Railing Systems for Use on Timber Deck Bridges

Bridge railing systems in the United States have historically been designed based on static load criteria given in the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. In the past decade, full-scale vehicle crash testing has been recognized as a more appropriate and reliable method of evaluating...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research record 1999, Vol.1656 (1), p.110-119
Hauptverfasser: Faller, Ronald K., Ritter, Michael A., Rosson, Barry T., Duwadi, Sheila R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 119
container_issue 1
container_start_page 110
container_title Transportation research record
container_volume 1656
creator Faller, Ronald K.
Ritter, Michael A.
Rosson, Barry T.
Duwadi, Sheila R.
description Bridge railing systems in the United States have historically been designed based on static load criteria given in the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. In the past decade, full-scale vehicle crash testing has been recognized as a more appropriate and reliable method of evaluating bridge railing acceptability. In 1989, AASHTO published the Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings, which gave the recommendations and procedures to evaluate bridge rails by full-scale vehicle crash testing. In 1993, the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) published Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features, which provided criteria for evaluating longitudinal barriers. Based on these specifications, a cooperative research program was initiated between the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the Forest Products Laboratory, and later the FHWA, to develop and crash test 11 bridge rails for wood deck bridges. The research that resulted in successful development and testing of 11 bridge railing systems for longitudinally and transversely laminated wood bridge decks in accordance with AASHTO Performance Level 1 and 2 (PL-1 and PL-2) requirements and Test Levels 1, 2, and 4 (TL-1, TL-2, and TL-4) requirements of NCHRP Report 350 are described here.
doi_str_mv 10.3141/1656-15
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3141_1656_15</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.3141_1656-15</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.3141_1656-15</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2575-6ec21770fc9866f8744dfdd5c3230294231dc3a9989e00f0ea7a6641da1465b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplj8tKAzEYRoMoOFbxFbIQXKXmz3Wy1HqFgqDtOqS5DFPnUhJd9O1tqdCFq29zOHwHoWugUw4C7kBJRUCeoIqBMkRQyU5RRbkCAqaGc3RRyppSzoXmFZp-uLZrhwZ_bst37AtOY8bLEvE44EXbr2LGj9F_4YfchiaWS3SWXFfi1d9O0PL5aTF7JfP3l7fZ_Zx4JrUkKnoGWtPkTa1UqrUQIYUgPWecMiMYh-C5M6Y2kdJEo9NOKQHBgVByRfkE3R68Po-l5JjsJre9y1sL1O4z7T7TgtyRNwdy44p3Xcpu8G054lArreCIFddEux5_8rD7_8_2C_w1WX8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Railing Systems for Use on Timber Deck Bridges</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Faller, Ronald K. ; Ritter, Michael A. ; Rosson, Barry T. ; Duwadi, Sheila R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Faller, Ronald K. ; Ritter, Michael A. ; Rosson, Barry T. ; Duwadi, Sheila R.</creatorcontrib><description>Bridge railing systems in the United States have historically been designed based on static load criteria given in the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. In the past decade, full-scale vehicle crash testing has been recognized as a more appropriate and reliable method of evaluating bridge railing acceptability. In 1989, AASHTO published the Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings, which gave the recommendations and procedures to evaluate bridge rails by full-scale vehicle crash testing. In 1993, the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) published Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features, which provided criteria for evaluating longitudinal barriers. Based on these specifications, a cooperative research program was initiated between the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the Forest Products Laboratory, and later the FHWA, to develop and crash test 11 bridge rails for wood deck bridges. The research that resulted in successful development and testing of 11 bridge railing systems for longitudinally and transversely laminated wood bridge decks in accordance with AASHTO Performance Level 1 and 2 (PL-1 and PL-2) requirements and Test Levels 1, 2, and 4 (TL-1, TL-2, and TL-4) requirements of NCHRP Report 350 are described here.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-1981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-4052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3141/1656-15</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRREDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Bridge elements ; Bridges ; Buildings. Public works ; Exact sciences and technology ; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction ; Road operations (signalization, lighting, safety and accessories, snow clearance, acoustical panel, etc.) ; Road transportation and traffic ; Transportation infrastructure</subject><ispartof>Transportation research record, 1999, Vol.1656 (1), p.110-119</ispartof><rights>1999 National Academy of Sciences</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2575-6ec21770fc9866f8744dfdd5c3230294231dc3a9989e00f0ea7a6641da1465b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2575-6ec21770fc9866f8744dfdd5c3230294231dc3a9989e00f0ea7a6641da1465b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3141/1656-15$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3141/1656-15$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,4009,4035,4036,21799,23910,23911,25119,27902,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1186761$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Faller, Ronald K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosson, Barry T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duwadi, Sheila R.</creatorcontrib><title>Railing Systems for Use on Timber Deck Bridges</title><title>Transportation research record</title><description>Bridge railing systems in the United States have historically been designed based on static load criteria given in the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. In the past decade, full-scale vehicle crash testing has been recognized as a more appropriate and reliable method of evaluating bridge railing acceptability. In 1989, AASHTO published the Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings, which gave the recommendations and procedures to evaluate bridge rails by full-scale vehicle crash testing. In 1993, the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) published Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features, which provided criteria for evaluating longitudinal barriers. Based on these specifications, a cooperative research program was initiated between the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the Forest Products Laboratory, and later the FHWA, to develop and crash test 11 bridge rails for wood deck bridges. The research that resulted in successful development and testing of 11 bridge railing systems for longitudinally and transversely laminated wood bridge decks in accordance with AASHTO Performance Level 1 and 2 (PL-1 and PL-2) requirements and Test Levels 1, 2, and 4 (TL-1, TL-2, and TL-4) requirements of NCHRP Report 350 are described here.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bridge elements</subject><subject>Bridges</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</subject><subject>Road operations (signalization, lighting, safety and accessories, snow clearance, acoustical panel, etc.)</subject><subject>Road transportation and traffic</subject><subject>Transportation infrastructure</subject><issn>0361-1981</issn><issn>2169-4052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplj8tKAzEYRoMoOFbxFbIQXKXmz3Wy1HqFgqDtOqS5DFPnUhJd9O1tqdCFq29zOHwHoWugUw4C7kBJRUCeoIqBMkRQyU5RRbkCAqaGc3RRyppSzoXmFZp-uLZrhwZ_bst37AtOY8bLEvE44EXbr2LGj9F_4YfchiaWS3SWXFfi1d9O0PL5aTF7JfP3l7fZ_Zx4JrUkKnoGWtPkTa1UqrUQIYUgPWecMiMYh-C5M6Y2kdJEo9NOKQHBgVByRfkE3R68Po-l5JjsJre9y1sL1O4z7T7TgtyRNwdy44p3Xcpu8G054lArreCIFddEux5_8rD7_8_2C_w1WX8</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>Faller, Ronald K.</creator><creator>Ritter, Michael A.</creator><creator>Rosson, Barry T.</creator><creator>Duwadi, Sheila R.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>National Research Council</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>Railing Systems for Use on Timber Deck Bridges</title><author>Faller, Ronald K. ; Ritter, Michael A. ; Rosson, Barry T. ; Duwadi, Sheila R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2575-6ec21770fc9866f8744dfdd5c3230294231dc3a9989e00f0ea7a6641da1465b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bridge elements</topic><topic>Bridges</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</topic><topic>Road operations (signalization, lighting, safety and accessories, snow clearance, acoustical panel, etc.)</topic><topic>Road transportation and traffic</topic><topic>Transportation infrastructure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Faller, Ronald K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosson, Barry T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duwadi, Sheila R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Faller, Ronald K.</au><au>Ritter, Michael A.</au><au>Rosson, Barry T.</au><au>Duwadi, Sheila R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Railing Systems for Use on Timber Deck Bridges</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>1656</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>110</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>110-119</pages><issn>0361-1981</issn><eissn>2169-4052</eissn><coden>TRREDM</coden><abstract>Bridge railing systems in the United States have historically been designed based on static load criteria given in the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. In the past decade, full-scale vehicle crash testing has been recognized as a more appropriate and reliable method of evaluating bridge railing acceptability. In 1989, AASHTO published the Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings, which gave the recommendations and procedures to evaluate bridge rails by full-scale vehicle crash testing. In 1993, the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) published Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features, which provided criteria for evaluating longitudinal barriers. Based on these specifications, a cooperative research program was initiated between the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the Forest Products Laboratory, and later the FHWA, to develop and crash test 11 bridge rails for wood deck bridges. The research that resulted in successful development and testing of 11 bridge railing systems for longitudinally and transversely laminated wood bridge decks in accordance with AASHTO Performance Level 1 and 2 (PL-1 and PL-2) requirements and Test Levels 1, 2, and 4 (TL-1, TL-2, and TL-4) requirements of NCHRP Report 350 are described here.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.3141/1656-15</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-1981
ispartof Transportation research record, 1999, Vol.1656 (1), p.110-119
issn 0361-1981
2169-4052
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3141_1656_15
source SAGE Complete
subjects Applied sciences
Bridge elements
Bridges
Buildings. Public works
Exact sciences and technology
Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction
Road operations (signalization, lighting, safety and accessories, snow clearance, acoustical panel, etc.)
Road transportation and traffic
Transportation infrastructure
title Railing Systems for Use on Timber Deck Bridges
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T17%3A05%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Railing%20Systems%20for%20Use%20on%20Timber%20Deck%20Bridges&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research%20record&rft.au=Faller,%20Ronald%20K.&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=1656&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=110-119&rft.issn=0361-1981&rft.eissn=2169-4052&rft.coden=TRREDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.3141/1656-15&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.3141_1656-15%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.3141_1656-15&rfr_iscdi=true