Evaluation of Dosimetry, Quantitative Methods, and Test-Retest Variability of 18 F-PI-2620 PET for the Assessment of Tau Deposits in the Human Brain

F-PI-2620 is a next-generation tau PET tracer that has demonstrated ability to image the spatial distribution of suspected tau pathology. The objective of this study was to assess the tracer biodistribution, dosimetry, and quantitative methods of F-PI-2620 in the human brain. Full kinetic modeling t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2020-06, Vol.61 (6), p.920-927
Hauptverfasser: Bullich, Santiago, Barret, Olivier, Constantinescu, Cristian, Sandiego, Christine, Mueller, Andre, Berndt, Mathias, Papin, Caroline, Perrotin, Audrey, Koglin, Norman, Kroth, Heiko, Pfeifer, Andrea, Tamagnan, Gilles, Madonia, Jennifer, Seibyl, John P, Marek, Kenneth, De Santi, Susan, Dinkelborg, Ludger M, Stephens, Andrew W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 927
container_issue 6
container_start_page 920
container_title Journal of Nuclear Medicine
container_volume 61
creator Bullich, Santiago
Barret, Olivier
Constantinescu, Cristian
Sandiego, Christine
Mueller, Andre
Berndt, Mathias
Papin, Caroline
Perrotin, Audrey
Koglin, Norman
Kroth, Heiko
Pfeifer, Andrea
Tamagnan, Gilles
Madonia, Jennifer
Seibyl, John P
Marek, Kenneth
De Santi, Susan
Dinkelborg, Ludger M
Stephens, Andrew W
description F-PI-2620 is a next-generation tau PET tracer that has demonstrated ability to image the spatial distribution of suspected tau pathology. The objective of this study was to assess the tracer biodistribution, dosimetry, and quantitative methods of F-PI-2620 in the human brain. Full kinetic modeling to quantify tau load was investigated. Noninvasive kinetic modeling and semiquantitative methods were evaluated against the full tracer kinetics. Finally, the reproducibility of PET measurements from test and retest scans was assessed. Three healthy controls (HCs) and 4 Alzheimer disease (AD) subjects underwent 2 dynamic PET scans, including arterial sampling. Distribution volume ratio (DVR) was estimated using full tracer kinetics (reversible 2-tissue-compartment [2TC] model and Logan graphical analysis [LGA]) and noninvasive kinetic models (noninvasive LGA [NI-LGA] and the multilinear reference tissue model [MRTM2]). SUV ratio (SUVR) was determined at different imaging windows after injection. The correlation between DVR and SUVR, effect size (Cohen's d), and test-retest variability (TRV) were evaluated. Additionally, 6 HCs received 1 tracer administration and underwent whole-body PET for dosimetry calculation. Organ doses and the whole-body effective dose were calculated using OLINDA 2.0. A strong correlation was found across different kinetic models ( > 0.97) and between DVR(2TC) and SUVR between 30 and 90 min, with an of more than 0.95. Secular equilibrium was reached at around 40 min after injection in most regions and subjects. TRV and effect size for SUVR across different regions were similar at 30-60 min (TRV, 3.8%; Cohen's d, 3.80), 45-75 min (TRV, 4.3%; Cohen's d, 3.77) and 60-90 min (TRV, 4.9%; Cohen's d, 3.73) and increased at later time points. Elimination was via the hepatobiliary and urinary systems. The whole-body effective dose was 33.3 ± 2.1 μSv/MBq for an adult female and 33.1 ± 1.4 μSv/MBq for an adult male, with a 1.5-h urinary bladder voiding interval. F-PI-2620 exhibits fast kinetics, suitable dosimetry, and low TRV. DVR measured using the 2TC model with arterial sampling correlated strongly with DVR measured by NI-LGA, MRTM2, and SUVR. SUVR can be used for F-PI-2620 PET quantification of tau deposits, avoiding arterial blood sampling. Static F-PI-2620 PET scans between 45 and 75 min after injection provide excellent quantification accuracy, a large effect size, and low TRV.
