Artificial Intelligence Literacy Among Healthcare Professionals and Students: A Systematic Review

Introduction: This systematic review investigated the level of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy among healthcare professionals and students.Methods: On October 4, 2023, we searched the databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant material. The evidence gathered from the stu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in health informatics 2023-11, Vol.12, p.168
Hauptverfasser: Kimiafar, Khalil, Sarbaz, Masoumeh, Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammad, Ghaddaripouri, Kosar, Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat, Raei Mehneh, Marziyeh, Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 168
container_title Frontiers in health informatics
container_volume 12
creator Kimiafar, Khalil
Sarbaz, Masoumeh
Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammad
Ghaddaripouri, Kosar
Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat
Raei Mehneh, Marziyeh
Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh
description Introduction: This systematic review investigated the level of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy among healthcare professionals and students.Methods: On October 4, 2023, we searched the databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant material. The evidence gathered from the studies included in this systematic review was reported in this study using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Studies that assessed the level of AI literacy among medical and health care professionals and students met the inclusion criteria for this study. The same standard checklist was used for data extraction. Among the data items contained in this form are the study reference, study nation, publication year, participant characteristics (number of participants and their field of study), study objectives, and study outcomes.Results: Of the 10 included studies, 4 (40%) reported a low level of preparation, knowledge, and literacy. In a study, it was also shown that radiologists had acceptable literacy about AI, and it seems that they had a better study of this field compared to other specialists. Another study showed that initially the level of AI literacy was not acceptable but improved significantly after training. Two studies also hailed AI's contribution to improving healthcare. Another study identified cases of clinical merit for AI that could be used to guide future teaching and learning programs in maximizing the potential benefits of AI-based tools and reducing potential harm. In another study, professional groups were required to adjust their roles in AI practice.Conclusion: Evidence from this systematic review suggests that AI literacy of healthcare professionals and students was insufficient. Training courses on AI and its application in healthcare are a must.
doi_str_mv 10.30699/fhi.v12i0.524
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_30699_fhi_v12i0_524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_30699_fhi_v12i0_524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1944-b934a0a0324dd765427cb7b450a95ff8003a149ece6fd1ed416d049e019421f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkDFPwzAUhC0EElXpyuw_kPDsOA5hiyqglSqBKMzRq_3cGqUJsk1R_z1Ry8B0d9LdDR9jtwLyAnRd37mdzw9CeshLqS7YROpKZ5UAdfnPX7NZjJ8AIEshJegJwyYk77zx2PFln6jr_JZ6Q3zlEwU0R97sh37LF4Rd2hkMxF_D4ChGP_TYRY695ev0balP8YE3fH2MifaYvOFvdPD0c8Ou3Fik2Z9O2cfT4_t8ka1enpfzZpUZUSuVbepCISAUUllb6VLJymyqjSoB69K5e4ACharJkHZWkFVCWxgzjGspHBRTlp9_TRhiDOTar-D3GI6tgPbEqB0ZtSdG7cio-AUif1t8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Artificial Intelligence Literacy Among Healthcare Professionals and Students: A Systematic Review</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Kimiafar, Khalil ; Sarbaz, Masoumeh ; Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammad ; Ghaddaripouri, Kosar ; Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat ; Raei Mehneh, Marziyeh ; Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Kimiafar, Khalil ; Sarbaz, Masoumeh ; Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammad ; Ghaddaripouri, Kosar ; Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat ; Raei Mehneh, Marziyeh ; Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: This systematic review investigated the level of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy among healthcare professionals and students.Methods: On October 4, 2023, we searched the databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant material. The evidence gathered from the studies included in this systematic review was reported in this study using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Studies that assessed the level of AI literacy among medical and health care professionals and students met the inclusion criteria for this study. The same standard checklist was used for data extraction. Among the data items contained in this form are the study reference, study nation, publication year, participant characteristics (number of participants and their field of study), study objectives, and study outcomes.Results: Of the 10 included studies, 4 (40%) reported a low level of preparation, knowledge, and literacy. In a study, it was also shown that radiologists had acceptable literacy about AI, and it seems that they had a better study of this field compared to other specialists. Another study showed that initially the level of AI literacy was not acceptable but improved significantly after training. Two studies also hailed AI's contribution to improving healthcare. Another study identified cases of clinical merit for AI that could be used to guide future teaching and learning programs in maximizing the potential benefits of AI-based tools and reducing potential harm. In another study, professional groups were required to adjust their roles in AI practice.Conclusion: Evidence from this systematic review suggests that AI literacy of healthcare professionals and students was insufficient. Training courses on AI and its application in healthcare are a must.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2676-7104</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2676-7104</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.30699/fhi.v12i0.524</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Frontiers in health informatics, 2023-11, Vol.12, p.168</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1944-b934a0a0324dd765427cb7b450a95ff8003a149ece6fd1ed416d049e019421f03</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-5817-9945 ; 0000-0001-5456-8505 ; 0000-0003-0351-4675 ; 0000-0002-3153-8968 ; 0000-0002-6643-558X ; 0009-0005-1318-8406 ; 0000-0002-2214-0077</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kimiafar, Khalil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarbaz, Masoumeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghaddaripouri, Kosar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raei Mehneh, Marziyeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><title>Artificial Intelligence Literacy Among Healthcare Professionals and Students: A Systematic Review</title><title>Frontiers in health informatics</title><description>Introduction: This systematic review investigated the level of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy among healthcare professionals and students.Methods: On October 4, 2023, we searched the databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant material. The evidence