Potential for improvement in clinical decision-making: tumor imaging with in-111 labeled liposomes results of a phase ii-iii study

Abstract Liposome scanning using In- 111 labeled VS102 liposomes (VesCanR) has previously been shown to image a wide variety of common human tumors, probably related to tumor neovascular capIIIary fenestrations and binding of liposomes to tumor cells. We further tested In-III VS102 liposomes in a Ph...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of liposome research 1994, Vol.4 (2), p.985-1008
Hauptverfasser: Presant, Cary A., Turner, A. Franklin, Proffitt, Richard T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1008
container_issue 2
container_start_page 985
container_title Journal of liposome research
container_volume 4
creator Presant, Cary A.
Turner, A. Franklin
Proffitt, Richard T.
description Abstract Liposome scanning using In- 111 labeled VS102 liposomes (VesCanR) has previously been shown to image a wide variety of common human tumors, probably related to tumor neovascular capIIIary fenestrations and binding of liposomes to tumor cells. We further tested In-III VS102 liposomes in a Phase II trial (27 patients) and a Phase III trial (38 patients). The sensitivity for detecting tumors in primary sites was 82% and in metastatic sites was 65% at the recommended lipid dose of 100 mg. There was 1 false positive scan (specificity 98%). Tumors which have been imaged include carcinomas of the breast, lung, head-neck, prostate, colon, ovary, cervix, thyroid, kidney, testes, melanoma, sarcoma and lymphoma. Sites imaged have included soft tissue, breast, mediastinum, bone, lung, lymph node, liver and pelvis. We also describe five patients in whom a In-111 liposome scan was performed in addition to standard tests, and in whom therapy plans were changed by use of liposome scan results. In two instances, no therapy would have been given without In-III liposome scan, but chemotherapy or radiotherapy were used based on liposome scan results and confirmatory tests. In one patient, surgery would have been used in the absence of In-III liposome scans, versus radiotherapy with In-III liposome scan results. In two other patients, palliative radiotherapy or chemotherapy would have been given without In-111 liposome scan. One of the patients would have required further therapy and the other needed curative surgery after liposome scan evaluation. These results suggest In-111 liposome scans may be useful to complement standard diagnostic tests in cancer patient management.
doi_str_mv 10.3109/08982109409018615
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>informahealthcare_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3109_08982109409018615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_3109_08982109409018615</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-934f32c461e996309dff56fc042484d7c15ed08aa2e3d0032b4240bdc22c7b6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAYhC0EEqXwANz8AgFvSWPggio2qRIc4Bw5XhoXJ65sB9QrT45LuSAEJy8z3_9rBoBTjM4oRvwc1bwm-cIQR7iucLkHJrikpCCUs30w2epFNrBDcBTjCiFE6pJMwMeTT3pIVjhofIC2Xwf_pvv8Be0ApbODlVlTWtpo_VD04tUOywuYxv7LLpb5Cd9t6rK_wBhDJ1rttILOrn30vY4w6Di6FKE3UMB1J6KG1hbWWhjTqDbH4MAIF_XJ9zkFL7c3z_P7YvF49zC_XhSSVDQVnDJDiWQV1pxXFHFlTFkZiRhhNVMziUutUC0E0VQhREmbBdQqSYictVVLpwDv5srgYwzaNOuQA4RNg1GzLbH5VWJmrnaMHXI9vXj3wakmiY3zwQQx5Fa26N_45Q-808KlToqgm5Ufw5Dj_rP8E8s9i5M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential for improvement in clinical decision-making: tumor imaging with in-111 labeled liposomes results of a phase ii-iii study</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Presant, Cary A. ; Turner, A. Franklin ; Proffitt, Richard T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Presant, Cary A. ; Turner, A. Franklin ; Proffitt, Richard T.