Nest sites of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius in Near-Natural and Managed Riverine Forests

The main goals of this study were to determine whether woodpeckers differ in nest-site selection between near-natural old-growth forests protected for ca. 50 years and managed forests. Great Spotted Woodpeckers preferred oaks as nest sites, but Middle Spotted Woodpeckers selected dead trees as well...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta ornithologica 2006-07, Vol.41 (1), p.21-32
Hauptverfasser: Kosiński, Ziemowit, ksit, Paweł, winiecki, Aleksander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 32
container_issue 1
container_start_page 21
container_title Acta ornithologica
container_volume 41
creator Kosiński, Ziemowit
ksit, Paweł
winiecki, Aleksander
description The main goals of this study were to determine whether woodpeckers differ in nest-site selection between near-natural old-growth forests protected for ca. 50 years and managed forests. Great Spotted Woodpeckers preferred oaks as nest sites, but Middle Spotted Woodpeckers selected dead trees as well as live ashes and oaks. It was found that the degree of silviculture did not affect the preference for tree species between long-term protected and managed areas in either Dendrocopos species. However, the share of ashes as nesting trees for Middle Spotted Woodpeckers was distinctly smaller in managed stands. In primeval Quercus-Fraxinus-Ulmus riverine forests ashes are thought to have played an important role as a nest-site for this species. In unmanaged forests both woodpeckers nested in trees of a larger diameter, at a nearly twofold higher rate than in managed stands. Nest-height was influenced by tree diameter. However, these relationships varied between the two woodpecker species, in relation both to the type of management and to the tree species, and were the most pronounced in Middle Spotted Woodpeckers nesting in ashes in near-natural stands. The type of management did not affect the placements of nest-holes in relation to tree condition, state of tree stump and condition of the wood in either species. However, in comparison to the near-natural forests, both species excavated holes more frequently than expected in tree-trunks in the managed stands. The results of the present work suggest a convergence of some nest-site characteristics in managed forests.
doi_str_mv 10.3161/068.041.0108
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>bioone_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3161_068_041_0108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10.3161/068.041.0108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b270t-d9a00ffe8327fabf33067f7eac6fd7854b7ea85ec08da70fa8ec91a74bad70e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1KAzEUhYMoWKs7HyBrcepNk5mkS6m2CrWCP7gc7kxuJLWdDMlU8E18XKfUta7uWXzncPkYOxcwkqIQV1CYESgxAgHmgA2EliozSotDNgAAkRUqV8fsJKUVgJxIUAP2vaTU8eQ7Sjw4Po-EHX9uQ9eR5W8h2JbqD4qJ31BjY6hDGxLf4CpEjo3lD97aNf1fIOu3ifuGLwljtsRuG3G9X8AG3_vqk_-k6BvisxD7l9IpO3K4TnT2e4fsdXb7Mr3LFo_z--n1IqvGGrrMThDAOTJyrB1WTkootNOEdeGsNrmq-mxyqsFY1ODQUD0RqFWFVgPlcsgu97t1DClFcmUb_QbjVymg3Fkte6tlb7XcWe3xiz1e-RAa-hv-AVQOewQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nest sites of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius in Near-Natural and Managed Riverine Forests</title><source>BioOne Open Access Titles</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kosiński, Ziemowit ; ksit, Paweł ; winiecki, Aleksander</creator><creatorcontrib>Kosiński, Ziemowit ; ksit, Paweł ; winiecki, Aleksander</creatorcontrib><description>The main goals of this study were to determine whether woodpeckers differ in nest-site selection between near-natural old-growth forests protected for ca. 50 years and managed forests. Great Spotted Woodpeckers preferred oaks as nest sites, but Middle Spotted Woodpeckers selected dead trees as well as live ashes and oaks. It was found that the degree of silviculture did not affect the preference for tree species between long-term protected and managed areas in either Dendrocopos species. However, the share of ashes as nesting trees for Middle Spotted Woodpeckers was distinctly smaller in managed stands. In primeval Quercus-Fraxinus-Ulmus riverine forests ashes are thought to have played an important role as a nest-site for this species. In unmanaged forests both woodpeckers nested in trees of a larger diameter, at a nearly twofold higher rate than in managed stands. Nest-height was influenced by tree diameter. However, these relationships varied between the two woodpecker species, in relation both to the type of management and to the tree species, and were the most pronounced in Middle Spotted Woodpeckers nesting in ashes in near-natural stands. The type of management did not affect the placements of nest-holes in relation to tree condition, state of tree stump and condition of the wood in either species. However, in comparison to the near-natural forests, both species excavated holes more frequently than expected in tree-trunks in the managed stands. The results of the present work suggest a convergence of some nest-site characteristics in managed forests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6454</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1734-8471</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3161/068.041.0108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>forest management ; nest-site convergence ; nest-site selection ; riverine forests ; stand structure</subject><ispartof>Acta ornithologica, 2006-07, Vol.41 (1), p.21-32</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b270t-d9a00ffe8327fabf33067f7eac6fd7854b7ea85ec08da70fa8ec91a74bad70e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b270t-d9a00ffe8327fabf33067f7eac6fd7854b7ea85ec08da70fa8ec91a74bad70e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.3161/068.041.0108$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>109,314,780,784,26978,27924,27925,52363,52719</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kosiński, Ziemowit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ksit, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>winiecki, Aleksander</creatorcontrib><title>Nest sites of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius in Near-Natural and Managed Riverine Forests</title><title>Acta ornithologica</title><description>The main goals of this study were to determine whether woodpeckers differ in nest-site selection between near-natural old-growth forests