Stinging nettle and neem enhance antibody response to local killed and imported live infectious bursal disease vaccines in indigenous chicken in Kenya
Abstract Immune responses are critical for protection of chickens from infectious bursal disease (IBD). In this study, the antibody response-enhancing effect of drinking water supplementation of 1% stinging nettle and neem on different IBD vaccines and vaccination regimes was evaluated, using 36 (n...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Poultry science 2018-02, Vol.97 (2), p.447-454 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 454 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 447 |
container_title | Poultry science |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Bwana, M O Njagi, L W Nyaga, P N Mbuthia, P G Bebora, L C Wahome, M W Mutinda, W U Kitala, P M |
description | Abstract
Immune responses are critical for protection of chickens from infectious bursal disease (IBD). In this study, the antibody response-enhancing effect of drinking water supplementation of 1% stinging nettle and neem on different IBD vaccines and vaccination regimes was evaluated, using 36 (n = 36) specific antibody negative indigenous chicks. The birds were allocated into 3 groups as follows: 1A-C, 2A-C, and 3A-B, while group 3C acted as the unvaccinated non-supplemented control. A local inactivated K1 and imported live attenuated D78 IBD vaccines were given to groups 1A-C and 3A-B at 14 and 28 d of age, respectively. A combination of K1 and D78 vaccines was given 30 d apart to groups 2A and 2B (D78 at 14 and 21 d and K1 at 44 d of age) and on the same d to group 2C at 14 and 28 d of age. Stinging nettle was given in water to groups 1B, 2B, and 2C, and neem to groups 1C, 2A, and 3B. Birds were bled weekly and immune responses monitored using indirect ELISA. Both neem and stinging nettle had antibody response-enhancing effects in groups 1B and 1C, receiving the local inactivated K1 vaccine. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in antibody titers between groups 1A and 2C. Stinging nettle induced earlier onset of high antibody responses in group 2C and persistent titers (>3.8 log10) from the third week in group 2B. Imported live D78 vaccine induced higher antibody titers compared to the local inactivated K1 vaccine. Groups 2B and 2C receiving a combination of the local K1 and imported live attenuated D78 vaccines had the highest antibody titers. Adoption of stinging nettle supplementation and a prime-boost program involving use of a local virus isolates-derived vaccine is recommended. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3382/ps/pex329 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_pex329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.3382/ps/pex329</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.3382/ps/pex329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-5460958b464da4b8bd1963d3f0aaf5720954d0c55ce432e1d9f3bb1588b470f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EoqUw8ALIAwtDqC9xLiOquIlKDMAcOfZJa5o4VpxW9EV4XhwCjEhHOrfv_4cfoXNKrjnP2Nz5uYMPzvIDNKWCiYjTlB6iKSGcRSLN6QSdeP9OCKNJkh6jCcsZpTmNp-jzpTd2FQpb6PsasLQ6jNBgsGtp1XDoTdnqPe7Au9Z6wH2L61bJGm9MXYP-lpjGtV0fltrsABtbgepNu_W43HY-oNp4kEG7k0oZCz4gobRZgR0otTZqA8MJP4Hdy1N0VMnaw9lPn6G3u9vXxUO0fL5_XNwsI8XjvI9EnJBcZGWcxFrGZVZqmidc84pIWYmUhWesiRJCQcwZUJ1XvCypyIIkJRXnM3Q1-qqu9b6DqnCdaWS3LygphmwL54sx28BejKzblg3oP_I3zABcjkC7df_4fAExQoUO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stinging nettle and neem enhance antibody response to local killed and imported live infectious bursal disease vaccines in indigenous chicken in Kenya</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bwana, M O ; Njagi, L W ; Nyaga, P N ; Mbuthia, P G ; Bebora, L C ; Wahome, M W ; Mutinda, W U ; Kitala, P M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bwana, M O ; Njagi, L W ; Nyaga, P N ; Mbuthia, P G ; Bebora, L C ; Wahome, M W ; Mutinda, W U ; Kitala, P M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Immune responses are critical for protection of chickens from infectious bursal disease (IBD). In this study, the antibody response-enhancing effect of drinking water supplementation of 1% stinging nettle and neem on different IBD vaccines and vaccination regimes was evaluated, using 36 (n = 36) specific antibody negative indigenous chicks. The birds were allocated into 3 groups as follows: 1A-C, 2A-C, and 3A-B, while group 3C acted as the unvaccinated non-supplemented control. A local inactivated K1 and imported live attenuated D78 IBD vaccines were given to groups 1A-C and 3A-B at 14 and 28 d of age, respectively. A combination of K1 and D78 vaccines was given 30 d apart to groups 2A and 2B (D78 at 14 and 21 d and K1 at 44 d of age) and on the same d to group 2C at 14 and 28 d of age. Stinging nettle was given in water to groups 1B, 2B, and 2C, and neem to groups 1C, 2A, and 3B. Birds were bled weekly and immune responses monitored using indirect ELISA. Both neem and stinging nettle had antibody response-enhancing effects in groups 1B and 1C, receiving the local inactivated K1 vaccine. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in antibody titers between groups 1A and 2C. Stinging nettle induced earlier onset of high antibody responses in group 2C and persistent titers (>3.8 log10) from the third week in group 2B. Imported live D78 vaccine induced higher antibody titers compared to the local inactivated K1 vaccine. Groups 2B and 2C receiving a combination of the local K1 and imported live attenuated D78 vaccines had the highest antibody titers. Adoption of stinging nettle supplementation and a prime-boost program involving use of a local virus isolates-derived vaccine is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3382/ps/pex329</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29211914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal Feed - analysis ; Animals ; Antibodies, Viral - immunology ; Antibody Formation ; Azadirachta - chemistry ; Birnaviridae Infections - immunology ; Birnaviridae Infections - prevention & control ; Birnaviridae Infections - veterinary ; Chickens ; Diet - veterinary ; Dietary Supplements - analysis ; Drinking Water - analysis ; Immunity, Innate ; Infectious bursal disease virus - immunology ; Kenya ; Poultry Diseases - immunology ; Poultry Diseases - prevention & control ; Random Allocation ; Urtica dioica - chemistry ; Vaccination - veterinary ; Vaccines, Inactivated - administration & dosage ; Viral Vaccines - administration & dosage</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2018-02, Vol.97 (2), p.447-454</ispartof><rights>2017 Poultry Science Association Inc. 2018</rights><rights>2017 Poultry Science Association Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-5460958b464da4b8bd1963d3f0aaf5720954d0c55ce432e1d9f3bb1588b470f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-5460958b464da4b8bd1963d3f0aaf5720954d0c55ce432e1d9f3bb1588b470f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2492-8503</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29211914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bwana, M O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Njagi, L W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyaga, P N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbuthia, P G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bebora, L C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wahome, M W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutinda, W U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitala, P M</creatorcontrib><title>Stinging nettle and neem enhance antibody response to local killed and imported live infectious bursal disease vaccines in indigenous chicken in Kenya</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>Abstract
Immune responses are critical for protection of chickens from infectious bursal disease (IBD). In this study, the antibody response-enhancing effect of drinking water supplementation of 1% stinging nettle and neem on different IBD vaccines and vaccination regimes was evaluated, using 36 (n = 36) specific antibody negative indigenous chicks. The birds were allocated into 3 groups as follows: 1A-C, 2A-C, and 3A-B, while group 3C acted as the unvaccinated non-supplemented control. A local inactivated K1 and imported live attenuated D78 IBD vaccines were given to groups 1A-C and 3A-B at 14 and 28 d of age, respectively. A combination of K1 and D78 vaccines was given 30 d apart to groups 2A and 2B (D78 at 14 and 21 d and K1 at 44 d of age) and on the same d to group 2C at 14 and 28 d of age. Stinging nettle was given in water to groups 1B, 2B, and 2C, and neem to groups 1C, 2A, and 3B. Birds were bled weekly and immune responses monitored using indirect ELISA. Both neem and stinging nettle had antibody response-enhancing effects in groups 1B and 1C, receiving the local inactivated K1 vaccine. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in antibody titers between groups 1A and 2C. Stinging nettle induced earlier onset of high antibody responses in group 2C and persistent titers (>3.8 log10) from the third week in group 2B. Imported live D78 vaccine induced higher antibody titers compared to the local inactivated K1 vaccine. Groups 2B and 2C receiving a combination of the local K1 and imported live attenuated D78 vaccines had the highest antibody titers. Adoption of stinging nettle supplementation and a prime-boost program involving use of a local virus isolates-derived vaccine is recommended.</description><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - immunology</subject><subject>Antibody Formation</subject><subject>Azadirachta - chemistry</subject><subject>Birnaviridae Infections - immunology</subject><subject>Birnaviridae Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Birnaviridae Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements - analysis</subject><subject>Drinking Water - analysis</subject><subject>Immunity, Innate</subject><subject>Infectious bursal disease virus - immunology</subject><subject>Kenya</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - immunology</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Urtica dioica - chemistry</subject><subject>Vaccination - veterinary</subject><subject>Vaccines, Inactivated - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Viral Vaccines - administration & dosage</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EoqUw8ALIAwtDqC9xLiOquIlKDMAcOfZJa5o4VpxW9EV4XhwCjEhHOrfv_4cfoXNKrjnP2Nz5uYMPzvIDNKWCiYjTlB6iKSGcRSLN6QSdeP9OCKNJkh6jCcsZpTmNp-jzpTd2FQpb6PsasLQ6jNBgsGtp1XDoTdnqPe7Au9Z6wH2L61bJGm9MXYP-lpjGtV0fltrsABtbgepNu_W43HY-oNp4kEG7k0oZCz4gobRZgR0otTZqA8MJP4Hdy1N0VMnaw9lPn6G3u9vXxUO0fL5_XNwsI8XjvI9EnJBcZGWcxFrGZVZqmidc84pIWYmUhWesiRJCQcwZUJ1XvCypyIIkJRXnM3Q1-qqu9b6DqnCdaWS3LygphmwL54sx28BejKzblg3oP_I3zABcjkC7df_4fAExQoUO</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Bwana, M O</creator><creator>Njagi, L W</creator><creator>Nyaga, P N</creator><creator>Mbuthia, P G</creator><creator>Bebora, L C</creator><creator>Wahome, M W</creator><creator>Mutinda, W U</creator><creator>Kitala, P M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2492-8503</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Stinging nettle and neem enhance antibody response to local killed and imported live infectious bursal disease vaccines in indigenous chicken in