Effect of a “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) Status on Patient Care: A Descriptive Survey on the Perceptions of ICU and Medical/Surgical Nurses

Background: Nursing research literature demonstrates a persistent concern regarding how nurses interpret “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) code status. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess nurses’ perceptions of the effect of a DNR code status on patient care. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Journal of Critical Care 2023-07, Vol.17 (2), p.39-53
Hauptverfasser: Rainbolt Clemente, Joria, Hess, Patrick, Oca, Cyr, Raphael, Mary, Valdez, Regina, Cohn, Felicia, Rondinelli, June
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 53
container_issue 2
container_start_page 39
container_title International Journal of Critical Care
container_volume 17
creator Rainbolt Clemente, Joria
Hess, Patrick
Oca, Cyr
Raphael, Mary
Valdez, Regina
Cohn, Felicia
Rondinelli, June
description Background: Nursing research literature demonstrates a persistent concern regarding how nurses interpret “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) code status. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess nurses’ perceptions of the effect of a DNR code status on patient care. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional, descriptive survey offered to all clinical nurses in the Medical, Surgical, Telemetry, Critical Care, and Emergency Departments within one urban community hospital in Southern California, USA.  Descriptive statistics were used for demographic data and individual question analysis, which included frequency and percentages for categorical variables in addition to means with standard deviation for continuous data. Open- ended questions received content analysis. Results: This study resulted in a convenience sample of 120 registered nurses (RNs). Greater than 95% of nurses who completed the survey agreed that nursing care should continue until patient death.  Yet when asked about physiologic, demographic, chronic, or cognitive status, participants answered with varying degrees of certainty about the care that should be provided. Conclusions: Further research is needed to explore the inconsistency in nurses’ understanding of the care provided to a patient with DNR status. There may be opportunities to improve consistency in practice with education or protocols to outline optimal care of a patient with DNR orders.    
doi_str_mv 10.29173/ijcc62
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_29173_ijcc62</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_29173_ijcc62</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_29173_ijcc623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj8FOwkAQhjdEE4gQX2Fu6gHYlliKN9Ni5EBDQM_NuszqGuySmS0JN17AN9CX40lshQNHTv_3Z75k8gtxHcheOAqGg7791DoKG6IVxkHUHcl7eXHCTdFhtm8VxVE4lHFLfI-NQe3BGVCw3_2kDjLnYY5csrZeedzvfuE2zeZ3sKhqyeAKmClvsfCQKMIHeIQUWZNde7tBWJS0wW1t-Q-EGZLG6uAKrn9MkldQxRKmuLRarfqV_F4DZCUxcltcGrVi7BzzStw8jV-S564mx0xo8jXZL0XbPJD5_-D8MHhwvvkHio9dsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of a “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) Status on Patient Care: A Descriptive Survey on the Perceptions of ICU and Medical/Surgical Nurses</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rainbolt Clemente, Joria ; Hess, Patrick ; Oca, Cyr ; Raphael, Mary ; Valdez, Regina ; Cohn, Felicia ; Rondinelli, June</creator><creatorcontrib>Rainbolt Clemente, Joria ; Hess, Patrick ; Oca, Cyr ; Raphael, Mary ; Valdez, Regina ; Cohn, Felicia ; Rondinelli, June</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Nursing research literature demonstrates a persistent concern regarding how nurses interpret “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) code status. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess nurses’ perceptions of the effect of a DNR code status on patient care. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional, descriptive survey offered to all clinical nurses in the Medical, Surgical, Telemetry, Critical Care, and Emergency Departments within one urban community hospital in Southern California, USA.  Descriptive statistics were used for demographic data and individual question analysis, which included frequency and percentages for categorical variables in addition to means with standard deviation for continuous data. Open- ended questions received content analysis. Results: This study resulted in a convenience sample of 120 registered nurses (RNs). Greater than 95% of nurses who completed the survey agreed that nursing care should continue until patient death.  Yet when asked about physiologic, demographic, chronic, or cognitive status, participants answered with varying degrees of certainty about the care that should be provided. Conclusions: Further research is needed to explore the inconsistency in nurses’ understanding of the care provided to a patient with DNR status. There may be opportunities to improve consistency in practice with education or protocols to outline optimal care of a patient with DNR orders.    </description><identifier>ISSN: 2816-9050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2816-9050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.29173/ijcc62</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International Journal of Critical Care, 2023-07, Vol.17 (2), p.39-53</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-9448-3060</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rainbolt Clemente, Joria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oca, Cyr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raphael, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdez, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rondinelli, June</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of a “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) Status on Patient Care: A Descriptive Survey on the Perceptions of ICU and Medical/Surgical Nurses</title><title>International Journal of Critical Care</title><description>Background: Nursing research literature demonstrates a persistent concern regarding how nurses interpret “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) code status. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess nurses’ perceptions of the effect of a DNR code status on patient care. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional, descriptive survey offered to all clinical nurses in the Medical, Surgical, Telemetry, Critical Care, and Emergency Departments within one urban community hospital in Southern California, USA.  Descriptive statistics were used for demographic data and individual question analysis, which included frequency and percentages for categorical variables in addition to means with standard deviation for continuous data. Open- ended questions received content analysis. Results: This study resulted in a convenience sample of 120 registered nurses (RNs). Greater than 95% of nurses who completed the survey agreed that nursing care should continue until patient death.  Yet when asked about physiologic, demographic, chronic, or cognitive status, participants answered with varying degrees of certainty about the care that should be provided. Conclusions: Further research is needed to explore the inconsistency in nurses’ understanding of the care provided to a patient with DNR status. There may be opportunities to improve consistency in practice with education or protocols to outline optimal care of a patient with DNR orders.    </description><issn>2816-9050</issn><issn>2816-9050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNj8FOwkAQhjdEE4gQX2Fu6gHYlliKN9Ni5EBDQM_NuszqGuySmS0JN17AN9CX40lshQNHTv_3Z75k8gtxHcheOAqGg7791DoKG6IVxkHUHcl7eXHCTdFhtm8VxVE4lHFLfI-NQe3BGVCw3_2kDjLnYY5csrZeedzvfuE2zeZ3sKhqyeAKmClvsfCQKMIHeIQUWZNde7tBWJS0wW1t-Q-EGZLG6uAKrn9MkldQxRKmuLRarfqV_F4DZCUxcltcGrVi7BzzStw8jV-S564mx0xo8jXZL0XbPJD5_-D8MHhwvvkHio9dsA</recordid><startdate>20230727</startdate><enddate>20230727</enddate><creator>Rainbolt Clemente, Joria</creator><creator>Hess, Patrick</creator><creator>Oca, Cyr</creator><creator>Raphael, Mary</creator><creator>Valdez, Regina</creator><creator>Cohn, Felicia</creator><creator>Rondinelli, June</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9448-3060</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230727</creationdate><title>Effect of a “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) Status on Patient Care: A Descriptive Survey on the Perceptions of ICU and Medical/Surgical Nurses</title><author>Rainbolt Clemente, Joria ; Hess, Patrick ; Oca, Cyr ; Raphael, Mary ; Valdez, Regina ; Cohn, Felicia ; Rondinelli, June</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_29173_ijcc623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rainbolt Clemente, Joria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oca, Cyr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raphael, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdez, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rondinelli, June</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Critical Care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rainbolt Clemente, Joria</au><au>Hess, Patrick</au><au>Oca, Cyr</au><au>Raphael, Mary</au><au>Valdez, Regina</au><au>Cohn, Felicia</au><au>Rondinelli, June</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of a “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) Status on Patient Care: A Descriptive Survey on the Perceptions of ICU and Medical/Surgical Nurses</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Critical Care</jtitle><date>2023-07-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>39-53</pages><issn>2816-9050</issn><eissn>2816-9050</eissn><abstract>Background: Nursing research literature demonstrates a persistent concern regarding how nurses interpret “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) code status. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess nurses’ perceptions of the effect of a DNR code status on patient care. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional, descriptive survey offered to all clinical nurses in the Medical, Surgical, Telemetry, Critical Care, and Emergency Departments within one urban community hospital in Southern California, USA.  Descriptive statistics were used for demographic data and individual question analysis, which included frequency and percentages for categorical variables in addition to means with standard deviation for continuous data. Open- ended questions received content analysis. Results: This study resulted in a convenience sample of 120 registered nurses (RNs). Greater than 95% of nurses who completed the survey agreed that nursing care should continue until patient death.  Yet when asked about physiologic, demographic, chronic, or cognitive status, participants answered with varying degrees of certainty about the care that should be provided. Conclusions: Further research is needed to explore the inconsistency in nurses’ understanding of the care provided to a patient with DNR status. There may be opportunities to improve consistency in practice with education or protocols to outline optimal care of a patient with DNR orders.    </abstract><doi>10.29173/ijcc62</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9448-3060</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2816-9050
ispartof International Journal of Critical Care, 2023-07, Vol.17 (2), p.39-53
issn 2816-9050
2816-9050
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_29173_ijcc62
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Effect of a “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) Status on Patient Care: A Descriptive Survey on the Perceptions of ICU and Medical/Surgical Nurses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T02%3A54%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20a%20%E2%80%9CDo%20Not%20Resuscitate%E2%80%9D%20(DNR)%20Status%20on%20Patient%20Care:%20A%20Descriptive%20Survey%20on%20the%20Perceptions%20of%20ICU%20and%20Medical/Surgical%20Nurses&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Critical%20Care&rft.au=Rainbolt%20Clemente,%20Joria&rft.date=2023-07-27&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=39-53&rft.issn=2816-9050&rft.eissn=2816-9050&rft_id=info:doi/10.29173/ijcc62&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_29173_ijcc62%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true