Effect of a Misidentified Centre of a Type ASG Material Measure on the Determined Topographic Spatial Resolution of an Optical Point Sensor

The article presents the determination of the topographic spatial resolution of an optical point sensor. It is quantified by the lateral period limit DLIM measured on a type ASG material measure, also called (topographic) Siemens star, with a confocal sensor following both a radial measurement and e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Metrology 2022-03, Vol.2 (1), p.19-32
Hauptverfasser: Schaude, Janik, Gröschl, Andreas Christian, Hausotte, Tino
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 32
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title Metrology
container_volume 2
creator Schaude, Janik
Gröschl, Andreas Christian
Hausotte, Tino
description The article presents the determination of the topographic spatial resolution of an optical point sensor. It is quantified by the lateral period limit DLIM measured on a type ASG material measure, also called (topographic) Siemens star, with a confocal sensor following both a radial measurement and evaluation, as proposed by ISO 25178-70, and the measurement and subsequent evaluation of two line scans, proposed by the NPL Good Practice Guide. As will be shown, for the latter, an only slightly misidentified target centre of the Siemens star leads to quite significant errors of the determined DLIM. Remarkably, a misidentified target centre does not necessarily result in an overestimation of DLIM, but lower values might also be obtained. Therefore, a modified Good Practice Guide is proposed to determine DLIM more accurately, as it includes a thorough determination of the centre of the Siemens star as well. While the measurement and evaluation effort is increased slightly compared to the NPL Good Practice Guide, it is still much faster than a complete radial measurement and evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/metrology2010002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3390_metrology2010002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_3390_metrology2010002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1661-1907a61c0a06d635e8a48cb3a85d78c612189a71ac1c2678dd558d5f48daa1573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1OwzAQhC0EElXpnaNfIGDH-XGOVSkFqVURLedosdetURpHtnvIM_DSJCoHxGlH-82OtEPIPWcPQlTs8YTRu8Yd-pRxxlh6RSZpUYpEpll2_UffklkIX6NDVjwr0wn5XhqDKlJnKNCNDVZjG62xqOliUB4vZN93SOe7Fd1ARG-hoRuEcB5xS-MR6RMO-5Nth7u969zBQ3e0iu46iKP7HYNrztEO7jGvpdsuWjWAN2fbSHfYBufvyI2BJuDsd07Jx_Nyv3hJ1tvV62K-ThQvCp7wipVQcMWAFboQOUrIpPoUIHNdSlXwlMsKSg6Kq-FzqXWeS52bTGoAnpdiStglV3kXgkdTd96ewPc1Z_XYZ_2_T_EDEjxr_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of a Misidentified Centre of a Type ASG Material Measure on the Determined Topographic Spatial Resolution of an Optical Point Sensor</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Schaude, Janik ; Gröschl, Andreas Christian ; Hausotte, Tino</creator><creatorcontrib>Schaude, Janik ; Gröschl, Andreas Christian ; Hausotte, Tino</creatorcontrib><description>The article presents the determination of the topographic spatial resolution of an optical point sensor. It is quantified by the lateral period limit DLIM measured on a type ASG material measure, also called (topographic) Siemens star, with a confocal sensor following both a radial measurement and evaluation, as proposed by ISO 25178-70, and the measurement and subsequent evaluation of two line scans, proposed by the NPL Good Practice Guide. As will be shown, for the latter, an only slightly misidentified target centre of the Siemens star leads to quite significant errors of the determined DLIM. Remarkably, a misidentified target centre does not necessarily result in an overestimation of DLIM, but lower values might also be obtained. Therefore, a modified Good Practice Guide is proposed to determine DLIM more accurately, as it includes a thorough determination of the centre of the Siemens star as well. While the measurement and evaluation effort is increased slightly compared to the NPL Good Practice Guide, it is still much faster than a complete radial measurement and evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2673-8244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2673-8244</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/metrology2010002</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Metrology, 2022-03, Vol.2 (1), p.19-32</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1661-1907a61c0a06d635e8a48cb3a85d78c612189a71ac1c2678dd558d5f48daa1573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1661-1907a61c0a06d635e8a48cb3a85d78c612189a71ac1c2678dd558d5f48daa1573</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5414-9394 ; 0000-0002-2923-3217</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schaude, Janik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gröschl, Andreas Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hausotte, Tino</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of a Misidentified Centre of a Type ASG Material Measure on the Determined Topographic Spatial Resolution of an Optical Point Sensor</title><title>Metrology</title><description>The article