Virus shedding and environmental deposition of novel A (H1N1) pandemic influenza virus: interim findings

The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) England), 2010-10, Vol.14 (46), p.237
Hauptverfasser: Killingley, B, Greatorex, J, Cauchemez, S, Enstone, J E, Curran, M, Read, R C, Lim, W S, Hayward, A, Nicholson, K G, Nguyen-Van-Tam, J S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 46
container_start_page 237
container_title Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
container_volume 14
creator Killingley, B
Greatorex, J
Cauchemez, S
Enstone, J E
Curran, M
Read, R C
Lim, W S
Hayward, A
Nicholson, K G
Nguyen-Van-Tam, J S
description The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of illness, however, little is known about the extent to which virus is deposited by infected individuals into the environment and whether deposited virus has the ability to infect new hosts. Further information about the deposition of viable influenza virus in the immediate vicinity of patients with pandemic influenza is fundamental to our understanding of the routes and mechanisms of transmission. To collect data on patients infected with pandemic H1N1 2009 (swine flu). Primary objectives were to correlate the amount of virus detected in a patient's nose with that recovered from his/her immediate environment, and with symptom duration and severity. Secondary objectives were to describe virus shedding and duration according to major patient characteristics: adults versus children, and those with mild illness (community patients) versus those with more severe disease (hospitalised patients). Adults and children, both in hospital and from the community, who had symptoms of pandemic H1N1 infection, were enrolled and visited every day during follow-up for a maximum of 12 days. Symptom data was collected and samples were taken, including nose swabs and swabs from surfaces and objects around patients. Samples of air were obtained using validated sampling equipment. The samples were tested for the presence of pandemic H1N1 virus, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect virus genome and an immunofluorescence technique to detect viable virus. Forty-three subjects were followed up, and 19 of them were subsequently proven to be infected with pandemic H1N1 virus. The median duration of virus shedding from the 19 infected cases was 6 days when detection was performed by PCR, and 3 days when detection was performed by a culture technique. Over 30% of cases remained potentially infectious for at least 5 days. Only 0.5% of all community and none of the hospital swabs taken revealed virus on surfaces. Five subjects had samples of the air around them collected and virus was detected by PCR from four; some of the air particles in which virus was detected were small enough to be inhaled and deposited deep in the lungs. Small number of subjects recruited. The finding that ove
doi_str_mv 10.3310/hta14460-04
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3310_hta14460_04</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20923613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-e5df7e3201a0ad0abb9608c65b6d995efcae99c7b7a9b2fa6710eed2566ab6603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM9LwzAUx4Mobk5P3iVHRaovP5ou3sZQJwy9qNeSNi8u0qal6Qbur7djztODx4cPXz6EXDK4E4LB_ao3TEoFCcgjMuYgVSI1l8dkzIRSScqz6YicxfgNIJlK2SkZcdBcKCbGZPXpu3WkcYXW-vBFTbAUw8Z3Tagx9KaiFtsm-t43gTaOhmaDFZ3R6wV7ZTe0HXisfUl9cNUaw9bQzU74MDx67HxNnQ87cTwnJ85UES_-7oR8PD2-zxfJ8u35ZT5bJqXgaZ9gal2GggMzYCyYotAKpqVKC2W1TtGVBrUusyIzuuDOqIwBouWpUqZQCsSE3O69ZdfE2KHL22GG6X5yBvmuV37olYMc6Ks93a6LGu0_ewgkfgH23Gex</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Virus shedding and environmental deposition of novel A (H1N1) pandemic influenza virus: interim findings</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>NCBI Bookshelf</source><creator>Killingley, B ; Greatorex, J ; Cauchemez, S ; Enstone, J E ; Curran, M ; Read, R C ; Lim, W S ; Hayward, A ; Nicholson, K G ; Nguyen-Van-Tam, J S</creator><creatorcontrib>Killingley, B ; Greatorex, J ; Cauchemez, S ; Enstone, J E ; Curran, M ; Read, R C ; Lim, W S ; Hayward, A ; Nicholson, K G ; Nguyen-Van-Tam, J S</creatorcontrib><description>The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of illness, however, little is known about the extent to which virus is deposited by infected individuals into the environment and whether deposited virus has the ability to infect new hosts. Further information about the deposition of viable influenza virus in the immediate vicinity of patients with pandemic influenza is fundamental to our understanding of the routes and mechanisms of transmission. To collect data on patients infected with pandemic H1N1 2009 (swine flu). Primary objectives were to correlate the amount of virus detected in a patient's nose with that recovered from his/her immediate environment, and with symptom duration and severity. Secondary objectives were to describe virus shedding and duration according to major patient characteristics: adults versus children, and those