What is Wrong with Nimbys? Renewable Energy, Landscape Impacts and Incommensurable Values
Local opposition to infrastructure projects that implement renewable energy (RE), such as wind farms, is often strong even if state-wide support for RE is strikingly high. The slogan 'Not In My Backyard' (NIMBY) has become synonymous for this kind of protest. This paper revisits the questi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental values 2017-12, Vol.26 (6), p.711-731 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 731 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 711 |
container_title | Environmental values |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Schwenkenbecher, Anne |
description | Local opposition to infrastructure projects that implement renewable energy (RE), such as wind farms, is often strong even if state-wide support for RE is strikingly high. The slogan 'Not In My Backyard' (NIMBY) has become synonymous for this kind of protest. This paper revisits the
question of what might be wrong with those who are NIMBYs about RE projects, and how best to address them. I will argue that local opponents to wind farm (and other RE) developments do not necessarily fail to contribute their fair share to producing a desirable public good (clean energy).
In fact, with landscape concerns being at the heart of much protest, the question of fair burden distribution becomes sidelined: landscape impacts cannot be distributed nor compensated for. Protests may be attempts to express a true conflict of (incommensurable) values. Understanding them
as such will help us better address NIMBY concerns and overcome such opposition through ensuring procedural justice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3197/096327117X15046905490353 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3197_096327117X15046905490353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>whp/ev/2017/00000026/00000006/art00005</ingid><galeid>A534379066</galeid><jstor_id>26407829</jstor_id><sage_id>10.3197_096327117X15046905490353</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A534379066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-603a10b1dd8ca4c1994ab3d179d089a636fdb19a96cffcabbcde84a5f820dd9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN1u0zAUgCMEEmXwCEh-ADL8EzvxDWiaNqjUgYSAwZV1Yjupq8SpbHdVefq5TQVXk7AvfHTO-T7bpygQwZeMyPo9loLRmpD6F-G4EhLzSmLG2bNiQWpOyxoT_rxYHNvK3CdfFq9i3GBMsaTNovh9v4aEXET3YfI92ru0Rl_c2B7iR_TNeruHdrDoxtvQH96hFXgTNWwtWo5b0CminEBLr6dxtD7uwqn7Jww7G18XLzoYon1zPi-KH7c3368_l6uvn5bXV6tS84qkUmAGBLfEmEZDpYmUFbTMkFoa3EgQTHSmJRKk0F2noW21sU0FvGsoNkZadlFczt4eBquc76YUQOdt7Oj05G3ncv6Ks4rVEguRgWYGdJhiDLZT2-BGCAdFsDrOVD0104zyGY3QW7WZdsHnr_0P93bmNjFN4e99VFS4bqjM9Q9z3fne-gT_1Pv1VtkHRTHJ-tOi4hxgoSCkY8Cz4O4JgdMnx_lpUj1Q4UX2UYIbyhShnCpjO9gNSSUIqv-jImeP95Wwlg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is Wrong with Nimbys? Renewable Energy, Landscape Impacts and Incommensurable Values</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Schwenkenbecher, Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwenkenbecher, Anne</creatorcontrib><description>Local opposition to infrastructure projects that implement renewable energy (RE), such as wind farms, is often strong even if state-wide support for RE is strikingly high. The slogan 'Not In My Backyard' (NIMBY) has become synonymous for this kind of protest. This paper revisits the
question of what might be wrong with those who are NIMBYs about RE projects, and how best to address them. I will argue that local opponents to wind farm (and other RE) developments do not necessarily fail to contribute their fair share to producing a desirable public good (clean energy).
In fact, with landscape concerns being at the heart of much protest, the question of fair burden distribution becomes sidelined: landscape impacts cannot be distributed nor compensated for. Protests may be attempts to express a true conflict of (incommensurable) values. Understanding them
as such will help us better address NIMBY concerns and overcome such opposition through ensuring procedural justice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-2719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-7015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3197/096327117X15046905490353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Isle of Harris, UK: The White Horse Press</publisher><subject>Climate Change ; Diseases and pests ; Environmental aspects ; Landscape ; Landscape Values ; Nimby ; Non-Standard Accounts Of Rationality ; Renewable Energy ; Social aspects ; Value Incommensurability ; Values (Philosophy)</subject><ispartof>Environmental values, 2017-12, Vol.26 (6), p.711-731</ispartof><rights>2017 The White Horse Press</rights><rights>2017 White Horse Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 The White Horse Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-603a10b1dd8ca4c1994ab3d179d089a636fdb19a96cffcabbcde84a5f820dd9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-603a10b1dd8ca4c1994ab3d179d089a636fdb19a96cffcabbcde84a5f820dd9e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26407829$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26407829$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwenkenbecher, Anne</creatorcontrib><title>What is Wrong with Nimbys? Renewable Energy, Landscape Impacts and Incommensurable Values</title><title>Environmental values</title><description>Local opposition to infrastructure projects that implement renewable energy (RE), such as wind farms, is often strong even if state-wide support for RE is strikingly high. The slogan 'Not In My Backyard' (NIMBY) has become synonymous for this kind of protest. This paper revisits the
question of what might be wrong with those who are NIMBYs about RE projects, and how best to address them. I will argue that local opponents to wind farm (and other RE) developments do not necessarily fail to contribute their fair share to producing a desirable public good (clean energy).