doi_str_mv 10.2967/jnumed.119.236240
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_119_236240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31712324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1134-db1a44e2bdf4787f6189cbfce978e1c936d688750c34490184a306e5158289f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kNtOwkAQhjdGI4g-gDdmH4Dizp66vUQOQoIRDXrbbNttWEJb0t2S8B4-sK3I1X_xzzeT-RB6BDKikQyfd2VTmGwEEI0ok5STK9QHwUQgpAyvUZ-AhEAIInrozrkdIUQqpW5Rj0EIlFHeRz-zo9432tuqxFWOp5WzhfH1aYg_Gl1669vqaPCb8dsqc0OsywxvjPPBp_Ft4G9dW53YvfWnjgeF58F6GVBJCV7PNjivauy3Bo-dM84VpvTd2EY3eGoO7THvsC3_JhZNoUv8Umtb3qObXO-defjPAfqazzaTRbB6f11OxqsgBWA8yBLQnBuaZDkPVZhLUFGa5KmJQmUgjZjM2n9DQVLGeURAcc2INAKEoirKKRsgOO9N68q52uTxobaFrk8xkLgzHJ8Nx63h-Gy4ZZ7OzKFJuupCXJSyX5IAd3M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Dosimetry, Quantitative Methods, and Test-Retest Variability of 18 F-PI-2620 PET for the Assessment of Tau Deposits in the Human Brain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bullich, Santiago ; Barret, Olivier ; Constantinescu, Cristian ; Sandiego, Christine ; Mueller, Andre ; Berndt, Mathias ; Papin, Caroline ; Perrotin, Audrey ; Koglin, Norman ; Kroth, Heiko ; Pfeifer, Andrea ; Tamagnan, Gilles ; Madonia, Jennifer ; Seibyl, John P ; Marek, Kenneth ; De Santi, Susan ; Dinkelborg, Ludger M ; Stephens, Andrew W</creator><creatorcontrib>Bullich, Santiago ; Barret, Olivier ; Constantinescu, Cristian ; Sandiego, Christine ; Mueller, Andre ; Berndt, Mathias ; Papin, Caroline ; Perrotin, Audrey ; Koglin, Norman ; Kroth, Heiko ; Pfeifer, Andrea ; Tamagnan, Gilles ; Madonia, Jennifer ; Seibyl, John P ; Marek, Kenneth ; De Santi, Susan ; Dinkelborg, Ludger M ; Stephens, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><description>F-PI-2620 is a next-generation tau PET tracer that has demonstrated ability to image the spatial distribution of suspected tau pathology. The objective of this study was to assess the tracer biodistribution, dosimetry, and quantitative methods of F-PI-2620 in the human brain. Full kinetic modeling to quantify tau load was investigated. Noninvasive kinetic modeling and semiquantitative methods were evaluated against the full tracer kinetics. Finally, the reproducibility of PET measurements from test and retest scans was assessed. Three healthy controls (HCs) and 4 Alzheimer disease (AD) subjects underwent 2 dynamic PET scans, including arterial sampling. Distribution volume ratio (DVR) was estimated using full tracer kinetics (reversible 2-tissue-compartment [2TC] model and Logan graphical analysis [LGA]) and noninvasive kinetic models (noninvasive LGA [NI-LGA] and the multilinear reference tissue model [MRTM2]). SUV ratio (SUVR) was determined at different imaging windows after injection. The correlation between DVR and SUVR, effect size (Cohen's d), and test-retest variability (TRV) were evaluated. Additionally, 6 HCs received 1 tracer administration and underwent whole-body PET for dosimetry calculation. Organ doses and the whole-body effective dose were calculated using OLINDA 2.0. A strong correlation was found across different kinetic models ( &gt; 0.97) and between DVR(2TC) and SUVR between 30 and 90 min, with an of more than 0.95. Secular equilibrium was reached at around 40 min after injection in most regions and subjects. TRV and effect size for SUVR across different regions were similar at 30-60 min (TRV, 3.8%; Cohen's d, 3.80), 45-75 min (TRV, 4.3%; Cohen's d, 3.77) and 60-90 min (TRV, 4.9%; Cohen's d, 3.73) and increased at later time points. Elimination was via the hepatobiliary and urinary systems. The whole-body effective dose was 33.3 ± 2.1 μSv/MBq for an adult female and 33.1 ± 1.4 μSv/MBq for an adult male, with a 1.5-h urinary bladder voiding interval. F-PI-2620 exhibits fast kinetics, suitable dosimetry, and low TRV. DVR measured using the 2TC model with arterial sampling correlated strongly with DVR measured by NI-LGA, MRTM2, and SUVR. SUVR can be used for F-PI-2620 PET quantification of tau deposits, avoiding arterial blood sampling. Static F-PI-2620 PET scans between 45 and 75 min after injection provide excellent quantification accuracy, a large effect size, and low