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Liposome scanning using In- 111 labeled VS102 liposomes (VesCanR) has previously been shown to image a wide variety of common human tumors, probably related to tumor neovascular capIIIary fenestrations and binding of liposomes to tumor cells. We further tested In-III VS102 liposomes in a Phase II trial (27 patients) and a Phase III trial (38 patients). The sensitivity for detecting tumors in primary sites was 82% and in metastatic sites was 65% at the recommended lipid dose of 100 mg. There was 1 false positive scan (specificity 98%). Tumors which have been imaged include carcinomas of the breast, lung, head-neck, prostate, colon, ovary, cervix, thyroid, kidney, testes, melanoma, sarcoma and lymphoma. Sites imaged have included soft tissue, breast, mediastinum, bone, lung, lymph node, liver and pelvis. We also describe five patients in whom a In-111 liposome scan was performed in addition to standard tests, and in whom therapy plans were changed by use of liposome scan results. In two instances, no therapy would have been given without In-III liposome scan, but chemotherapy or radiotherapy were used based on liposome scan results and confirmatory tests. In one patient, surgery would have been used in the absence of In-III liposome scans, versus radiotherapy with In-III liposome scan results. In two other patients, palliative radiotherapy or chemotherapy would have been given without In-111 liposome scan. One of the patients would have required further therapy and the other needed curative surgery after liposome scan evaluation. These results suggest In-111 liposome scans may be useful to complement standard diagnostic tests in cancer patient management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2104</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2394</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/08982109409018615</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Informa UK Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Journal of liposome research, 1994, Vol.4 (2), p.985-1008</ispartof><rights>1994 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-934f32c461e996309dff56fc042484d7c15ed08aa2e3d0032b4240bdc22c7b6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-934f32c461e996309dff56fc042484d7c15ed08aa2e3d0032b4240bdc22c7b6b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/08982109409018615$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/08982109409018615$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,59620,59726,60409,60515,61194,61229,61375,61410</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Presant, Cary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, A. Franklin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proffitt, Richard T.</creatorcontrib><title>Potential for improvement in clinical decision-making: tumor imaging with in-111 labeled liposomes results of a phase ii-iii study</title><title>Journal of liposome research</title><description>Abstract Liposome scanning using In- 111 labeled VS102 liposomes (VesCanR) has previously been shown to image a wide variety of common human tumors, probably related to tumor neovascular capIIIary fenestrations and binding of liposomes to tumor cells. We further tested In-III VS102 liposomes in a Phase II trial (27 patients) and a Phase III trial (38 patients). The sensitivity for detecting tumors in primary sites was 82% and in metastatic sites was 65% at the recommended lipid dose of 100 mg. There was 1 false positive scan (specificity 98%). Tumors which have been imaged include carcinomas of the breast, lung, head-neck, prostate, colon, ovary, cervix, thyroid, kidney, testes, melanoma, sarcoma and lymphoma. Sites imaged have included soft tissue, breast, mediastinum, bone, lung, lymph node, liver and pelvis. We also describe five patients in whom a In-111 liposome scan was performed in addition to standard tests, and in whom therapy plans were changed by use of liposome scan results. In two instances, no therapy would have been given without In-III liposome scan, but chemotherapy or radiotherapy were used based on liposome scan results and confirmatory tests. In one patient, surgery would have been used in the absence of In-III liposome scans, versus radiotherapy with In-III liposome scan results. In two other patients, palliative radiotherapy or chemotherapy would have been given without In-111 liposome scan. One of the patients would have required further therapy and the other needed curative surgery after liposome scan evaluation. These results suggest In-111 liposome scans may be useful to complement standard diagnostic tests in cancer patient management.</description><issn>0898-2104</issn><issn>1532-2394</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAYhC0EEqXwANz8AgFvSWPggio2qRIc4Bw5XhoXJ65sB9QrT45LuSAEJy8z3_9rBoBTjM4oRvwc1bwm-cIQR7iucLkHJrikpCCUs30w2epFNrBDcBTjCiFE6pJMwMeTT3pIVjhofIC2Xwf_pvv8Be0ApbODlVlTWtpo_VD04tUOywuYxv7LLpb5Cd9t6rK_wBhDJ1rttILOrn30vY4w6Di6FKE3UMB1J6KG1hbWWhjTqDbH4MAIF_XJ9zkFL7c3z_P7YvF49zC_XhSSVDQVnDJDiWQV1pxXFHFlTFkZiRhhNVMziUutUC0E0VQhREmbBdQqSYictVVLpwDv5srgYwzaNOuQA4RNg1GzLbH5VWJmrnaMHXI9vXj3wakmiY3zwQQx5Fa26N_45Q-808KlToqgm5Ufw5Dj_rP8E8s9i5M</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>Presant, Cary A.