O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych. Część druga: typologia przepisów
In a previously published article (Przegląd Sejmowy No. 5(142)/2017) the authors proposed definitions of the following concepts: normativity, redundancy and uselessness of a legal text. The article provides a typological review of Polish legal texts. The authors analysed the basic units of the integ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Przegląd Sejmowy 2021, Vol.2(163) (2), p.181-221 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 221 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 181 |
container_title | Przegląd Sejmowy |
container_volume | 2(163) |
creator | Wróblewski, Bartłomiej Zajęcki, Maurycy |
description | In a previously published article (Przegląd Sejmowy No. 5(142)/2017) the authors proposed definitions of the following concepts: normativity, redundancy and uselessness of a legal text. The article provides a typological review of Polish legal texts. The authors analysed the basic units of the integral (articulated) part of normative acts, i.e. legal provisions, showing their normativity, redundancy, and uselessness. The analyse includes: internal preambles, provisions describing the object and subject scope of the act, legal principles, programme and task provisions, meliorative provisions, emendations, permanently unrealisable regulations, legal definitions. The analyses led to identification of four basic types of errors in legal provisions, which were named: “doubles”, “widows”, “orphans”, and “botches”. In their closing remarks, the authors signalled the need to supplement the analysis with a description of non-integral (non-articulated) parts of normative acts. Another part of the study, devoted to these problems, is currently being prepared. |
doi_str_mv | 10.31268/PS.2021.23 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_31268_PS_2021_23</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>953688</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>953688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1363-5861cc5b8d3b5d0e068f4ba5839ca77527b2b0b1bf9486025fb9be1302fa49913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0MtKw0AUANBZKFhqV25dZG8T55GZTtxJ8QWFFqrrYV6pKWkmTFJK-gN-Q-ln-Amm_2W0Xbjwbu6Dw-VyAbhCMCIIM347m0cYYhRhcgZ6CBMYUgrxBRhU1RJ2QWOOGemBbBoUzq9k3WwKd9jrbBh4a9aFkUV9HARZsFXtzpy60m9tmVVfn5uulJui0e9RMN62u8O-_QiMXy_kXVA3pcvdIpN_-CU4T2Ve2cEp98Hb48Pr-DmcTJ9exveTUCPCSEg5Q1pTxQ1R1EALGU9jJSkniZajEcUjhRVUSKVJzBnENFWJsohAnMo4SRDpg5vjXu1dVXmbitJnK-kbgaD4fY6YzcXPcwQmnR6etLUuF0u39kV3nZC-znRuhXFaJJQwzkVp0o5f_8uPhHwDlSZ5ow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych. Część druga: typologia przepisów</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wróblewski, Bartłomiej ; Zajęcki, Maurycy</creator><creatorcontrib>Wróblewski, Bartłomiej ; Zajęcki, Maurycy</creatorcontrib><description>In a previously published article (Przegląd Sejmowy No. 5(142)/2017) the authors proposed definitions of the following concepts: normativity, redundancy and uselessness of a legal text. The article provides a typological review of Polish legal texts. The authors analysed the basic units of the integral (articulated) part of normative acts, i.e. legal provisions, showing their normativity, redundancy, and uselessness. The analyse includes: internal preambles, provisions describing the object and subject scope of the act, legal principles, programme and task provisions, meliorative provisions, emendations, permanently unrealisable regulations, legal definitions. The analyses led to identification of four basic types of errors in legal provisions, which were named: “doubles”, “widows”, “orphans”, and “botches”. In their closing remarks, the authors signalled the need to supplement the analysis with a description of non-integral (non-articulated) parts of normative acts. Another part of the study, devoted to these problems, is currently being prepared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1230-5502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31268/PS.2021.23</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chancellery of the Sejm</publisher><subject>Administrative Law ; History of Law ; Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence ; Politics / Political Sciences</subject><ispartof>Przegląd Sejmowy, 2021, Vol.2(163) (2), p.181-221</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1363-5861cc5b8d3b5d0e068f4ba5839ca77527b2b0b1bf9486025fb9be1302fa49913</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3641-8719 ; 0000-0001-9086-642X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2021_60844.