Irregularity Protection of Citizens' Constitutional Rights to the Administrative Silence: Ketidakteraturan Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Atas Sikap Diam Badan dan/atau Pejabat Pemerintahan

The Administrative's silence legally was an administrative error, however there are no standard to rule the mechanisms for protecting citizens against those an administrative error. This Research have two objectives. First of all, to analyze whether the changes of negative fictitional to positi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Jurnal Konstitusi 2023-09, Vol.20 (3), p.451-467
1. Verfasser: Umar, Umar Dani
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 467
container_issue 3
container_start_page 451
container_title Jurnal Konstitusi
container_volume 20
creator Umar, Umar Dani
description The Administrative's silence legally was an administrative error, however there are no standard to rule the mechanisms for protecting citizens against those an administrative error. This Research have two objectives. First of all, to analyze whether the changes of negative fictitional to positive fictitional are form of legal irregularity, secondly to study regulatory impact of Positive fictional after the issuance of Law number 11 of 2020 against on the protection of citizens' rights. This Research use normative legal research. The Result of this research showed that repeal of norm can be done by changing those law itself or because of the constitutional court decision. negation of negative fictitional validity into chapter 3 law number 5 of 1986 to the positive fictitional through chapter 53 law number 11 of 2020 impact two things. First, remove access of constitutional citizens right, second, automatic approval decision without supervision can be used as a legality tool and may harm the third parties
doi_str_mv 10.31078/jk3035
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_31078_jk3035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_31078_jk3035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_31078_jk30353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjrtOw0AQAE-ISFgQ8QvbpTLc2djnlMgKgi5KKNJZJ7NONjh3aHcTKXw94vEBVFPMFGPMrbN3pbO-ud-_l7asLkxWVA9N7urKX5rMNcU8997WV2YqsrfWFnPnfFFnZvPCjNvjGJj0DEtOir1SipAGaEnpE6PMoE1RlPT4bcIIK9ruVEAT6A7h8e1AkUQ5KJ0Q1jRi7PHGTIYwCk7_eG1mT4vX9jnvOYkwDt0H0yHwuXO2-3nvft_L_5dfFFdKhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Irregularity Protection of Citizens' Constitutional Rights to the Administrative Silence: Ketidakteraturan Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Atas Sikap Diam Badan dan/atau Pejabat Pemerintahan</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Umar, Umar Dani</creator><creatorcontrib>Umar, Umar Dani</creatorcontrib><description>The Administrative's silence legally was an administrative error, however there are no standard to rule the mechanisms for protecting citizens against those an administrative error. This Research have two objectives. First of all, to analyze whether the changes of negative fictitional to positive fictitional are form of legal irregularity, secondly to study regulatory impact of Positive fictional after the issuance of Law number 11 of 2020 against on the protection of citizens' rights. This Research use normative legal research. The Result of this research showed that repeal of norm can be done by changing those law itself or because of the constitutional court decision. negation of negative fictitional validity into chapter 3 law number 5 of 1986 to the positive fictitional through chapter 53 law number 11 of 2020 impact two things. First, remove access of constitutional citizens right, second, automatic approval decision without supervision can be used as a legality tool and may harm the third parties</description><identifier>ISSN: 1829-7706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2548-1657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31078/jk3035</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Jurnal Konstitusi, 2023-09, Vol.20 (3), p.451-467</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_31078_jk30353</cites><orcidid>0009-0001-7516-8495</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Umar, Umar Dani</creatorcontrib><title>Irregularity Protection of Citizens' Constitutional Rights to the Administrative Silence: Ketidakteraturan Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Atas Sikap Diam Badan dan/atau Pejabat Pemerintahan</title><title>Jurnal Konstitusi</title><description>The Administrative's silence legally was an administrative error, however there are no standard to rule the mechanisms for protecting citizens against those an administrative error. This Research have two objectives. First of all, to analyze whether the changes of negative fictitional to positive fictitional are form of legal irregularity, secondly to study regulatory impact of Positive fictional after the issuance of Law number 11 of 2020 against on the protection of citizens' rights. This Research use normative legal research. The Result of this research showed that repeal of norm can be done by changing those law itself or because of the constitutional court decision. negation of negative fictitional validity into chapter 3 law number 5 of 1986 to the positive fictitional through chapter 53 law number 11 of 2020 impact two things. First, remove access of constitutional citizens right, second, automatic approval decision without supervision can be used as a legality tool and may harm the third parties</description><issn>1829-7706</issn><issn>2548-1657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjrtOw0AQAE-ISFgQ8QvbpTLc2djnlMgKgi5KKNJZJ7NONjh3aHcTKXw94vEBVFPMFGPMrbN3pbO-ud-_l7asLkxWVA9N7urKX5rMNcU8997WV2YqsrfWFnPnfFFnZvPCjNvjGJj0DEtOir1SipAGaEnpE6PMoE1RlPT4bcIIK9ruVEAT6A7h8e1AkUQ5KJ0Q1jRi7PHGTIYwCk7_eG1mT4vX9jnvOYkwDt0H0yHwuXO2-3nvft_L_5dfFFdKhQ</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Umar, Umar Dani</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7516-8495</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Irregularity Protection of Citizens' Constitutional Rights to the Administrative Silence</title><author>Umar, Umar Dani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_31078_jk30353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Umar, Umar Dani</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Jurnal Konstitusi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Umar, Umar Dani</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Irregularity Protection of Citizens' Constitutional Rights to the Administrative Silence: Ketidakteraturan Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Atas Sikap Diam Badan dan/atau Pejabat Pemerintahan</atitle><jtitle>Jurnal Konstitusi</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>451</spage><epage>467</epage><pages>451-467</pages><issn>1829-7706</issn><eissn>2548-1657</eissn><abstract>The Administrative's silence legally was an administrative error, however there are no standard to rule the mechanisms for protecting citizens against those an administrative error. This Research have two objectives. First of all, to analyze whether the changes of negative fictitional to positive fictitional are form of legal irregularity, secondly to study regulatory impact of Positive fictional after the issuance of Law number 11 of 2020 against on the protection of citizens' rights. This Research use normative legal research. The Result of this research showed that repeal of norm can be done by changing those law itself or because of the constitutional court decision. negation of negative fictitional validity into chapter 3 law number 5 of 1986 to the positive fictitional through chapter 53 law number 11 of 2020 impact two things. First, remove access of constitutional citizens right, second, automatic approval decision without supervision can be used as a legality tool and may harm the third parties</abstract><doi>10.31078/jk3035</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7516-8495</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1829-7706
ispartof Jurnal Konstitusi, 2023-09, Vol.20 (3), p.451-467
issn 1829-7706
2548-1657
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_31078_jk3035
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
title Irregularity Protection of Citizens' Constitutional Rights to the Administrative Silence: Ketidakteraturan Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Atas Sikap Diam Badan dan/atau Pejabat Pemerintahan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A48%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Irregularity%20Protection%20of%20Citizens'%20Constitutional%20Rights%20to%20the%20Administrative%20Silence:%20Ketidakteraturan%20Perlindungan%20Hak%20Konstitusional%20Warga%20Negara%20Atas%20Sikap%20Diam%20Badan%20dan/atau%20Pejabat%20Pemerintahan&rft.jtitle=Jurnal%20Konstitusi&rft.au=Umar,%20Umar%20Dani&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=451&rft.epage=467&rft.pages=451-467&rft.issn=1829-7706&rft.eissn=2548-1657&rft_id=info:doi/10.31078/jk3035&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_31078_jk3035%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true