O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych. Część druga: typologia przepisów

In a previously published article (Przegląd Sejmowy No. 5(142)/2017) the authors proposed definitions of the following concepts: normativity, redundancy and uselessness of a legal text. The article provides a typological review of Polish legal texts. The authors analysed the basic units of the integ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Przegląd Sejmowy 2021, Vol.2(163) (2), p.181-221
Hauptverfasser: Wróblewski, Bartłomiej, Zajęcki, Maurycy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 221
container_issue 2
container_start_page 181
container_title Przegląd Sejmowy
container_volume 2(163)
creator Wróblewski, Bartłomiej
Zajęcki, Maurycy
description In a previously published article (Przegląd Sejmowy No. 5(142)/2017) the authors proposed definitions of the following concepts: normativity, redundancy and uselessness of a legal text. The article provides a typological review of Polish legal texts. The authors analysed the basic units of the integral (articulated) part of normative acts, i.e. legal provisions, showing their normativity, redundancy, and uselessness. The analyse includes: internal preambles, provisions describing the object and subject scope of the act, legal principles, programme and task provisions, meliorative provisions, emendations, permanently unrealisable regulations, legal definitions. The analyses led to identification of four basic types of errors in legal provisions, which were named: “doubles”, “widows”, “orphans”, and “botches”. In their closing remarks, the authors signalled the need to supplement the analysis with a description of non-integral (non-articulated) parts of normative acts. Another part of the study, devoted to these problems, is currently being prepared.
doi_str_mv 10.31268/PS.2021.23
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_31268_PS_2021_23</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>953688</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>953688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1363-5861cc5b8d3b5d0e068f4ba5839ca77527b2b0b1bf9486025fb9be1302fa49913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0MtKw0AUANBZKFhqV25dZG8T55GZTtxJ8QWFFqrrYV6pKWkmTFJK-gN-Q-ln-Amm_2W0Xbjwbu6Dw-VyAbhCMCIIM347m0cYYhRhcgZ6CBMYUgrxBRhU1RJ2QWOOGemBbBoUzq9k3WwKd9jrbBh4a9aFkUV9HARZsFXtzpy60m9tmVVfn5uulJui0e9RMN62u8O-_QiMXy_kXVA3pcvdIpN_-CU4T2Ve2cEp98Hb48Pr-DmcTJ9exveTUCPCSEg5Q1pTxQ1R1EALGU9jJSkniZajEcUjhRVUSKVJzBnENFWJsohAnMo4SRDpg5vjXu1dVXmbitJnK-kbgaD4fY6YzcXPcwQmnR6etLUuF0u39kV3nZC-znRuhXFaJJQwzkVp0o5f_8uPhHwDlSZ5ow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych. Część druga: typologia przepisów</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wróblewski, Bartłomiej ; Zajęcki, Maurycy</creator><creatorcontrib>Wróblewski, Bartłomiej ; Zajęcki, Maurycy</creatorcontrib><description>In a previously published article (Przegląd Sejmowy No. 5(142)/2017) the authors proposed definitions of the following concepts: normativity, redundancy and uselessness of a legal text. The article provides a typological review of Polish legal texts. The authors analysed the basic units of the integral (articulated) part of normative acts, i.e. legal provisions, showing their normativity, redundancy, and uselessness. The analyse includes: internal preambles, provisions describing the object and subject scope of the act, legal principles, programme and task provisions, meliorative provisions, emendations, permanently unrealisable regulations, legal definitions. The analyses led to identification of four basic types of errors in legal provisions, which were named: “doubles”, “widows”, “orphans”, and “botches”. In their closing remarks, the authors signalled the need to supplement the analysis with a description of non-integral (non-articulated) parts of normative acts. Another part of the study, devoted to these problems, is currently being prepared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1230-5502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31268/PS.2021.23</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chancellery of the Sejm</publisher><subject>Administrative Law ; History of Law ; Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence ; Politics / Political Sciences</subject><ispartof>Przegląd Sejmowy, 2021, Vol.2(163) (2), p.181-221</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1363-5861cc5b8d3b5d0e068f4ba5839ca77527b2b0b1bf9486025fb9be1302fa49913</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3641-8719 ; 0000-0001-9086-642X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2021_60844.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27921,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wróblewski, Bartłomiej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zajęcki, Maurycy</creatorcontrib><title>O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych. Część druga: typologia przepisów</title><title>Przegląd Sejmowy</title><addtitle>Przegląd Sejmowy</addtitle><description>In a previously published article (Przegląd Sejmowy No. 5(142)/2017) the authors proposed definitions of the following concepts: normativity, redundancy and uselessness of a legal text. The article provides a typological review of Polish legal texts. The authors analysed the basic units of the integral (articulated) part of normative acts, i.e. legal provisions, showing their normativity, redundancy, and uselessness. The analyse includes: internal preambles, provisions describing the object and subject scope of the act, legal principles, programme and task provisions, meliorative provisions, emendations, permanently unrealisable regulations, legal definitions. The analyses led to identification of four basic types of errors in legal provisions, which were named: “doubles”, “widows”, “orphans”, and “botches”. In their closing remarks, the authors signalled the need to supplement the analysis with a description of non-integral (non-articulated) parts of normative acts. Another part of the study, devoted to these problems, is currently being prepared.</description><subject>Administrative Law</subject><subject>History of Law</subject><subject>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Politics / Political Sciences</subject><issn>1230-5502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0MtKw0AUANBZKFhqV25dZG8T55GZTtxJ8QWFFqrrYV6pKWkmTFJK-gN-Q-ln-Amm_2W0Xbjwbu6Dw-VyAbhCMCIIM347m0cYYhRhcgZ6CBMYUgrxBRhU1RJ2QWOOGemBbBoUzq9k3WwKd9jrbBh4a9aFkUV9HARZsFXtzpy60m9tmVVfn5uulJui0e9RMN62u8O-_QiMXy_kXVA3pcvdIpN_-CU4T2Ve2cEp98Hb48Pr-DmcTJ9exveTUCPCSEg5Q1pTxQ1R1EALGU9jJSkniZajEcUjhRVUSKVJzBnENFWJsohAnMo4SRDpg5vjXu1dVXmbitJnK-kbgaD4fY6YzcXPcwQmnR6etLUuF0u39kV3nZC-znRuhXFaJJQwzkVp0o5f_8uPhHwDlSZ5ow</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Wróblewski, Bartłomiej</creator><creator>Zajęcki, Maurycy</creator><general>Chancellery of the Sejm</general><general>Kancelaria Sejmu</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3641-8719</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-642X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych. Część druga: typologia przepisów</title><author>Wróblewski, Bartłomiej ; Zajęcki, Maurycy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1363-5861cc5b8d3b5d0e068f4ba5839ca77527b2b0b1bf9486025fb9be1302fa49913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Administrative Law</topic><topic>History of Law</topic><topic>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Politics / Political Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wróblewski, Bartłomiej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zajęcki, Maurycy</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Przegląd Sejmowy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wróblewski, Bartłomiej</au><au>Zajęcki, Maurycy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych. Część druga: typologia przepisów</atitle><jtitle>Przegląd Sejmowy</jtitle><addtitle>Przegląd Sejmowy</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>2(163)</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>181-221</pages><issn>1230-5502</issn><abstract>In a previously published article (Przegląd Sejmowy No. 5(142)/2017) the authors proposed definitions of the following concepts: normativity, redundancy and uselessness of a legal text. The article provides a typological review of Polish legal texts. The authors analysed the basic units of the integral (articulated) part of normative acts, i.e. legal provisions, showing their normativity, redundancy, and uselessness. The analyse includes: internal preambles, provisions describing the object and subject scope of the act, legal principles, programme and task provisions, meliorative provisions, emendations, permanently unrealisable regulations, legal definitions. The analyses led to identification of four basic types of errors in legal provisions, which were named: “doubles”, “widows”, “orphans”, and “botches”. In their closing remarks, the authors signalled the need to supplement the analysis with a description of non-integral (non-articulated) parts of normative acts. Another part of the study, devoted to these problems, is currently being prepared.</abstract><pub>Chancellery of the Sejm</pub><doi>10.31268/PS.2021.23</doi><tpages>41</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3641-8719</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-642X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1230-5502
ispartof Przegląd Sejmowy, 2021, Vol.2(163) (2), p.181-221
issn 1230-5502
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_31268_PS_2021_23
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Administrative Law
History of Law
Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Politics / Political Sciences
title O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych. Część druga: typologia przepisów
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T06%3A46%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=O%20normatywno%C5%9Bci,%20redundantno%C5%9Bci%20i%20zb%C4%99dno%C5%9Bci%20przepis%C3%B3w%20prawnych.%20Cz%C4%99%C5%9B%C4%87%20druga:%20typologia%20przepis%C3%B3w&rft.jtitle=Przegl%C4%85d%20Sejmowy&rft.au=Wr%C3%B3blewski,%20Bart%C5%82omiej&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=2(163)&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=181-221&rft.issn=1230-5502&rft_id=info:doi/10.31268/PS.2021.23&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_cross%3E953688%3C/ceeol_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=953688&rfr_iscdi=true