</creator><creator>Turner, A. Franklin</creator><creator>Proffitt, Richard T.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>Potential for improvement in clinical decision-making: tumor imaging with in-111 labeled liposomes results of a phase ii-iii study</title><author>Presant, Cary A. ; Turner, A. Franklin ; Proffitt, Richard T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-934f32c461e996309dff56fc042484d7c15ed08aa2e3d0032b4240bdc22c7b6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Presant, Cary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, A. Franklin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proffitt, Richard T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of liposome research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Presant, Cary A.</au><au>Turner, A. Franklin</au><au>Proffitt, Richard T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential for improvement in clinical decision-making: tumor imaging with in-111 labeled liposomes results of a phase ii-iii study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of liposome research</jtitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>985</spage><epage>1008</epage><pages>985-1008</pages><issn>0898-2104</issn><eissn>1532-2394</eissn><abstract>Abstract Liposome scanning using In- 111 labeled VS102 liposomes (VesCanR) has previously been shown to image a wide variety of common human tumors, probably related to tumor neovascular capIIIary fenestrations and binding of liposomes to tumor cells. We further tested In-III VS102 liposomes in a Phase II trial (27 patients) and a Phase III trial (38 patients). The sensitivity for detecting tumors in primary sites was 82% and in metastatic sites was 65% at the recommended lipid dose of 100 mg. There was 1 false positive scan (specificity 98%). Tumors which have been imaged include carcinomas of the breast, lung, head-neck, prostate, colon, ovary, cervix, thyroid, kidney, testes, melanoma, sarcoma and lymphoma. Sites imaged have included soft tissue, breast, mediastinum, bone, lung, lymph node, liver and pelvis. We also describe five patients in whom a In-111 liposome scan was performed in addition to standard tests, and in whom therapy plans were changed by use of liposome scan results. In two instances, no therapy would have been given without In-III liposome scan, but chemotherapy or radiotherapy were used based on liposome scan results and confirmatory tests. In one patient, surgery would have been used in the absence of In-III liposome scans, versus radiotherapy with In-III liposome scan results. In two other patients, palliative radiotherapy or chemotherapy would have been given without In-111 liposome scan. One of the patients would have required further therapy and the other needed curative surgery after liposome scan evaluation. These results suggest In-111 liposome scans may be useful to complement standard diagnostic tests in cancer patient management.</abstract><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><doi>10.3109/08982109409018615</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-2104
ispartof Journal of liposome research, 1994, Vol.4 (2), p.985-1008
issn 0898-2104
1532-2394
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3109_08982109409018615
source Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
title Potential for improvement in clinical decision-making: tumor imaging with in-111 labeled liposomes results of a phase ii-iii study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T11%3A45%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-informahealthcare_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20for%20improvement%20in%20clinical%20decision-making:%20tumor%20imaging%20with%20in-111%20labeled%20liposomes%20results%20of%20a%20phase%20ii-iii%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20liposome%20research&rft.au=Presant,%20Cary%20A.&rft.date=1994&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=985&rft.epage=1008&rft.pages=985-1008&rft.issn=0898-2104&rft.eissn=1532-2394&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/08982109409018615&rft_dat=%3Cinformahealthcare_cross%3E10_3109_08982109409018615%3C/informahealthcare_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true