Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 1. Litter characteristics and quality
SUMMARY Litter production, physicochemical properties, and the nutrient composition of river bed sand, coconut husk, rice hulls, Guinea grass, newspaper combined with wood shavings, and corn cob were determined and compared with wood shavings (WS) as the control. The trial was carried out over 35 d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied poultry research 2013-06, Vol.22 (2), p.168-176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 176 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 168 |
container_title | Journal of applied poultry research |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Garcês, A. Afonso, S. M. S. Chilundo, A. Jairoce, C. T. S. |
description | SUMMARY
Litter production, physicochemical properties, and the nutrient composition of river bed sand, coconut husk, rice hulls, Guinea grass, newspaper combined with wood shavings, and corn cob were determined and compared with wood shavings (WS) as the control. The trial was carried out over 35 d in an open-sided and naturally-ventilated broiler house under conditions of high ambient temperatures and relative humidity. Compared with WS, more litter was produced using sand and corn cob (P < 0.05), less with coconut husk, grass, and newspaper (P < 0.05), and similar amounts using rice hulls. Rice hulls and corn cob litters were less compacted (P < 0.05) than WS. The water holding capacity of both sand and coconut husk was lower (P < 0.05) and that of grass was higher (P < 0.05) than WS. Only coconut husk showed a significantly higher moisture content than WS, whereas sand was about 1/5 as wet (P < 0.05). The initial pH of all substrates except rice hulls differed significantly from WS, but at the end of the rearing cycle all litters were at the same level. Sand, grass, and newspaper litters volatilized greater amounts of ammonia than WS (P < 0.05). Nutrient composition of the organic litters was similar to WS, except for the ash content, which was higher in coconut husk, rice hulls, and grass. Most litters were equivalent to a 1N:1P2O5 grade fertilizer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3382/japr.2012-00547 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3382_japr_2012_00547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.3382/japr.2012-00547</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.3382/japr.2012-00547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-c10e3d031dfe5179b914a41b0c395ab04de9c1a521cedd8d1f6ea9438f83f8753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbPXvcspN3JZruJNyl-QcGLnsNkP-iWJBs3SaE_wP_tpvHqZWYY5nkHHkLuga04z9P1AbuwShmkCWMikxdkAYLLhGVcXsaZiU2yAQnX5KbvD4ylnOXpgvw8H7EecXC-pd5S7aw1wbQDrd0wmEAbjNVh3VPrA62Cd3XcdsHrUZ0h11Kkez9QbDXdj43T1LRHF3zbxJhHCiu6m6PUHgOqKa4fnOrPwPeI8dHpllzZ-MPc_fUl-Xp5_ty-JbuP1_ft0y5RHOSQKGCGa8ZBWyNAFlUBGWZQMcULgRXLtCkUoEhBGa1zDXZjsMh4bnNucyn4kqznXBV83wdjyy64BsOpBFZOFsvJYjlZLM8WI_EwE37s_j-elfNf7yZ2gA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 1. Litter characteristics and quality</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Garcês, A. ; Afonso, S. M. S. ; Chilundo, A. ; Jairoce, C. T. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcês, A. ; Afonso, S. M. S. ; Chilundo, A. ; Jairoce, C. T. S.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[SUMMARY
Litter production, physicochemical properties, and the nutrient composition of river bed sand, coconut husk, rice hulls, Guinea grass, newspaper combined with wood shavings, and corn cob were determined and compared with wood shavings (WS) as the control. The trial was carried out over 35 d in an open-sided and naturally-ventilated broiler house under conditions of high ambient temperatures and relative humidity. Compared with WS, more litter was produced using sand and corn cob (P < 0.05), less with coconut husk, grass, and newspaper (P < 0.05), and similar amounts using rice hulls. Rice hulls and corn cob litters were less compacted (P < 0.05) than WS. The water holding capacity of both sand and coconut husk was lower (P < 0.05) and that of grass was higher (P < 0.05) than WS. Only coconut husk showed a significantly higher moisture content than WS, whereas sand was about 1/5 as wet (P < 0.05). The initial pH of all substrates except rice hulls differed significantly from WS, but at the end of the rearing cycle all litters were at the same level. Sand, grass, and newspaper litters volatilized greater amounts of ammonia than WS (P < 0.05). Nutrient composition of the organic litters was similar to WS, except for the ash content, which was higher in coconut husk, rice hulls, and grass. Most litters were equivalent to a 1N:1P2O5 grade fertilizer.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1056-6171</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-0437</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3382/japr.2012-00547</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of applied poultry research, 2013-06, Vol.22 (2), p.168-176</ispartof><rights>2013 Poultry Science Association Inc. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-c10e3d031dfe5179b914a41b0c395ab04de9c1a521cedd8d1f6ea9438f83f8753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-c10e3d031dfe5179b914a41b0c395ab04de9c1a521cedd8d1f6ea9438f83f8753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcês, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afonso, S. M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chilundo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jairoce, C. T. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 1. Litter characteristics and quality</title><title>Journal of applied poultry research</title><description><![CDATA[SUMMARY