with mild illness (community patients) versus those with more severe disease (hospitalised patients). Adults and children, both in hospital and from the community, who had symptoms of pandemic H1N1 infection, were enrolled and visited every day during follow-up for a maximum of 12 days. Symptom data was collected and samples were taken, including nose swabs and swabs from surfaces and objects around patients. Samples of air were obtained using validated sampling equipment. The samples were tested for the presence of pandemic H1N1 virus, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect virus genome and an immunofluorescence technique to detect viable virus. Forty-three subjects were followed up, and 19 of them were subsequently proven to be infected with pandemic H1N1 virus. The median duration of virus shedding from the 19 infected cases was 6 days when detection was performed by PCR, and 3 days when detection was performed by a culture technique. Over 30% of cases remained potentially infectious for at least 5 days. Only 0.5% of all community and none of the hospital swabs taken revealed virus on surfaces. Five subjects had samples of the air around them collected and virus was detected by PCR from four; some of the air particles in which virus was detected were small enough to be inhaled and deposited deep in the lungs. Small number of subjects recruited. The finding that over 30% of infected individuals have infectious virus in their noses for 5 days or more has infection control implications. The data suggest that contact transmission of pandemic influenza via fomites may be less important than previously thought, but transmission via bioaerosols at short range may be possible, meaning that high-level personal protective equipment may be needed by health-care workers when attending patients with pandemic influenza. Further work is being undertaken to consolidate these findings, as they have important potential implications for the protection of health-care workers and the formulation of advice to households, nationally and internationally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-5278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-4924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3310/hta14460-04</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20923613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aerosols ; Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Confidence Intervals ; Data Collection ; Disease Outbreaks - prevention &amp; control ; Environmental Microbiology ; Female ; Fluorescent Antibody Technique ; Fomites ; Global Health ; Humans ; Infant ; Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype ; Influenza, Human - epidemiology ; Influenza, Human - prevention &amp; control ; Influenza, Human - transmission ; Male ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Statistics as Topic ; Time Factors ; Viral Load ; Virus Shedding ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2010-10, Vol.14 (46), p.237</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-e5df7e3201a0ad0abb9608c65b6d995efcae99c7b7a9b2fa6710eed2566ab6603</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20923613$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Killingley, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greatorex, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cauchemez, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enstone, J E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curran, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, R C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, W S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, K G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen-Van-Tam, J S</creatorcontrib><title>Virus shedding and environmental deposition of novel A (H1N1) pandemic influenza virus: interim findings</title><title>Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)</title><addtitle>Health Technol Assess</addtitle><description>The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of illness, however, little is known about the extent to which virus is deposited by infected individuals into the environment and whether deposited virus has the ability to infect new hosts. Further information about the deposition of viable influenza virus in the immediate vicinity of patients with pandemic influenza is fundamental to our understanding of the routes and mechanisms of transmission. To collect data on patients infected with pandemic H1N1 2009 (swine flu). Primary objectives were to correlate the amount of virus detected in a patient's nose with that recovered from his/her immediate environment, and with symptom duration and severity. Secondary objectives were to describe virus shedding and duration according to major patient characteristics: adults versus children, and those with mild illness (community patients) versus those with more severe disease (hospitalised patients). Adults and children, both in hospital and from the community, who had symptoms of pandemic H1N1 infection, were enrolled and visited every day during follow-up for a maximum of 12 days. Symptom data was collected and samples were taken, including nose swabs and swabs from surfaces and objects around patients. Samples of air were obtained using validated sampling equipment. The samples were tested for the presence of pandemic H1N1 virus, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect virus genome and an immunofluorescence technique to detect viable virus. Forty-three subjects were followed up, and 19 of them were subsequently proven to be infected with pandemic H1N1 virus. The median duration of virus shedding from the 19 infected cases was 6 days when detection was performed by PCR, and 3 days when detection was performed by a culture technique. Over 30% of cases remained potentially infectious for at least 5 days. Only 0.5% of all community and none of the hospital swabs taken revealed virus on surfaces. Five subjects had samples of the air around them collected and virus was detected by PCR from four; some of the air particles in which virus was detected were small enough to be inhaled and deposited deep in the lungs. Small number of subjects recruited. The finding that over 30% of infected individuals have infectious virus in their noses for 5 days or more has infection control implications. The data suggest that contact transmission of pandemic influenza via fomites may be less important than previously thought, but transmission via bioaerosols at short range may be possible, meaning that high-level personal protective equipment may be needed by health-care workers when attending patients with pandemic influenza. Further work is being undertaken to consolidate these findings, as they have important potential implications for the protection of health-care workers and the formulation of advice to households, nationally and internationally.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Environmental Microbiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</subject><subject>Fomites</subject><subject>Global Health</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype</subject><subject>Influenza, Human - epidemiology</subject><subject>Influenza, Human - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Influenza, Human - transmission</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Viral Load</subject><subject>Virus Shedding</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1366-5278</issn><issn>2046-4924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM9LwzAUx4Mobk5P3iVHRaovP5ou3sZQJwy9qNeSNi8u0qal6Qbur7djztODx4cPXz6EXDK4E4LB_ao3TEoFCcgjMuYgVSI1l8dkzIRSScqz6YicxfgNIJlK2SkZcdBcKCbGZPXpu3WkcYXW-vBFTbAUw8Z3Tagx9KaiFtsm-t43gTaOhmaDFZ3R6wV7ZTe0HXisfUl9cNUaw9bQzU74MDx67HxNnQ87cTwnJ85UES_-7oR8PD2-zxfJ8u35ZT5bJqXgaZ9gal2GggMzYCyYotAKpqVKC2W1TtGVBrUusyIzuuDOqIwBouWpUqZQCsSE3O69ZdfE2KHL22GG6X5yBvmuV37olYMc6Ks93a6LGu0_ewgkfgH23Gex</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Killingley, B</creator><creator>Greatorex, J</creator><creator>Cauchemez, S</creator><creator>Enstone, J E</creator><creator>Curran, M</creator><creator>Read, R C</creator><creator>Lim, W S</creator><creator>Hayward, A</creator><creator>Nicholson, K G</creator><creator>Nguyen-Van-Tam, J S</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Virus shedding and environmental deposition of novel A (H1N1) pandemic influenza virus: interim findings</title><author>Killingley, B ; Greatorex, J ; Cauchemez, S ; Enstone, J E ; Curran, M ; Read, R C ; Lim, W S ; Hayward, A ; Nicholson, K G ; Nguyen-Van-Tam, J S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-e5df7e3201a0ad0abb9608c65b6d995efcae99c7b7a9b2fa6710eed2566ab6603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Environmental Microbiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</topic><topic>Fomites</topic><topic>Global Health</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype</topic><topic>Influenza, Human - epidemiology</topic><topic>Influenza, Human - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Influenza, Human - transmission</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Viral Load</topic><topic>Virus Shedding</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Killingley, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greatorex, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cauchemez, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enstone, J E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curran, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, R C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, W S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, K G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen-Van-Tam, J S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Killingley, B</au><au>Greatorex, J</au><au>Cauchemez, S</au><au>Enstone, J E</au><au>Curran, M</au><au>Read, R C</au><au>Lim, W S</au><au>Hayward, A</au><au>Nicholson, K G</au><au>Nguyen-Van-Tam, J S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Virus shedding and environmental deposition of novel A (H1N1) pandemic influenza virus: interim findings</atitle><jtitle>Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Health Technol Assess</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>46</issue><spage>237</spage><pages>237-</pages><issn>1366-5278</issn><eissn>2046-4924</eissn><abstract>The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of illness, however, little is known about the extent to which virus is deposited by infected individuals into the environment and whether deposited virus has the ability to infect new hosts. Further information about the deposition of viable influenza virus in the immediate vicinity of patients with pandemic influenza is fundamental to our understanding of the routes and mechanisms of transmission. To collect data on patients infected with pandemic H1N1 2009 (swine flu). Primary objectives were to correlate the amount of virus detected in a patient's nose with that recovered from his/her immediate environment, and with symptom duration and severity. Secondary objectives were to describe virus shedding and duration according to major patient characteristics: adults versus children, and those with mild illness (community patients) versus those with more severe disease (hospitalised patients). Adults and children, both in hospital and from the community, who had symptoms of pandemic H1N1 infection, were enrolled and visited every day during follow-up for a maximum of 12 days. Symptom data was collected and samples were taken, including nose swabs and swabs from surfaces and objects around patients. Samples of air were obtained using validated sampling equipment. The samples were tested for the presence of pandemic H1N1 virus, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect virus genome and an immunofluorescence technique to detect viable virus. Forty-three subjects were followed up, and 19 of them were subsequently proven to be infected with pandemic H1N1 virus. The median duration of virus shedding from the 19 infected cases was 6 days when detection was performed by PCR, and 3 days when detection was performed by a culture technique. Over 30% of cases remained potentially infectious for at least 5 days. Only 0.5% of all community and none of the hospital swabs taken revealed virus on surfaces. Five subjects had samples of the air around them collected and virus was detected by PCR from four; some of the air particles in which virus was detected were small enough to be inhaled and deposited deep in the lungs. Small number of subjects recruited. The finding that over 30% of infected individuals have infectious virus in their noses for 5 days or more has infection control implications. The data suggest that contact transmission of pandemic influenza via fomites may be less important than previously thought, but transmission via bioaerosols at short range may be possible, meaning that high-level personal protective equipment may be needed by health-care workers when attending patients with pandemic influenza. Further work is being undertaken to consolidate these findings, as they have important potential implications for the protection of health-care workers and the formulation of advice to households, nationally and internationally.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>20923613</pmid><doi>10.3310/hta14460-04</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1366-5278
ispartof Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2010-10, Vol.14 (46), p.237
issn 1366-5278
2046-4924
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3310_hta14460_04
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; NCBI Bookshelf
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aerosols
Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use
Child
Child, Preschool
Confidence Intervals
Data Collection
Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control
Environmental Microbiology
Female
Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Fomites
Global Health
Humans
Infant
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype
Influenza, Human - epidemiology
Influenza, Human - prevention & control
Influenza, Human - transmission
Male
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Prospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Statistics as Topic
Time Factors
Viral Load
Virus Shedding
Young Adult
title Virus shedding and environmental deposition of novel A (H1N1) pandemic influenza virus: interim findings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A58%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Virus%20shedding%20and%20environmental%20deposition%20of%20novel%20A%20(H1N1)%20pandemic%20influenza%20virus:%20interim%20findings&rft.jtitle=Health%20technology%20assessment%20(Winchester,%20England)&rft.au=Killingley,%20B&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=46&rft.spage=237&rft.pages=237-&rft.issn=1366-5278&rft.eissn=2046-4924&rft_id=info:doi/10.3310/hta14460-04&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E20923613%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/20923613&rfr_iscdi=true