One sense of 'information': A quick tutorial to Information-Theoretic Logic

One of the multiple meanings of the word ‘information’ is given implicitly in the postulates and conditions of information-theoretic logic (I-T-L). The tradition of looking at logical phenomena from an informational stance goes back as far as the XIX century. Logicians such as Boole, De Morgan, Jevo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:TripleC 2009-11, Vol.7 (2), p.179-184
1. Verfasser: Sagüillo, José Miguel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 184
container_issue 2
container_start_page 179
container_title TripleC
container_volume 7
creator Sagüillo, José Miguel
description One of the multiple meanings of the word ‘information’ is given implicitly in the postulates and conditions of information-theoretic logic (I-T-L). The tradition of looking at logical phenomena from an informational stance goes back as far as the XIX century. Logicians such as Boole, De Morgan, Jevons, and Venn already suggested that deducing is a sort of unpacking the information already contained in given premises. In the XX century this tradition is recovered by Carnap and Bar Hillel, Cohen and Nagel, and more recently by Corcoran. John Corcoran has articulated a specific information-theoretic viewpoint of logic with its own particular characteristics. I intend to explain the basic ideas of I-T-L by motivating their philosophical underpinnings. One desideratum is to complement and to shed light on some of the philosophical shortcomings of the nowadays paradigmatic model-theoretic concept of logical consequence. Another is to provide a brief sample of questions to be newly addressed form the I-T-L, such as insufficiency as well as redundancy of information in a given axiom-set.
doi_str_mv 10.31269/vol7iss2pp179-184
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_31269_vol7iss2pp179_184</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_31269_vol7iss2pp179_184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_31269_vol7iss2pp179_1843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdzr0KwjAUBeAgCtafF3C6m1M1qZK2biKKouDi4BZKSTXa9tbcKPj2igjq6nTOcA58jPUEH4xEIOPhDfPQEAVVJcLYF9G4xjwRBtKXId_Xv3qTtYhOnEsZxZHH1ttSA-mSNGAGfVNmaIvEGSz7E5jC5WrSM7irQ2uSHBzC6rPwd0eNVjuTwgYPJu2wRpbkpLvvbLNgMd_Nln5qkcjqTFXWFIm9K8HVi61-2OrJHv11egAG1U-m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>One sense of 'information': A quick tutorial to Information-Theoretic Logic</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sagüillo, José Miguel</creator><creatorcontrib>Sagüillo, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><description>One of the multiple meanings of the word ‘information’ is given implicitly in the postulates and conditions of information-theoretic logic (I-T-L). The tradition of looking at logical phenomena from an informational stance goes back as far as the XIX century. Logicians such as Boole, De Morgan, Jevons, and Venn already suggested that deducing is a sort of unpacking the information already contained in given premises. In the XX century this tradition is recovered by Carnap and Bar Hillel, Cohen and Nagel, and more recently by Corcoran. John Corcoran has articulated a specific information-theoretic viewpoint of logic with its own particular characteristics. I intend to explain the basic ideas of I-T-L by motivating their philosophical underpinnings. One desideratum is to complement and to shed light on some of the philosophical shortcomings of the nowadays paradigmatic model-theoretic concept of logical consequence. Another is to provide a brief sample of questions to be newly addressed form the I-T-L, such as insufficiency as well as redundancy of information in a given axiom-set.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1726-670X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1726-670X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31269/vol7iss2pp179-184</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>TripleC, 2009-11, Vol.7 (2), p.179-184</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sagüillo, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><title>One sense of 'information': A quick tutorial to Information-Theoretic Logic</title><title>TripleC</title><description>One of the multiple meanings of the word ‘information’ is given implicitly in the postulates and conditions of information-theoretic logic (I-T-L). The tradition of looking at logical phenomena from an informational stance goes back as far as the XIX century. Logicians such as Boole, De Morgan, Jevons, and Venn already suggested that deducing is a sort of unpacking the information already contained in given premises. In the XX century this tradition is recovered by Carnap and Bar Hillel, Cohen and Nagel, and more recently by Corcoran. John Corcoran has articulated a specific information-theoretic viewpoint of logic with its own particular characteristics. I intend to explain the basic ideas of I-T-L by motivating their philosophical underpinnings. One desideratum is to complement and to shed light on some of the philosophical shortcomings of the nowadays paradigmatic model-theoretic concept of logical consequence. Another is to provide a brief sample of questions to be newly addressed form the I-T-L, such as insufficiency as well as redundancy of information in a given axiom-set.</description><issn>1726-670X</issn><issn>1726-670X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdzr0KwjAUBeAgCtafF3C6m1M1qZK2biKKouDi4BZKSTXa9tbcKPj2igjq6nTOcA58jPUEH4xEIOPhDfPQEAVVJcLYF9G4xjwRBtKXId_Xv3qTtYhOnEsZxZHH1ttSA-mSNGAGfVNmaIvEGSz7E5jC5WrSM7irQ2uSHBzC6rPwd0eNVjuTwgYPJu2wRpbkpLvvbLNgMd_Nln5qkcjqTFXWFIm9K8HVi61-2OrJHv11egAG1U-m</recordid><startdate>20091106</startdate><enddate>20091106</enddate><creator>Sagüillo, José Miguel</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091106</creationdate><title>One sense of 'information': A quick tutorial to Information-Theoretic Logic</title><author>Sagüillo, José Miguel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_31269_vol7iss2pp179_1843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sagüillo, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>TripleC</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sagüillo, José Miguel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One sense of 'information': A quick tutorial to Information-Theoretic Logic</atitle><jtitle>TripleC</jtitle><date>2009-11-06</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>179-184</pages><issn>1726-670X</issn><eissn>1726-670X</eissn><abstract>One of the multiple meanings of the word ‘information’ is given implicitly in the postulates and conditions of information-theoretic logic (I-T-L). The tradition of looking at logical phenomena from an informational stance goes back as far as the XIX century. Logicians such as Boole, De Morgan, Jevons, and Venn already suggested that deducing is a sort of unpacking the information already contained in given premises. In the XX century this tradition is recovered by Carnap and Bar Hillel, Cohen and Nagel, and more recently by Corcoran. John Corcoran has articulated a specific information-theoretic viewpoint of logic with its own particular characteristics. I intend to explain the basic ideas of I-T-L by motivating their philosophical underpinnings. One desideratum is to complement and to shed light on some of the philosophical shortcomings of the nowadays paradigmatic model-theoretic concept of logical consequence. Another is to provide a brief sample of questions to be newly addressed form the I-T-L, such as insufficiency as well as redundancy of information in a given axiom-set.</abstract><doi>10.31269/vol7iss2pp179-184</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1726-670X
ispartof TripleC, 2009-11, Vol.7 (2), p.179-184
issn 1726-670X
1726-670X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_31269_vol7iss2pp179_184
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title One sense of 'information': A quick tutorial to Information-Theoretic Logic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T09%3A41%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20sense%20of%20'information':%20A%20quick%20tutorial%20to%20Information-Theoretic%20Logic&rft.jtitle=TripleC&rft.au=Sag%C3%BCillo,%20Jos%C3%A9%20Miguel&rft.date=2009-11-06&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=179-184&rft.issn=1726-670X&rft.eissn=1726-670X&rft_id=info:doi/10.31269/vol7iss2pp179-184&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_31269_vol7iss2pp179_184%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true