Environmental and Economic Assessment on Garbage Recycling Technology Using LCA

The environmental impacts and life cycle costs (LCC) of garbage utilization systems were estimated by LCA procedure. Five types of garbage utilization processes were considered: composting; methane fermentation + effluent disposal, methane fermentation + liquid fertilizer, gasification melting and s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan Japan, 2006, Vol.2(4), pp.370-378
Hauptverfasser: YANG, Cuifen, SHIMIZU, Akio, HISHINUMA, Tatsuo, GENCHI, Yutaka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 378
container_issue 4
container_start_page 370
container_title Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan
container_volume 2
creator YANG, Cuifen
SHIMIZU, Akio
HISHINUMA, Tatsuo
GENCHI, Yutaka
description The environmental impacts and life cycle costs (LCC) of garbage utilization systems were estimated by LCA procedure. Five types of garbage utilization processes were considered: composting; methane fermentation + effluent disposal, methane fermentation + liquid fertilizer, gasification melting and stoker-type incineration. An inventory analysis was carried out to evaluate the environmental loads of each system for construction, processing, and transportation. The environmental impacts were estimated using LIME (Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method based on Endpoint Modeling). The effects of substitution for chemical fertilizer and electric power generation were taken into account in the environmental impact analyses. At the same time, the life cycle cost of each system was calculated using the same functional unit and system boundaries as set in the LCA. Results indicated that the stoker-type incineration system would have the largest environmental impact among the garbage utilization systems considered. The methane fermentation system was more effective in reducing environmental impacts if effluents were used as liquid fertilizer. The effect from saving resource by using liquid fertilizer from the methane fermentation process was significantly large. On the other hand, effects from the electric power generation from incineration or gasification melting systems were negligible. From the point of life cycle costs, construction and collection costs were dominant in all the considered systems. The gasification melting system was estimated to be the most expensive due to its high construction cost. The methane fermentation system was concluded to be the most effective means of garbage utilization for both environmental impacts and life cycle costs.
doi_str_mv 10.3370/lca.2.370
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3370_lca_2_370</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_lca_2_4_2_4_370_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c128n-ec7fc5ba558743df5dbf472686e599e01b133b08cc4d5f5d4be4f6eeb5aaa06c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFrAjEQhUNpoWI99B_k2sPaZJPsZg89iFgtCELRc0hmZ3XLmpRECv777qrtYZjHe98MzBDyzNlUiJK9dmCn-bRXd2TEteYZU7y6v2iW5WXBH8kkpdYxlkstpa5GZLPwP20M_oj-ZDtqfU0XEHw4tkBnKWFKQ0KDp0sbnd0j_UQ4Q9f6Pd0iHHzowv5Md2kw1vPZE3lobJdwcutjsntfbOerbL1Zfsxn6wx4rn2GUDagnFVKl1LUjapdI8u80AWqqkLGHRfCMQ0ga9Wn0qFsCkSnrLWsADEmL9e9EENKERvzHdujjWfDmRmeYfpnmNz0qmffruxXOvUX_JM2nlro8EbKSw2Tfz4cbDToxS-j0GnS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental and Economic Assessment on Garbage Recycling Technology Using LCA</title><source>J-STAGE</source><creator>YANG, Cuifen ; SHIMIZU, Akio ; HISHINUMA, Tatsuo ; GENCHI, Yutaka</creator><creatorcontrib>YANG, Cuifen ; SHIMIZU, Akio ; HISHINUMA, Tatsuo ; GENCHI, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><description>The environmental impacts and life cycle costs (LCC) of garbage utilization systems were estimated by LCA procedure. Five types of garbage utilization processes were considered: composting; methane fermentation + effluent disposal, methane fermentation + liquid fertilizer, gasification melting and stoker-type incineration. An inventory analysis was carried out to evaluate the environmental loads of each system for construction, processing, and transportation. The environmental impacts were estimated using LIME (Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method based on Endpoint Modeling). The effects of substitution for chemical fertilizer and electric power generation were taken into account in the environmental impact analyses. At the same time, the life cycle cost of each system was calculated using the same functional unit and system boundaries as set in the LCA. Results indicated that the stoker-type incineration system would have the largest environmental impact among the garbage utilization systems considered. The methane fermentation system was more effective in reducing environmental impacts if effluents were used as liquid fertilizer. The effect from saving resource by using liquid fertilizer from the methane fermentation process was significantly large. On the other hand, effects from the electric power generation from incineration or gasification melting systems were negligible. From the point of life cycle costs, construction and collection costs were dominant in all the considered systems. The gasification melting system was estimated to be the most expensive due to its high construction cost. The methane fermentation system was concluded to be the most effective means of garbage utilization for both environmental impacts and life cycle costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1880-2761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1881-0519</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3370/lca.2.370</identifier><language>jpn</language><publisher>The Institute of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan</publisher><subject>composting ; cost ; garbage ; LIME ; methane fermentation</subject><ispartof>Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan, 2006, Vol.2(4), pp.370-378</ispartof><rights>2006 The Institute of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c128n-ec7fc5ba558743df5dbf472686e599e01b133b08cc4d5f5d4be4f6eeb5aaa06c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c128n-ec7fc5ba558743df5dbf472686e599e01b133b08cc4d5f5d4be4f6eeb5aaa06c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1876,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>YANG, Cuifen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHIMIZU, Akio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HISHINUMA, Tatsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GENCHI, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental and Economic Assessment on Garbage Recycling Technology Using LCA</title><title>Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan</title><addtitle>Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan</addtitle><description>The