Single-Stage Stereotactic Diagnosis and Radiosurgery: Feasibility and Cost Implications

We compared the efficacy and the hospital charges of either single-stage or two-stage stereotactic diagnosis and radiosurgery procedures. Twelve patients underwent either one-stage or two-stage diagnosis and management of their brain tumors. Both techniques utilize high-resolution intraoperative ste...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computer aided surgery (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1995, Vol.1 (3), p.141-150
Hauptverfasser: Gerszten, Peter C., Lunsford, L. Dade, Rutigliano, Michael J., Kondziolka, Douglas, Flickinger, John C., Martínez, A. Julio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 150
container_issue 3
container_start_page 141
container_title Computer aided surgery (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 1
creator Gerszten, Peter C.
Lunsford, L. Dade
Rutigliano, Michael J.
Kondziolka, Douglas
Flickinger, John C.
Martínez, A. Julio
description We compared the efficacy and the hospital charges of either single-stage or two-stage stereotactic diagnosis and radiosurgery procedures. Twelve patients underwent either one-stage or two-stage diagnosis and management of their brain tumors. Both techniques utilize high-resolution intraoperative stereotactic image-guided technology and rapid touch preparation (imprint) cytopathological techniques to confirm the presence of neoplasm. Following this pathologic diagnosis, six patients immediately underwent stereotactic radiosurgery employing the same frame application and dose planning based on preoperative and intraoperative images. Six patients underwent two-stage procedures, i.e., discharge from the hospital after histopathological diagnosis followed by readmission, reapplication of the stereotactic head frame, and repeat neuroradiological imaging prior to radiosurgery. Requirements for success of the single-stage procedure include intraoperative stereotactic high-resolution imaging, a hospital-wide ethernet system for transferring neurodiagnostic images, and expertise in rapid touch-preparation histopathological technique for accurate diagnosis. Intraoperative computed tomography imaging after biopsy confirmed the target accuracy and lack of movement of the target after brain biopsy. The advantages of the single-stage approach include reduced length of overall hospital stay, simultaneous histopathological diagnosis and therapy in a single hospital admission, and reduced total hospital charges. For patients highly suspected of having brain tumors and for whom stereotactic radiosurgery will be utilized in the treatment, single-stage stereotactic diagnosis immediately followed by radiosurgery is an accurate, effective, and potentially less costly management strategy than a two-stage approach.
doi_str_mv 10.3109/10929089509105688
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>informahealthcare_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3109_10929089509105688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_3109_10929089509105688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3728-b16562217a51bae3fcb414cf49f7c3554a9c49aaeed6ff9e47113c5dfbd977fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLwzAQx4MoOKcfwLd-gWrSNG2jvsh0OhgITvGxXNOky8iSkWRIv73d5ouIPhx33N3vf9wfoUuCryjB_HqIjOOKM8wJZkVVHaHR0CtTTBg-3tdZOixUp-gshBXGmBe0GqGPhbadkekiQieTRZReuggiapE8aOisCzokYNvkFVrtwtZ30vc3yVRC0I02Ovb76cSFmMzWG6MFRO1sOEcnCkyQF995jN6nj2-T53T-8jSb3M9TQcusShtSsCLLSAmMNCCpEk1OcqFyrkpBGcuBi5wDSNkWSnGZl4RQwVrVtLwslaBjRA66wrsQvFT1xus1-L4muN45U_9yZmDuDoy2yvk1fDpv2jpCb5xXHqzQYYf-jd_-wJcSTFwK8LJeua23w7v_HP8C2qZ9WA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single-Stage Stereotactic Diagnosis and Radiosurgery: Feasibility and Cost Implications</title><source>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Gerszten, Peter C. ; Lunsford, L. Dade ; Rutigliano, Michael J. ; Kondziolka, Douglas ; Flickinger, John C. ; Martínez, A. Julio</creator><creatorcontrib>Gerszten, Peter C. ; Lunsford, L. Dade ; Rutigliano, Michael J. ; Kondziolka, Douglas ; Flickinger, John C. ; Martínez, A. Julio</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the efficacy and the hospital charges of either single-stage or two-stage stereotactic diagnosis and radiosurgery procedures. Twelve patients underwent either one-stage or two-stage diagnosis and management of their brain tumors. Both techniques utilize high-resolution intraoperative stereotactic image-guided technology and rapid touch preparation (imprint) cytopathological techniques to confirm the presence of neoplasm. Following this pathologic diagnosis, six patients immediately underwent stereotactic radiosurgery employing the same frame application and dose planning based on preoperative and intraoperative images. Six patients underwent two-stage procedures, i.e., discharge from the hospital after histopathological diagnosis followed by readmission, reapplication of the stereotactic