Failure of two feed additives (shell-developer and ethacal) to improve eggshell quality

Two feed additives were tested for their ability to improve eggshell quality. One was Shell-Developer, containing approximately 60% NaHCO3, and the other was Ethacal, a sodium aluminosilicate. Both feed additives were fed to three commercial strains of hens. The first trial began in early summer and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Poultry science 1991-03, Vol.70 (3), p.593-599
Hauptverfasser: Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH), Turner, K.A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 599
container_issue 3
container_start_page 593
container_title Poultry science
container_volume 70
creator Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH)
Turner, K.A
description Two feed additives were tested for their ability to improve eggshell quality. One was Shell-Developer, containing approximately 60% NaHCO3, and the other was Ethacal, a sodium aluminosilicate. Both feed additives were fed to three commercial strains of hens. The first trial began in early summer and lasted 28 days, the hens having been in production for 56 wk at the start of the trial. Ethacal was fed at a rate of .75% of the diet. Shell-Developer was fed at a rate of 1.25% of the diet for 7 days, .625% for the next 7 days, and .3125% for the last 14 days. The second trial ran for 56 days in autumn utilizing the same hens after a forced rest and approximately 2 mo of production. The addition of Shell-Developer had no positive effects at any time on any of the characteristics measured. Ethacal had a negative effect on the rate of egg production and egg weight during the last 28 days of Trial 2. Ethacal also decreased feed consumption in three of the five data collection periods tested. In Trial 2 Ethacal significantly improved egg specific gravity and also improved the percentage of eggs with a specific gravity of at least 1.08. The negative effect of Ethacal on egg production and egg weight is postulated to be due to its negative effect on phosphorus nutrition
doi_str_mv 10.3382/ps.0700593
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_0700593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US9122214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-775c9c7e1c1aaa63e119aaacb1537adff0a30231e82af3a83f8abbe4654ef27b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkDFPwzAQRi0EEqWwMDJ5BKQUn6-JkxFVLSBVYoCK0bok5zbIJcFOi_rvKbTT9w1Pb3hCXIMaIeb6oYsjZZRKCzwRA0h1miAYOBUDpVAnqSngXFzE-KmUhiwzA_Exo8ZvAsvWyf6nlY65llTXTd9sOcrbuGLvk5q37NuOg6SvWnK_oor8nexb2ay70G5Z8nL5j8rvDfmm312KM0c-8tVxh2Ixm75PnpP569PL5HGeVICAiTFpVVSGoQIiypABiv2pSkjRUO2cIlQagXNNDilHl1NZ8jhLx-y0KXEo7g_eKrQxBna2C82aws6Csn9JbBftMckevjnAjlpLy9BEu3grQGsNY_wFmHJdXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Failure of two feed additives (shell-developer and ethacal) to improve eggshell quality</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH) ; Turner, K.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH) ; Turner, K.A</creatorcontrib><description>Two feed additives were tested for their ability to improve eggshell quality. One was Shell-Developer, containing approximately 60% NaHCO3, and the other was Ethacal, a sodium aluminosilicate. Both feed additives were fed to three commercial strains of hens. The first trial began in early summer and lasted 28 days, the hens having been in production for 56 wk at the start of the trial. Ethacal was fed at a rate of .75% of the diet. Shell-Developer was fed at a rate of 1.25% of the diet for 7 days, .625% for the next 7 days, and .3125% for the last 14 days. The second trial ran for 56 days in autumn utilizing the same hens after a forced rest and approximately 2 mo of production. The addition of Shell-Developer had no positive effects at any time on any of the characteristics measured. Ethacal had a negative effect on the rate of egg production and egg weight during the last 28 days of Trial 