TRV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-662X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236240</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31712324</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - metabolism ; Female ; Fluorine Radioisotopes - pharmacokinetics ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Biological ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Pyridines - pharmacokinetics ; Radiopharmaceuticals - pharmacokinetics ; tau Proteins - metabolism ; Tissue Distribution</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2020-06, Vol.61 (6), p.920-927</ispartof><rights>2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1134-db1a44e2bdf4787f6189cbfce978e1c936d688750c34490184a306e5158289f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1134-db1a44e2bdf4787f6189cbfce978e1c936d688750c34490184a306e5158289f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31712324$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bullich, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barret, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constantinescu, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandiego, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berndt, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papin, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrotin, Audrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koglin, Norman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroth, Heiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamagnan, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madonia, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seibyl, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marek, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Santi, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinkelborg, Ludger M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Dosimetry, Quantitative Methods, and Test-Retest Variability of 18 F-PI-2620 PET for the Assessment of Tau Deposits in the Human Brain</title><title>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>F-PI-2620 is a next-generation tau PET tracer that has demonstrated ability to image the spatial distribution of suspected tau pathology. The objective of this study was to assess the tracer biodistribution, dosimetry, and quantitative methods of F-PI-2620 in the human brain. Full kinetic modeling to quantify tau load was investigated. Noninvasive kinetic modeling and semiquantitative methods were evaluated against the full tracer kinetics. Finally, the reproducibility of PET measurements from test and retest scans was assessed. Three healthy controls (HCs) and 4 Alzheimer disease (AD) subjects underwent 2 dynamic PET scans, including arterial sampling. Distribution volume ratio (DVR) was estimated using full tracer kinetics (reversible 2-tissue-compartment [2TC] model and Logan graphical analysis [LGA]) and noninvasive kinetic models (noninvasive LGA [NI-LGA] and the multilinear reference tissue model [MRTM2]). SUV ratio (SUVR) was determined at different imaging windows after injection. The correlation between DVR and SUVR, effect size (Cohen's d), and test-retest variability (TRV) were evaluated. Additionally, 6 HCs received 1 tracer administration and underwent whole-body PET for dosimetry calculation. Organ doses and the whole-body effective dose were calculated using OLINDA 2.0. A strong correlation was found across different kinetic models ( &gt; 0.97) and between DVR(2TC) and SUVR between 30 and 90 min, with an of more than 0.95. Secular equilibrium was reached at around 40 min after injection in most regions and subjects. TRV and effect size for SUVR across different regions were similar at 30-60 min (TRV, 3.8%; Cohen's d, 3.80), 45-75 min (TRV, 4.3%; Cohen's d, 3.77) and 60-90 min (TRV, 4.9%; Cohen's d, 3.73) and increased at later time points. Elimination was via the hepatobiliary and urinary systems. The whole-body effective dose was 33.3 ± 2.1 μSv/MBq for an adult female and 33.1 ± 1.4 μSv/MBq for an adult male, with a 1.5-h urinary bladder voiding interval. F-PI-2620 exhibits fast kinetics, suitable dosimetry, and low TRV. DVR measured using the 2TC model with arterial sampling correlated strongly with DVR measured by NI-LGA, MRTM2, and SUVR. SUVR can be used for F-PI-2620 PET quantification of tau deposits, avoiding arterial blood sampling. Static F-PI-2620 PET scans between 45 and 75 min after injection provide excellent quantification accuracy, a large effect size, and low TRV.