head frame, and repeat neuroradiological imaging prior to radiosurgery. Requirements for success of the single-stage procedure include intraoperative stereotactic high-resolution imaging, a hospital-wide ethernet system for transferring neurodiagnostic images, and expertise in rapid touch-preparation histopathological technique for accurate diagnosis. Intraoperative computed tomography imaging after biopsy confirmed the target accuracy and lack of movement of the target after brain biopsy. The advantages of the single-stage approach include reduced length of overall hospital stay, simultaneous histopathological diagnosis and therapy in a single hospital admission, and reduced total hospital charges. For patients highly suspected of having brain tumors and for whom stereotactic radiosurgery will be utilized in the treatment, single-stage stereotactic diagnosis immediately followed by radiosurgery is an accurate, effective, and potentially less costly management strategy than a two-stage approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-9088</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1078-7844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-712X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/10929089509105688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>biopsy ; radiosurgery ; stereotactic surgery ; touch-preparation technique</subject><ispartof>Computer aided surgery (New York, N.Y.), 1995, Vol.1 (3), p.141-150</ispartof><rights>1995 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3728-b16562217a51bae3fcb414cf49f7c3554a9c49aaeed6ff9e47113c5dfbd977fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3728-b16562217a51bae3fcb414cf49f7c3554a9c49aaeed6ff9e47113c5dfbd977fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/10929089509105688$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/10929089509105688$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,61218,61219</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gerszten, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunsford, L. Dade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutigliano, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kondziolka, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flickinger, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, A. Julio</creatorcontrib><title>Single-Stage Stereotactic Diagnosis and Radiosurgery: Feasibility and Cost Implications</title><title>Computer aided surgery (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>We compared the efficacy and the hospital charges of either single-stage or two-stage stereotactic diagnosis and radiosurgery procedures. Twelve patients underwent either one-stage or two-stage diagnosis and management of their brain tumors. Both techniques utilize high-resolution intraoperative stereotactic image-guided technology and rapid touch preparation (imprint) cytopathological techniques to confirm the presence of neoplasm. Following this pathologic diagnosis, six patients immediately underwent stereotactic radiosurgery employing the same frame application and dose planning based on preoperative and intraoperative images. Six patients underwent two-stage procedures, i.e., discharge from the hospital after histopathological diagnosis followed by readmission, reapplication of the stereotactic head frame, and repeat neuroradiological imaging prior to radiosurgery. Requirements for success of the single-stage procedure include intraoperative stereotactic high-resolution imaging, a hospital-wide ethernet system for transferring neurodiagnostic images, and expertise in rapid touch-preparation histopathological technique for accurate diagnosis. Intraoperative computed tomography imaging after biopsy confirmed the target accuracy and lack of movement of the target after brain biopsy. The advantages of the single-stage approach include reduced length of overall hospital stay, simultaneous histopathological diagnosis and therapy in a single hospital admission, and reduced total hospital charges. For patients highly suspected of having brain tumors and for whom stereotactic radiosurgery will be utilized in the treatment, single-stage stereotactic diagnosis immediately followed by radiosurgery is an accurate, effective, and potentially less costly management strategy than a two-stage approach.</description><subject>biopsy</subject><subject>radiosurgery</subject><subject>stereotactic surgery</subject><subject>touch-preparation technique</subject><issn>1092-9088</issn><issn>1078-7844</issn><issn>1097-0150</issn><issn>1522-712X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kFFLwzAQx4MoOKcfwLd-gWrSNG2jvsh0OhgITvGxXNOky8iSkWRIv73d5ouIPhx33N3vf9wfoUuCryjB_HqIjOOKM8wJZkVVHaHR0CtTTBg-3tdZOixUp-gshBXGmBe0GqGPhbadkekiQieTRZReuggiapE8aOisCzokYNvkFVrtwtZ30vc3yVRC0I02Ovb76cSFmMzWG6MFRO1sOEcnCkyQF995jN6nj2-T53T-8jSb3M9TQcusShtSsCLLSAmMNCCpEk1OcqFyrkpBGcuBi5wDSNkWSnGZl4RQwVrVtLwslaBjRA66wrsQvFT1xus1-L4muN45U_9yZmDuDoy2yvk1fDpv2jpCb5xXHqzQYYf-jd_-wJcSTFwK8LJeua23w7v_HP8C2qZ9WA</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>Gerszten, Peter C.