Upstream foraging by medusae

Convergence upon similar morphological traits is common among predators feeding on similar prey in similar environments. Aboral placement of tentacles during swimming appears to be such a trait and has evolved in parallel among several medusan lineages. Here we examine this trait in 1 scyphomedusa a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2006-12, Vol.327, p.143-155
Hauptverfasser: Colin, Sean P., Costello, John H., Kordula, Heather
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 155
container_issue
container_start_page 143
container_title Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)
container_volume 327
creator Colin, Sean P.
Costello, John H.
Kordula, Heather
description Convergence upon similar morphological traits is common among predators feeding on similar prey in similar environments. Aboral placement of tentacles during swimming appears to be such a trait and has evolved in parallel among several medusan lineages. Here we examine this trait in 1 scyphomedusa and 2 hydromedusae representing different lineages within the Medusozoa with the goal of evaluating whether aborally directed tentacles function similarly among these varied medusae. We analyzed flow generation, swimming kinematics and swimming behavior ofCraspedacusta sowerbyi(Hydrozoa, Limnomedusa),Nausithoë punctata(Scyphozoa, Coronata) andSolmissus albescens(Hydrozoa, Narcomedusa), and the prey capture mechanics ofN. puncatata. The 3 species swam similarly and generated similar wake structures in comparison to each other and to oblate medusae with trailing tentacles. Foraging behavior, as measured by the percent of time spent swimming, was similar for medusae possessing both leading and trailing tentacle placement. These findings indicate that medusae possessing either type of tentacle placement swim and forage similarly but that medusae with leading tentacles capture prey ‘upstream’ while medusae with trailing tentacles capture prey ‘downstream’ of vortices generated at the bell margin during swimming. These differences in tentacle placement relative to flow around the medusae may have important consequences for prey capture and trophic interactions that lead to different prey-selection patterns.
doi_str_mv 10.3354/meps327143
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3354_meps327143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24870725</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24870725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-918279eeb8216e6f863e8f0c936274440096a06456e3dae6e4ce9fca6b01257c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj0FLAzEQRoMouFYvnhX2LERnkuwkOUqxKhS82POSTSelxXWXZD3031up6Om7PL7HE-Ia4V7rxjz0PBatLBp9IiokJImN96eiArQoHWk4Fxel7ACQjKVK3KzGMmUOfZ2GHDbbz03d7eue118l8KU4S-Gj8NXvzsRq8fQ-f5HLt-fX-eNSRuX8JD06ZT1z5xQSUzpo2CWIXpOyxhgATwHINMR6HZjYRPYpBuoAVWOjnom742_MQymZUzvmbR_yvkVof7ra_64DfHuEd2Ua8h-pjLNgVaO_AfkzSKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Upstream foraging by medusae</title><source>Inter-Research</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Colin, Sean P. ; Costello, John H. ; Kordula, Heather</creator><creatorcontrib>Colin, Sean P. ; Costello, John H. ; Kordula, Heather</creatorcontrib><description>Convergence upon similar morphological traits is common among predators feeding on similar prey in similar environments. Aboral placement of tentacles during swimming appears to be such a trait and has evolved in parallel among several medusan lineages. Here we examine this trait in 1 scyphomedusa and 2 hydromedusae representing different lineages within the Medusozoa with the goal of evaluating whether aborally directed tentacles function similarly among these varied medusae. We analyzed flow generation, swimming kinematics and swimming behavior ofCraspedacusta sowerbyi(Hydrozoa, Limnomedusa),Nausithoë punctata(Scyphozoa, Coronata) andSolmissus albescens(Hydrozoa, Narcomedusa), and the prey capture mechanics ofN. puncatata. The 3 species swam similarly and generated similar wake structures in comparison to each other and to oblate medusae with trailing tentacles. Foraging behavior, as measured by the percent of time spent swimming, was similar for medusae possessing both leading and trailing tentacle placement. These findings indicate that medusae possessing either type of tentacle placement swim and forage similarly but that medusae with leading tentacles capture prey ‘upstream’ while medusae with trailing tentacles capture prey ‘downstream’ of vortices generated at the bell margin during swimming. These differences in tentacle placement relative to flow around the medusae may have important consequences for prey capture and trophic interactions that lead to different prey-selection patterns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps327143</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Inter-Research</publisher><subject>Dyes ; Foraging ; Kinematics ; Predators ; Propulsion ; Rowing ; Swimming ; Velar consonants ; Velocity ; Vortex rings</subject><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2006-12, Vol.327, p.143-155</ispartof><rights>Inter-Research 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-918279eeb8216e6f863e8f0c936274440096a06456e3dae6e4ce9fca6b01257c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24870725$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24870725$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3759,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colin, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costello, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kordula, Heather</creatorcontrib><title>Upstream foraging by medusae</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><description>Convergence upon similar morphological traits is common among predators feeding on similar prey in similar environments. Aboral placement of tentacles during swimming appears to be such a trait and has evolved in parallel among several medusan lineages. Here we examine this trait in 1 scyphomedusa and 2 hydromedusae representing different lineages within the Medusozoa with the goal of evaluating whether aborally directed tentacles function similarly among these varied medusae. We analyzed flow generation, swimming kinematics and swimming behavior ofCraspedacusta sowerbyi(Hydrozoa, Limnomedusa),Nausithoë punctata(Scyphozoa, Coronata) andSolmissus albescens(Hydrozoa, Narcomedusa), and the prey capture mechanics ofN. puncatata. The 3 species swam similarly and generated similar wake structures in comparison to each other and to oblate medusae with trailing tentacles. Foraging behavior, as measured by the percent of time spent swimming, was similar for medusae possessing both leading and trailing tentacle placement. These findings indicate that medusae possessing either type of tentacle placement swim and forage similarly but that medusae with leading tentacles capture prey ‘upstream’ while medusae with trailing tentacles capture prey ‘downstream’ of vortices generated at the bell margin during swimming. These differences in tentacle placement relative to flow around the medusae may have important consequences for prey capture and trophic interactions that lead to different prey-selection patterns.</description><subject>Dyes</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Propulsion</subject><subject>Rowing</subject><subject>Swimming</subject><subject>Velar consonants</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Vortex rings</subject><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFj0FLAzEQRoMouFYvnhX2LERnkuwkOUqxKhS82POSTSelxXWXZD3031up6Om7PL7HE-Ia4V7rxjz0PBatLBp9IiokJImN96eiArQoHWk4Fxel7ACQjKVK3KzGMmUOfZ2GHDbbz03d7eue118l8KU4S-Gj8NXvzsRq8fQ-f5HLt-fX-eNSRuX8JD06ZT1z5xQSUzpo2CWIXpOyxhgATwHINMR6HZjYRPYpBuoAVWOjnom742_MQymZUzvmbR_yvkVof7ra_64DfHuEd2Ua8h-pjLNgVaO_AfkzSKw</recordid><startdate>20061207</startdate><enddate>20061207</enddate><creator>Colin, Sean P.</creator><creator>Costello, John H.</creator><creator>Kordula, Heather</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061207</creationdate><title>Upstream foraging by medusae</title><author>Colin, Sean P. ; Costello, John H. ; Kordula, Heather</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-918279eeb8216e6f863e8f0c936274440096a06456e3dae6e4ce9fca6b01257c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Dyes</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Propulsion</topic><topic>Rowing</topic><topic>Swimming</topic><topic>Velar consonants</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Vortex rings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colin, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costello, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kordula, Heather</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colin, Sean P.</au><au>Costello, John H.</au><au>Kordula, Heather</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Upstream foraging by medusae</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><date>2006-12-07</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>327</volume><spage>143</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>143-155</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>Convergence upon similar morphological traits is common among predators feeding on similar prey in similar environments. Aboral placement of tentacles during swimming appears to be such a trait and has evolved in parallel among several medusan lineages. Here we examine this trait in 1 scyphomedusa and 2 hydromedusae representing different lineages within the Medusozoa with the goal of evaluating whether aborally directed tentacles function similarly among these varied medusae. We analyzed flow generation, swimming kinematics and swimming behavior ofCraspedacusta sowerbyi(Hydrozoa, Limnomedusa),Nausithoë punctata(Scyphozoa, Coronata) andSolmissus albescens(Hydrozoa, Narcomedusa), and the prey capture mechanics ofN. puncatata. The 3 species swam similarly and generated similar wake structures in comparison to each other and to oblate medusae with trailing tentacles. Foraging behavior, as measured by the percent of time spent swimming, was similar for medusae possessing both leading and trailing tentacle placement. These findings indicate that medusae possessing either type of tentacle placement swim and forage similarly but that medusae with leading tentacles capture prey ‘upstream’ while medusae with trailing tentacles capture prey ‘downstream’ of vortices generated at the bell margin during swimming. These differences in tentacle placement relative to flow around the medusae may have important consequences for prey capture and trophic interactions that lead to different prey-selection patterns.</abstract><pub>Inter-Research</pub><doi>10.3354/meps327143</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-8630
ispartof Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2006-12, Vol.327, p.143-155
issn 0171-8630
1616-1599
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3354_meps327143
source Inter-Research; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Dyes
Foraging
Kinematics
Predators
Propulsion
Rowing
Swimming
Velar consonants
Velocity
Vortex rings
title Upstream foraging by medusae
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A20%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upstream%20foraging%20by%20medusae&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Colin,%20Sean%20P.&rft.date=2006-12-07&rft.volume=327&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=143-155&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps327143&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E24870725%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24870725&rfr_iscdi=true