Failure of two feed additives (shell-developer and ethacal) to improve eggshell quality
Two feed additives were tested for their ability to improve eggshell quality. One was Shell-Developer, containing approximately 60% NaHCO3, and the other was Ethacal, a sodium aluminosilicate. Both feed additives were fed to three commercial strains of hens. The first trial began in early summer and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Poultry science 1991-03, Vol.70 (3), p.593-599 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 599 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 593 |
container_title | Poultry science |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH) Turner, K.A |
description | Two feed additives were tested for their ability to improve eggshell quality. One was Shell-Developer, containing approximately 60% NaHCO3, and the other was Ethacal, a sodium aluminosilicate. Both feed additives were fed to three commercial strains of hens. The first trial began in early summer and lasted 28 days, the hens having been in production for 56 wk at the start of the trial. Ethacal was fed at a rate of .75% of the diet. Shell-Developer was fed at a rate of 1.25% of the diet for 7 days, .625% for the next 7 days, and .3125% for the last 14 days. The second trial ran for 56 days in autumn utilizing the same hens after a forced rest and approximately 2 mo of production. The addition of Shell-Developer had no positive effects at any time on any of the characteristics measured. Ethacal had a negative effect on the rate of egg production and egg weight during the last 28 days of Trial 2. Ethacal also decreased feed consumption in three of the five data collection periods tested. In Trial 2 Ethacal significantly improved egg specific gravity and also improved the percentage of eggs with a specific gravity of at least 1.08. The negative effect of Ethacal on egg production and egg weight is postulated to be due to its negative effect on phosphorus nutrition |
doi_str_mv | 10.3382/ps.0700593 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>fao_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_0700593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US9122214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-775c9c7e1c1aaa63e119aaacb1537adff0a30231e82af3a83f8abbe4654ef27b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkDFPwzAQRi0EEqWwMDJ5BKQUn6-JkxFVLSBVYoCK0bok5zbIJcFOi_rvKbTT9w1Pb3hCXIMaIeb6oYsjZZRKCzwRA0h1miAYOBUDpVAnqSngXFzE-KmUhiwzA_Exo8ZvAsvWyf6nlY65llTXTd9sOcrbuGLvk5q37NuOg6SvWnK_oor8nexb2ay70G5Z8nL5j8rvDfmm312KM0c-8tVxh2Ixm75PnpP569PL5HGeVICAiTFpVVSGoQIiypABiv2pSkjRUO2cIlQagXNNDilHl1NZ8jhLx-y0KXEo7g_eKrQxBna2C82aws6Csn9JbBftMckevjnAjlpLy9BEu3grQGsNY_wFmHJdXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Failure of two feed additives (shell-developer and ethacal) to improve eggshell quality</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH) ; Turner, K.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH) ; Turner, K.A</creatorcontrib><description>Two feed additives were tested for their ability to improve eggshell quality. One was Shell-Developer, containing approximately 60% NaHCO3, and the other was Ethacal, a sodium aluminosilicate. Both feed additives were fed to three commercial strains of hens. The first trial began in early summer and lasted 28 days, the hens having been in production for 56 wk at the start of the trial. Ethacal was fed at a rate of .75% of the diet. Shell-Developer was fed at a rate of 1.25% of the diet for 7 days, .625% for the next 7 days, and .3125% for the last 14 days. The second trial ran for 56 days in autumn utilizing the same hens after a forced rest and approximately 2 mo of production. The addition of Shell-Developer had no positive effects at any time on any of the characteristics measured. Ethacal had a negative effect on the rate of egg production and egg weight during the last 28 days of Trial 2. Ethacal also decreased feed consumption in