2. Ethacal also decreased feed consumption in three of the five data collection periods tested. In Trial 2 Ethacal significantly improved egg specific gravity and also improved the percentage of eggs with a specific gravity of at least 1.08. The negative effect of Ethacal on egg production and egg weight is postulated to be due to its negative effect on phosphorus nutrition</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3382/ps.0700593</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>ALUMINIO ; ALUMINIUM ; BICARBONATE DE SODIUM ; BICARBONATO SODICO ; CALIDAD ; CASCARA DE HUEVO ; COQUILLE D'OEUF ; DENSIDAD ; DENSITE ; ENVEJECIMIENTO ; FOSFORO ; HUEVOS ; OEUF ; PESO ; PHOSPHORE ; POIDS ; POLLO ; POULET ; PRODUCCION DE HUEVOS ; PRODUCTION D'OEUFS ; QUALITE ; VIEILLISSEMENT ; ZEOLITAS ; ZEOLITE</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 1991-03, Vol.70 (3), p.593-599</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-775c9c7e1c1aaa63e119aaacb1537adff0a30231e82af3a83f8abbe4654ef27b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-775c9c7e1c1aaa63e119aaacb1537adff0a30231e82af3a83f8abbe4654ef27b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, K.A</creatorcontrib><title>Failure of two feed additives (shell-developer and ethacal) to improve eggshell quality</title><title>Poultry science</title><description>Two feed additives were tested for their ability to improve eggshell quality. One was Shell-Developer, containing approximately 60% NaHCO3, and the other was Ethacal, a sodium aluminosilicate. Both feed additives were fed to three commercial strains of hens. The first trial began in early summer and lasted 28 days, the hens having been in production for 56 wk at the start of the trial. Ethacal was fed at a rate of .75% of the diet. Shell-Developer was fed at a rate of 1.25% of the diet for 7 days, .625% for the next 7 days, and .3125% for the last 14 days. The second trial ran for 56 days in autumn utilizing the same hens after a forced rest and approximately 2 mo of production. The addition of Shell-Developer had no positive effects at any time on any of the characteristics measured. Ethacal had a negative effect on the rate of egg production and egg weight during the last 28 days of Trial 2. Ethacal also decreased feed consumption in three of the five data collection periods tested. In Trial 2 Ethacal significantly improved egg specific gravity and also improved the percentage of eggs with a specific gravity of at least 1.08. The negative effect of Ethacal on egg production and egg weight is postulated to be due to its negative effect on phosphorus nutrition</description><subject>ALUMINIO</subject><subject>ALUMINIUM</subject><subject>BICARBONATE DE SODIUM</subject><subject>BICARBONATO SODICO</subject><subject>CALIDAD</subject><subject>CASCARA DE HUEVO</subject><subject>COQUILLE D'OEUF</subject><subject>DENSIDAD</subject><subject>DENSITE</subject><subject>ENVEJECIMIENTO</subject><subject>FOSFORO</subject><subject>HUEVOS</subject><subject>OEUF</subject><subject>PESO</subject><subject>PHOSPHORE</subject><subject>POIDS</subject><subject>POLLO</subject><subject>POULET</subject><subject>PRODUCCION DE HUEVOS</subject><subject>PRODUCTION D'OEUFS</subject><subject>QUALITE</subject><subject>VIEILLISSEMENT</subject><subject>ZEOLITAS</subject><subject>ZEOLITE</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkDFPwzAQRi0EEqWwMDJ5BKQUn6-JkxFVLSBVYoCK0bok5zbIJcFOi_rvKbTT9w1Pb3hCXIMaIeb6oYsjZZRKCzwRA0h1miAYOBUDpVAnqSngXFzE-KmUhiwzA_Exo8ZvAsvWyf6nlY65llTXTd9sOcrbuGLvk5q37NuOg6SvWnK_oor8nexb2ay70G5Z8nL5j8rvDfmm312KM0c-8tVxh2Ixm75PnpP569PL5HGeVICAiTFpVVSGoQIiypABiv2pSkjRUO2cIlQagXNNDilHl1NZ8jhLx-y0KXEo7g_eKrQxBna2C82aws6Csn9JbBftMckevjnAjlpLy9BEu3grQGsNY_wFmHJdXA</recordid><startdate>199103</startdate><enddate>199103</enddate><creator>Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH)</creator><creator>Turner, K.A</creator><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199103</creationdate><title>Failure of two feed additives (shell-developer and ethacal) to improve eggshell quality</title><author>Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH) ; Turner, K.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-775c9c7e1c1aaa63e119aaacb1537adff0a30231e82af3a83f8abbe4654ef27b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>ALUMINIO</topic><topic>ALUMINIUM</topic><topic>BICARBONATE DE SODIUM</topic><topic>BICARBONATO SODICO</topic><topic>CALIDAD</topic><topic>CASCARA DE HUEVO</topic><topic>COQUILLE D'OEUF</topic><topic>DENSIDAD</topic><topic>DENSITE</topic><topic>ENVEJECIMIENTO</topic><topic>FOSFORO</topic><topic>HUEVOS</topic><topic>OEUF</topic><topic>PESO</topic><topic>PHOSPHORE</topic><topic>POIDS</topic><topic>POLLO</topic><topic>POULET</topic><topic>PRODUCCION DE HUEVOS</topic><topic>PRODUCTION D'OEUFS</topic><topic>QUALITE</topic><topic>VIEILLISSEMENT</topic><topic>ZEOLITAS</topic><topic>ZEOLITE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, K.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH)</au><au>Turner, K.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Failure of two feed additives (shell-developer and ethacal) to improve eggshell quality</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><date>1991-03</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>593</spage><epage>599</epage><pages>593-599</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>Two feed additives were tested for their ability to improve eggshell quality. One was Shell-Developer, containing approximately 60% NaHCO3, and the other was Ethacal, a sodium aluminosilicate. Both feed additives were fed to three commercial strains of hens. The first trial began in early summer and lasted 28 days, the hens having been in production for 56 wk at the start of the trial. Ethacal was fed at a rate of .75% of the diet. Shell-Developer was fed at a rate of 1.25% of the diet for 7 days, .625% for the next 7 days, and .3125% for the last 14 days. The second trial ran for 56 days in autumn utilizing the same hens after a forced rest and approximately 2 mo of production. The addition of Shell-Developer had no positive effects at any time on any of the characteristics measured. Ethacal had a negative effect on the rate of egg production and egg weight during the last 28 days of Trial 2. Ethacal also decreased feed consumption in three of the five data collection periods tested. In Trial 2 Ethacal significantly improved egg specific gravity and also improved the percentage of eggs with a specific gravity of at least 1.08. The negative effect of Ethacal on egg production and egg weight is postulated to be due to its negative effect on phosphorus nutrition</abstract><doi>10.3382/ps.0700593</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5791
ispartof Poultry science, 1991-03, Vol.70 (3), p.593-599
issn 0032-5791
1525-3171
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_0700593
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects ALUMINIO
ALUMINIUM
BICARBONATE DE SODIUM
BICARBONATO SODICO
CALIDAD
CASCARA DE HUEVO
COQUILLE D'OEUF
DENSIDAD
DENSITE
ENVEJECIMIENTO
FOSFORO
HUEVOS
OEUF
PESO
PHOSPHORE
POIDS
POLLO
POULET
PRODUCCION DE HUEVOS
PRODUCTION D'OEUFS
QUALITE
VIEILLISSEMENT
ZEOLITAS
ZEOLITE
title Failure of two feed additives (shell-developer and ethacal) to improve eggshell quality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A47%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Failure%20of%20two%20feed%20additives%20(shell-developer%20and%20ethacal)%20to%20improve%20eggshell%20quality&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Latshaw,%20J.D.%20(The%20Ohio%20State%20University,%20Columbus,%20OH)&rft.date=1991-03&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=593&rft.epage=599&rft.pages=593-599&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.3382/ps.0700593&rft_dat=%3Cfao_cross%3EUS9122214%3C/fao_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true