Transit Stop Environments and Waiting Time Perception: Impacts of Trees, Traffic Exposure, and Polluted Air

Reducing the burden of waiting in transit travel is critical to increasing the attractiveness of public transportation. Waiting time perceptions are highly subjective and vary according to mode, availability of schedule information, and stop amenities. The research on pedestrian design finds that hi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research record 2016, Vol.2543 (1), p.82-90
Hauptverfasser: Lagune-Reutler, Marina, Guthrie, Andrew, Fan, Yingling, Levinson, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 90
container_issue 1
container_start_page 82
container_title Transportation research record
container_volume 2543
creator Lagune-Reutler, Marina
Guthrie, Andrew
Fan, Yingling
Levinson, David
description Reducing the burden of waiting in transit travel is critical to increasing the attractiveness of public transportation. Waiting time perceptions are highly subjective and vary according to mode, availability of schedule information, and stop amenities. The research on pedestrian design finds that high-quality and natural environments reduce stress and encourage walking and bicycling. It seems reasonable that similar effects would apply for transit users on the basis of the environments around transit stops, but little research directly explores the issue. This paper responds to this knowledge gap by examining how perceptions of waiting time vary in relation to stop environments. The research compared transit users’ actual and estimated wait time at 36 stops and stations in a mix of environmental situations in the region of the Twin Cities, Minnesota. Regression analysis explained the variation in riders’ self-reported waiting time as a function of their externally observed waiting times as well as characteristics of the environment surrounding the stop and station. For waits longer than 5 min, perceptible pollution and exposure to traffic led to significant overestimates of waiting time. Riders waiting at stops with dense, mature tree cover, however, significantly underestimated their waiting times. The effect of dense, mature tree cover is strong enough to compensate for the effects of both air pollution and traffic awareness. Policy implications and further research needs are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.3141/2543-09
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3141_2543_09</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.3141_2543-09</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.3141_2543-09</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-7279ade016ee19e8dff411736e957baa7ebebf37dbe37414aa571cf8469da47f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEFLwzAYhoMoOKf4F3IQvKyar0mbxdsYUwcDB1Y8lrT9MjLXpCSd6L-3c948PZeHh5eXkGtgdxwE3KeZ4AlTJ2SUQq4SwbL0lIwYzyEBNYVzchHjljHOheQj8lEE7aLt6WvvO7pwnzZ416LrI9Wuoe_a9tZtaGFbpGsMNXa99e6BLttO14PkDS0CYpwM0MbYmi6-Oh_3ASe_gbXf7fY9NnRmwyU5M3oX8eqPY_L2uCjmz8nq5Wk5n62SmkPWJzKVSjfIIEcEhdPGGAEgeY4qk5XWEiusDJdNhVwKEFpnEmozFblqtJCGj8ntsVsHH2NAU3bBtjp8l8DKw0fl4aOSqcG8OZpRb7Dc-n1ww7B_2g9g_mU4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transit Stop Environments and Waiting Time Perception: Impacts of Trees, Traffic Exposure, and Polluted Air</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Lagune-Reutler, Marina ; Guthrie, Andrew ; Fan, Yingling ; Levinson, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Lagune-Reutler, Marina ; Guthrie, Andrew ; Fan, Yingling ; Levinson, David</creatorcontrib><description>Reducing the burden of waiting in transit travel is critical to increasing the attractiveness of public transportation. Waiting time perceptions are highly subjective and vary according to mode, availability of schedule information, and stop amenities. The research on pedestrian design finds that high-quality and natural environments reduce stress and encourage walking and bicycling. It seems reasonable that similar effects would apply for transit users on the basis of the environments around transit stops, but little research directly explores the issue. This paper responds to this knowledge gap by examining how perceptions of waiting time vary in relation to stop environments. The research compared transit users’ actual and estimated wait time at 36 stops and stations in a mix of environmental situations in the region of the Twin Cities, Minnesota. Regression analysis explained the variation in riders’ self-reported waiting time as a function of their externally observed waiting times as well as characteristics of the environment surrounding the stop and station. For waits longer than 5 min, perceptible pollution and exposure to traffic led to significant overestimates of waiting time. Riders waiting at stops with dense, mature tree cover, however, significantly underestimated their waiting times. The effect of dense, mature tree cover is strong enough to compensate for the effects of both air pollution and traffic awareness. Policy implications and further research needs are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-1981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-4052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3141/2543-09</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Transportation research record, 2016, Vol.2543 (1), p.82-90</ispartof><rights>2016 National Academy of Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-7279ade016ee19e8dff411736e957baa7ebebf37dbe37414aa571cf8469da47f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-7279ade016ee19e8dff411736e957baa7ebebf37dbe37414aa571cf8469da47f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3141/2543-09$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3141/2543-09$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,21798,27900,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lagune-Reutler, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guthrie, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Yingling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levinson, David</creatorcontrib><title>Transit