Analysis of Electric Vehicle Purchaser Satisfaction and Rejection Reasons

This study used a matched data set drawn from more than 1 million new vehicle postpurchase consumer satisfaction surveys to test for differences in satisfaction and reasons for vehicle choice and rejection between conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and plug-in electric vehicles (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research record 2017, Vol.2628 (1), p.110-119
Hauptverfasser: Jabbari, Parasto, Chernicoff, William, MacKenzie, Don
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 119
container_issue 1
container_start_page 110
container_title Transportation research record
container_volume 2628
creator Jabbari, Parasto
Chernicoff, William
MacKenzie, Don
description This study used a matched data set drawn from more than 1 million new vehicle postpurchase consumer satisfaction surveys to test for differences in satisfaction and reasons for vehicle choice and rejection between conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). The Wilcoxon signed rank test and the McNemar and chi-square tests were used to evaluate consumer satisfaction and reasons for rejecting considered vehicles, respectively. Results show that PEV purchasers and considerers—people who considered purchasing a specific type of car (Editor’s note: This term is the authors’.)—were less satisfied with their overall purchase experience, but those who considered and rejected a PEV were less likely than those who considered and rejected an ICE to cite the dealer’s attitude as the reason for rejection. Price and value were the most cited reasons and were similarly important for both groups. Reasons related to model availability and vehicle attributes were more often a concern for PEV considerers than for ICE considerers. These results suggest that even with existing incentives, the limitations of the current technology (e.g., price and range) and the variety of available vehicles are the most important challenges to market expansion.
doi_str_mv 10.3141/2628-12
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3141_2628_12</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.3141_2628-12</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.3141_2628-12</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-e524fe000f5d0a21f9bcf70f903b37a863a65e7f830204c69a2ceac50f7ca9e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1Lw0AURQdRMFbxL8xCcBV9M5NMkmUptRYKSv3YDq_TNzYhJjIvXfTf2xJ3ri4XDhfuEeJWwYNRmXrUVpep0mci0cpWaQa5PhcJGKtSVZXqUlwxNwDGZIVJxHLaYXvgmmUf5LwlP8Tay0_a1b4l-bqPfodMUb7hUHNAP9R9J7HbyjU1NLY1IfcdX4uLgC3TzV9OxMfT_H32nK5eFsvZdJV6XeohpVxngQAg5FtArUK18aGAUIHZmAJLa9DmVITSgIbM2wq1J_Q5hMJjRdZMxP2462PPHCm4n1h_Yzw4Be5kwJ0MOKWP5N1IMn6Ra_p9PH7lf9gv3K5Y7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of Electric Vehicle Purchaser Satisfaction and Rejection Reasons</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Jabbari, Parasto ; Chernicoff, William ; MacKenzie, Don</creator><creatorcontrib>Jabbari, Parasto ; Chernicoff, William ; MacKenzie, Don</creatorcontrib><description>This study used a matched data set drawn from more than 1 million new vehicle postpurchase consumer satisfaction surveys to test for differences in satisfaction and reasons for vehicle choice and rejection between conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). The Wilcoxon signed rank test and the McNemar and chi-square tests were used to evaluate consumer satisfaction and reasons for rejecting considered vehicles, respectively. Results show that PEV purchasers and considerers—people who considered purchasing a specific type of car (Editor’s note: This term is the authors’.)—were less satisfied with their overall purchase experience, but those who considered and rejected a PEV were less likely than those who considered and rejected an ICE to cite the dealer’s attitude as the reason for rejection. Price and value were the most cited reasons and were similarly important for both groups. Reasons related to model availability and vehicle attributes were more often a concern for PEV considerers than for ICE considerers. These results suggest that even with existing incentives, the limitations of the current technology (e.g., price and range) and the variety of available vehicles are the most important challenges to market expansion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-1981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-4052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3141/2628-12</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Transportation research record, 2017, Vol.2628 (1), p.110-119</ispartof><rights>2017 National Academy of Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-e524fe000f5d0a21f9bcf70f903b37a863a65e7f830204c69a2ceac50f7ca9e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-e524fe000f5d0a21f9bcf70f903b37a863a65e7f830204c69a2ceac50f7ca9e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3141/2628-12$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3141/2628-12$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,21817,27921,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jabbari, Parasto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chernicoff, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKenzie, Don</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of Electric Vehicle Purchaser Satisfaction and Rejection Reasons</title><title>Transportation research record</title><description>This study used a matched data set drawn from more than 1 million new vehicle postpurchase consumer satisfaction surveys to test for differences in satisfaction and reasons for vehicle choice and rejection between conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). The Wilcoxon signed rank test and the McNemar and chi-square tests were used to evaluate consumer satisfaction and reasons for rejecting considered vehicles, respectively. Results show that PEV purchasers and considerers—people who considered purchasing a specific type of car (Editor’s note: This term is the authors’.)