Travelling the National Route: South Africa's Protection of Investment Act 2015
The South African Protection of Investment Act 2015 is a strong response to the perceived inadequacy of investment treaties, which are facing growing criticism for their unbalanced character, the undue restrictions on policy space and the shortcomings of the mechanism for the settlement of disputes....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | African journal of international and comparative law 2018-05, Vol.26 (2), p.242-263 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 263 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 242 |
container_title | African journal of international and comparative law |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Gazzini, Tarcisio |
description | The South African Protection of Investment Act 2015 is a strong response to the perceived inadequacy of investment treaties, which are facing growing criticism for their unbalanced character, the undue restrictions on policy space and the shortcomings of the mechanism for the settlement of disputes. While other states have opted for a revision of their treaty models (i.e. India), concluded innovative BITs (i.e. the BIT between Morocco and Nigeria, not yet in force) or preferred facilitation agreements (i.e. Brazil), South Africa has taken a different route based on the assumption that domestic legislation is more appropriate than international legal instruments to regulate foreign investment. The Act is firmly anchored to the Constitution and provides a level of substantive and procedural protection that efficiently preserves South African sovereign prerogatives, but definitely falls short of that commonly ensured under international investment treaties. While states obviously need to balance the private and public rights and obligations at stake with a view to pursuing their economic and social development policies, it remains to be seen whether the drastic reduction in the protection of foreign investors operated by the Act was unavoidable and what impact it may have on the flow of foreign investment to South Africa. The article ultimately reflects on the implications of the Act from the standpoint of the protection enjoyed by foreign investors under both customary international law and investment treaties currently binding South Africa. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3366/ajicl.2018.0230 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3366_ajicl_2018_0230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2576879986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-3fd7d1765619fc69659e96769de242408d1ee4eb67d36af3b3413f53c9e179363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAURS0EEqUws1piYEpqx7Eds1UVH5UqiqDMlus8t6nSpNhOJf49CWVnusu97x0dhG4pSRkTYmJ2la3TjNAiJRkjZ2hEJecJFUSdoxFRPE-KQpFLdBXCjhBBpOAjtFx5c4S6rpoNjlvAryZWbWNq_N52ER7wRx9bPHW-suY-4DffRrBDBbcOz5sjhLiHJuKpjbj_za_RhTN1gJu_HKPPp8fV7CVZLJ_ns-kisSwrYsJcKUvaEwiqnBVKcAVKSKFKyPIsJ0VJAXJYC1kyYRxbs5wyx5lVQKVigo3R3enuwbdfXU-hd23ne_CgMy5FIZUqhtbk1LK-DcGD0wdf7Y3_1pTowZr-taYHa3qw1i_EaQFl1aw7v9l2Bw8h_Dv8AVN0cUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576879986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Travelling the National Route: South Africa's Protection of Investment Act 2015</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Gazzini, Tarcisio</creator><creatorcontrib>Gazzini, Tarcisio</creatorcontrib><description>The South African Protection of Investment Act 2015 is a strong response to the perceived inadequacy of investment treaties, which are facing growing criticism for their unbalanced character, the undue restrictions on policy space and the shortcomings of the mechanism for the settlement of disputes. While other states have opted for a revision of their treaty models (i.e. India), concluded innovative BITs (i.e. the BIT between Morocco and Nigeria, not yet in force) or preferred facilitation agreements (i.e. Brazil), South Africa has taken a different route based on the assumption that domestic legislation is more appropriate than international legal instruments to regulate foreign investment. The Act is firmly anchored to the Constitution and provides a level of substantive and procedural protection that efficiently preserves South African sovereign prerogatives, but definitely falls short of that commonly ensured under international investment treaties. While states obviously need to balance the private and public rights and obligations at stake with a view to pursuing their economic and social development policies, it remains to be seen whether the drastic reduction in the protection of foreign investors operated by the Act was unavoidable and what impact it may have on the flow of foreign investment to South Africa. The article ultimately reflects on the implications of the Act from the standpoint of the protection enjoyed by foreign investors under both customary international law and investment treaties currently binding South Africa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-8890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-1609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3366/ajicl.2018.0230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Edinburgh University Press</publisher><subject>African Studies ; Criticism ; Customary law ; Development policy ; Economic development ; Foreign investment ; International law ; Investors ; Legislation ; Social development ; State ; Treaties</subject><ispartof>African journal of international and comparative law, 2018-05, Vol.26 (2), p.242-263</ispartof><rights>Copyright Edinburgh University Press May 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gazzini, Tarcisio</creatorcontrib><title>Travelling the National Route: South Africa's Protection of Investment Act 2015</title><title>African journal of international and comparative law</title><description>The South African Protection of Investment Act 2015 is a strong response to the perceived inadequacy of investment treaties, which are facing growing criticism for their unbalanced character, the undue restrictions on policy space and the shortcomings of the mechanism for the settlement of disputes. While other states have opted for a revision of their treaty models (i.e. India), concluded innovative