In fact, with landscape concerns being at the heart of much protest, the question of fair burden distribution becomes sidelined: landscape impacts cannot be distributed nor compensated for. Protests may be attempts to express a true conflict of (incommensurable) values. Understanding them
as such will help us better address NIMBY concerns and overcome such opposition through ensuring procedural justice.</description><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Diseases and pests</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape Values</subject><subject>Nimby</subject><subject>Non-Standard Accounts Of Rationality</subject><subject>Renewable Energy</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Value Incommensurability</subject><subject>Values (Philosophy)</subject><issn>0963-2719</issn><issn>1752-7015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkN1u0zAUgCMEEmXwCEh-ADL8EzvxDWiaNqjUgYSAwZV1Yjupq8SpbHdVefq5TQVXk7AvfHTO-T7bpygQwZeMyPo9loLRmpD6F-G4EhLzSmLG2bNiQWpOyxoT_rxYHNvK3CdfFq9i3GBMsaTNovh9v4aEXET3YfI92ru0Rl_c2B7iR_TNeruHdrDoxtvQH96hFXgTNWwtWo5b0CminEBLr6dxtD7uwqn7Jww7G18XLzoYon1zPi-KH7c3368_l6uvn5bXV6tS84qkUmAGBLfEmEZDpYmUFbTMkFoa3EgQTHSmJRKk0F2noW21sU0FvGsoNkZadlFczt4eBquc76YUQOdt7Oj05G3ncv6Ks4rVEguRgWYGdJhiDLZT2-BGCAdFsDrOVD0104zyGY3QW7WZdsHnr_0P93bmNjFN4e99VFS4bqjM9Q9z3fne-gT_1Pv1VtkHRTHJ-tOi4hxgoSCkY8Cz4O4JgdMnx_lpUj1Q4UX2UYIbyhShnCpjO9gNSSUIqv-jImeP95Wwlg</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Schwenkenbecher, Anne</creator><general>The White Horse Press</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>What is Wrong with Nimbys? Renewable Energy, Landscape Impacts and Incommensurable Values</title><author>Schwenkenbecher, Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-603a10b1dd8ca4c1994ab3d179d089a636fdb19a96cffcabbcde84a5f820dd9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Diseases and pests</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape Values</topic><topic>Nimby</topic><topic>Non-Standard Accounts Of Rationality</topic><topic>Renewable Energy</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Value Incommensurability</topic><topic>Values (Philosophy)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwenkenbecher, Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Environmental values</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwenkenbecher, Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is Wrong with Nimbys? Renewable Energy, Landscape Impacts and Incommensurable Values</atitle><jtitle>Environmental values</jtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>711</spage><epage>731</epage><pages>711-731</pages><issn>0963-2719</issn><eissn>1752-7015</eissn><abstract>Local opposition to infrastructure projects that implement renewable energy (RE), such as wind farms, is often strong even if state-wide support for RE is strikingly high. The slogan 'Not In My Backyard' (NIMBY) has become synonymous for this kind of protest. This paper revisits the
question of what might be wrong with those who are NIMBYs about RE projects, and how best to address them. I will argue that local opponents to wind farm (and other RE) developments do not necessarily fail to contribute their fair share to producing a desirable public good (clean energy).
In fact, with landscape concerns being at the heart of much protest, the question of fair burden distribution becomes sidelined: landscape impacts cannot be distributed nor compensated for. Protests may be attempts to express a true conflict of (incommensurable) values. Understanding them
as such will help us better address NIMBY concerns and overcome such opposition through ensuring procedural justice.</abstract><cop>Isle of Harris, UK</cop><pub>The White Horse Press</pub><doi>10.3197/096327117X15046905490353</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-2719 |
ispartof | Environmental values, 2017-12, Vol.26 (6), p.711-731 |
issn | 0963-2719 1752-7015 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_3197_096327117X15046905490353 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Climate Change Diseases and pests Environmental aspects Landscape Landscape Values Nimby Non-Standard Accounts Of Rationality Renewable Energy Social aspects Value Incommensurability Values (Philosophy) |
title | What is Wrong with Nimbys? Renewable Energy, Landscape Impacts and Incommensurable Values |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A23%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20Wrong%20with%20Nimbys?%20Renewable%20Energy,%20Landscape%20Impacts%20and%20Incommensurable%20Values&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20values&rft.au=Schwenkenbecher,%20Anne&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=711&rft.epage=731&rft.pages=711-731&rft.issn=0963-2719&rft.eissn=1752-7015&rft_id=info:doi/10.3197/096327117X15046905490353&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA534379066%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A534379066&rft_ingid=whp/ev/2017/00000026/00000006/art00005&rft_jstor_id=26407829&rft_sage_id=10.3197_096327117X15046905490353&rfr_iscdi=true |