Deep-Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation of Head and Neck Organs for Radiation Therapy in Dogs

Purpose: This study was conducted to develop a deep learning-based automatic segmentation (DLBAS) model of head and neck organs for radiotherapy (RT) in dogs, and to evaluate the feasibility for delineating the RT planning. Materials and Methods: The segmentation indicated that there were potentiall...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in veterinary science 2021-09, Vol.8
Hauptverfasser: Park, Jeongsu, Choi, Byoungsu, Ko, Jaeeun, Chun, Jaehee, Park, Inkyung, Lee, Juyoung, Kim, Jayon, Kim, Jaehwan, Eom, Kidong, Kim, Jin Sung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Frontiers in veterinary science
container_volume 8
creator Park, Jeongsu
Choi, Byoungsu
Ko, Jaeeun
Chun, Jaehee
Park, Inkyung
Lee, Juyoung
Kim, Jayon
Kim, Jaehwan
Eom, Kidong
Kim, Jin Sung
description Purpose: This study was conducted to develop a deep learning-based automatic segmentation (DLBAS) model of head and neck organs for radiotherapy (RT) in dogs, and to evaluate the feasibility for delineating the RT planning. Materials and Methods: The segmentation indicated that there were potentially 15 organs at risk (OARs) in the head and neck of dogs. Post-contrast computed tomography (CT) was performed in 90 dogs. The training and validation sets comprised 80 CT data sets, including 20 test sets. The accuracy of the segmentation was assessed using both the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the Hausdorff distance (HD), and by referencing the expert contours as the ground truth. An additional 10 clinical test sets with relatively large displacement or deformation of organs were selected for verification in cancer patients. To evaluate the applicability in cancer patients, and the impact of expert intervention, three methods–HA, DLBAS, and the readjustment of the predicted data obtained via the DLBAS of the clinical test sets (HA_DLBAS)–were compared. Results: The DLBAS model (in the 20 test sets) showed reliable DSC and HD values; it also had a short contouring time of ~3 s. The average (mean ± standard deviation) DSC (0.83 ± 0.04) and HD (2.71 ± 1.01 mm) values were similar to those of previous human studies. The DLBAS was highly accurate and had no large displacement of head and neck organs. However, the DLBAS in the 10 clinical test sets showed lower DSC (0.78 ± 0.11) and higher HD (4.30 ± 3.69 mm) values than those of the test sets. The HA_DLBAS was comparable to both the HA (DSC: 0.85 ± 0.06 and HD: 2.74 ± 1.18 mm) and DLBAS presented better comparison metrics and decreased statistical deviations (DSC: 0.94 ± 0.03 and HD: 2.30 ± 0.41 mm). In addition, the contouring time of HA_DLBAS (30 min) was less than that of HA (80 min). Conclusion: In conclusion, HA_DLBAS method and the proposed DLBAS was highly consistent and robust in its performance. Thus, DLBAS has great potential as a single or supportive tool to the key process in RT planning.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fvets.2021.721612
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2021_721612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_77f4a431a15d43fbb5b1de3f18104e87</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8450455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b3bc7fb97f39bd5dc5541a957b35a5304aafb2ef5e024a4b442dfa0854742b843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkdtKxDAQhoMoKuoDeJcX6JqjaW8EzwqLgofrOGkmtbrbLEkVfHujFdGrGebwwf__hOxzNpOybg7CO455JpjgMyP4IRdrZFuIxlTcHDbrf_otspfzC2OMa2VkzTbJllRal7XeJk9niKtqjpCGfuiqE8jo6fHbGJcw9i29x26Jw1j6ONAY6BWCpzB4eoPtK71NHQyZhpjoHfh-unp4xgSrD9oP9Cx2eZdsBFhk3PupO-Tx4vzh9Kqa315enx7Pq1axZqycdK0JrjFBNs5r32qtODTaOKlBS6YAghMYNDKhQDmlhA_A6iJJCVcruUOuJ66P8GJXqV9C-rARevs9iKmzkIqkBVpjQkFIDlx7JYNz2nGPMvCaM4W1KayjibV6c0v0bXEgweIf9P9m6J9tF99trTQr1hYAnwBtijknDL-_nNmv9Ox3evYrPTulJz8BVwaOBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deep-Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation of Head and Neck Organs for Radiation Therapy in Dogs</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Park, Jeongsu ; Choi, Byoungsu ; Ko, Jaeeun ; Chun, Jaehee ; Park, Inkyung ; Lee, Juyoung ; Kim, Jayon ; Kim, Jaehwan ; Eom, Kidong ; Kim, Jin Sung</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Jeongsu ; Choi, Byoungsu ; Ko, Jaeeun ; Chun, Jaehee ; Park, Inkyung ; Lee, Juyoung ; Kim, Jayon ; Kim, Jaehwan ; Eom, Kidong ; Kim, Jin Sung</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: This study was conducted to develop a deep learning-based automatic segmentation (DLBAS) model of head and neck organs for radiotherapy (RT) in dogs, and to evaluate the feasibility for delineating the RT planning. Materials and Methods: The segmentation indicated that there were potentially 15 organs at risk (OARs) in the head and neck of dogs. Post-contrast computed tomography (CT) was performed in 90 dogs. The training and validation sets comprised 80 CT data sets, including 20 test sets. The accuracy of the segmentation was assessed using both the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the Hausdorff distance (HD), and by referencing the expert contours as the ground truth. An additional 10 clinical test sets with relatively large displacement or deformation of organs were selected for verification in cancer patients. To evaluate the applicability in cancer patients, and the impact of expert intervention, three methods–HA, DLBAS, and the readjustment of the predicted data obtained via the DLBAS of the clinical test sets (HA_DLBAS)–were compared. Results: The DLBAS model (in the 20 test sets) showed reliable DSC and HD values; it also had a short contouring time of ~3 s. The average (mean ± standard deviation) DSC (0.83 ± 0.04) and HD (2.71 ± 1.01 mm) values were similar to those of previous human studies. The DLBAS was highly accurate and had no large displacement of head and neck organs. However, the DLBAS in the 10 clinical test sets showed lower DSC (0.78 ± 0.11) and higher HD (4.30 ± 3.69 mm) values than those of the test sets. The HA_DLBAS was comparable to both the HA (DSC: 0.85 ± 0.06 and HD: 2.74 ± 1.18 mm) and DLBAS presented better comparison metrics and decreased statistical deviations (DSC: 0.94 ± 0.03 and HD: 2.30 ± 0.41 mm). In addition, the contouring time of HA_DLBAS (30 min) was less than that of HA (80 min). Conclusion: In conclusion, HA_DLBAS method and the proposed DLBAS was highly consistent and robust in its performance. Thus, DLBAS has great potential as a single or supportive tool to the key process in RT planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2297-1769</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2297-1769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.721612</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34552975</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>artificial intelligence ; deep-learning-based automatic segmentation ; dog head and neck ; head and neck cancer ; radiation therapy ; Veterinary Science</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021-09, Vol.8</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Park, Choi, Ko, Chun, Park, Lee, Kim, Kim, Eom and Kim. 2021 Park, Choi, Ko, Chun, Park, Lee, Kim, Kim, Eom and Kim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b3bc7fb97f39bd5dc5541a957b35a5304aafb2ef5e024a4b442dfa0854742b843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b3bc7fb97f39bd5dc5541a957b35a5304aafb2ef5e024a4b442dfa0854742b843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450455/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450455/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Jeongsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Byoungsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Jaeeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chun, Jaehee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Inkyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Juyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jayon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jaehwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eom, Kidong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin Sung</creatorcontrib><title>Deep-Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation of Head and Neck Organs for Radiation Therapy in Dogs</title><title>Frontiers in veterinary science</title><description>Purpose: This study was conducted to develop a deep learning-based automatic segmentation (DLBAS) model of head and neck organs for radiotherapy (RT) in dogs, and to evaluate the