presents the determination of the topographic spatial resolution of an optical point sensor. It is quantified by the lateral period limit DLIM measured on a type ASG material measure, also called (topographic) Siemens star, with a confocal sensor following both a radial measurement and evaluation, as proposed by ISO 25178-70, and the measurement and subsequent evaluation of two line scans, proposed by the NPL Good Practice Guide. As will be shown, for the latter, an only slightly misidentified target centre of the Siemens star leads to quite significant errors of the determined DLIM. Remarkably, a misidentified target centre does not necessarily result in an overestimation of DLIM, but lower values might also be obtained. Therefore, a modified Good Practice Guide is proposed to determine DLIM more accurately, as it includes a thorough determination of the centre of the Siemens star as well. While the measurement and evaluation effort is increased slightly compared to the NPL Good Practice Guide, it is still much faster than a complete radial measurement and evaluation.</description><issn>2673-8244</issn><issn>2673-8244</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkM1OwzAQhC0EElXpnaNfIGDH-XGOVSkFqVURLedosdetURpHtnvIM_DSJCoHxGlH-82OtEPIPWcPQlTs8YTRu8Yd-pRxxlh6RSZpUYpEpll2_UffklkIX6NDVjwr0wn5XhqDKlJnKNCNDVZjG62xqOliUB4vZN93SOe7Fd1ARG-hoRuEcB5xS-MR6RMO-5Nth7u969zBQ3e0iu46iKP7HYNrztEO7jGvpdsuWjWAN2fbSHfYBufvyI2BJuDsd07Jx_Nyv3hJ1tvV62K-ThQvCp7wipVQcMWAFboQOUrIpPoUIHNdSlXwlMsKSg6Kq-FzqXWeS52bTGoAnpdiStglV3kXgkdTd96ewPc1Z_XYZ_2_T_EDEjxr_g</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Schaude, Janik</creator><creator>Gröschl, Andreas Christian</creator><creator>Hausotte, Tino</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5414-9394</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2923-3217</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Effect of a Misidentified Centre of a Type ASG Material Measure on the Determined Topographic Spatial Resolution of an Optical Point Sensor</title><author>Schaude, Janik ; Gröschl, Andreas Christian ; Hausotte, Tino</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1661-1907a61c0a06d635e8a48cb3a85d78c612189a71ac1c2678dd558d5f48daa1573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schaude, Janik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gröschl, Andreas Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hausotte, Tino</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Metrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schaude, Janik</au><au>Gröschl, Andreas Christian</au><au>Hausotte, Tino</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of a Misidentified Centre of a Type ASG Material Measure on the Determined Topographic Spatial Resolution of an Optical Point Sensor</atitle><jtitle>Metrology</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>19-32</pages><issn>2673-8244</issn><eissn>2673-8244</eissn><abstract>The article presents the determination of the topographic spatial resolution of an optical point sensor. It is quantified by the lateral period limit DLIM measured on a type ASG material measure, also called (topographic) Siemens star, with a confocal sensor following both a radial measurement and evaluation, as proposed by ISO 25178-70, and the measurement and subsequent evaluation of two line scans, proposed by the NPL Good Practice Guide. As will be shown, for the latter, an only slightly misidentified target centre of the Siemens star leads to quite significant errors of the determined DLIM. Remarkably, a misidentified target centre does not necessarily result in an overestimation of DLIM, but lower values might also be obtained. Therefore, a modified Good Practice Guide is proposed to determine DLIM more accurately, as it includes a thorough determination of the centre of the Siemens star as well. While the measurement and evaluation effort is increased slightly compared to the NPL Good Practice Guide, it is still much faster than a complete radial measurement and evaluation.</abstract><doi>10.3390/metrology2010002</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5414-9394</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2923-3217</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2673-8244
ispartof Metrology, 2022-03, Vol.2 (1), p.19-32
issn 2673-8244
2673-8244
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3390_metrology2010002
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
title Effect of a Misidentified Centre of a Type ASG Material Measure on the Determined Topographic Spatial Resolution of an Optical Point Sensor
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A23%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20a%20Misidentified%20Centre%20of%20a%20Type%20ASG%20Material%20Measure%20on%20the%20Determined%20Topographic%20Spatial%20Resolution%20of%20an%20Optical%20Point%20Sensor&rft.jtitle=Metrology&rft.au=Schaude,%20Janik&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=19-32&rft.issn=2673-8244&rft.eissn=2673-8244&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/metrology2010002&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_3390_metrology2010002%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true