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27921,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wróblewski, Bartłomiej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zajęcki, Maurycy</creatorcontrib><title>O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych. Część druga: typologia przepisów</title><title>Przegląd Sejmowy</title><addtitle>Przegląd Sejmowy</addtitle><description>In a previously published article (Przegląd Sejmowy No. 5(142)/2017) the authors proposed definitions of the following concepts: normativity, redundancy and uselessness of a legal text. The article provides a typological review of Polish legal texts. The authors analysed the basic units of the integral (articulated) part of normative acts, i.e. legal provisions, showing their normativity, redundancy, and uselessness. The analyse includes: internal preambles, provisions describing the object and subject scope of the act, legal principles, programme and task provisions, meliorative provisions, emendations, permanently unrealisable regulations, legal definitions. The analyses led to identification of four basic types of errors in legal provisions, which were named: “doubles”, “widows”, “orphans”, and “botches”. In their closing remarks, the authors signalled the need to supplement the analysis with a description of non-integral (non-articulated) parts of normative acts. Another part of the study, devoted to these problems, is currently being prepared.</description><subject>Administrative Law</subject><subject>History of Law</subject><subject>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Politics / Political Sciences</subject><issn>1230-5502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0MtKw0AUANBZKFhqV25dZG8T55GZTtxJ8QWFFqrrYV6pKWkmTFJK-gN-Q-ln-Amm_2W0Xbjwbu6Dw-VyAbhCMCIIM347m0cYYhRhcgZ6CBMYUgrxBRhU1RJ2QWOOGemBbBoUzq9k3WwKd9jrbBh4a9aFkUV9HARZsFXtzpy60m9tmVVfn5uulJui0e9RMN62u8O-_QiMXy_kXVA3pcvdIpN_-CU4T2Ve2cEp98Hb48Pr-DmcTJ9exveTUCPCSEg5Q1pTxQ1R1EALGU9jJSkniZajEcUjhRVUSKVJzBnENFWJsohAnMo4SRDpg5vjXu1dVXmbitJnK-kbgaD4fY6YzcXPcwQmnR6etLUuF0u39kV3nZC-znRuhXFaJJQwzkVp0o5f_8uPhHwDlSZ5ow</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Wróblewski, Bartłomiej</creator><creator>Zajęcki, Maurycy</creator><general>Chancellery of the Sejm</general><general>Kancelaria Sejmu</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3641-8719</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-642X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych. Część druga: typologia przepisów</title><author>Wróblewski, Bartłomiej ; Zajęcki, Maurycy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1363-5861cc5b8d3b5d0e068f4ba5839ca77527b2b0b1bf9486025fb9be1302fa49913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Administrative Law</topic><topic>History of Law</topic><topic>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Politics / Political Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wróblewski, Bartłomiej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zajęcki, Maurycy</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Przegląd Sejmowy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wróblewski, Bartłomiej</au><au>Zajęcki, Maurycy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych. Część druga: typologia przepisów</atitle><jtitle>Przegląd Sejmowy</jtitle><addtitle>Przegląd Sejmowy</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>2(163)</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>181-221</pages><issn>1230-5502</issn><abstract>In a previously published article (Przegląd Sejmowy No. 5(142)/2017) the authors proposed definitions of the following concepts: normativity, redundancy and uselessness of a legal text. The article provides a typological review of Polish legal texts. The authors analysed the basic units of the integral (articulated) part of normative acts, i.e. legal provisions, showing their normativity, redundancy, and uselessness. The analyse includes: internal preambles, provisions describing the object and subject scope of the act, legal principles, programme and task provisions, meliorative provisions, emendations, permanently unrealisable regulations, legal definitions. The analyses led to identification of four basic types of errors in legal provisions, which were named: “doubles”, “widows”, “orphans”, and “botches”. In their closing remarks, the authors signalled the need to supplement the analysis with a description of non-integral (non-articulated) parts of normative acts. Another part of the study, devoted to these problems, is currently being prepared.</abstract><pub>Chancellery of the Sejm</pub><doi>10.31268/PS.2021.23</doi><tpages>41</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3641-8719</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-642X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1230-5502 |
ispartof | Przegląd Sejmowy, 2021, Vol.2(163) (2), p.181-221 |
issn | 1230-5502 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_31268_PS_2021_23 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Administrative Law History of Law Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Politics / Political Sciences |
title | O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych. Część druga: typologia przepisów |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T06%3A46%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=O%20normatywno%C5%9Bci,%20redundantno%C5%9Bci%20i%20zb%C4%99dno%C5%9Bci%20przepis%C3%B3w%20prawnych.%20Cz%C4%99%C5%9B%C4%87%20druga:%20typologia%20przepis%C3%B3w&rft.jtitle=Przegl%C4%85d%20Sejmowy&rft.au=Wr%C3%B3blewski,%20Bart%C5%82omiej&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=2(163)&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=181-221&rft.issn=1230-5502&rft_id=info:doi/10.31268/PS.2021.23&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_cross%3E953688%3C/ceeol_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=953688&rfr_iscdi=true |