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - metabolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorine Radioisotopes - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Pyridines - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>tau Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Tissue Distribution</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><issn>2159-662X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kNtOwkAQhjdGI4g-gDdmH4Dizp66vUQOQoIRDXrbbNttWEJb0t2S8B4-sK3I1X_xzzeT-RB6BDKikQyfd2VTmGwEEI0ok5STK9QHwUQgpAyvUZ-AhEAIInrozrkdIUQqpW5Rj0EIlFHeRz-zo9432tuqxFWOp5WzhfH1aYg_Gl1669vqaPCb8dsqc0OsywxvjPPBp_Ft4G9dW53YvfWnjgeF58F6GVBJCV7PNjivauy3Bo-dM84VpvTd2EY3eGoO7THvsC3_JhZNoUv8Umtb3qObXO-defjPAfqazzaTRbB6f11OxqsgBWA8yBLQnBuaZDkPVZhLUFGa5KmJQmUgjZjM2n9DQVLGeURAcc2INAKEoirKKRsgOO9N68q52uTxobaFrk8xkLgzHJ8Nx63h-Gy4ZZ7OzKFJuupCXJSyX5IAd3M</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Bullich, Santiago</creator><creator>Barret, Olivier</creator><creator>Constantinescu, Cristian</creator><creator>Sandiego, Christine</creator><creator>Mueller, Andre</creator><creator>Berndt, Mathias</creator><creator>Papin, Caroline</creator><creator>Perrotin, Audrey</creator><creator>Koglin, Norman</creator><creator>Kroth, Heiko</creator><creator>Pfeifer, Andrea</creator><creator>Tamagnan, Gilles</creator><creator>Madonia, Jennifer</creator><creator>Seibyl, John P</creator><creator>Marek, Kenneth</creator><creator>De Santi, Susan</creator><creator>Dinkelborg, Ludger M</creator><creator>Stephens, Andrew W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Dosimetry, Quantitative Methods, and Test-Retest Variability of 18 F-PI-2620 PET for the Assessment of Tau Deposits in the Human Brain</title><author>Bullich, Santiago ; Barret, Olivier ; Constantinescu, Cristian ; Sandiego, Christine ; Mueller, Andre ; Berndt, Mathias ; Papin, Caroline ; Perrotin, Audrey ; Koglin, Norman ; Kroth, Heiko ; Pfeifer, Andrea ; Tamagnan, Gilles ; Madonia, Jennifer ; Seibyl, John P ; Marek, Kenneth ; De Santi, Susan ; Dinkelborg, Ludger M ; Stephens, Andrew W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1134-db1a44e2bdf4787f6189cbfce978e1c936d688750c34490184a306e5158289f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - metabolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorine Radioisotopes - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Pyridines - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>tau Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Tissue Distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bullich, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barret, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constantinescu, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandiego, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berndt, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papin, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrotin, Audrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koglin, Norman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroth, Heiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamagnan, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madonia, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seibyl, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marek, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Santi, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinkelborg, Ludger M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bullich, Santiago</au><au>Barret, Olivier</au><au>Constantinescu, Cristian</au><au>Sandiego, Christine</au><au>Mueller, Andre</au><au>Berndt, Mathias</au><au>Papin, Caroline</au><au>Perrotin, Audrey</au><au>Koglin, Norman</au><au>Kroth, Heiko</au><au>Pfeifer, Andrea</au><au>Tamagnan, Gilles</au><au>Madonia, Jennifer</au><au>Seibyl, John P</au><au>Marek, Kenneth</au><au>De Santi, Susan</au><au>Dinkelborg, Ludger M</au><au>Stephens, Andrew W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Dosimetry, Quantitative