gathered from the studies included in this systematic review was reported in this study using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Studies that assessed the level of AI literacy among medical and health care professionals and students met the inclusion criteria for this study. The same standard checklist was used for data extraction. Among the data items contained in this form are the study reference, study nation, publication year, participant characteristics (number of participants and their field of study), study objectives, and study outcomes.Results: Of the 10 included studies, 4 (40%) reported a low level of preparation, knowledge, and literacy. In a study, it was also shown that radiologists had acceptable literacy about AI, and it seems that they had a better study of this field compared to other specialists. Another study showed that initially the level of AI literacy was not acceptable but improved significantly after training. Two studies also hailed AI's contribution to improving healthcare. Another study identified cases of clinical merit for AI that could be used to guide future teaching and learning programs in maximizing the potential benefits of AI-based tools and reducing potential harm. In another study, professional groups were required to adjust their roles in AI practice.Conclusion: Evidence from this systematic review suggests that AI literacy of healthcare professionals and students was insufficient. Training courses on AI and its application in healthcare are a must.</description><issn>2676-7104</issn><issn>2676-7104</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkDFPwzAUhC0EElXpyuw_kPDsOA5hiyqglSqBKMzRq_3cGqUJsk1R_z1Ry8B0d9LdDR9jtwLyAnRd37mdzw9CeshLqS7YROpKZ5UAdfnPX7NZjJ8AIEshJegJwyYk77zx2PFln6jr_JZ6Q3zlEwU0R97sh37LF4Rd2hkMxF_D4ChGP_TYRY695ev0balP8YE3fH2MifaYvOFvdPD0c8Ou3Fik2Z9O2cfT4_t8ka1enpfzZpUZUSuVbepCISAUUllb6VLJymyqjSoB69K5e4ACharJkHZWkFVCWxgzjGspHBRTlp9_TRhiDOTar-D3GI6tgPbEqB0ZtSdG7cio-AUif1t8</recordid><startdate>20231111</startdate><enddate>20231111</enddate><creator>Kimiafar, Khalil</creator><creator>Sarbaz, Masoumeh</creator><creator>Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammad</creator><creator>Ghaddaripouri, Kosar</creator><creator>Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat</creator><creator>Raei Mehneh, Marziyeh</creator><creator>Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5817-9945</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5456-8505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0351-4675</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3153-8968</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6643-558X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1318-8406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-0077</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231111</creationdate><title>Artificial Intelligence Literacy Among Healthcare Professionals and Students: A Systematic Review</title><author>Kimiafar, Khalil ; Sarbaz, Masoumeh ; Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammad ; Ghaddaripouri, Kosar ; Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat ; Raei Mehneh, Marziyeh ; Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1944-b934a0a0324dd765427cb7b450a95ff8003a149ece6fd1ed416d049e019421f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kimiafar, Khalil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarbaz, Masoumeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghaddaripouri, Kosar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raei Mehneh, Marziyeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in health informatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kimiafar, Khalil</au><au>Sarbaz, Masoumeh</au><au>Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammad</au><au>Ghaddaripouri, Kosar</au><au>Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat</au><au>Raei Mehneh, Marziyeh</au><au>Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Artificial Intelligence Literacy Among Healthcare Professionals and Students: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in health informatics</jtitle><date>2023-11-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>168</spage><pages>168-</pages><issn>2676-7104</issn><eissn>2676-7104</eissn><abstract>Introduction: This systematic review investigated the level of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy among healthcare professionals and students.Methods: On October 4, 2023, we searched the databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant material. The evidence gathered from the studies included in this systematic review was reported in this study using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Studies that assessed the level of AI literacy among medical and health care professionals and students met the inclusion criteria for this study. The same standard checklist was used for data extraction. Among the data items contained in this form are the study reference, study nation, publication year, participant characteristics (number of participants and their field of study), study objectives, and study outcomes.Results: Of the 10 included studies, 4 (40%) reported a low level of preparation, knowledge, and literacy. In a study, it was also shown that radiologists had acceptable literacy about AI, and it seems that they had a better study of this field compared to other specialists. Another study showed that initially the level of AI literacy was not acceptable but improved significantly after training. Two studies also hailed AI's contribution to improving healthcare. Another study identified cases of clinical merit for AI that could be used to guide future teaching and learning programs in maximizing the potential benefits of AI-based tools and reducing potential harm. In another study, professional groups were required to adjust their roles in AI practice.Conclusion: Evidence from this systematic review suggests that AI literacy of healthcare professionals and students was insufficient. Training courses on AI and its application in healthcare are a must.</abstract><doi>10.30699/fhi.v12i0.524</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5817-9945</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5456-8505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0351-4675</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3153-8968</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6643-558X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1318-8406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-0077</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2676-7104
ispartof Frontiers in health informatics, 2023-11, Vol.12, p.168
issn 2676-7104
2676-7104
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_30699_fhi_v12i0_524
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Artificial Intelligence Literacy Among Healthcare Professionals and Students: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A32%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Artificial%20Intelligence%20Literacy%20Among%20Healthcare%20Professionals%20and%20Students:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20health%20informatics&rft.au=Kimiafar,%20Khalil&rft.date=2023-11-11&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=168&rft.pages=168-&rft.issn=2676-7104&rft.eissn=2676-7104&rft_id=info:doi/10.30699/fhi.v12i0.524&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_30699_fhi_v12i0_524%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true