What is Wrong with Nimbys? Renewable Energy, Landscape Impacts and Incommensurable Values

Local opposition to infrastructure projects that implement renewable energy (RE), such as wind farms, is often strong even if state-wide support for RE is strikingly high. The slogan 'Not In My Backyard' (NIMBY) has become synonymous for this kind of protest. This paper revisits the questi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental values 2017-12, Vol.26 (6), p.711-731
1. Verfasser: Schwenkenbecher, Anne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 731
container_issue 6
container_start_page 711
container_title Environmental values
container_volume 26
creator Schwenkenbecher, Anne
description Local opposition to infrastructure projects that implement renewable energy (RE), such as wind farms, is often strong even if state-wide support for RE is strikingly high. The slogan 'Not In My Backyard' (NIMBY) has become synonymous for this kind of protest. This paper revisits the question of what might be wrong with those who are NIMBYs about RE projects, and how best to address them. I will argue that local opponents to wind farm (and other RE) developments do not necessarily fail to contribute their fair share to producing a desirable public good (clean energy). In fact, with landscape concerns being at the heart of much protest, the question of fair burden distribution becomes sidelined: landscape impacts cannot be distributed nor compensated for. Protests may be attempts to express a true conflict of (incommensurable) values. Understanding them as such will help us better address NIMBY concerns and overcome such opposition through ensuring procedural justice.
doi_str_mv 10.3197/096327117X15046905490353
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3197_096327117X15046905490353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>whp/ev/2017/00000026/00000006/art00005</ingid><galeid>A534379066</galeid><jstor_id>26407829</jstor_id><sage_id>10.3197_096327117X15046905490353</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A534379066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-603a10b1dd8ca4c1994ab3d179d089a636fdb19a96cffcabbcde84a5f820dd9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN1u0zAUgCMEEmXwCEh-ADL8EzvxDWiaNqjUgYSAwZV1Yjupq8SpbHdVefq5TQVXk7AvfHTO-T7bpygQwZeMyPo9loLRmpD6F-G4EhLzSmLG2bNiQWpOyxoT_rxYHNvK3CdfFq9i3GBMsaTNovh9v4aEXET3YfI92ru0Rl_c2B7iR_TNeruHdrDoxtvQH96hFXgTNWwtWo5b0CminEBLr6dxtD7uwqn7Jww7G18XLzoYon1zPi-KH7c3368_l6uvn5bXV6tS84qkUmAGBLfEmEZDpYmUFbTMkFoa3EgQTHSmJRKk0F2noW21sU0FvGsoNkZadlFczt4eBquc76YUQOdt7Oj05G3ncv6Ks4rVEguRgWYGdJhiDLZT2-BGCAdFsDrOVD0104zyGY3QW7WZdsHnr_0P93bmNjFN4e99VFS4bqjM9Q9z3fne-gT_1Pv1VtkHRTHJ-tOi4hxgoSCkY8Cz4O4JgdMnx_lpUj1Q4UX2UYIbyhShnCpjO9gNSSUIqv-jImeP95Wwlg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is Wrong with Nimbys? Renewable Energy, Landscape Impacts and Incommensurable Values</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Schwenkenbecher, Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwenkenbecher, Anne</creatorcontrib><description>Local opposition to infrastructure projects that implement renewable energy (RE), such as wind farms, is often strong even if state-wide support for RE is strikingly high. The slogan 'Not In My Backyard' (NIMBY) has become synonymous for this kind of protest. This paper revisits the question of what might be wrong with those who are NIMBYs about RE projects, and how best to address them. I will argue that local opponents to wind farm (and other RE) developments do not necessarily fail to contribute their fair share to producing a desirable public good (clean energy). In fact, with landscape concerns being at the heart of much protest, the question of fair burden distribution becomes sidelined: landscape impacts cannot be distributed nor compensated for. Protests may be attempts to express a true conflict of (incommensurable) values. Understanding them as such will help us better address NIMBY concerns and overcome such opposition through ensuring procedural justice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-2719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-7015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3197/096327117X15046905490353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Isle of Harris, UK: The White Horse Press</publisher><subject>Climate Change ; Diseases and pests ; Environmental aspects ; Landscape ; Landscape Values ; Nimby ; Non-Standard Accounts Of Rationality ; Renewable Energy ; Social aspects ; Value Incommensurability ; Values (Philosophy)</subject><ispartof>Environmental values, 2017-12, Vol.26 (6), p.711-731</ispartof><rights>2017 The White Horse Press</rights><rights>2017 White Horse Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 The White Horse Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-603a10b1dd8ca4c1994ab3d179d089a636fdb19a96cffcabbcde84a5f820dd9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-603a10b1dd8ca4c1994ab3d179d089a636fdb19a96cffcabbcde84a5f820dd9e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26407829$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26407829$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwenkenbecher, Anne</creatorcontrib><title>What is Wrong with Nimbys? Renewable Energy, Landscape Impacts and Incommensurable Values</title><title>Environmental values</title><description>Local opposition to infrastructure projects that implement renewable energy (RE), such as wind farms, is often strong even if state-wide support