Methods, and Test-Retest Variability of 18 F-PI-2620 PET for the Assessment of Tau Deposits in the Human Brain</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>920</spage><epage>927</epage><pages>920-927</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><eissn>2159-662X</eissn><abstract>F-PI-2620 is a next-generation tau PET tracer that has demonstrated ability to image the spatial distribution of suspected tau pathology. The objective of this study was to assess the tracer biodistribution, dosimetry, and quantitative methods of F-PI-2620 in the human brain. Full kinetic modeling to quantify tau load was investigated. Noninvasive kinetic modeling and semiquantitative methods were evaluated against the full tracer kinetics. Finally, the reproducibility of PET measurements from test and retest scans was assessed. Three healthy controls (HCs) and 4 Alzheimer disease (AD) subjects underwent 2 dynamic PET scans, including arterial sampling. Distribution volume ratio (DVR) was estimated using full tracer kinetics (reversible 2-tissue-compartment [2TC] model and Logan graphical analysis [LGA]) and noninvasive kinetic models (noninvasive LGA [NI-LGA] and the multilinear reference tissue model [MRTM2]). SUV ratio (SUVR) was determined at different imaging windows after injection. The correlation between DVR and SUVR, effect size (Cohen's d), and test-retest variability (TRV) were evaluated. Additionally, 6 HCs received 1 tracer administration and underwent whole-body PET for dosimetry calculation. Organ doses and the whole-body effective dose were calculated using OLINDA 2.0. A strong correlation was found across different kinetic models ( &gt; 0.97) and between DVR(2TC) and SUVR between 30 and 90 min, with an of more than 0.95. Secular equilibrium was reached at around 40 min after injection in most regions and subjects. TRV and effect size for SUVR across different regions were similar at 30-60 min (TRV, 3.8%; Cohen's d, 3.80), 45-75 min (TRV, 4.3%; Cohen's d, 3.77) and 60-90 min (TRV, 4.9%; Cohen's d, 3.73) and increased at later time points. Elimination was via the hepatobiliary and urinary systems. The whole-body effective dose was 33.3 ± 2.1 μSv/MBq for an adult female and 33.1 ± 1.4 μSv/MBq for an adult male, with a 1.5-h urinary bladder voiding interval. F-PI-2620 exhibits fast kinetics, suitable dosimetry, and low TRV. DVR measured using the 2TC model with arterial sampling correlated strongly with DVR measured by NI-LGA, MRTM2, and SUVR. SUVR can be used for F-PI-2620 PET quantification of tau deposits, avoiding arterial blood sampling. Static F-PI-2620 PET scans between 45 and 75 min after injection provide excellent quantification accuracy, a large effect size, and low TRV.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>31712324</pmid><doi>10.2967/jnumed.119.236240</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2020-06, Vol.61 (6), p.920-927
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
2159-662X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_119_236240
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging
Brain - metabolism
Female
Fluorine Radioisotopes - pharmacokinetics
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Biological
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
Pyridines - pharmacokinetics
Radiopharmaceuticals - pharmacokinetics
tau Proteins - metabolism
Tissue Distribution
title Evaluation of Dosimetry, Quantitative Methods, and Test-Retest Variability of 18 F-PI-2620 PET for the Assessment of Tau Deposits in the Human Brain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A15%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Dosimetry,%20Quantitative%20Methods,%20and%20Test-Retest%20Variability%20of%2018%20F-PI-2620%20PET%20for%20the%20Assessment%20of%20Tau%20Deposits%20in%20the%20Human%20Brain&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nuclear%20Medicine&rft.au=Bullich,%20Santiago&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=920&rft.epage=927&rft.pages=920-927&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967/jnumed.119.236240&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E31712324%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/31712324&rfr_iscdi=true