environmental impacts and life cycle costs (LCC) of garbage utilization systems were estimated by LCA procedure. Five types of garbage utilization processes were considered: composting; methane fermentation + effluent disposal, methane fermentation + liquid fertilizer, gasification melting and stoker-type incineration. An inventory analysis was carried out to evaluate the environmental loads of each system for construction, processing, and transportation. The environmental impacts were estimated using LIME (Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method based on Endpoint Modeling). The effects of substitution for chemical fertilizer and electric power generation were taken into account in the environmental impact analyses. At the same time, the life cycle cost of each system was calculated using the same functional unit and system boundaries as set in the LCA. Results indicated that the stoker-type incineration system would have the largest environmental impact among the garbage utilization systems considered. The methane fermentation system was more effective in reducing environmental impacts if effluents were used as liquid fertilizer. The effect from saving resource by using liquid fertilizer from the methane fermentation process was significantly large. On the other hand, effects from the electric power generation from incineration or gasification melting systems were negligible. From the point of life cycle costs, construction and collection costs were dominant in all the considered systems. The gasification melting system was estimated to be the most expensive due to its high construction cost. The methane fermentation system was concluded to be the most effective means of garbage utilization for both environmental impacts and life cycle costs.</description><subject>composting</subject><subject>cost</subject><subject>garbage</subject><subject>LIME</subject><subject>methane fermentation</subject><issn>1880-2761</issn><issn>1881-0519</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEFrAjEQhUNpoWI99B_k2sPaZJPsZg89iFgtCELRc0hmZ3XLmpRECv777qrtYZjHe98MzBDyzNlUiJK9dmCn-bRXd2TEteYZU7y6v2iW5WXBH8kkpdYxlkstpa5GZLPwP20M_oj-ZDtqfU0XEHw4tkBnKWFKQ0KDp0sbnd0j_UQ4Q9f6Pd0iHHzowv5Md2kw1vPZE3lobJdwcutjsntfbOerbL1Zfsxn6wx4rn2GUDagnFVKl1LUjapdI8u80AWqqkLGHRfCMQ0ga9Wn0qFsCkSnrLWsADEmL9e9EENKERvzHdujjWfDmRmeYfpnmNz0qmffruxXOvUX_JM2nlro8EbKSw2Tfz4cbDToxS-j0GnS</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>YANG, Cuifen</creator><creator>SHIMIZU, Akio</creator><creator>HISHINUMA, Tatsuo</creator><creator>GENCHI, Yutaka</creator><general>The Institute of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Environmental and Economic Assessment on Garbage Recycling Technology Using LCA</title><author>YANG, Cuifen ; SHIMIZU, Akio ; HISHINUMA, Tatsuo ; GENCHI, Yutaka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c128n-ec7fc5ba558743df5dbf472686e599e01b133b08cc4d5f5d4be4f6eeb5aaa06c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>jpn</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>composting</topic><topic>cost</topic><topic>garbage</topic><topic>LIME</topic><topic>methane fermentation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>YANG, Cuifen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHIMIZU, Akio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HISHINUMA, Tatsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GENCHI, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>YANG, Cuifen</au><au>SHIMIZU, Akio</au><au>HISHINUMA, Tatsuo</au><au>GENCHI, Yutaka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental and Economic Assessment on Garbage Recycling Technology Using LCA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>370</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>370-378</pages><issn>1880-2761</issn><eissn>1881-0519</eissn><abstract>The environmental impacts and life cycle costs (LCC) of garbage utilization systems were estimated by LCA procedure. Five types of garbage utilization processes were considered: composting; methane fermentation + effluent disposal, methane fermentation + liquid fertilizer, gasification melting and stoker-type incineration. An inventory analysis was carried out to evaluate the environmental loads of each system for construction, processing, and transportation. The environmental impacts were estimated using LIME (Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method based on Endpoint Modeling). The effects of substitution for chemical fertilizer and electric power generation were taken into account in the environmental impact analyses. At the same time, the life cycle cost of each system was calculated using the same functional unit and system boundaries as set in the LCA. Results indicated that the stoker-type incineration system would have the largest environmental impact among the garbage utilization systems considered. The methane fermentation system was more effective in reducing environmental impacts if effluents were used as liquid fertilizer. The effect from saving resource by using liquid fertilizer from the methane fermentation process was significantly large. On the other hand, effects from the electric power generation from incineration or gasification melting systems were negligible. From the point of life cycle costs, construction and collection costs were dominant in all the considered systems. The gasification melting system was estimated to be the most expensive due to its high construction cost. The methane fermentation system was concluded to be the most effective means of garbage utilization for both environmental impacts and life cycle costs.</abstract><pub>The Institute of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan</pub><doi>10.3370/lca.2.370</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1880-2761
ispartof Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan, 2006, Vol.2(4), pp.370-378
issn 1880-2761
1881-0519
language jpn
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3370_lca_2_370
source J-STAGE
subjects composting
cost
garbage
LIME
methane fermentation
title Environmental and Economic Assessment on Garbage Recycling Technology Using LCA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A54%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20and%20Economic%20Assessment%20on%20Garbage%20Recycling%20Technology%20Using%20LCA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Life%20Cycle%20Assessment,%20Japan&rft.au=YANG,%20Cuifen&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=370&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=370-378&rft.issn=1880-2761&rft.eissn=1881-0519&rft_id=info:doi/10.3370/lca.2.370&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_cross%3Earticle_lca_2_4_2_4_370_article_char_en%3C/jstage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true