Development, Validity, and Reliability of a Japanese Version of the End-of-Life in Dementia Scales
Background & Aims: In Japan, there are no reliable instruments to measure the quality of care for a person with end-stage dementia. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the End-of-Life in Dementia scales (EOLD-J) and evaluate its reliability and validity.Methods: The EOLD-J was crea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Kita Kantō igaku (The Kitakanto Medical Journal) 2022/11/01, Vol.72(4), pp.327-335 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background & Aims: In Japan, there are no reliable instruments to measure the quality of care for a person with end-stage dementia. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the End-of-Life in Dementia scales (EOLD-J) and evaluate its reliability and validity.Methods: The EOLD-J was created by translating measurements of original scales: Satisfaction with Care (SWC-EOLD-J), Symptom Management (SM-EOLD-J), and Comfort Assessment in Dying with Dementia (CAD-EOLD-J). Participants comprised 113 family members of a deceased person with dementia and 113 nurses. The reliability and construct validity of the EOLD-J were evaluated using the scores of the SWC-EOLD-J, the Japanese Decision Regret Scale (DRS-J), the SM-EOLD-J, a short version of the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Dementia (short QOL-D), and the CAD-EOLD-J.Results: Responses from 83 family members and 62 nurses were analyzed. The Cronbach’s alphas of SWC-EOLD-J, SM-EOLD-J, and CAD-EOLD-J were 0.77, 0.60, and 0.88, respectively. While the SWC-EOLD-J score was significantly correlated with DRS-J (r=0.504, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1343-2826 1881-1191 |
DOI: | 10.2974/kmj.72.327 |