Evaluation of research in context: an approach and two cases
Science is increasingly heterogeneous, posing new questions for research evaluation. How can we evaluate the between scientific and societal quality of research, taking into account differences between research fields and between research groups? In this paper we present the findings of two case stu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Research evaluation 2011-03, Vol.20 (1), p.61-72 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 72 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 61 |
| container_title | Research evaluation |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | de Jong, Stefan P L van Arensbergen, Pleun Daemen, Floortje van der Meulen, Barend van den Besselaar, Peter |
| description | Science is increasingly heterogeneous, posing new questions for research evaluation. How can we evaluate the between scientific and societal quality of research, taking into account differences between research fields and between research groups? In this paper we present the findings of two case studies in fields where societal and scholarly output of research are highly intertwined (architecture and law). We analyze the nature of the two fields in terms of research areas and specific aspects of knowledge dynamics. This results in an approach and indicators for contextual research evaluation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3152/095820211X12941371876346 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3152_095820211X12941371876346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.3152/095820211X12941371876346</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.3152/095820211X12941371876346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-bd628ce200a8d9243769d1e066d519317d7f2203d39997c35a6774f4c4e67b443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1KAzEUhYMoOFbfIS8wmpvcyY-4kVKtUHCj4G64TTI4UidDMvXn7W2pW8HVgcP5zuJjjIO4VNDIK-EaK4UEeAHpEJQBa7RCfcQqQAN1g-iOWbWf1budO2VnpbwJAVYLrNjN4oM2W5r6NPDU8RxLpOxfeT9wn4Ypfk3XnAZO45gT7XoaAp8-E_dUYjlnJx1tSrz4zRl7vls8zZf16vH-YX67qj2Cm-p10NL6KIUgG5xEZbQLEIXWoQGnwATTSSlUUM4541VD2hjs0GPUZo2oZswefn1OpeTYtWPu3yl_tyDavYX2Lws7VB3QtB3_T_0AQ11caw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of research in context: an approach and two cases</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>de Jong, Stefan P L ; van Arensbergen, Pleun ; Daemen, Floortje ; van der Meulen, Barend ; van den Besselaar, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Stefan P L ; van Arensbergen, Pleun ; Daemen, Floortje ; van der Meulen, Barend ; van den Besselaar, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Science is increasingly heterogeneous, posing new questions for research evaluation. How can we evaluate the between scientific and societal quality of research, taking into account differences between research fields and between research groups? In this paper we present the findings of two case studies in fields where societal and scholarly output of research are highly intertwined (architecture and law). We analyze the nature of the two fields in terms of research areas and specific aspects of knowledge dynamics. This results in an approach and indicators for contextual research evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-2029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-5449</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876346</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beech Tree Publishing</publisher><ispartof>Research evaluation, 2011-03, Vol.20 (1), p.61-72</ispartof><rights>Beech Tree Publishing 2011 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-bd628ce200a8d9243769d1e066d519317d7f2203d39997c35a6774f4c4e67b443</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Stefan P L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Arensbergen, Pleun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daemen, Floortje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Meulen, Barend</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Besselaar, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of research in context: an approach and two cases</title><title>Research evaluation</title><addtitle>res eval</addtitle><description>Science is increasingly heterogeneous, posing new questions for research evaluation. How can we evaluate the between scientific and societal quality of research, taking into account differences between research fields and between research groups? In this paper we present the findings of two case studies in fields where societal and scholarly output of research are highly intertwined (architecture and law). We analyze the nature of the two fields in terms of research areas and specific aspects of knowledge dynamics. This results in an approach and indicators for contextual research evaluation.</description><issn>0958-2029</issn><issn>1471-5449</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1KAzEUhYMoOFbfIS8wmpvcyY-4kVKtUHCj4G64TTI4UidDMvXn7W2pW8HVgcP5zuJjjIO4VNDIK-EaK4UEeAHpEJQBa7RCfcQqQAN1g-iOWbWf1budO2VnpbwJAVYLrNjN4oM2W5r6NPDU8RxLpOxfeT9wn4Ypfk3XnAZO45gT7XoaAp8-E_dUYjlnJx1tSrz4zRl7vls8zZf16vH-YX67qj2Cm-p10NL6KIUgG5xEZbQLEIXWoQGnwATTSSlUUM4541VD2hjs0GPUZo2oZswefn1OpeTYtWPu3yl_tyDavYX2Lws7VB3QtB3_T_0AQ11caw</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>de Jong, Stefan P L</creator><creator>van Arensbergen, Pleun</creator><creator>Daemen, Floortje</creator><creator>van der Meulen, Barend</creator><creator>van den Besselaar, Peter</creator><general>Beech Tree Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>Evaluation of research in context: an approach and two cases</title><author>de Jong, Stefan P L ; van Arensbergen, Pleun ; Daemen, Floortje ; van der Meulen, Barend ; van den Besselaar, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-bd628ce200a8d9243769d1e066d519317d7f2203d39997c35a6774f4c4e67b443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Stefan P L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Arensbergen, Pleun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daemen, Floortje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Meulen, Barend</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Besselaar, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Research evaluation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Jong, Stefan P L</au><au>van Arensbergen, Pleun</au><au>Daemen, Floortje</au><au>van der Meulen, Barend</au><au>van den Besselaar, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of research in context: an approach and two cases</atitle><jtitle>Research evaluation</jtitle><stitle>res eval</stitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>61-72</pages><issn>0958-2029</issn><eissn>1471-5449</eissn><abstract>Science is increasingly heterogeneous, posing new questions for research evaluation. How can we evaluate the between scientific and societal quality of research, taking into account differences between research fields and between research groups? In this paper we present the findings of two case studies in fields where societal and scholarly output of research are highly intertwined (architecture and law). We analyze the nature of the two fields in terms of research areas and specific aspects of knowledge dynamics. This results in an approach and indicators for contextual research evaluation.</abstract><pub>Beech Tree Publishing</pub><doi>10.3152/095820211X12941371876346</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0958-2029 |
| ispartof | Research evaluation, 2011-03, Vol.20 (1), p.61-72 |
| issn | 0958-2029 1471-5449 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_3152_095820211X12941371876346 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| title | Evaluation of research in context: an approach and two cases |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A44%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20research%20in%20context:%20an%20approach%20and%20two%20cases&rft.jtitle=Research%20evaluation&rft.au=de%20Jong,%20Stefan%20P%20L&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=61-72&rft.issn=0958-2029&rft.eissn=1471-5449&rft_id=info:doi/10.3152/095820211X12941371876346&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.3152/095820211X12941371876346%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.3152/095820211X12941371876346&rfr_iscdi=true |