feasibility for delineating the RT planning. Materials and Methods: The segmentation indicated that there were potentially 15 organs at risk (OARs) in the head and neck of dogs. Post-contrast computed tomography (CT) was performed in 90 dogs. The training and validation sets comprised 80 CT data sets, including 20 test sets. The accuracy of the segmentation was assessed using both the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the Hausdorff distance (HD), and by referencing the expert contours as the ground truth. An additional 10 clinical test sets with relatively large displacement or deformation of organs were selected for verification in cancer patients. To evaluate the applicability in cancer patients, and the impact of expert intervention, three methods–HA, DLBAS, and the readjustment of the predicted data obtained via the DLBAS of the clinical test sets (HA_DLBAS)–were compared. Results: The DLBAS model (in the 20 test sets) showed reliable DSC and HD values; it also had a short contouring time of ~3 s. The average (mean ± standard deviation) DSC (0.83 ± 0.04) and HD (2.71 ± 1.01 mm) values were similar to those of previous human studies. The DLBAS was highly accurate and had no large displacement of head and neck organs. However, the DLBAS in the 10 clinical test sets showed lower DSC (0.78 ± 0.11) and higher HD (4.30 ± 3.69 mm) values than those of the test sets. The HA_DLBAS was comparable to both the HA (DSC: 0.85 ± 0.06 and HD: 2.74 ± 1.18 mm) and DLBAS presented better comparison metrics and decreased statistical deviations (DSC: 0.94 ± 0.03 and HD: 2.30 ± 0.41 mm). In addition, the contouring time of HA_DLBAS (30 min) was less than that of HA (80 min). Conclusion: In conclusion, HA_DLBAS method and the proposed DLBAS was highly consistent and robust in its performance. Thus, DLBAS has great potential as a single or supportive tool to the key process in RT planning.</description><subject>artificial intelligence</subject><subject>deep-learning-based automatic segmentation</subject><subject>dog head and neck</subject><subject>head and neck cancer</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Veterinary Science</subject><issn>2297-1769</issn><issn>2297-1769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkdtKxDAQhoMoKuoDeJcX6JqjaW8EzwqLgofrOGkmtbrbLEkVfHujFdGrGebwwf__hOxzNpOybg7CO455JpjgMyP4IRdrZFuIxlTcHDbrf_otspfzC2OMa2VkzTbJllRal7XeJk9niKtqjpCGfuiqE8jo6fHbGJcw9i29x26Jw1j6ONAY6BWCpzB4eoPtK71NHQyZhpjoHfh-unp4xgSrD9oP9Cx2eZdsBFhk3PupO-Tx4vzh9Kqa315enx7Pq1axZqycdK0JrjFBNs5r32qtODTaOKlBS6YAghMYNDKhQDmlhA_A6iJJCVcruUOuJ66P8GJXqV9C-rARevs9iKmzkIqkBVpjQkFIDlx7JYNz2nGPMvCaM4W1KayjibV6c0v0bXEgweIf9P9m6J9tF99trTQr1hYAnwBtijknDL-_nNmv9Ox3evYrPTulJz8BVwaOBQ</recordid><startdate>20210906</startdate><enddate>20210906</enddate><creator>Park, Jeongsu</creator><creator>Choi, Byoungsu</creator><creator>Ko, Jaeeun</creator><creator>Chun, Jaehee</creator><creator>Park, Inkyung</creator><creator>Lee, Juyoung</creator><creator>Kim, Jayon</creator><creator>Kim, Jaehwan</creator><creator>Eom, Kidong</creator><creator>Kim, Jin Sung</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210906</creationdate><title>Deep-Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation of Head and Neck Organs for Radiation Therapy in Dogs</title><author>Park, Jeongsu ; Choi, Byoungsu ; Ko, Jaeeun ; Chun, Jaehee ; Park, Inkyung ; Lee, Juyoung ; Kim, Jayon ; Kim, Jaehwan ; Eom, Kidong ; Kim, Jin Sung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b3bc7fb97f39bd5dc5541a957b35a5304aafb2ef5e024a4b442dfa0854742b843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>artificial intelligence</topic><topic>deep-learning-based automatic segmentation</topic><topic>dog head and neck</topic><topic>head and neck cancer</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Veterinary Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Jeongsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Byoungsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Jaeeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chun, Jaehee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Inkyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Juyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jayon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jaehwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eom, Kidong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin Sung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in veterinary science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Jeongsu</au><au>Choi, Byoungsu</au><au>Ko, Jaeeun</au><au>Chun, Jaehee</au><au>Park, Inkyung</au><au>Lee, Juyoung</au><au>Kim, Jayon</au><au>Kim, Jaehwan</au><au>Eom, Kidong</au><au>Kim, Jin Sung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deep-Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation of Head and Neck Organs for Radiation Therapy in Dogs</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in veterinary science</jtitle><date>2021-09-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>8</volume><issn>2297-1769</issn><eissn>2297-1769</eissn><abstract>Purpose: This study was conducted to develop a deep learning-based automatic segmentation (DLBAS) model of head and neck organs for radiotherapy (RT) in dogs, and to evaluate the feasibility for delineating the RT planning. Materials and Methods: The segmentation indicated that there were potentially 15 organs at risk (OARs) in the head and neck of dogs. Post-contrast computed tomography (CT) was performed in 90 dogs. The training and validation sets comprised 80 CT data sets, including 20 test sets. The accuracy of the segmentation was assessed using both the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the Hausdorff distance (HD), and by referencing the expert contours as the ground truth. An additional 10 clinical test sets with relatively large displacement or deformation of organs were selected for verification in cancer patients. To evaluate the applicability in cancer patients, and the impact of expert intervention, three methods–HA, DLBAS, and the readjustment of the predicted data obtained via the DLBAS of the clinical test sets (HA_DLBAS)–were compared. Results: The DLBAS model (in the 20 test sets) showed reliable DSC and HD values; it also had a short contouring time of ~3 s. The average (mean ± standard deviation) DSC (0.83 ± 0.04) and HD (2.71 ± 1.01 mm) values were similar to those of previous human studies. The DLBAS was highly accurate and had no large displacement of head and neck organs. However, the DLBAS in the 10 clinical test sets showed lower DSC (0.78 ± 0.11) and higher HD (4.30 ± 3.69 mm) values than those of the test sets. The HA_DLBAS was comparable to both the HA (DSC: 0.85 ± 0.06 and HD: 2.74 ± 1.18 mm) and DLBAS presented better comparison metrics and decreased statistical deviations (DSC: 0.94 ± 0.03 and HD: 2.30 ± 0.41 mm). In addition, the contouring time of HA_DLBAS (30 min) was less than that of HA (80 min). Conclusion: In conclusion, HA_DLBAS method and the proposed DLBAS was highly consistent and robust in its performance. Thus, DLBAS has great potential as a single or supportive tool to the key process in RT planning.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>34552975</pmid><doi>10.3389/fvets.2021.721612</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2297-1769
ispartof Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021-09, Vol.8
issn 2297-1769
2297-1769
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2021_721612
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects artificial intelligence
deep-learning-based automatic segmentation
dog head and neck
head and neck cancer
radiation therapy
Veterinary Science
title Deep-Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation of Head and Neck Organs for Radiation Therapy in Dogs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A44%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep-Learning-Based%20Automatic%20Segmentation%20of%20Head%20and%20Neck%20Organs%20for%20Radiation%20Therapy%20in%20Dogs&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20veterinary%20science&rft.au=Park,%20Jeongsu&rft.date=2021-09-06&rft.volume=8&rft.issn=2297-1769&rft.eissn=2297-1769&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fvets.2021.721612&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_doaj_%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8450455%3C/pubmedcentral_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/34552975&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_77f4a431a15d43fbb5b1de3f18104e87&rfr_iscdi=true