three of the five data collection periods tested. In Trial 2 Ethacal significantly improved egg specific gravity and also improved the percentage of eggs with a specific gravity of at least 1.08. The negative effect of Ethacal on egg production and egg weight is postulated to be due to its negative effect on phosphorus nutrition</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3382/ps.0700593</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>ALUMINIO ; ALUMINIUM ; BICARBONATE DE SODIUM ; BICARBONATO SODICO ; CALIDAD ; CASCARA DE HUEVO ; COQUILLE D'OEUF ; DENSIDAD ; DENSITE ; ENVEJECIMIENTO ; FOSFORO ; HUEVOS ; OEUF ; PESO ; PHOSPHORE ; POIDS ; POLLO ; POULET ; PRODUCCION DE HUEVOS ; PRODUCTION D'OEUFS ; QUALITE ; VIEILLISSEMENT ; ZEOLITAS ; ZEOLITE</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 1991-03, Vol.70 (3), p.593-599</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-775c9c7e1c1aaa63e119aaacb1537adff0a30231e82af3a83f8abbe4654ef27b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-775c9c7e1c1aaa63e119aaacb1537adff0a30231e82af3a83f8abbe4654ef27b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, K.A</creatorcontrib><title>Failure of two feed additives (shell-developer and ethacal) to improve eggshell quality</title><title>Poultry science</title><description>Two feed additives were tested for their ability to improve eggshell quality. One was Shell-Developer, containing approximately 60% NaHCO3, and the other was Ethacal, a sodium aluminosilicate. Both feed additives were fed to three commercial strains of hens. The first trial began in early summer and lasted 28 days, the hens having been in production for 56 wk at the start of the trial. Ethacal was fed at a rate of .75% of the diet. Shell-Developer was fed at a rate of 1.25% of the diet for 7 days, .625% for the next 7 days, and .3125% for the last 14 days. The second trial ran for 56 days in autumn utilizing the same hens after a forced rest and approximately 2 mo of production. The addition of Shell-Developer had no positive effects at any time on any of the characteristics measured. Ethacal had a negative effect on the rate of egg production and egg weight during the last 28 days of Trial 2. Ethacal also decreased feed consumption in three of the five data collection periods tested. In Trial 2 Ethacal significantly improved egg specific gravity and also improved the percentage of eggs with a specific gravity of at least 1.08. The negative effect of Ethacal on egg production and egg weight is postulated to be due to its negative effect on phosphorus nutrition</description><subject>ALUMINIO</subject><subject>ALUMINIUM</subject><subject>BICARBONATE DE SODIUM</subject><subject>BICARBONATO SODICO</subject><subject>CALIDAD</subject><subject>CASCARA DE HUEVO</subject><subject>COQUILLE D'OEUF</subject><subject>DENSIDAD</subject><subject>DENSITE</subject><subject>ENVEJECIMIENTO</subject><subject>FOSFORO</subject><subject>HUEVOS</subject><subject>OEUF</subject><subject>PESO</subject><subject>PHOSPHORE</subject><subject>POIDS</subject><subject>POLLO</subject><subject>POULET</subject><subject>PRODUCCION DE HUEVOS</subject><subject>PRODUCTION D'OEUFS</subject><subject>QUALITE</subject><subject>VIEILLISSEMENT</subject><subject>ZEOLITAS</subject><subject>ZEOLITE</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkDFPwzAQRi0EEqWwMDJ5BKQUn6-JkxFVLSBVYoCK0bok5zbIJcFOi_rvKbTT9w1Pb3hCXIMaIeb6oYsjZZRKCzwRA0h1miAYOBUDpVAnqSngXFzE-KmUhiwzA_Exo8ZvAsvWyf6nlY65llTXTd9sOcrbuGLvk5q37NuOg6SvWnK_oor8nexb2ay70G5Z8nL5j8rvDfmm312KM0c-8tVxh2Ixm75PnpP569PL5HGeVICAiTFpVVSGoQIiypABiv2pSkjRUO2cIlQagXNNDilHl1NZ8jhLx-y0KXEo7g_eKrQxBna2C82aws6Csn9JbBftMckevjnAjlpLy9BEu3grQGsNY_wFmHJdXA</recordid><startdate>199103</startdate><enddate>199103</enddate><creator>Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH)</creator><creator>Turner, K.A</creator><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199103</creationdate><title>Failure of two feed additives (shell-developer and ethacal) to improve eggshell quality</title><author>Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH) ; Turner, K.