Stop Environments and Waiting Time Perception: Impacts of Trees, Traffic Exposure, and Polluted Air</title><title>Transportation research record</title><description>Reducing the burden of waiting in transit travel is critical to increasing the attractiveness of public transportation. Waiting time perceptions are highly subjective and vary according to mode, availability of schedule information, and stop amenities. The research on pedestrian design finds that high-quality and natural environments reduce stress and encourage walking and bicycling. It seems reasonable that similar effects would apply for transit users on the basis of the environments around transit stops, but little research directly explores the issue. This paper responds to this knowledge gap by examining how perceptions of waiting time vary in relation to stop environments. The research compared transit users’ actual and estimated wait time at 36 stops and stations in a mix of environmental situations in the region of the Twin Cities, Minnesota. Regression analysis explained the variation in riders’ self-reported waiting time as a function of their externally observed waiting times as well as characteristics of the environment surrounding the stop and station. For waits longer than 5 min, perceptible pollution and exposure to traffic led to significant overestimates of waiting time. Riders waiting at stops with dense, mature tree cover, however, significantly underestimated their waiting times. The effect of dense, mature tree cover is strong enough to compensate for the effects of both air pollution and traffic awareness. Policy implications and further research needs are discussed.</description><issn>0361-1981</issn><issn>2169-4052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkEFLwzAYhoMoOKf4F3IQvKyar0mbxdsYUwcDB1Y8lrT9MjLXpCSd6L-3c948PZeHh5eXkGtgdxwE3KeZ4AlTJ2SUQq4SwbL0lIwYzyEBNYVzchHjljHOheQj8lEE7aLt6WvvO7pwnzZ416LrI9Wuoe_a9tZtaGFbpGsMNXa99e6BLttO14PkDS0CYpwM0MbYmi6-Oh_3ASe_gbXf7fY9NnRmwyU5M3oX8eqPY_L2uCjmz8nq5Wk5n62SmkPWJzKVSjfIIEcEhdPGGAEgeY4qk5XWEiusDJdNhVwKEFpnEmozFblqtJCGj8ntsVsHH2NAU3bBtjp8l8DKw0fl4aOSqcG8OZpRb7Dc-n1ww7B_2g9g_mU4</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Lagune-Reutler, Marina</creator><creator>Guthrie, Andrew</creator><creator>Fan, Yingling</creator><creator>Levinson, David</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Transit Stop Environments and Waiting Time Perception: Impacts of Trees, Traffic Exposure, and Polluted Air</title><author>Lagune-Reutler, Marina ; Guthrie, Andrew ; Fan, Yingling ; Levinson, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-7279ade016ee19e8dff411736e957baa7ebebf37dbe37414aa571cf8469da47f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lagune-Reutler, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guthrie, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Yingling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levinson, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lagune-Reutler, Marina</au><au>Guthrie, Andrew</au><au>Fan, Yingling</au><au>Levinson, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transit Stop Environments and Waiting Time Perception: Impacts of Trees, Traffic Exposure, and Polluted Air</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>2543</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>82-90</pages><issn>0361-1981</issn><eissn>2169-4052</eissn><abstract>Reducing the burden of waiting in transit travel is critical to increasing the attractiveness of public transportation. Waiting time perceptions are highly subjective and vary according to mode, availability of schedule information, and stop amenities. The research on pedestrian design finds that high-quality and natural environments reduce stress and encourage walking and bicycling. It seems reasonable that similar effects would apply for transit users on the basis of the environments around transit stops, but little research directly explores the issue. This paper responds to this knowledge gap by examining how perceptions of waiting time vary in relation to stop environments. The research compared transit users’ actual and estimated wait time at 36 stops and stations in a mix of environmental situations in the region of the Twin Cities, Minnesota. Regression analysis explained the variation in riders’ self-reported waiting time as a function of their externally observed waiting times as well as characteristics of the environment surrounding the stop and station. For waits longer than 5 min, perceptible pollution and exposure to traffic led to significant overestimates of waiting time. Riders waiting at stops with dense, mature tree cover, however, significantly underestimated their waiting times. The effect of dense, mature tree cover is strong enough to compensate for the effects of both air pollution and traffic awareness. Policy implications and further research needs are discussed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.3141/2543-09</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-1981
ispartof Transportation research record, 2016, Vol.2543 (1), p.82-90
issn 0361-1981
2169-4052
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3141_2543_09
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Transit Stop Environments and Waiting Time Perception: Impacts of Trees, Traffic Exposure, and Polluted Air
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T22%3A30%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transit%20Stop%20Environments%20and%20Waiting%20Time%20Perception:%20Impacts%20of%20Trees,%20Traffic%20Exposure,%20and%20Polluted%20Air&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research%20record&rft.au=Lagune-Reutler,%20Marina&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=2543&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=82-90&rft.issn=0361-1981&rft.eissn=2169-4052&rft_id=info:doi/10.3141/2543-09&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.3141_2543-09%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.3141_2543-09&rfr_iscdi=true