for RE is strikingly high. The slogan 'Not In My Backyard' (NIMBY) has become synonymous for this kind of protest. This paper revisits the question of what might be wrong with those who are NIMBYs about RE projects, and how best to address them. I will argue that local opponents to wind farm (and other RE) developments do not necessarily fail to contribute their fair share to producing a desirable public good (clean energy). In fact, with landscape concerns being at the heart of much protest, the question of fair burden distribution becomes sidelined: landscape impacts cannot be distributed nor compensated for. Protests may be attempts to express a true conflict of (incommensurable) values. Understanding them as such will help us better address NIMBY concerns and overcome such opposition through ensuring procedural justice.</description><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Diseases and pests</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape Values</subject><subject>Nimby</subject><subject>Non-Standard Accounts Of Rationality</subject><subject>Renewable Energy</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Value Incommensurability</subject><subject>Values (Philosophy)</subject><issn>0963-2719</issn><issn>1752-7015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkN1u0zAUgCMEEmXwCEh-ADL8EzvxDWiaNqjUgYSAwZV1Yjupq8SpbHdVefq5TQVXk7AvfHTO-T7bpygQwZeMyPo9loLRmpD6F-G4EhLzSmLG2bNiQWpOyxoT_rxYHNvK3CdfFq9i3GBMsaTNovh9v4aEXET3YfI92ru0Rl_c2B7iR_TNeruHdrDoxtvQH96hFXgTNWwtWo5b0CminEBLr6dxtD7uwqn7Jww7G18XLzoYon1zPi-KH7c3368_l6uvn5bXV6tS84qkUmAGBLfEmEZDpYmUFbTMkFoa3EgQTHSmJRKk0F2noW21sU0FvGsoNkZadlFczt4eBquc76YUQOdt7Oj05G3ncv6Ks4rVEguRgWYGdJhiDLZT2-BGCAdFsDrOVD0104zyGY3QW7WZdsHnr_0P93bmNjFN4e99VFS4bqjM9Q9z3fne-gT_1Pv1VtkHRTHJ-tOi4hxgoSCkY8Cz4O4JgdMnx_lpUj1Q4UX2UYIbyhShnCpjO9gNSSUIqv-jImeP95Wwlg</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Schwenkenbecher, Anne</creator><general>The White Horse Press</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>What is Wrong with Nimbys? Renewable Energy, Landscape Impacts and Incommensurable Values</title><author>Schwenkenbecher, Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-603a10b1dd8ca4c1994ab3d179d089a636fdb19a96cffcabbcde84a5f820dd9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Diseases and pests</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape Values</topic><topic>Nimby</topic><topic>Non-Standard Accounts Of Rationality</topic><topic>Renewable Energy</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Value Incommensurability</topic><topic>Values (Philosophy)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwenkenbecher, Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Environmental values</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwenkenbecher, Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is Wrong with Nimbys? Renewable Energy, Landscape Impacts and Incommensurable Values</atitle><jtitle>Environmental values</jtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>711</spage><epage>731</epage><pages>711-731</pages><issn>0963-2719</issn><eissn>1752-7015</eissn><abstract>Local opposition to infrastructure projects that implement renewable energy (RE), such as wind farms, is often strong even if state-wide support for RE is strikingly high. The slogan 'Not In My Backyard' (NIMBY) has become synonymous for this kind of protest. This paper revisits the question of what might be wrong with those who are NIMBYs about RE projects, and how best to address them. I will argue that local opponents to wind farm (and other RE) developments do not necessarily fail to contribute their fair share to producing a desirable public good (clean energy). In fact, with landscape concerns being at the heart of much protest, the question of fair burden distribution becomes sidelined: landscape impacts cannot be distributed nor compensated for. Protests may be attempts to express a true conflict of (incommensurable) values. Understanding them as such will help us better address NIMBY concerns and overcome such opposition through ensuring procedural justice.</abstract><cop>Isle of Harris, UK</cop><pub>The White Horse Press</pub><doi>10.3197/096327117X15046905490353</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-2719
ispartof Environmental values, 2017-12, Vol.26 (6), p.711-731
issn 0963-2719
1752-7015
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3197_096327117X15046905490353
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Climate Change
Diseases and pests
Environmental aspects
Landscape
Landscape Values
Nimby
Non-Standard Accounts Of Rationality
Renewable Energy
Social aspects
Value Incommensurability
Values (Philosophy)
title What is Wrong with Nimbys? Renewable Energy, Landscape Impacts and Incommensurable Values
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A23%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20Wrong%20with%20Nimbys?%20Renewable%20Energy,%20Landscape%20Impacts%20and%20Incommensurable%20Values&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20values&rft.au=Schwenkenbecher,%20Anne&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=711&rft.epage=731&rft.pages=711-731&rft.issn=0963-2719&rft.eissn=1752-7015&rft_id=info:doi/10.3197/096327117X15046905490353&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA534379066%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A534379066&rft_ingid=whp/ev/2017/00000026/00000006/art00005&rft_jstor_id=26407829&rft_sage_id=10.3197_096327117X15046905490353&rfr_iscdi=true