Review of Pedestrian Level of Service: Perspective in Developing Countries

Analyses of pedestrian-related issues have been gaining much attention from researchers in recent years, particularly studies of pedestrian safety and pedestrian level of service (LOS) in developing countries. The focus for evaluating pedestrian LOS has shifted from quantitative methods to qualitati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research record 2016, Vol.2581 (1), p.37-47
Hauptverfasser: Kadali, B. Raghuram, Vedagiri, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 47
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title Transportation research record
container_volume 2581
creator Kadali, B. Raghuram
Vedagiri, P.
description Analyses of pedestrian-related issues have been gaining much attention from researchers in recent years, particularly studies of pedestrian safety and pedestrian level of service (LOS) in developing countries. The focus for evaluating pedestrian LOS has shifted from quantitative methods to qualitative methods and factors to be considered have been changing. Crosswalks (namely, signalized, unsignalized, and midblock) are complex locations because of the interaction of pedestrians with the vehicle flow. Pedestrian LOS at crosswalks is quite different from that on sidewalks. A measure of effectiveness (MOE) is usually adopted for evaluation of pedestrian facilities, and the MOE changes with the type of facility. Pedestrian delay and space at the corner are considered as MOEs for signalized intersections. The MOE might depend on pedestrian safety, delay, available vehicle gaps (crossing difficulty), and behavior of pedestrians as well as that of vehicle drivers at unprotected midblock crosswalks. This study sought to identify the importance of pedestrian LOS in the context of developing countries, particularly at unprotected midblock crosswalks. To achieve this objective, a review of the literature was carried out on the pedestrian LOS at various facilities such as the sidewalk, intersection, and midblock crosswalk. The review highlighted the need for further pedestrian LOS studies at various facilities under mixed traffic.
doi_str_mv 10.3141/2581-05
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3141_2581_05</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.3141_2581-05</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.3141_2581-05</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-f9e706494042dbd193dc4a89db936349b93610633c760a9fa4ca2c080af2b7cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEtLxDAUhYMoWEfxL2QhuIrePJo27qSOLwqKj3VJ09shw9iWZKbiv7dl3Lk6cO53DpdDyDmHK8kVvxZpzhmkByQRXBumIBWHJAGpOeMm58fkJMY1gJQqkwl5fsPR4zftW_qKDcZt8LajJY64mb13DKN3eDMdQxzQbf2I1Hf0bgb6wXcrWvS7bkphPCVHrd1EPPvTBfm8X34Uj6x8eXgqbkvmpMq3rDWYgVZGgRJN3XAjG6dsbpraSC2VmYWDltJlGqxprXJWOMjBtqLOnJMLcrnvdaGPMWBbDcF_2fBTcajmCap5ggrSibzYk9GusFr3u9BNj_3DfgHUCFiZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of Pedestrian Level of Service: Perspective in Developing Countries</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Kadali, B. Raghuram ; Vedagiri, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kadali, B. Raghuram ; Vedagiri, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Analyses of pedestrian-related issues have been gaining much attention from researchers in recent years, particularly studies of pedestrian safety and pedestrian level of service (LOS) in developing countries. The focus for evaluating pedestrian LOS has shifted from quantitative methods to qualitative methods and factors to be considered have been changing. Crosswalks (namely, signalized, unsignalized, and midblock) are complex locations because of the interaction of pedestrians with the vehicle flow. Pedestrian LOS at crosswalks is quite different from that on sidewalks. A measure of effectiveness (MOE) is usually adopted for evaluation of pedestrian facilities, and the MOE changes with the type of facility. Pedestrian delay and space at the corner are considered as MOEs for signalized intersections. The MOE might depend on pedestrian safety, delay, available vehicle gaps (crossing difficulty), and behavior of pedestrians as well as that of vehicle drivers at unprotected midblock crosswalks. This study sought to identify the importance of pedestrian LOS in the context of developing countries, particularly at unprotected midblock crosswalks. To achieve this objective, a review of the literature was carried out on the pedestrian LOS at various facilities such as the sidewalk, intersection, and midblock crosswalk. The review highlighted the need for further pedestrian LOS studies at various facilities under mixed traffic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-1981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-4052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3141/2581-05</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Transportation research record, 2016, Vol.2581 (1), p.37-47</ispartof><rights>2016 National Academy of Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-f9e706494042dbd193dc4a89db936349b93610633c760a9fa4ca2c080af2b7cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-f9e706494042dbd193dc4a89db936349b93610633c760a9fa4ca2c080af2b7cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3141/2581-05$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3141/2581-05$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,21798,27900,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kadali, B. Raghuram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vedagiri, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Review