</creator><creator>Lunsford, L. Dade</creator><creator>Rutigliano, Michael J.</creator><creator>Kondziolka, Douglas</creator><creator>Flickinger, John C.</creator><creator>Martínez, A. Julio</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>Single-Stage Stereotactic Diagnosis and Radiosurgery: Feasibility and Cost Implications</title><author>Gerszten, Peter C. ; Lunsford, L. Dade ; Rutigliano, Michael J. ; Kondziolka, Douglas ; Flickinger, John C. ; Martínez, A. Julio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3728-b16562217a51bae3fcb414cf49f7c3554a9c49aaeed6ff9e47113c5dfbd977fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>biopsy</topic><topic>radiosurgery</topic><topic>stereotactic surgery</topic><topic>touch-preparation technique</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gerszten, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunsford, L. Dade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutigliano, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kondziolka, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flickinger, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, A. Julio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Computer aided surgery (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gerszten, Peter C.</au><au>Lunsford, L. Dade</au><au>Rutigliano, Michael J.</au><au>Kondziolka, Douglas</au><au>Flickinger, John C.</au><au>Martínez, A. Julio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single-Stage Stereotactic Diagnosis and Radiosurgery: Feasibility and Cost Implications</atitle><jtitle>Computer aided surgery (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>141-150</pages><issn>1092-9088</issn><issn>1078-7844</issn><eissn>1097-0150</eissn><eissn>1522-712X</eissn><abstract>We compared the efficacy and the hospital charges of either single-stage or two-stage stereotactic diagnosis and radiosurgery procedures. Twelve patients underwent either one-stage or two-stage diagnosis and management of their brain tumors. Both techniques utilize high-resolution intraoperative stereotactic image-guided technology and rapid touch preparation (imprint) cytopathological techniques to confirm the presence of neoplasm. Following this pathologic diagnosis, six patients immediately underwent stereotactic radiosurgery employing the same frame application and dose planning based on preoperative and intraoperative images. Six patients underwent two-stage procedures, i.e., discharge from the hospital after histopathological diagnosis followed by readmission, reapplication of the stereotactic head frame, and repeat neuroradiological imaging prior to radiosurgery. Requirements for success of the single-stage procedure include intraoperative stereotactic high-resolution imaging, a hospital-wide ethernet system for transferring neurodiagnostic images, and expertise in rapid touch-preparation histopathological technique for accurate diagnosis. Intraoperative computed tomography imaging after biopsy confirmed the target accuracy and lack of movement of the target after brain biopsy. The advantages of the single-stage approach include reduced length of overall hospital stay, simultaneous histopathological diagnosis and therapy in a single hospital admission, and reduced total hospital charges. For patients highly suspected of having brain tumors and for whom stereotactic radiosurgery will be utilized in the treatment, single-stage stereotactic diagnosis immediately followed by radiosurgery is an accurate, effective, and potentially less costly management strategy than a two-stage approach.</abstract><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><doi>10.3109/10929089509105688</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-9088
ispartof Computer aided surgery (New York, N.Y.), 1995, Vol.1 (3), p.141-150
issn 1092-9088
1078-7844
1097-0150
1522-712X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3109_10929089509105688
source Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection)
subjects biopsy
radiosurgery
stereotactic surgery
touch-preparation technique
title Single-Stage Stereotactic Diagnosis and Radiosurgery: Feasibility and Cost Implications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T21%3A40%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-informahealthcare_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single-Stage%20Stereotactic%20Diagnosis%20and%20Radiosurgery:%20Feasibility%20and%20Cost%20Implications&rft.jtitle=Computer%20aided%20surgery%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Gerszten,%20Peter%20C.&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=141-150&rft.issn=1092-9088&rft.eissn=1097-0150&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/10929089509105688&rft_dat=%3Cinformahealthcare_cross%3E10_3109_10929089509105688%3C/informahealthcare_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true