Re-Thinking Bloomfield’s Concepts of Meaning: Do Meaning Really as a Weak Point in Language Study?

This paper aims to describe the concepts of meaning in Bloomfield’s Theory. The methodology used to gain data in this paper is a qualitative descriptive using documentation method. Sources of data consists of words, sentences, and discourses found in the book Language by Bloomfield published by Henr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:REiLA : journal of research and innovation in language 2019-12, Vol.1 (3), p.84-89
Hauptverfasser: Lauren, Cendy, Rahmadani, Anggi Resti, Wulandari, Farni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 89
container_issue 3
container_start_page 84
container_title REiLA : journal of research and innovation in language
container_volume 1
creator Lauren, Cendy
Rahmadani, Anggi Resti
Wulandari, Farni
description This paper aims to describe the concepts of meaning in Bloomfield’s Theory. The methodology used to gain data in this paper is a qualitative descriptive using documentation method. Sources of data consists of words, sentences, and discourses found in the book Language by Bloomfield published by Henry Holt in New York in 1933. This research collects its data in a descriptive manner by reducing data, presentation data then drawing conclusions. The results of the analysis of this study indicate that  Bloomfield underlines that meaning as a weak point in language study and believed that it might well be all expressed in behaviourist terms. Bloomfield also stressed the context of the situation was a very important level of linguistic analysis aside syntax, morphology, phonology, and phonetics, all of which support to linguistic meaning. This present study also found that Bloomfield considered words to be ambiguous notions both in everyday speech and in linguistics. 
doi_str_mv 10.31849/reila.v1i3.3562
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_31849_reila_v1i3_3562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_31849_reila_v1i3_3562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c832-c17896e640166e6320e368a61d4aacd37eb93ce1705eccbd227029556c6721853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEtOwzAURS0EElXpnKE3kOBP7DhMEJSvVAQqlRhGr85LsJraVdwiZcY22B4roS1ldM7g6g4OIeecpZKbrLjo0LWQfnInU6m0OCIDoY1KZMH08cGZ4eaUjGJ0c5ZluTKcmwGpppjMPpxfON_QmzaEZe2wrX6-viMdB29xtY401PQZwW8nl_Q2_DudIrRtTyFSoO8IC_oanF9T5-kEfLOBBunbelP1V2fkpIY24ujAIZnd383Gj8nk5eFpfD1JrJEisTw3hUadMa63kIKh1AY0rzIAW8kc54W0yHOm0Np5JUTORKGUtjoX3Cg5JOzv1nYhxg7rctW5JXR9yVm571TuO5W7TuWuk_wFbStdIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Re-Thinking Bloomfield’s Concepts of Meaning: Do Meaning Really as a Weak Point in Language Study?</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Lauren, Cendy ; Rahmadani, Anggi Resti ; Wulandari, Farni</creator><creatorcontrib>Lauren, Cendy ; Rahmadani, Anggi Resti ; Wulandari, Farni</creatorcontrib><description>This paper aims to describe the concepts of meaning in Bloomfield’s Theory. The methodology used to gain data in this paper is a qualitative descriptive using documentation method. Sources of data consists of words, sentences, and discourses found in the book Language by Bloomfield published by Henry Holt in New York in 1933. This research collects its data in a descriptive manner by reducing data, presentation data then drawing conclusions. The results of the analysis of this study indicate that  Bloomfield underlines that meaning as a weak point in language study and believed that it might well be all expressed in behaviourist terms. Bloomfield also stressed the context of the situation was a very important level of linguistic analysis aside syntax, morphology, phonology, and phonetics, all of which support to linguistic meaning. This present study also found that Bloomfield considered words to be ambiguous notions both in everyday speech and in linguistics. </description><identifier>ISSN: 2685-0818</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2685-3906</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31849/reila.v1i3.3562</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>REiLA : journal of research and innovation in language, 2019-12, Vol.1 (3), p.84-89</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lauren, Cendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmadani, Anggi Resti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wulandari, Farni</creatorcontrib><title>Re-Thinking Bloomfield’s Concepts of Meaning: Do Meaning Really as a Weak Point in Language Study?