Comparison of Propofol Vs Thiopentone in Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Introduction: Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is one of the commonest causes of significant morbidity in the patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV when propofol and thiopentone were used as induction agents during laparos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical journal of Shree Birendra Hospital 2019-02, Vol.18 (1), p.23-29
Hauptverfasser: Kunwar, Bhuwan Raj, Rijal, Thaneshowr, Thapa, Puja, Rayamajhi, Mallika, Amatya, Biswo Ram
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title Medical journal of Shree Birendra Hospital
container_volume 18
creator Kunwar, Bhuwan Raj
Rijal, Thaneshowr
Thapa, Puja
Rayamajhi, Mallika
Amatya, Biswo Ram
description Introduction: Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is one of the commonest causes of significant morbidity in the patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV when propofol and thiopentone were used as induction agents during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: A prospective, randomised comparative study was conducted in operation theatre at a tertiary level referral hospital of Nepal. A sample size of 100 ASA I - II patients aged between 18 and 70 years were included and scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study population were divided into two groups: Group A (Propofol), n = 50 and Group B (Thiopentone), n = 50. These patients were followed up for the first 24 hours postoperatively for any PONV at 0-6 hrs, 6-12 hrs, 12-24 hrs. Results: Out of the 100 patients, PONV was observed almost similar in both groups. i.e. group A (Propofol) n = 31, (62%) and group B (Thiopentone) n = 26 (52%) with no statistical significance (p value = 0.1998) within the first 24 hours postoperatively in both groups; and no significant difference was observed at the different time intervals viz. at 0-6 hrs (p value 0.262): Group A = 45%; Group B = 40%; 6-12 hrs (p value 0.781): Group A = 17.5%, Group B = 22.5%; 12-24 hrs (p value 1.000) Group A = 0%; Group B = 2.5% when using the Fisher exact test. The mean ages for development of PONV in these two groups were: Group A = 40 years and Group B = 38 years. The p-value was 0.5125 which showed no statistical significance. In our study 76% (n = 38) were females and 24% (n = 12) were males in Group A; while 70% (n = 35) were females and 30% (n = 15) males in Group B. However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of PONV. Conclusions: The study showed that there was a high incidence of PONV during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV when propofol or thiopentone was used.  
doi_str_mv 10.3126/mjsbh.v18i1.20506
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3126_mjsbh_v18i1_20506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_3126_mjsbh_v18i1_20506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_3126_mjsbh_v18i1_205063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdj8FKAzEQhoMotGgfoLd5ga7Jhi7teVE8iPZQew0xzXZTNpmQiYU9-eqmi_gAzmWGf-Zj-BhbCl5JUTeP_kyffXURGyeqmq95c8PmNd-KFRdbefs3b9YztiA681KNqKXkc_bdoo86OcIA2MEuYcQOBzgQ7HuH0YaMwYILsEPK8B5t0tldLLzpL7IadDjCAb3LLpymq7ItDMFHONp0wmv8qssHJIPRGWh7HKwZKVuT0Y8P7K7TA9nFb79n4vlp376sTCEo2U7F5LxOoxJcXWXVJKsmWTXJyv8wP2AyYtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Propofol Vs Thiopentone in Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Kunwar, Bhuwan Raj ; Rijal, Thaneshowr ; Thapa, Puja ; Rayamajhi, Mallika ; Amatya, Biswo Ram</creator><creatorcontrib>Kunwar, Bhuwan Raj ; Rijal, Thaneshowr ; Thapa, Puja ; Rayamajhi, Mallika ; Amatya, Biswo Ram</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is one of the commonest causes of significant morbidity in the patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV when propofol and thiopentone were used as induction agents during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: A prospective, randomised comparative study was conducted in operation theatre at a tertiary level referral hospital of Nepal. A sample size of 100 ASA I - II patients aged between 18 and 70 years were included and scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study population were divided into two groups: Group A (Propofol), n = 50 and Group B (Thiopentone), n = 50. These patients were followed up for the first 24 hours postoperatively for any PONV at 0-6 hrs, 6-12 hrs, 12-24 hrs. Results: Out of the 100 patients, PONV was observed almost similar in both groups. i.e. group A (Propofol) n = 31, (62%) and group B (Thiopentone) n = 26 (52%) with no statistical significance (p value = 0.1998) within the first 24 hours postoperatively in both groups; and no significant difference was observed at the different time intervals viz. at 0-6 hrs (p value 0.262): Group A = 45%; Group B = 40%; 6-12 hrs (p value 0.781): Group A = 17.5%, Group B = 22.5%; 12-24 hrs (p value 1.000) Group A = 0%; Group B = 2.5% when using the Fisher exact test. The mean ages for development of PONV in these two groups were: Group A = 40 years and Group B = 38 years. The p-value was 0.5125 which showed no statistical significance. In our study 76% (n = 38) were females and 24% (n = 12) were males in Group A; while 70% (n = 35) were females and 30% (n = 15) males in Group B. However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of PONV. Conclusions: The study showed that there was a high incidence of PONV during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV when propofol or thiopentone was used.  </description><identifier>ISSN: 2091-0185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2091-0193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3126/mjsbh.v18i1.20506</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Medical journal of Shree Birendra Hospital, 2019-02, Vol.18 (1), p.23-29</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kunwar, Bhuwan Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rijal, Thaneshowr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thapa, Puja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayamajhi, Mallika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amatya, Biswo Ram</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Propofol Vs Thiopentone in Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy</title><title>Medical journal of Shree Birendra Hospital</title><description>Introduction: Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is one of the commonest causes of significant morbidity in the patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV when propofol and thiopentone were used as induction agents during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: A prospective, randomised comparative study was conducted in operation theatre at a tertiary level referral hospital of Nepal. A sample size of 100 ASA I - II patients aged between 18 and 70 years were included and scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study population were divided into two groups: Group A (Propofol), n = 50 and Group B (Thiopentone), n = 50. These patients were followed up for the first 24 hours postoperatively for any PONV at 0-6 hrs, 6-12 hrs, 12-24 hrs. Results: Out of the 100 patients, PONV was observed almost similar in both groups. i.e. group A (Propofol) n = 31, (62%) and group B (Thiopentone) n = 26 (52%) with no statistical significance (p value = 0.1998) within the first 24 hours postoperatively in both groups; and no significant difference was observed at the different time intervals viz. at 0-6 hrs (p value 0.262): Group A = 45%; Group B = 40%; 6-12 hrs (p value 0.781): Group A = 17.5%, Group B = 22.5%; 12-24 hrs (p value 1.000) Group A = 0%; Group B = 2.5% when using the Fisher exact test. The mean ages for development of PONV in these two groups were: Group A = 40 years and Group B = 38 years. The p-value was 0.5125 which showed no statistical significance. In our study 76% (n = 38) were females and 24% (n = 12) were males in Group A; while 70% (n = 35) were females and 30% (n = 15) males in Group B. However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of PONV. Conclusions: The study showed that there was a high incidence of PONV during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV when propofol or thiopentone was used.  </description><issn>2091-0185</issn><issn>2091-0193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdj8FKAzEQhoMotGgfoLd5ga7Jhi7teVE8iPZQew0xzXZTNpmQiYU9-eqmi_gAzmWGf-Zj-BhbCl5JUTeP_kyffXURGyeqmq95c8PmNd-KFRdbefs3b9YztiA681KNqKXkc_bdoo86OcIA2MEuYcQOBzgQ7HuH0YaMwYILsEPK8B5t0tldLLzpL7IadDjCAb3LLpymq7ItDMFHONp0wmv8qssHJIPRGWh7HKwZKVuT0Y8P7K7TA9nFb79n4vlp376sTCEo2U7F5LxOoxJcXWXVJKsmWTXJyv8wP2AyYtg</recordid><startdate>20190226</startdate><enddate>20190226</enddate><creator>Kunwar, Bhuwan Raj</creator><creator>Rijal, Thaneshowr</creator><creator>Thapa, Puja</creator><creator>Rayamajhi, Mallika</creator><creator>Amatya, Biswo Ram</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190226</creationdate><title>Comparison of Propofol Vs Thiopentone in Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy</title><author>Kunwar, Bhuwan Raj ; Rijal, Thaneshowr ; Thapa, Puja ; Rayamajhi, Mallika ; Amatya, Biswo Ram</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_3126_mjsbh_v18i1_205063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kunwar, Bhuwan Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rijal, Thaneshowr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thapa, Puja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayamajhi, Mallika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amatya, Biswo Ram</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical journal of Shree Birendra Hospital</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kunwar, Bhuwan Raj</au><au>Rijal, Thaneshowr</au><au>Thapa, Puja</au><au>Rayamajhi, Mallika</au><au>Amatya, Biswo Ram</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Propofol Vs Thiopentone in Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy</atitle><jtitle>Medical journal of Shree Birendra Hospital</jtitle><date>2019-02-26</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>23-29</pages><issn>2091-0185</issn><eissn>2091-0193</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is one of the commonest causes of significant morbidity in the patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV when propofol and thiopentone were used as induction agents during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: A prospective, randomised comparative study was conducted in operation theatre at a tertiary level referral hospital of Nepal. A sample size of 100 ASA I - II patients aged between 18 and 70 years were included and scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study population were divided into two groups: Group A (Propofol), n = 50 and Group B (Thiopentone), n = 50. These patients were followed up for the first 24 hours postoperatively for any PONV at 0-6 hrs, 6-12 hrs, 12-24 hrs. Results: Out of the 100 patients, PONV was observed almost similar in both groups. i.e. group A (Propofol) n = 31, (62%) and group B (Thiopentone) n = 26 (52%) with no statistical significance (p value = 0.1998) within the first 24 hours postoperatively in both groups; and no significant difference was observed at the different time intervals viz. at 0-6 hrs (p value 0.262): Group A = 45%; Group B = 40%; 6-12 hrs (p value 0.781): Group A = 17.5%, Group B = 22.5%; 12-24 hrs (p value 1.000) Group A = 0%; Group B = 2.5% when using the Fisher exact test. The mean ages for development of PONV in these two groups were: Group A = 40 years and Group B = 38 years. The p-value was 0.5125 which showed no statistical significance. In our study 76% (n = 38) were females and 24% (n = 12) were males in Group A; while 70% (n = 35) were females and 30% (n = 15) males in Group B. However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of PONV. Conclusions: The study showed that there was a high incidence of PONV during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV when propofol or thiopentone was used.  </abstract><doi>10.3126/mjsbh.v18i1.20506</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2091-0185
ispartof Medical journal of Shree Birendra Hospital, 2019-02, Vol.18 (1), p.23-29
issn 2091-0185
2091-0193
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3126_mjsbh_v18i1_20506
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Comparison of Propofol Vs Thiopentone in Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A31%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Propofol%20Vs%20Thiopentone%20in%20Post%20Operative%20Nausea%20and%20Vomiting%20in%20Patients%20Undergoing%20Laparoscopic%20Cholecystectomy&rft.jtitle=Medical%20journal%20of%20Shree%20Birendra%20Hospital&rft.au=Kunwar,%20Bhuwan%20Raj&rft.date=2019-02-26&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=23-29&rft.issn=2091-0185&rft.eissn=2091-0193&rft_id=info:doi/10.3126/mjsbh.v18i1.20506&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_3126_mjsbh_v18i1_20506%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true