Kenya</title><author>Bwana, M O ; Njagi, L W ; Nyaga, P N ; Mbuthia, P G ; Bebora, L C ; Wahome, M W ; Mutinda, W U ; Kitala, P M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-5460958b464da4b8bd1963d3f0aaf5720954d0c55ce432e1d9f3bb1588b470f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - immunology</topic><topic>Antibody Formation</topic><topic>Azadirachta - chemistry</topic><topic>Birnaviridae Infections - immunology</topic><topic>Birnaviridae Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Birnaviridae Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements - analysis</topic><topic>Drinking Water - analysis</topic><topic>Immunity, Innate</topic><topic>Infectious bursal disease virus - immunology</topic><topic>Kenya</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - immunology</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Urtica dioica - chemistry</topic><topic>Vaccination - veterinary</topic><topic>Vaccines, Inactivated - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Viral Vaccines - administration & dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bwana, M O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Njagi, L W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyaga, P N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbuthia, P G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bebora, L C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wahome, M W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutinda, W U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitala, P M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bwana, M O</au><au>Njagi, L W</au><au>Nyaga, P N</au><au>Mbuthia, P G</au><au>Bebora, L C</au><au>Wahome, M W</au><au>Mutinda, W U</au><au>Kitala, P M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stinging nettle and neem enhance antibody response to local killed and imported live infectious bursal disease vaccines in indigenous chicken in Kenya</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>447</spage><epage>454</epage><pages>447-454</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Immune responses are critical for protection of chickens from infectious bursal disease (IBD). In this study, the antibody response-enhancing effect of drinking water supplementation of 1% stinging nettle and neem on different IBD vaccines and vaccination regimes was evaluated, using 36 (n = 36) specific antibody negative indigenous chicks. The birds were allocated into 3 groups as follows: 1A-C, 2A-C, and 3A-B, while group 3C acted as the unvaccinated non-supplemented control. A local inactivated K1 and imported live attenuated D78 IBD vaccines were given to groups 1A-C and 3A-B at 14 and 28 d of age, respectively. A combination of K1 and D78 vaccines was given 30 d apart to groups 2A and 2B (D78 at 14 and 21 d and K1 at 44 d of age) and on the same d to group 2C at 14 and 28 d of age. Stinging nettle was given in water to groups 1B, 2B, and 2C, and neem to groups 1C, 2A, and 3B. Birds were bled weekly and immune responses monitored using indirect ELISA. Both neem and stinging nettle had antibody response-enhancing effects in groups 1B and 1C, receiving the local inactivated K1 vaccine. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in antibody titers between groups 1A and 2C. Stinging nettle induced earlier onset of high antibody responses in group 2C and persistent titers (>3.8 log10) from the third week in group 2B. Imported live D78 vaccine induced higher antibody titers compared to the local inactivated K1 vaccine. Groups 2B and 2C receiving a combination of the local K1 and imported live attenuated D78 vaccines had the highest antibody titers. Adoption of stinging nettle supplementation and a prime-boost program involving use of a local virus isolates-derived vaccine is recommended.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>29211914</pmid><doi>10.3382/ps/pex329</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2492-8503</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-5791 |
ispartof | Poultry science, 2018-02, Vol.97 (2), p.447-454 |
issn | 0032-5791 1525-3171 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_pex329 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animal Feed - analysis Animals Antibodies, Viral - immunology Antibody Formation Azadirachta - chemistry Birnaviridae Infections - immunology Birnaviridae Infections - prevention & control Birnaviridae Infections - veterinary Chickens Diet - veterinary Dietary Supplements - analysis Drinking Water - analysis Immunity, Innate Infectious bursal disease virus - immunology Kenya Poultry Diseases - immunology Poultry Diseases - prevention & control Random Allocation Urtica dioica - chemistry Vaccination - veterinary Vaccines, Inactivated - administration & dosage Viral Vaccines - administration & dosage |
title | Stinging nettle and neem enhance antibody response to local killed and imported live infectious bursal disease vaccines in indigenous chicken in Kenya |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T23%3A04%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stinging%20nettle%20and%20neem%20enhance%20antibody%20response%20to%20local%20killed%20and%20imported%20live%20infectious%20bursal%20disease%20vaccines%20in%20indigenous%20chicken%20in%20Kenya&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Bwana,%20M%20O&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=447&rft.epage=454&rft.pages=447-454&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.3382/ps/pex329&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.3382/ps/pex329%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/29211914&rft_oup_id=10.3382/ps/pex329&rfr_iscdi=true |