Summary of the “Open Space Technology Discussions” on Reliability of NDE

Since the beginnings of the European American Workshops (EAW) in 1997, the aim was to gather the experts in NDE reliability and discuss burning topics with the aim of identifying crucial problems and suggesting ways to move forward. This was usually achieved during the so-called break-out sessions,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materialprüfung 2014-07, Vol.56 (7), p.602-606
Hauptverfasser: Bertovic, Marija, Calmon, Pierre, Carter, Luke, Fischer, Jay, Forsyth, David, Holstein, Ralf, McGrath, Bernard, Müller, Christina, Pavlovic, Mato, Ronneteg, Ulf, Rummel, Ward, Schubert, Frank, Selby, Greg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 606
container_issue 7
container_start_page 602
container_title Materialprüfung
container_volume 56
creator Bertovic, Marija
Calmon, Pierre
Carter, Luke
Fischer, Jay
Forsyth, David
Holstein, Ralf
McGrath, Bernard
Müller, Christina
Pavlovic, Mato
Ronneteg, Ulf
Rummel, Ward
Schubert, Frank
Selby, Greg
description Since the beginnings of the European American Workshops (EAW) in 1997, the aim was to gather the experts in NDE reliability and discuss burning topics with the aim of identifying crucial problems and suggesting ways to move forward. This was usually achieved during the so-called break-out sessions, in which predetermined topics were discussed. During the 5 EAW, held in Berlin in 2013, this approach was replaced by an Open Space Technology (OST) approach. The benefit of this approach is seen in the freedom of topic choices, i. e., the topics are not predetermined but rather arise at that moment in that space and by the participants’ choice. The following topics arose: new reliability methods (Bayesian, MAPOD, …), structural health monitoring, definition of requirements of NDE by customer versus provider, what value of POD is good enough?, human factors, manual versus automated inspection, and basic concepts of reliability of NDE. The participants were encouraged to walk from one session to another and openly express their opinions. These were in the end summarized by a chosen group of moderators and presented in this paper.
doi_str_mv 10.3139/120.110604
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>walterdegruyter_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3139_120_110604</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_3139_120_110604567_8602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-897ee7ef51cb41cd7b32046e9668653bf0433d546f7efa8ebf398dd8bd8064153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1OwzAQRi0EEqWw4QReI6WM7dhx2KG2_EgVlWhZW4ljt6nSuLIToex6ELhcT0JKWbKaWbzv08xD6JbAiBGW3hMKI0JAQHyGBpSkPJI8oedoAEB5xBnAJboKYQMgOKVigGaLdrvNfIedxc3a4MP-a74zNV7sMm3w0uh17Sq36vCkDLoNoXR1OOy_savxu6nKLC-rsvlNv02m1-jCZlUwN39ziD6epsvxSzSbP7-OH2eRppI2kUwTYxJjOdF5THSR5IxCLEwqhBSc5RZixgoeC9tDmTS5ZaksCpkXEkRMOBuiu1Ov9i4Eb6za-fL4hSKgjh5U70GdPPTwwwn-zKrG-MKsfNv1i9q41tf9mf-EuEiUFEDZD0nXY1I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Summary of the “Open Space Technology Discussions” on Reliability of NDE</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Bertovic, Marija ; Calmon, Pierre ; Carter, Luke ; Fischer, Jay ; Forsyth, David ; Holstein, Ralf ; McGrath, Bernard ; Müller, Christina ; Pavlovic, Mato ; Ronneteg, Ulf ; Rummel, Ward ; Schubert, Frank ; Selby, Greg</creator><creatorcontrib>Bertovic, Marija ; Calmon, Pierre ; Carter, Luke ; Fischer, Jay ; Forsyth, David ; Holstein, Ralf ; McGrath, Bernard ; Müller, Christina ; Pavlovic, Mato ; Ronneteg, Ulf ; Rummel, Ward ; Schubert, Frank ; Selby, Greg</creatorcontrib><description>Since the beginnings of the European American Workshops (EAW) in 1997, the aim was to gather the experts in NDE reliability and discuss burning topics with the aim of identifying crucial problems and suggesting ways to move forward. This was usually achieved during the so-called break-out sessions, in which predetermined topics were discussed. During the 5 EAW, held in Berlin in 2013, this approach was replaced by an Open Space Technology (OST) approach. The benefit of this approach is seen in the freedom of topic choices, i. e., the topics are not predetermined but rather arise at that moment in that space and by the participants’ choice. The following topics arose: new reliability methods (Bayesian, MAPOD, …), structural health monitoring, definition of requirements of NDE by customer versus provider, what value of POD is good enough?, human factors, manual versus automated inspection, and basic concepts of reliability of NDE. The participants were encouraged to walk from one session to another and openly express their opinions. These were in the end summarized by a chosen group of moderators and presented in this paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-5300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2195-8572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3139/120.110604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher><ispartof>Materialprüfung, 2014-07, Vol.56 (7), p.602-606</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-897ee7ef51cb41cd7b32046e9668653bf0433d546f7efa8ebf398dd8bd8064153</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.3139/120.110604/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.3139/120.110604/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,66725,68509</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bertovic, Marija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calmon, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsyth, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holstein, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGrath, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlovic, Mato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronneteg, Ulf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rummel, Ward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selby, Greg</creatorcontrib><title>Summary of the “Open Space Technology Discussions” on Reliability of NDE</title><title>Materialprüfung</title><description>Since the beginnings of the European American Workshops (EAW) in 1997, the aim was to gather the experts in NDE reliability and discuss burning topics with the aim of identifying crucial problems and suggesting ways to move forward. This was usually achieved during the so-called break-out sessions, in which predetermined topics were discussed. During the 5 EAW, held in Berlin in 2013, this approach was replaced by an Open Space Technology (OST) approach. The benefit of this approach is seen in the freedom of topic choices, i. e., the topics are not predetermined but rather arise at that moment in that space and by the participants’ choice. The following topics arose: new reliability methods (Bayesian, MAPOD, …), structural health monitoring, definition of requirements of NDE by customer versus provider, what value of POD is good enough?, human factors, manual versus automated inspection, and basic concepts of reliability of NDE. The participants were encouraged to walk from one session to another and openly express their opinions. These were in the end summarized by a chosen group of moderators and presented in this paper.</description><issn>0025-5300</issn><issn>2195-8572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkE1OwzAQRi0EEqWw4QReI6WM7dhx2KG2_EgVlWhZW4ljt6nSuLIToex6ELhcT0JKWbKaWbzv08xD6JbAiBGW3hMKI0JAQHyGBpSkPJI8oedoAEB5xBnAJboKYQMgOKVigGaLdrvNfIedxc3a4MP-a74zNV7sMm3w0uh17Sq36vCkDLoNoXR1OOy_savxu6nKLC-rsvlNv02m1-jCZlUwN39ziD6epsvxSzSbP7-OH2eRppI2kUwTYxJjOdF5THSR5IxCLEwqhBSc5RZixgoeC9tDmTS5ZaksCpkXEkRMOBuiu1Ov9i4Eb6za-fL4hSKgjh5U70GdPPTwwwn-zKrG-MKsfNv1i9q41tf9mf-EuEiUFEDZD0nXY1I</recordid><startdate>20140715</startdate><enddate>20140715</enddate><creator>Bertovic, Marija</creator><creator>Calmon, Pierre</creator><creator>Carter, Luke</creator><creator>Fischer, Jay</creator><creator>Forsyth, David</creator><creator>Holstein, Ralf</creator><creator>McGrath, Bernard</creator><creator>Müller, Christina</creator><creator>Pavlovic, Mato</creator><creator>Ronneteg, Ulf</creator><creator>Rummel, Ward</creator><creator>Schubert, Frank</creator><creator>Selby, Greg</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140715</creationdate><title>Summary of the “Open Space Technology Discussions” on Reliability of NDE</title><author>Bertovic, Marija ; Calmon, Pierre ; Carter, Luke ; Fischer, Jay ; Forsyth, David ; Holstein, Ralf ; McGrath, Bernard ; Müller, Christina ; Pavlovic, Mato ; Ronneteg, Ulf ; Rummel, Ward ; Schubert, Frank ; Selby, Greg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-897ee7ef51cb41cd7b32046e9668653bf0433d546f7efa8ebf398dd8bd8064153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bertovic, Marija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calmon, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsyth, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holstein, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGrath, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlovic, Mato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronneteg, Ulf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rummel, Ward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selby, Greg</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Materialprüfung</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bertovic, Marija</au><au>Calmon, Pierre</au><au>Carter, Luke</au><au>Fischer, Jay</au><au>Forsyth, David</au><au>Holstein, Ralf</au><au>McGrath, Bernard</au><au>Müller, Christina</au><au>Pavlovic, Mato</au><au>Ronneteg, Ulf</au><au>Rummel, Ward</au><au>Schubert, Frank</au><au>Selby, Greg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Summary of the “Open Space Technology Discussions” on Reliability of NDE</atitle><jtitle>Materialprüfung</jtitle><date>2014-07-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>602</spage><epage>606</epage><pages>602-606</pages><issn>0025-5300</issn><eissn>2195-8572</eissn><abstract>Since the beginnings of the European American Workshops (EAW) in 1997, the aim was to gather the experts in NDE reliability and discuss burning topics with the aim of identifying crucial problems and suggesting ways to move forward. This was usually achieved during the so-called break-out sessions, in which predetermined topics were discussed. During the 5 EAW, held in Berlin in 2013, this approach was replaced by an Open Space Technology (OST) approach. The benefit of this approach is seen in the freedom of topic choices, i. e., the topics are not predetermined but rather arise at that moment in that space and by the participants’ choice. The following topics arose: new reliability methods (Bayesian, MAPOD, …), structural health monitoring, definition of requirements of NDE by customer versus provider, what value of POD is good enough?, human factors, manual versus automated inspection, and basic concepts of reliability of NDE. The participants were encouraged to walk from one session to another and openly express their opinions. These were in the end summarized by a chosen group of moderators and presented in this paper.</abstract><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.3139/120.110604</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-5300
ispartof Materialprüfung, 2014-07, Vol.56 (7), p.602-606
issn 0025-5300
2195-8572
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3139_120_110604
source De Gruyter journals
title Summary of the “Open Space Technology Discussions” on Reliability of NDE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T05%3A18%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-walterdegruyter_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Summary%20of%20the%20%E2%80%9COpen%20Space%20Technology%20Discussions%E2%80%9D%20on%20Reliability%20of%20NDE&rft.jtitle=Materialpr%C3%BCfung&rft.au=Bertovic,%20Marija&rft.date=2014-07-15&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=602&rft.epage=606&rft.pages=602-606&rft.issn=0025-5300&rft.eissn=2195-8572&rft_id=info:doi/10.3139/120.110604&rft_dat=%3Cwalterdegruyter_cross%3E10_3139_120_110604567_8602%3C/walterdegruyter_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true