Evaluation of Power Weeders for Mechanized Weeding in Pulse Crop Cultivation

Now a days weeding necessitates the introduction of suitable power weeders for pulse cultivation. A study was conducted at TNAU fields with 3 models of commercially available power weeders (Model A, B and C). To suit the power weeder the crop geometry was modified with 60x10 cm and the performance o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Madras agricultural journal 2012, Vol.99 (JUNE), p.394-396
Hauptverfasser: T, Senthilkumar, V M, Duraisamy, D, Asokan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 396
container_issue JUNE
container_start_page 394
container_title Madras agricultural journal
container_volume 99
creator T, Senthilkumar
V M, Duraisamy
D, Asokan
description Now a days weeding necessitates the introduction of suitable power weeders for pulse cultivation. A study was conducted at TNAU fields with 3 models of commercially available power weeders (Model A, B and C). To suit the power weeder the crop geometry was modified with 60x10 cm and the performance of three power weeder models were compared with conventional method of hand weeding. The working width of the power weeders was 60 cm, 60 cm and 30 cm respectively for Model A, B and C. Manual weeding using hand hoe registred maximum weeding efficiency of 83.10 per cent (wet basis) and 82.5 per cent (dry basis). The weeding efficiency of Model A was 74.10 per cent (wet basis) and 73.45 per cent(dry basis), Model B recorded 63.49 per cent (wet basis) and 64.15 per cent (dry basis) and Model C recorded the lowest weeding efficiency of 43.43 per cent (wet basis) and 43.13 per cent (dry basis). The saving in cost of weeding was observed as 75.8, 72.5 and 54.8 per cent respectively for Models A, B and C when compared to manual weeding. The saving in time of weeding operation was 95.8, 94.6 and 89.8 per cent for Models A, B and C, respectively when compared to the manual weeding.
doi_str_mv 10.29321/MAJ.10.100096
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_29321_MAJ_10_100096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_29321_MAJ_10_100096</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c796-15511b7218b06692beb59a4b1f27ef69b92eaa013119cd39ac56e5a5cecc50233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtOwzAURC0EEqGwZe0fSLi2a6deVlF5qRVdVGIZ2c41BIW4spsi-HpCymo0c6RZHEJuGRRcC87uNsvnYiwMALQ6IxmXC57LkZyTDIDPc62AX5KrlD4AlBBcZ2S9OppuMIc29DR4ug1fGOkrYoMxUR8i3aB7N337g800t_0bbXu6HbqEtIphT6uhO7TH6eGaXHgzgpv_nJHd_WpXPebrl4enarnOXalVzqRkzJacLSwopblFK7WZW-Z5iV5pqzkaA0wwpl0jtHFSoTTSoXMSuBAzUpxuXQwpRfT1PrafJn7XDOpJRT2q-CsnFeIXcNtREQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Power Weeders for Mechanized Weeding in Pulse Crop Cultivation</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>T, Senthilkumar ; V M, Duraisamy ; D, Asokan</creator><creatorcontrib>T, Senthilkumar ; V M, Duraisamy ; D, Asokan ; Agricultural Machinery Research Centre Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural university, Coimbatore - 641 003</creatorcontrib><description>Now a days weeding necessitates the introduction of suitable power weeders for pulse cultivation. A study was conducted at TNAU fields with 3 models of commercially available power weeders (Model A, B and C). To suit the power weeder the crop geometry was modified with 60x10 cm and the performance of three power weeder models were compared with conventional method of hand weeding. The working width of the power weeders was 60 cm, 60 cm and 30 cm respectively for Model A, B and C. Manual weeding using hand hoe registred maximum weeding efficiency of 83.10 per cent (wet basis) and 82.5 per cent (dry basis). The weeding efficiency of Model A was 74.10 per cent (wet basis) and 73.45 per cent(dry basis), Model B recorded 63.49 per cent (wet basis) and 64.15 per cent (dry basis) and Model C recorded the lowest weeding efficiency of 43.43 per cent (wet basis) and 43.13 per cent (dry basis). The saving in cost of weeding was observed as 75.8, 72.5 and 54.8 per cent respectively for Models A, B and C when compared to manual weeding. The saving in time of weeding operation was 95.8, 94.6 and 89.8 per cent for Models A, B and C, respectively when compared to the manual weeding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-9602</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2582-5321</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.29321/MAJ.10.100096</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Madras agricultural journal, 2012, Vol.99 (JUNE), p.394-396</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>T, Senthilkumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>V M, Duraisamy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D, Asokan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agricultural Machinery Research Centre Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural university, Coimbatore - 641 003</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Power Weeders for Mechanized Weeding in Pulse Crop Cultivation</title><title>Madras agricultural journal</title><description>Now a days weeding necessitates the introduction of suitable power weeders for pulse cultivation. A study was conducted at TNAU fields with 3 models of commercially available power weeders (Model A, B and C). To suit the power weeder the crop geometry was modified with 60x10 cm and the performance of three power weeder models were compared with conventional method of hand weeding. The working width of the power weeders was 60 cm, 60 cm and 30 cm respectively for Model A, B and C. Manual weeding using hand hoe registred maximum weeding efficiency of 83.10 per cent (wet basis) and 82.5 per cent (dry basis). The weeding efficiency of Model A was 74.10 per cent (wet basis) and 73.45 per cent(dry basis), Model B recorded 63.49 per cent (wet basis) and 64.15 per cent (dry basis) and Model C recorded the lowest weeding efficiency of 43.43 per cent (wet basis) and 43.13 per cent (dry basis). The saving in cost of weeding was observed as 75.8, 72.5 and 54.8 per cent respectively for Models A, B and C when compared to manual weeding. The saving in time of weeding operation was 95.8, 94.6 and 89.8 per cent for Models A, B and C, respectively when compared to the manual weeding.</description><issn>0024-9602</issn><issn>2582-5321</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkMtOwzAURC0EEqGwZe0fSLi2a6deVlF5qRVdVGIZ2c41BIW4spsi-HpCymo0c6RZHEJuGRRcC87uNsvnYiwMALQ6IxmXC57LkZyTDIDPc62AX5KrlD4AlBBcZ2S9OppuMIc29DR4ug1fGOkrYoMxUR8i3aB7N337g800t_0bbXu6HbqEtIphT6uhO7TH6eGaXHgzgpv_nJHd_WpXPebrl4enarnOXalVzqRkzJacLSwopblFK7WZW-Z5iV5pqzkaA0wwpl0jtHFSoTTSoXMSuBAzUpxuXQwpRfT1PrafJn7XDOpJRT2q-CsnFeIXcNtREQ</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>T, Senthilkumar</creator><creator>V M, Duraisamy</creator><creator>D, Asokan</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Power Weeders for Mechanized Weeding in Pulse Crop Cultivation</title><author>T, Senthilkumar ; V M, Duraisamy ; D, Asokan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c796-15511b7218b06692beb59a4b1f27ef69b92eaa013119cd39ac56e5a5cecc50233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>T, Senthilkumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>V M, Duraisamy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D, Asokan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agricultural Machinery Research Centre Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural university, Coimbatore - 641 003</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Madras agricultural journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>T, Senthilkumar</au><au>V M, Duraisamy</au><au>D, Asokan</au><aucorp>Agricultural Machinery Research Centre Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural university, Coimbatore - 641 003</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Power Weeders for Mechanized Weeding in Pulse Crop Cultivation</atitle><jtitle>Madras agricultural journal</jtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>JUNE</issue><spage>394</spage><epage>396</epage><pages>394-396</pages><issn>0024-9602</issn><eissn>2582-5321</eissn><abstract>Now a days weeding necessitates the introduction of suitable power weeders for pulse cultivation. A study was conducted at TNAU fields with 3 models of commercially available power weeders (Model A, B and C). To suit the power weeder the crop geometry was modified with 60x10 cm and the performance of three power weeder models were compared with conventional method of hand weeding. The working width of the power weeders was 60 cm, 60 cm and 30 cm respectively for Model A, B and C. Manual weeding using hand hoe registred maximum weeding efficiency of 83.10 per cent (wet basis) and 82.5 per cent (dry basis). The weeding efficiency of Model A was 74.10 per cent (wet basis) and 73.45 per cent(dry basis), Model B recorded 63.49 per cent (wet basis) and 64.15 per cent (dry basis) and Model C recorded the lowest weeding efficiency of 43.43 per cent (wet basis) and 43.13 per cent (dry basis). The saving in cost of weeding was observed as 75.8, 72.5 and 54.8 per cent respectively for Models A, B and C when compared to manual weeding. The saving in time of weeding operation was 95.8, 94.6 and 89.8 per cent for Models A, B and C, respectively when compared to the manual weeding.</abstract><doi>10.29321/MAJ.10.100096</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-9602
ispartof Madras agricultural journal, 2012, Vol.99 (JUNE), p.394-396
issn 0024-9602
2582-5321
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_29321_MAJ_10_100096
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Evaluation of Power Weeders for Mechanized Weeding in Pulse Crop Cultivation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T23%3A44%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Power%20Weeders%20for%20Mechanized%20Weeding%20in%20Pulse%20Crop%20Cultivation&rft.jtitle=Madras%20agricultural%20journal&rft.au=T,%20Senthilkumar&rft.aucorp=Agricultural%20Machinery%20Research%20Centre%20Agricultural%20Engineering%20College%20and%20Research%20Institute,%20Tamil%20Nadu%20Agricultural%20university,%20Coimbatore%20-%20641%20003&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=JUNE&rft.spage=394&rft.epage=396&rft.pages=394-396&rft.issn=0024-9602&rft.eissn=2582-5321&rft_id=info:doi/10.29321/MAJ.10.100096&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_29321_MAJ_10_100096%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true