</title><title>REiLA : journal of research and innovation in language</title><description>This paper aims to describe the concepts of meaning in Bloomfield’s Theory. The methodology used to gain data in this paper is a qualitative descriptive using documentation method. Sources of data consists of words, sentences, and discourses found in the book Language by Bloomfield published by Henry Holt in New York in 1933. This research collects its data in a descriptive manner by reducing data, presentation data then drawing conclusions. The results of the analysis of this study indicate that  Bloomfield underlines that meaning as a weak point in language study and believed that it might well be all expressed in behaviourist terms. Bloomfield also stressed the context of the situation was a very important level of linguistic analysis aside syntax, morphology, phonology, and phonetics, all of which support to linguistic meaning. This present study also found that Bloomfield considered words to be ambiguous notions both in everyday speech and in linguistics. </description><issn>2685-0818</issn><issn>2685-3906</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kEtOwzAURS0EElXpnKE3kOBP7DhMEJSvVAQqlRhGr85LsJraVdwiZcY22B4roS1ldM7g6g4OIeecpZKbrLjo0LWQfnInU6m0OCIDoY1KZMH08cGZ4eaUjGJ0c5ZluTKcmwGpppjMPpxfON_QmzaEZe2wrX6-viMdB29xtY401PQZwW8nl_Q2_DudIrRtTyFSoO8IC_oanF9T5-kEfLOBBunbelP1V2fkpIY24ujAIZnd383Gj8nk5eFpfD1JrJEisTw3hUadMa63kIKh1AY0rzIAW8kc54W0yHOm0Np5JUTORKGUtjoX3Cg5JOzv1nYhxg7rctW5JXR9yVm571TuO5W7TuWuk_wFbStdIg</recordid><startdate>20191229</startdate><enddate>20191229</enddate><creator>Lauren, Cendy</creator><creator>Rahmadani, Anggi Resti</creator><creator>Wulandari, Farni</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191229</creationdate><title>Re-Thinking Bloomfield’s Concepts of Meaning: Do Meaning Really as a Weak Point in Language Study?</title><author>Lauren, Cendy ; Rahmadani, Anggi Resti ; Wulandari, Farni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c832-c17896e640166e6320e368a61d4aacd37eb93ce1705eccbd227029556c6721853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lauren, Cendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmadani, Anggi Resti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wulandari, Farni</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>REiLA : journal of research and innovation in language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lauren, Cendy</au><au>Rahmadani, Anggi Resti</au><au>Wulandari, Farni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Re-Thinking Bloomfield’s Concepts of Meaning: Do Meaning Really as a Weak Point in Language Study?</atitle><jtitle>REiLA : journal of research and innovation in language</jtitle><date>2019-12-29</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>84-89</pages><issn>2685-0818</issn><eissn>2685-3906</eissn><abstract>This paper aims to describe the concepts of meaning in Bloomfield’s Theory. The methodology used to gain data in this paper is a qualitative descriptive using documentation method. Sources of data consists of words, sentences, and discourses found in the book Language by Bloomfield published by Henry Holt in New York in 1933. This research collects its data in a descriptive manner by reducing data, presentation data then drawing conclusions. The results of the analysis of this study indicate that  Bloomfield underlines that meaning as a weak point in language study and believed that it might well be all expressed in behaviourist terms. Bloomfield also stressed the context of the situation was a very important level of linguistic analysis aside syntax, morphology, phonology, and phonetics, all of which support to linguistic meaning. This present study also found that Bloomfield considered words to be ambiguous notions both in everyday speech and in linguistics. </abstract><doi>10.31849/reila.v1i3.3562</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2685-0818
ispartof REiLA : journal of research and innovation in language, 2019-12, Vol.1 (3), p.84-89
issn 2685-0818
2685-3906
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_31849_reila_v1i3_3562
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
title Re-Thinking Bloomfield’s Concepts of Meaning: Do Meaning Really as a Weak Point in Language Study?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A13%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Re-Thinking%20Bloomfield%E2%80%99s%20Concepts%20of%20Meaning:%20Do%20Meaning%20Really%20as%20a%20Weak%20Point%20in%20Language%20Study?&rft.jtitle=REiLA%20:%20journal%20of%20research%20and%20innovation%20in%20language&rft.au=Lauren,%20Cendy&rft.date=2019-12-29&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=84-89&rft.issn=2685-0818&rft.eissn=2685-3906&rft_id=info:doi/10.31849/reila.v1i3.3562&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_31849_reila_v1i3_3562%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true