protected for ca. 50 years and managed forests. Great Spotted Woodpeckers preferred oaks as nest sites, but Middle Spotted Woodpeckers selected dead trees as well as live ashes and oaks. It was found that the degree of silviculture did not affect the preference for tree species between long-term protected and managed areas in either Dendrocopos species. However, the share of ashes as nesting trees for Middle Spotted Woodpeckers was distinctly smaller in managed stands. In primeval Quercus-Fraxinus-Ulmus riverine forests ashes are thought to have played an important role as a nest-site for this species. In unmanaged forests both woodpeckers nested in trees of a larger diameter, at a nearly twofold higher rate than in managed stands. Nest-height was influenced by tree diameter. However, these relationships varied between the two woodpecker species, in relation both to the type of management and to the tree species, and were the most pronounced in Middle Spotted Woodpeckers nesting in ashes in near-natural stands. The type of management did not affect the placements of nest-holes in relation to tree condition, state of tree stump and condition of the wood in either species. However, in comparison to the near-natural forests, both species excavated holes more frequently than expected in tree-trunks in the managed stands. The results of the present work suggest a convergence of some nest-site characteristics in managed forests.</description><subject>forest management</subject><subject>nest-site convergence</subject><subject>nest-site selection</subject><subject>riverine forests</subject><subject>stand structure</subject><issn>0001-6454</issn><issn>1734-8471</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1KAzEUhYMoWKs7HyBrcepNk5mkS6m2CrWCP7gc7kxuJLWdDMlU8E18XKfUta7uWXzncPkYOxcwkqIQV1CYESgxAgHmgA2EliozSotDNgAAkRUqV8fsJKUVgJxIUAP2vaTU8eQ7Sjw4Po-EHX9uQ9eR5W8h2JbqD4qJ31BjY6hDGxLf4CpEjo3lD97aNf1fIOu3ifuGLwljtsRuG3G9X8AG3_vqk_-k6BvisxD7l9IpO3K4TnT2e4fsdXb7Mr3LFo_z--n1IqvGGrrMThDAOTJyrB1WTkootNOEdeGsNrmq-mxyqsFY1ODQUD0RqFWFVgPlcsgu97t1DClFcmUb_QbjVymg3Fkte6tlb7XcWe3xiz1e-RAa-hv-AVQOewQ</recordid><startdate>200607</startdate><enddate>200607</enddate><creator>Kosiński, Ziemowit</creator><creator>ksit, Paweł</creator><creator>winiecki, Aleksander</creator><general>Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200607</creationdate><title>Nest sites of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius in Near-Natural and Managed Riverine Forests</title><author>Kosiński, Ziemowit ; ksit, Paweł ; winiecki, Aleksander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b270t-d9a00ffe8327fabf33067f7eac6fd7854b7ea85ec08da70fa8ec91a74bad70e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>forest management</topic><topic>nest-site convergence</topic><topic>nest-site selection</topic><topic>riverine forests</topic><topic>stand structure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kosiński, Ziemowit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ksit, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>winiecki, Aleksander</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Acta ornithologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kosiński, Ziemowit</au><au>ksit, Paweł</au><au>winiecki, Aleksander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nest sites of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius in Near-Natural and Managed Riverine Forests</atitle><jtitle>Acta ornithologica</jtitle><date>2006-07</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>21-32</pages><issn>0001-6454</issn><eissn>1734-8471</eissn><abstract>The main goals of this study were to determine whether woodpeckers differ in nest-site selection between near-natural old-growth forests protected for ca. 50 years and managed forests. Great Spotted Woodpeckers preferred oaks as nest sites, but Middle Spotted Woodpeckers selected dead trees as well as live ashes and oaks. It was found that the degree of silviculture did not affect the preference for tree species between long-term protected and managed areas in either Dendrocopos species. However, the share of ashes as nesting trees for Middle Spotted Woodpeckers was distinctly smaller in managed stands. In primeval Quercus-Fraxinus-Ulmus riverine forests ashes are thought to have played an important role as a nest-site for this species. In unmanaged forests both woodpeckers nested in trees of a larger diameter, at a nearly twofold higher rate than in managed stands. Nest-height was influenced by tree diameter. However, these relationships varied between the two woodpecker species, in relation both to the type of management and to the tree species, and were the most pronounced in Middle Spotted Woodpeckers nesting in ashes in near-natural stands. The type of management did not affect the placements of nest-holes in relation to tree condition, state of tree stump and condition of the wood in either species. However, in comparison to the near-natural forests, both species excavated holes more frequently than expected in tree-trunks in the managed stands. The results of the present work suggest a convergence of some nest-site characteristics in managed forests.</abstract><pub>Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences</pub><doi>10.3161/068.041.0108</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-6454
ispartof Acta ornithologica, 2006-07, Vol.41 (1), p.21-32
issn 0001-6454
1734-8471
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3161_068_041_0108
source BioOne Open Access Titles; BioOne Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects forest management
nest-site convergence
nest-site selection
riverine forests
stand structure
title Nest sites of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius in Near-Natural and Managed Riverine Forests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A53%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-bioone_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nest%20sites%20of%20Great%20Spotted%20Woodpeckers%20Dendrocopos%20major%20and%20Middle%20Spotted%20Woodpeckers%20Dendrocopos%20medius%20in%20Near-Natural%20and%20Managed%20Riverine%20Forests&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ornithologica&rft.au=Kosi%C5%84ski,%20Ziemowit&rft.date=2006-07&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=21-32&rft.issn=0001-6454&rft.eissn=1734-8471&rft_id=info:doi/10.3161/068.041.0108&rft_dat=%3Cbioone_cross%3E10.3161/068.041.0108%3C/bioone_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true