of Pedestrian Level of Service: Perspective in Developing Countries</title><title>Transportation research record</title><description>Analyses of pedestrian-related issues have been gaining much attention from researchers in recent years, particularly studies of pedestrian safety and pedestrian level of service (LOS) in developing countries. The focus for evaluating pedestrian LOS has shifted from quantitative methods to qualitative methods and factors to be considered have been changing. Crosswalks (namely, signalized, unsignalized, and midblock) are complex locations because of the interaction of pedestrians with the vehicle flow. Pedestrian LOS at crosswalks is quite different from that on sidewalks. A measure of effectiveness (MOE) is usually adopted for evaluation of pedestrian facilities, and the MOE changes with the type of facility. Pedestrian delay and space at the corner are considered as MOEs for signalized intersections. The MOE might depend on pedestrian safety, delay, available vehicle gaps (crossing difficulty), and behavior of pedestrians as well as that of vehicle drivers at unprotected midblock crosswalks. This study sought to identify the importance of pedestrian LOS in the context of developing countries, particularly at unprotected midblock crosswalks. To achieve this objective, a review of the literature was carried out on the pedestrian LOS at various facilities such as the sidewalk, intersection, and midblock crosswalk. The review highlighted the need for further pedestrian LOS studies at various facilities under mixed traffic.</description><issn>0361-1981</issn><issn>2169-4052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkEtLxDAUhYMoWEfxL2QhuIrePJo27qSOLwqKj3VJ09shw9iWZKbiv7dl3Lk6cO53DpdDyDmHK8kVvxZpzhmkByQRXBumIBWHJAGpOeMm58fkJMY1gJQqkwl5fsPR4zftW_qKDcZt8LajJY64mb13DKN3eDMdQxzQbf2I1Hf0bgb6wXcrWvS7bkphPCVHrd1EPPvTBfm8X34Uj6x8eXgqbkvmpMq3rDWYgVZGgRJN3XAjG6dsbpraSC2VmYWDltJlGqxprXJWOMjBtqLOnJMLcrnvdaGPMWBbDcF_2fBTcajmCap5ggrSibzYk9GusFr3u9BNj_3DfgHUCFiZ</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Kadali, B. Raghuram</creator><creator>Vedagiri, P.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Review of Pedestrian Level of Service: Perspective in Developing Countries</title><author>Kadali, B. Raghuram ; Vedagiri, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-f9e706494042dbd193dc4a89db936349b93610633c760a9fa4ca2c080af2b7cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kadali, B. Raghuram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vedagiri, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kadali, B. Raghuram</au><au>Vedagiri, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of Pedestrian Level of Service: Perspective in Developing Countries</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>2581</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>37-47</pages><issn>0361-1981</issn><eissn>2169-4052</eissn><abstract>Analyses of pedestrian-related issues have been gaining much attention from researchers in recent years, particularly studies of pedestrian safety and pedestrian level of service (LOS) in developing countries. The focus for evaluating pedestrian LOS has shifted from quantitative methods to qualitative methods and factors to be considered have been changing. Crosswalks (namely, signalized, unsignalized, and midblock) are complex locations because of the interaction of pedestrians with the vehicle flow. Pedestrian LOS at crosswalks is quite different from that on sidewalks. A measure of effectiveness (MOE) is usually adopted for evaluation of pedestrian facilities, and the MOE changes with the type of facility. Pedestrian delay and space at the corner are considered as MOEs for signalized intersections. The MOE might depend on pedestrian safety, delay, available vehicle gaps (crossing difficulty), and behavior of pedestrians as well as that of vehicle drivers at unprotected midblock crosswalks. This study sought to identify the importance of pedestrian LOS in the context of developing countries, particularly at unprotected midblock crosswalks. To achieve this objective, a review of the literature was carried out on the pedestrian LOS at various facilities such as the sidewalk, intersection, and midblock crosswalk. The review highlighted the need for further pedestrian LOS studies at various facilities under mixed traffic.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.3141/2581-05</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-1981
ispartof Transportation research record, 2016, Vol.2581 (1), p.37-47
issn 0361-1981
2169-4052
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3141_2581_05
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Review of Pedestrian Level of Service: Perspective in Developing Countries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T17%3A48%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20Pedestrian%20Level%20of%20Service:%20Perspective%20in%20Developing%20Countries&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research%20record&rft.au=Kadali,%20B.%20Raghuram&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=2581&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=37-47&rft.issn=0361-1981&rft.eissn=2169-4052&rft_id=info:doi/10.3141/2581-05&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.3141_2581-05%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.3141_2581-05&rfr_iscdi=true