Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Short Wave Diathermy on Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Background: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is widely used as a therapeutic adjunct in the management of low back pain. It is a relatively safe, non-invasive, and easy-to-use modality, making it an attractive treatment option. For more than four decades, TENS has been applied in t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:TAJ (Rājshāhi, Bangladesh) Bangladesh), 2023-08, Vol.36 (1), p.63-73
Hauptverfasser: Ahmed, Monjur, Hoque, Ahsanul, Zannat, Nur A, Sadeque, A B M Zafar, Khan, Tariqul Islam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 73
container_issue 1
container_start_page 63
container_title TAJ (Rājshāhi, Bangladesh)
container_volume 36
creator Ahmed, Monjur
Hoque, Ahsanul
Zannat, Nur A
Sadeque, A B M Zafar
Khan, Tariqul Islam
description Background: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is widely used as a therapeutic adjunct in the management of low back pain. It is a relatively safe, non-invasive, and easy-to-use modality, making it an attractive treatment option. For more than four decades, TENS has been applied in the treatment of acute and chronic pain syndromes.  Short wave diathermy (SWD) is a modality that produces deep heating by converting electromagnetic energy to thermal energy. Short wave diathermy (SWD) is also a popular therapy for low back pain. Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy between TENS and SWD on chronic nonspecific low back pain patients. One hundred twenty patients with chronic low back pain were treated according to inclusion & exclusion criteria. Patients were equally distributed in three groups. Group-A patients (n=40) were treated with NSAID+ADL, Group-B patients (n=40) were treated with NSAID+ADL+TENS, and Group-C patients (n=40) were treated with NSAID+ADL+SWD. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Data were calculated and analyzed by computer-based software SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) Windows 16.0 version.  Main outcome measure (s): Subjective pain intensity score, visual analogue scale, tenderness index, disability due to pain, spinal mobility index, and Oswestry disability index. Results: The mean duration of pain was found to be 23.90±2.57 months in group A, 21.0+1.50 months in group B and 22.1±1.89 months in group C. The visual analog score was improved individually in group-A, group B and Group C after treatment, which was statistically significant (P0.05) between Group B and Group C. Conclusion: Beneficial effects of TENS and SWD were seen in the study population, but no firm conclusion could be drawn. TAJ 2022; 36: No-1: 63-73
doi_str_mv 10.3329/taj.v36i1.68284
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3329_taj_v36i1_68284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_3329_taj_v36i1_68284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_3329_taj_v36i1_682843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEtqwzAQhkVpoabNutu5gB2_kbd1XboIoZBAl2JQZazUlowkJ-QgvW8nIRfobIbhfwx8jL1kaVIUebMOeEiORa2zpOY5L-9YlJcpjzmvynsWZWnWxLyqqke28v6Q0lCoqJuI_bZ2mtFpbw3YHsKgoOt7LVGeL_feofFyCWiUXTx0o5LBkTrCVrmjgl3Q0zJi0BRH8w27wboAX0jSm0ZqcxP1GPgkizLBw0mHAdrBWaMlbK3xs5Ka_sHGnuAV5Q9ZtXlmDz2OXq1u-4mt37t9-xFLZ713qhez0xO6s8hScQEgCIC4AhBXAMX_E3_XZmfM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Short Wave Diathermy on Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain</title><source>Bangladesh Journals Online</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ahmed, Monjur ; Hoque, Ahsanul ; Zannat, Nur A ; Sadeque, A B M Zafar ; Khan, Tariqul Islam</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Monjur ; Hoque, Ahsanul ; Zannat, Nur A ; Sadeque, A B M Zafar ; Khan, Tariqul Islam</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is widely used as a therapeutic adjunct in the management of low back pain. It is a relatively safe, non-invasive, and easy-to-use modality, making it an attractive treatment option. For more than four decades, TENS has been applied in the treatment of acute and chronic pain syndromes.  Short wave diathermy (SWD) is a modality that produces deep heating by converting electromagnetic energy to thermal energy. Short wave diathermy (SWD) is also a popular therapy for low back pain. Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy between TENS and SWD on chronic nonspecific low back pain patients. One hundred twenty patients with chronic low back pain were treated according to inclusion &amp; exclusion criteria. Patients were equally distributed in three groups. Group-A patients (n=40) were treated with NSAID+ADL, Group-B patients (n=40) were treated with NSAID+ADL+TENS, and Group-C patients (n=40) were treated with NSAID+ADL+SWD. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Data were calculated and analyzed by computer-based software SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) Windows 16.0 version.  Main outcome measure (s): Subjective pain intensity score, visual analogue scale, tenderness index, disability due to pain, spinal mobility index, and Oswestry disability index. Results: The mean duration of pain was found to be 23.90±2.57 months in group A, 21.0+1.50 months in group B and 22.1±1.89 months in group C. The visual analog score was improved individually in group-A, group B and Group C after treatment, which was statistically significant (P&lt;0.05). Oswestry disability questionnaire score was also improved individually in group-A, group B and Group C after treatment, which was statistically significant (P&lt;0.05). In the case of comparison between Group B and Group C, this was not statistically significant (P&gt;0.05). In this current study, it was observed that the entire variable individually improved in Group-A, Group B, and Group C. So, all three treatment groups benefited from drugs and therapy. However, these were not statistically significant (P&gt;0.05) between Group B and Group C. Conclusion: Beneficial effects of TENS and SWD were seen in the study population, but no firm conclusion could be drawn. TAJ 2022; 36: No-1: 63-73</description><identifier>ISSN: 1019-8555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2408-8854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3329/taj.v36i1.68284</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>TAJ (Rājshāhi, Bangladesh), 2023-08, Vol.36 (1), p.63-73</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4125,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Monjur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoque, Ahsanul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zannat, Nur A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadeque, A B M Zafar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Tariqul Islam</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Short Wave Diathermy on Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain</title><title>TAJ (Rājshāhi, Bangladesh)</title><description>Background: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is widely used as a therapeutic adjunct in the management of low back pain. It is a relatively safe, non-invasive, and easy-to-use modality, making it an attractive treatment option. For more than four decades, TENS has been applied in the treatment of acute and chronic pain syndromes.  Short wave diathermy (SWD) is a modality that produces deep heating by converting electromagnetic energy to thermal energy. Short wave diathermy (SWD) is also a popular therapy for low back pain. Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy between TENS and SWD on chronic nonspecific low back pain patients. One hundred twenty patients with chronic low back pain were treated according to inclusion &amp; exclusion criteria. Patients were equally distributed in three groups. Group-A patients (n=40) were treated with NSAID+ADL, Group-B patients (n=40) were treated with NSAID+ADL+TENS, and Group-C patients (n=40) were treated with NSAID+ADL+SWD. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Data were calculated and analyzed by computer-based software SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) Windows 16.0 version.  Main outcome measure (s): Subjective pain intensity score, visual analogue scale, tenderness index, disability due to pain, spinal mobility index, and Oswestry disability index. Results: The mean duration of pain was found to be 23.90±2.57 months in group A, 21.0+1.50 months in group B and 22.1±1.89 months in group C. The visual analog score was improved individually in group-A, group B and Group C after treatment, which was statistically significant (P&lt;0.05). Oswestry disability questionnaire score was also improved individually in group-A, group B and Group C after treatment, which was statistically significant (P&lt;0.05). In the case of comparison between Group B and Group C, this was not statistically significant (P&gt;0.05). In this current study, it was observed that the entire variable individually improved in Group-A, Group B, and Group C. So, all three treatment groups benefited from drugs and therapy. However, these were not statistically significant (P&gt;0.05) between Group B and Group C. Conclusion: Beneficial effects of TENS and SWD were seen in the study population, but no firm conclusion could be drawn. TAJ 2022; 36: No-1: 63-73</description><issn>1019-8555</issn><issn>2408-8854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkEtqwzAQhkVpoabNutu5gB2_kbd1XboIoZBAl2JQZazUlowkJ-QgvW8nIRfobIbhfwx8jL1kaVIUebMOeEiORa2zpOY5L-9YlJcpjzmvynsWZWnWxLyqqke28v6Q0lCoqJuI_bZ2mtFpbw3YHsKgoOt7LVGeL_feofFyCWiUXTx0o5LBkTrCVrmjgl3Q0zJi0BRH8w27wboAX0jSm0ZqcxP1GPgkizLBw0mHAdrBWaMlbK3xs5Ka_sHGnuAV5Q9ZtXlmDz2OXq1u-4mt37t9-xFLZ713qhez0xO6s8hScQEgCIC4AhBXAMX_E3_XZmfM</recordid><startdate>20230824</startdate><enddate>20230824</enddate><creator>Ahmed, Monjur</creator><creator>Hoque, Ahsanul</creator><creator>Zannat, Nur A</creator><creator>Sadeque, A B M Zafar</creator><creator>Khan, Tariqul Islam</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230824</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Short Wave Diathermy on Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain</title><author>Ahmed, Monjur ; Hoque, Ahsanul ; Zannat, Nur A ; Sadeque, A B M Zafar ; Khan, Tariqul Islam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_3329_taj_v36i1_682843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Monjur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoque, Ahsanul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zannat, Nur A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadeque, A B M Zafar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Tariqul Islam</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>TAJ (Rājshāhi, Bangladesh)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahmed, Monjur</au><au>Hoque, Ahsanul</au><au>Zannat, Nur A</au><au>Sadeque, A B M Zafar</au><au>Khan, Tariqul Islam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Short Wave Diathermy on Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain</atitle><jtitle>TAJ (Rājshāhi, Bangladesh)</jtitle><date>2023-08-24</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>63-73</pages><issn>1019-8555</issn><eissn>2408-8854</eissn><abstract>Background: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is widely used as a therapeutic adjunct in the management of low back pain. It is a relatively safe, non-invasive, and easy-to-use modality, making it an attractive treatment option. For more than four decades, TENS has been applied in the treatment of acute and chronic pain syndromes.  Short wave diathermy (SWD) is a modality that produces deep heating by converting electromagnetic energy to thermal energy. Short wave diathermy (SWD) is also a popular therapy for low back pain. Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy between TENS and SWD on chronic nonspecific low back pain patients. One hundred twenty patients with chronic low back pain were treated according to inclusion &amp; exclusion criteria. Patients were equally distributed in three groups. Group-A patients (n=40) were treated with NSAID+ADL, Group-B patients (n=40) were treated with NSAID+ADL+TENS, and Group-C patients (n=40) were treated with NSAID+ADL+SWD. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Data were calculated and analyzed by computer-based software SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) Windows 16.0 version.  Main outcome measure (s): Subjective pain intensity score, visual analogue scale, tenderness index, disability due to pain, spinal mobility index, and Oswestry disability index. Results: The mean duration of pain was found to be 23.90±2.57 months in group A, 21.0+1.50 months in group B and 22.1±1.89 months in group C. The visual analog score was improved individually in group-A, group B and Group C after treatment, which was statistically significant (P&lt;0.05). Oswestry disability questionnaire score was also improved individually in group-A, group B and Group C after treatment, which was statistically significant (P&lt;0.05). In the case of comparison between Group B and Group C, this was not statistically significant (P&gt;0.05). In this current study, it was observed that the entire variable individually improved in Group-A, Group B, and Group C. So, all three treatment groups benefited from drugs and therapy. However, these were not statistically significant (P&gt;0.05) between Group B and Group C. Conclusion: Beneficial effects of TENS and SWD were seen in the study population, but no firm conclusion could be drawn. TAJ 2022; 36: No-1: 63-73</abstract><doi>10.3329/taj.v36i1.68284</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1019-8555
ispartof TAJ (Rājshāhi, Bangladesh), 2023-08, Vol.36 (1), p.63-73
issn 1019-8555
2408-8854
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3329_taj_v36i1_68284
source Bangladesh Journals Online; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Short Wave Diathermy on Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A50%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Efficacy%20of%20Transcutaneous%20Electrical%20Nerve%20Stimulation%20and%20Short%20Wave%20Diathermy%20on%20Patients%20with%20Chronic%20Nonspecific%20Low%20Back%20Pain&rft.jtitle=TAJ%20(R%C4%81jsh%C4%81hi,%20Bangladesh)&rft.au=Ahmed,%20Monjur&rft.date=2023-08-24&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=63-73&rft.issn=1019-8555&rft.eissn=2408-8854&rft_id=info:doi/10.3329/taj.v36i1.68284&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_3329_taj_v36i1_68284%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true