it comes to depictions of animals, plants, technologies, humans and their activities. We argue that animal depictions are a useful subject to study on a large scale, as it is the most widespread representative motif, and the most appropriate subject to study when the goal is to draw conclusions on environmental changes. Rock art can fill gaps in the local archaeological record and generate new questions of it, but also offer new insights into the history of local human–animal interaction: animal species depicted and/or referred to in rock art are likely to have been a selection of spiritually important animals and a comparison to known information on human interactions with local species may reveal patterns among which animals are selected for local rock art depictions and which are not. Interregional comparison can in turn shed light on whether humans in general tend to ascribe meaning to the same types of animals. We end the review with suggestions for future study, with a special role for computational methods, which are suitable for the analysis of large databases of visual imagery.</description><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>animal depictions</subject><subject>Animal human relations</subject><subject>Animal species</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cave art</subject><subject>Engraving</subject><subject>environmental change</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>environmental studies</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Hominids</subject><subject>Mental task performance</subject><subject>Petroglyphs</subject><subject>rock art</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>shamanism</subject><subject>Visual system</subject><issn>2571-550X</issn><issn>2571-550X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUdtKAzEUXETBUvvkDwR8lGoum2ziWyleCtVKseBbOJtLu3XdtMkW6d-7tSI-nTmHw8wwk2WXBN8wpvDtdgdtgXOMc3mS9SgvyJBz_H76D59ng5TWGGMquRC46GXzWW0RNBa9uC802mxiALNyCVUNmgfzgUaxvUOLVDVLNGqqT6jRc2grn1Ab0MS6psN79Ao1uLCCsmqhTRfZmYc6ucHv7GeLh_u38dNwOnucjEfToSGikEMQxFCFJcVKcKsKIxh31lkpc-WZNAaM6TaWc7DYQE6ppKp0yhgvvQHO-tnkyGsDrPUmdu7iXgeo9M8hxKWG2FamdrrMBfEF9qCIzaX1UpREOilNiSUhvOi4ro5cXQDbnUutXoddbDr7mpFcFZQJelC8Pn6ZGFKKzv-pEqwPHeh_HbBv0hx4nQ</recordid><startdate>20241107</startdate><enddate>20241107</enddate><creator>Korpershoek, Mirte</creator><creator>Reynolds, Sally C.</creator><creator>Budka, Marcin</creator><creator>Riris, Philip</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6313-6405</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0158-6309</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241107</creationdate><title>Old and New Approaches in Rock Art: Using Animal Motifs to Identify Palaeohabitats</title><author>Korpershoek, Mirte ; Reynolds, Sally C. ; Budka, Marcin ; Riris, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1678-a61c290820965d97c635eded8849f38ccacced8345ad0ca422829be9ccf8fca53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>animal depictions</topic><topic>Animal human relations</topic><topic>Animal species</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cave art</topic><topic>Engraving</topic><topic>environmental change</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>environmental studies</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Hominids</topic><topic>Mental task performance</topic><topic>Petroglyphs</topic><topic>rock art</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>shamanism</topic><topic>Visual system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korpershoek, Mirte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Sally C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budka, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riris, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Quaternary</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korpershoek, Mirte</au><au>Reynolds, Sally C.</au><au>Budka, Marcin</au><au>Riris, Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Old and New Approaches in Rock Art: Using Animal Motifs to Identify Palaeohabitats</atitle><jtitle>Quaternary</jtitle><date>2024-11-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>48</spage><pages>48-</pages><issn>2571-550X</issn><eissn>2571-550X</eissn><abstract>Humans are well known to have made paintings and engravings on rock surfaces, both geometric motifs with an unclear representation, and representative motifs that refer to their activities and aspects of their environment. This kind of art is widespread across time and space and has throughout history been subjected to various kinds of approaches. Typically, rock art research focuses on its role in the development of the hominin brain and the capability of abstract thinking, as well as on interpreting representative and non-representative motifs. Ethnography and cognitive research have often stressed that rock art is the result of ritual practises and the expression of a shamanic belief system. However, representative motifs may also shed light on a region’s ecological and human prehistory. Here, we give an overview of the general development of rock art study: we highlight the development of artistic behaviour in humans by discussing aesthetic preferences, and the creation of simple geometric motifs and eventually representative motifs, before describing the theories that developed from the earliest study of rock art. These have largely focused on classification and interpretation of the motifs, and often centred on Palaeolithic material from Europe. We then move on to discuss how ethnography among rock art creating communities often suggests important relationships between specific animals in both the realms of spiritual belief systems and within the local environment. Lastly, we highlight how rock art reflects the local penecontemporaneous environment when it comes to depictions of animals, plants, technologies, humans and their activities. We argue that animal depictions are a useful subject to study on a large scale, as it is the most widespread representative motif, and the most appropriate subject to study when the goal is to draw conclusions on environmental changes. Rock art can fill gaps in the local archaeological record and generate new questions of it, but also offer new insights into the history of local human–animal interaction: animal species depicted and/or referred to in rock art are likely to have been a selection of spiritually important animals and a comparison to known information on human interactions with local species may reveal patterns among which animals are selected for local rock art depictions and which are not. Interregional comparison can in turn shed light on whether humans in general tend to ascribe meaning to the same types of animals. We end the review with suggestions for future study, with a special role for computational methods, which are suitable for the analysis of large databases of visual imagery.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/quat7040048</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6313-6405</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0158-6309</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2571-550X |
ispartof | Quaternary, 2024-11, Vol.7 (4), p.48 |
issn | 2571-550X 2571-550X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_3390_quat7040048 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
subjects | Aesthetics animal depictions Animal human relations Animal species Animals Cave art Engraving environmental change Environmental changes environmental studies Ethnography Hominids Mental task performance Petroglyphs rock art Rocks shamanism Visual system |
title | Old and New Approaches in Rock Art: Using Animal Motifs to Identify Palaeohabitats |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A54%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Old%20and%20New%20Approaches%20in%20Rock%20Art:%20Using%20Animal%20Motifs%20to%20Identify%20Palaeohabitats&rft.jtitle=Quaternary&rft.au=Korpershoek,%20Mirte&rft.date=2024-11-07&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=48&rft.pages=48-&rft.issn=2571-550X&rft.eissn=2571-550X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/quat7040048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3149723625%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149723625&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b461f70fa91d48df86b18e88cb081157&rfr_iscdi=true |