—were less satisfied with their overall purchase experience, but those who considered and rejected a PEV were less likely than those who considered and rejected an ICE to cite the dealer’s attitude as the reason for rejection. Price and value were the most cited reasons and were similarly important for both groups. Reasons related to model availability and vehicle attributes were more often a concern for PEV considerers than for ICE considerers. These results suggest that even with existing incentives, the limitations of the current technology (e.g., price and range) and the variety of available vehicles are the most important challenges to market expansion.</description><issn>0361-1981</issn><issn>2169-4052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkE1Lw0AURQdRMFbxL8xCcBV9M5NMkmUptRYKSv3YDq_TNzYhJjIvXfTf2xJ3ri4XDhfuEeJWwYNRmXrUVpep0mci0cpWaQa5PhcJGKtSVZXqUlwxNwDGZIVJxHLaYXvgmmUf5LwlP8Tay0_a1b4l-bqPfodMUb7hUHNAP9R9J7HbyjU1NLY1IfcdX4uLgC3TzV9OxMfT_H32nK5eFsvZdJV6XeohpVxngQAg5FtArUK18aGAUIHZmAJLa9DmVITSgIbM2wq1J_Q5hMJjRdZMxP2462PPHCm4n1h_Yzw4Be5kwJ0MOKWP5N1IMn6Ra_p9PH7lf9gv3K5Y7Q</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Jabbari, Parasto</creator><creator>Chernicoff, William</creator><creator>MacKenzie, Don</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Analysis of Electric Vehicle Purchaser Satisfaction and Rejection Reasons</title><author>Jabbari, Parasto ; Chernicoff, William ; MacKenzie, Don</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-e524fe000f5d0a21f9bcf70f903b37a863a65e7f830204c69a2ceac50f7ca9e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jabbari, Parasto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chernicoff, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKenzie, Don</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jabbari, Parasto</au><au>Chernicoff, William</au><au>MacKenzie, Don</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of Electric Vehicle Purchaser Satisfaction and Rejection Reasons</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>2628</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>110</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>110-119</pages><issn>0361-1981</issn><eissn>2169-4052</eissn><abstract>This study used a matched data set drawn from more than 1 million new vehicle postpurchase consumer satisfaction surveys to test for differences in satisfaction and reasons for vehicle choice and rejection between conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). The Wilcoxon signed rank test and the McNemar and chi-square tests were used to evaluate consumer satisfaction and reasons for rejecting considered vehicles, respectively. Results show that PEV purchasers and considerers—people who considered purchasing a specific type of car (Editor’s note: This term is the authors’.)—were less satisfied with their overall purchase experience, but those who considered and rejected a PEV were less likely than those who considered and rejected an ICE to cite the dealer’s attitude as the reason for rejection. Price and value were the most cited reasons and were similarly important for both groups. Reasons related to model availability and vehicle attributes were more often a concern for PEV considerers than for ICE considerers. These results suggest that even with existing incentives, the limitations of the current technology (e.g., price and range) and the variety of available vehicles are the most important challenges to market expansion.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.3141/2628-12</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-1981
ispartof Transportation research record, 2017, Vol.2628 (1), p.110-119
issn 0361-1981
2169-4052
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3141_2628_12
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Analysis of Electric Vehicle Purchaser Satisfaction and Rejection Reasons
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T11%3A59%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20Electric%20Vehicle%20Purchaser%20Satisfaction%20and%20Rejection%20Reasons&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research%20record&rft.au=Jabbari,%20Parasto&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=2628&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=110-119&rft.issn=0361-1981&rft.eissn=2169-4052&rft_id=info:doi/10.3141/2628-12&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.3141_2628-12%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.3141_2628-12&rfr_iscdi=true