BITs (i.e. the BIT between Morocco and Nigeria, not yet in force) or preferred facilitation agreements (i.e. Brazil), South Africa has taken a different route based on the assumption that domestic legislation is more appropriate than international legal instruments to regulate foreign investment. The Act is firmly anchored to the Constitution and provides a level of substantive and procedural protection that efficiently preserves South African sovereign prerogatives, but definitely falls short of that commonly ensured under international investment treaties. While states obviously need to balance the private and public rights and obligations at stake with a view to pursuing their economic and social development policies, it remains to be seen whether the drastic reduction in the protection of foreign investors operated by the Act was unavoidable and what impact it may have on the flow of foreign investment to South Africa. The article ultimately reflects on the implications of the Act from the standpoint of the protection enjoyed by foreign investors under both customary international law and investment treaties currently binding South Africa.</description><subject>African Studies</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Customary law</subject><subject>Development policy</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Foreign investment</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Social development</subject><subject>State</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><issn>0954-8890</issn><issn>1755-1609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAURS0EEqUws1piYEpqx7Eds1UVH5UqiqDMlus8t6nSpNhOJf49CWVnusu97x0dhG4pSRkTYmJ2la3TjNAiJRkjZ2hEJecJFUSdoxFRPE-KQpFLdBXCjhBBpOAjtFx5c4S6rpoNjlvAryZWbWNq_N52ER7wRx9bPHW-suY-4DffRrBDBbcOz5sjhLiHJuKpjbj_za_RhTN1gJu_HKPPp8fV7CVZLJ_ns-kisSwrYsJcKUvaEwiqnBVKcAVKSKFKyPIsJ0VJAXJYC1kyYRxbs5wyx5lVQKVigo3R3enuwbdfXU-hd23ne_CgMy5FIZUqhtbk1LK-DcGD0wdf7Y3_1pTowZr-taYHa3qw1i_EaQFl1aw7v9l2Bw8h_Dv8AVN0cUw</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Gazzini, Tarcisio</creator><general>Edinburgh University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Travelling the National Route: South Africa's Protection of Investment Act 2015</title><author>Gazzini, Tarcisio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-3fd7d1765619fc69659e96769de242408d1ee4eb67d36af3b3413f53c9e179363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>African Studies</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Customary law</topic><topic>Development policy</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Foreign investment</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Social development</topic><topic>State</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gazzini, Tarcisio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>African journal of international and comparative law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gazzini, Tarcisio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Travelling the National Route: South Africa's Protection of Investment Act 2015</atitle><jtitle>African journal of international and comparative law</jtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>242</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>242-263</pages><issn>0954-8890</issn><eissn>1755-1609</eissn><abstract>The South African Protection of Investment Act 2015 is a strong response to the perceived inadequacy of investment treaties, which are facing growing criticism for their unbalanced character, the undue restrictions on policy space and the shortcomings of the mechanism for the settlement of disputes. While other states have opted for a revision of their treaty models (i.e. India), concluded innovative BITs (i.e. the BIT between Morocco and Nigeria, not yet in force) or preferred facilitation agreements (i.e. Brazil), South Africa has taken a different route based on the assumption that domestic legislation is more appropriate than international legal instruments to regulate foreign investment. The Act is firmly anchored to the Constitution and provides a level of substantive and procedural protection that efficiently preserves South African sovereign prerogatives, but definitely falls short of that commonly ensured under international investment treaties. While states obviously need to balance the private and public rights and obligations at stake with a view to pursuing their economic and social development policies, it remains to be seen whether the drastic reduction in the protection of foreign investors operated by the Act was unavoidable and what impact it may have on the flow of foreign investment to South Africa. The article ultimately reflects on the implications of the Act from the standpoint of the protection enjoyed by foreign investors under both customary international law and investment treaties currently binding South Africa.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Edinburgh University Press</pub><doi>10.3366/ajicl.2018.0230</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0954-8890 |
ispartof | African journal of international and comparative law, 2018-05, Vol.26 (2), p.242-263 |
issn | 0954-8890 1755-1609 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_3366_ajicl_2018_0230 |
source | PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | African Studies Criticism Customary law Development policy Economic development Foreign investment International law Investors Legislation Social development State Treaties |
title | Travelling the National Route: South Africa's Protection of Investment Act 2015 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T01%3A44%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Travelling%20the%20National%20Route:%20South%20Africa's%20Protection%20of%20Investment%20Act%202015&rft.jtitle=African%20journal%20of%20international%20and%20comparative%20law&rft.au=Gazzini,%20Tarcisio&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=242&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=242-263&rft.issn=0954-8890&rft.eissn=1755-1609&rft_id=info:doi/10.3366/ajicl.2018.0230&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2576879986%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576879986&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |