The Response of Chicks to Several Antibiotics in Different Diets and Environments

ANTIBIOTICS appear to exert their greatest effect with chicks reared in an “old” environment according to data reported by Coates et al. (1951), Hill et al. (1953), Lillie et al. (1953), Morrison et al. (1954) and others. Nevertheless Waibel et al. (1954) and Libby and Schaible (1955) noted that, wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Poultry science 1959-07, Vol.38 (4), p.771-774
Hauptverfasser: Biely, J., March, B.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 774
container_issue 4
container_start_page 771
container_title Poultry science
container_volume 38
creator Biely, J.
March, B.E.
description ANTIBIOTICS appear to exert their greatest effect with chicks reared in an “old” environment according to data reported by Coates et al. (1951), Hill et al. (1953), Lillie et al. (1953), Morrison et al. (1954) and others. Nevertheless Waibel et al. (1954) and Libby and Schaible (1955) noted that, with the continued feeding of antibiotics in a given environment, the response obtained gradually decreased. This would indicate that, in an “old” environment, chicks do not grow at a maximum rate (1) because of the presence of bacteria detrimental to the well-being of the chick or (2) because bacteria which might be beneficial to the chick are suppressed in a highly infected environment. It has been noted that the response to antibiotics in our laboratory was variable. At first it was surmised that the differences in response to antibiotics reflected small variations in the vitamin content of the diets fed. In …
doi_str_mv 10.3382/ps.0380771
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_0380771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0032579119481455</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0032579119481455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-b79241cd7e8ea995336d23e0846cc167810ee11840ee57fe64e649652056c9833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkFtLAzEQhYMoWKsv_oI8C1tz2Vz2sdR6gYKo9Tlss7M02iZLJhT89660j8LAGQ7fDIdDyC1nMymtuB9wxqRlxvAzMuFKqEpyw8_JhDEpKmUafkmuEL8YE1xrMyFv6y3Qd8AhRQSaerrYBv-NtCT6AQfI7Y7OYwmbkErwSEOkD6HvIUMs4wYFaRs7uoyHkFPcjy5ek4u-3SHcnHRKPh-X68VztXp9elnMV5UXtSjVxjSi5r4zYKFtGiWl7oQEZmvtPdfGcgbAua1HUaYHXY_TaCWY0r6xUk7J3fGvzwkxQ--GHPZt_nGcub8y3IDuVMYI10cYxkSHANmhDxA9dCGDL65L4b-zX_JxYs0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Response of Chicks to Several Antibiotics in Different Diets and Environments</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Biely, J. ; March, B.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Biely, J. ; March, B.E.</creatorcontrib><description>ANTIBIOTICS appear to exert their greatest effect with chicks reared in an “old” environment according to data reported by Coates et al. (1951), Hill et al. (1953), Lillie et al. (1953), Morrison et al. (1954) and others. Nevertheless Waibel et al. (1954) and Libby and Schaible (1955) noted that, with the continued feeding of antibiotics in a given environment, the response obtained gradually decreased. This would indicate that, in an “old” environment, chicks do not grow at a maximum rate (1) because of the presence of bacteria detrimental to the well-being of the chick or (2) because bacteria which might be beneficial to the chick are suppressed in a highly infected environment. It has been noted that the response to antibiotics in our laboratory was variable. At first it was surmised that the differences in response to antibiotics reflected small variations in the vitamin content of the diets fed. In …</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3382/ps.0380771</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Poultry science, 1959-07, Vol.38 (4), p.771-774</ispartof><rights>1959 Poultry Science Association Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-b79241cd7e8ea995336d23e0846cc167810ee11840ee57fe64e649652056c9833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-b79241cd7e8ea995336d23e0846cc167810ee11840ee57fe64e649652056c9833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biely, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>March, B.E.</creatorcontrib><title>The Response of Chicks to Several Antibiotics in Different Diets and Environments</title><title>Poultry science</title><description>ANTIBIOTICS appear to exert their greatest effect with chicks reared in an “old” environment according to data reported by Coates et al. (1951), Hill et al. (1953), Lillie et al. (1953), Morrison et al. (1954) and others. Nevertheless Waibel et al. (1954) and Libby and Schaible (1955) noted that, with the continued feeding of antibiotics in a given environment, the response obtained gradually decreased. This would indicate that, in an “old” environment, chicks do not grow at a maximum rate (1) because of the presence of bacteria detrimental to the well-being of the chick or (2) because bacteria which might be beneficial to the chick are suppressed in a highly infected environment. It has been noted that the response to antibiotics in our laboratory was variable. At first it was surmised that the differences in response to antibiotics reflected small variations in the vitamin content of the diets fed. In …</description><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1959</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkFtLAzEQhYMoWKsv_oI8C1tz2Vz2sdR6gYKo9Tlss7M02iZLJhT89660j8LAGQ7fDIdDyC1nMymtuB9wxqRlxvAzMuFKqEpyw8_JhDEpKmUafkmuEL8YE1xrMyFv6y3Qd8AhRQSaerrYBv-NtCT6AQfI7Y7OYwmbkErwSEOkD6HvIUMs4wYFaRs7uoyHkFPcjy5ek4u-3SHcnHRKPh-X68VztXp9elnMV5UXtSjVxjSi5r4zYKFtGiWl7oQEZmvtPdfGcgbAua1HUaYHXY_TaCWY0r6xUk7J3fGvzwkxQ--GHPZt_nGcub8y3IDuVMYI10cYxkSHANmhDxA9dCGDL65L4b-zX_JxYs0</recordid><startdate>19590701</startdate><enddate>19590701</enddate><creator>Biely, J.</creator><creator>March, B.E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19590701</creationdate><title>The Response of Chicks to Several Antibiotics in Different Diets and Environments</title><author>Biely, J. ; March, B.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-b79241cd7e8ea995336d23e0846cc167810ee11840ee57fe64e649652056c9833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1959</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biely, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>March, B.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biely, J.</au><au>March, B.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Response of Chicks to Several Antibiotics in Different Diets and Environments</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><date>1959-07-01</date><risdate>1959</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>771</spage><epage>774</epage><pages>771-774</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>ANTIBIOTICS appear to exert their greatest effect with chicks reared in an “old” environment according to data reported by Coates et al. (1951), Hill et al. (1953), Lillie et al. (1953), Morrison et al. (1954) and others. Nevertheless Waibel et al. (1954) and Libby and Schaible (1955) noted that, with the continued feeding of antibiotics in a given environment, the response obtained gradually decreased. This would indicate that, in an “old” environment, chicks do not grow at a maximum rate (1) because of the presence of bacteria detrimental to the well-being of the chick or (2) because bacteria which might be beneficial to the chick are suppressed in a highly infected environment. It has been noted that the response to antibiotics in our laboratory was variable. At first it was surmised that the differences in response to antibiotics reflected small variations in the vitamin content of the diets fed. In …</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.3382/ps.0380771</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5791
ispartof Poultry science, 1959-07, Vol.38 (4), p.771-774
issn 0032-5791
1525-3171
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_0380771
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title The Response of Chicks to Several Antibiotics in Different Diets and Environments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A41%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Response%20of%20Chicks%20to%20Several%20Antibiotics%20in%20Different%20Diets%20and%20Environments&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Biely,%20J.&rft.date=1959-07-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=771&rft.epage=774&rft.pages=771-774&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.3382/ps.0380771&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0032579119481455%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0032579119481455&rfr_iscdi=true