Litter production, physicochemical properties, and the nutrient composition of river bed sand, coconut husk, rice hulls, Guinea grass, newspaper combined with wood shavings, and corn cob were determined and compared with wood shavings (WS) as the control. The trial was carried out over 35 d in an open-sided and naturally-ventilated broiler house under conditions of high ambient temperatures and relative humidity. Compared with WS, more litter was produced using sand and corn cob (P < 0.05), less with coconut husk, grass, and newspaper (P < 0.05), and similar amounts using rice hulls. Rice hulls and corn cob litters were less compacted (P < 0.05) than WS. The water holding capacity of both sand and coconut husk was lower (P < 0.05) and that of grass was higher (P < 0.05) than WS. Only coconut husk showed a significantly higher moisture content than WS, whereas sand was about 1/5 as wet (P < 0.05). The initial pH of all substrates except rice hulls differed significantly from WS, but at the end of the rearing cycle all litters were at the same level. Sand, grass, and newspaper litters volatilized greater amounts of ammonia than WS (P < 0.05). Nutrient composition of the organic litters was similar to WS, except for the ash content, which was higher in coconut husk, rice hulls, and grass. Most litters were equivalent to a 1N:1P2O5 grade fertilizer.]]></description><issn>1056-6171</issn><issn>1537-0437</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbPXvcspN3JZruJNyl-QcGLnsNkP-iWJBs3SaE_wP_tpvHqZWYY5nkHHkLuga04z9P1AbuwShmkCWMikxdkAYLLhGVcXsaZiU2yAQnX5KbvD4ylnOXpgvw8H7EecXC-pd5S7aw1wbQDrd0wmEAbjNVh3VPrA62Cd3XcdsHrUZ0h11Kkez9QbDXdj43T1LRHF3zbxJhHCiu6m6PUHgOqKa4fnOrPwPeI8dHpllzZ-MPc_fUl-Xp5_ty-JbuP1_ft0y5RHOSQKGCGa8ZBWyNAFlUBGWZQMcULgRXLtCkUoEhBGa1zDXZjsMh4bnNucyn4kqznXBV83wdjyy64BsOpBFZOFsvJYjlZLM8WI_EwE37s_j-elfNf7yZ2gA</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Garcês, A.</creator><creator>Afonso, S. M. S.</creator><creator>Chilundo, A.</creator><creator>Jairoce, C. T. S.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 1. Litter characteristics and quality</title><author>Garcês, A. ; Afonso, S. M. S. ; Chilundo, A. ; Jairoce, C. T. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-c10e3d031dfe5179b914a41b0c395ab04de9c1a521cedd8d1f6ea9438f83f8753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcês, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afonso, S. M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chilundo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jairoce, C. T. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied poultry research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcês, A.</au><au>Afonso, S. M. S.</au><au>Chilundo, A.</au><au>Jairoce, C. T. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 1. Litter characteristics and quality</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied poultry research</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>168-176</pages><issn>1056-6171</issn><eissn>1537-0437</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[SUMMARY
Litter production, physicochemical properties, and the nutrient composition of river bed sand, coconut husk, rice hulls, Guinea grass, newspaper combined with wood shavings, and corn cob were determined and compared with wood shavings (WS) as the control. The trial was carried out over 35 d in an open-sided and naturally-ventilated broiler house under conditions of high ambient temperatures and relative humidity. Compared with WS, more litter was produced using sand and corn cob (P < 0.05), less with coconut husk, grass, and newspaper (P < 0.05), and similar amounts using rice hulls. Rice hulls and corn cob litters were less compacted (P < 0.05) than WS. The water holding capacity of both sand and coconut husk was lower (P < 0.05) and that of grass was higher (P < 0.05) than WS. Only coconut husk showed a significantly higher moisture content than WS, whereas sand was about 1/5 as wet (P < 0.05). The initial pH of all substrates except rice hulls differed significantly from WS, but at the end of the rearing cycle all litters were at the same level. Sand, grass, and newspaper litters volatilized greater amounts of ammonia than WS (P < 0.05). Nutrient composition of the organic litters was similar to WS, except for the ash content, which was higher in coconut husk, rice hulls, and grass. Most litters were equivalent to a 1N:1P2O5 grade fertilizer.]]></abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.3382/japr.2012-00547</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1056-6171 |
ispartof | Journal of applied poultry research, 2013-06, Vol.22 (2), p.168-176 |
issn | 1056-6171 1537-0437 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_3382_japr_2012_00547 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 1. Litter characteristics and quality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T03%3A13%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20different%20litter%20materials%20for%20broiler%20production%20in%20a%20hot%20and%20humid%20environment:%201.%20Litter%20characteristics%20and%20quality&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20poultry%20research&rft.au=Garc%C3%AAs,%20A.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=168-176&rft.issn=1056-6171&rft.eissn=1537-0437&rft_id=info:doi/10.3382/japr.2012-00547&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.3382/japr.2012-00547%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.3382/japr.2012-00547&rfr_iscdi=true |