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-775c9c7e1c1aaa63e119aaacb1537adff0a30231e82af3a83f8abbe4654ef27b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>ALUMINIO</topic><topic>ALUMINIUM</topic><topic>BICARBONATE DE SODIUM</topic><topic>BICARBONATO SODICO</topic><topic>CALIDAD</topic><topic>CASCARA DE HUEVO</topic><topic>COQUILLE D'OEUF</topic><topic>DENSIDAD</topic><topic>DENSITE</topic><topic>ENVEJECIMIENTO</topic><topic>FOSFORO</topic><topic>HUEVOS</topic><topic>OEUF</topic><topic>PESO</topic><topic>PHOSPHORE</topic><topic>POIDS</topic><topic>POLLO</topic><topic>POULET</topic><topic>PRODUCCION DE HUEVOS</topic><topic>PRODUCTION D'OEUFS</topic><topic>QUALITE</topic><topic>VIEILLISSEMENT</topic><topic>ZEOLITAS</topic><topic>ZEOLITE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, K.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Latshaw, J.D. (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH)</au><au>Turner, K.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Failure of two feed additives (shell-developer and ethacal) to improve eggshell quality</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><date>1991-03</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>593</spage><epage>599</epage><pages>593-599</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>Two feed additives were tested for their ability to improve eggshell quality. One was Shell-Developer, containing approximately 60% NaHCO3, and the other was Ethacal, a sodium aluminosilicate. Both feed additives were fed to three commercial strains of hens. The first trial began in early summer and lasted 28 days, the hens having been in production for 56 wk at the start of the trial. Ethacal was fed at a rate of .75% of the diet. Shell-Developer was fed at a rate of 1.25% of the diet for 7 days, .625% for the next 7 days, and .3125% for the last 14 days. The second trial ran for 56 days in autumn utilizing the same hens after a forced rest and approximately 2 mo of production. The addition of Shell-Developer had no positive effects at any time on any of the characteristics measured. Ethacal had a negative effect on the rate of egg production and egg weight during the last 28 days of Trial 2. Ethacal also decreased feed consumption in three of the five data collection periods tested. In Trial 2 Ethacal significantly improved egg specific gravity and also improved the percentage of eggs with a specific gravity of at least 1.08. The negative effect of Ethacal on egg production and egg weight is postulated to be due to its negative effect on phosphorus nutrition</abstract><doi>10.3382/ps.0700593</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-5791 |
ispartof | Poultry science, 1991-03, Vol.70 (3), p.593-599 |
issn | 0032-5791 1525-3171 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_0700593 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | ALUMINIO ALUMINIUM BICARBONATE DE SODIUM BICARBONATO SODICO CALIDAD CASCARA DE HUEVO COQUILLE D'OEUF DENSIDAD DENSITE ENVEJECIMIENTO FOSFORO HUEVOS OEUF PESO PHOSPHORE POIDS POLLO POULET PRODUCCION DE HUEVOS PRODUCTION D'OEUFS QUALITE VIEILLISSEMENT ZEOLITAS ZEOLITE |
title | Failure of two feed additives (shell-developer and ethacal) to improve eggshell quality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A47%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Failure%20of%20two%20feed%20additives%20(shell-developer%20and%20ethacal)%20to%20improve%20eggshell%20quality&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Latshaw,%20J.D.%20(The%20Ohio%20State%20University,%20Columbus,%20OH)&rft.date=1991-03&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=593&rft.epage=599&rft.pages=593-599&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.3382/ps.0700593&rft_dat=%3Cfao_cross%3EUS9122214%3C/fao_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |