Erosion of university autonomy: Judicial supervision of university conduct
The university was once envisaged as an autonomous, self-governing institution where academic endeavours could flourish sans outside interference. It is a vision with diminishing correspondence to reality. This article explores the degree of autonomy afforded to universities when the university visi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Alberta law review 2024-09, Vol.61 (4), p.881-910 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 910 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 881 |
container_title | Alberta law review |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Wong, Anna S.P. |
description | The university was once envisaged as an autonomous, self-governing institution where academic endeavours could flourish sans outside interference. It is a vision with diminishing correspondence to reality. This article explores the degree of autonomy afforded to universities when the university visitor was given a prominent role to play in adjudicating disputes in contrast to contemporary times when universities find themselves increasingly - and inconsistently - under the supervision of the judiciary. By examining universityfocused jurisprudence involving judicial review, civil litigation, and 'Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms' challenges, the article highlights instances where universities have fallen under the scrutiny of judicial oversight, and circumstances where the courts have chosen not to intervene. The article concludes that today's universities are subject to both public and private law as administrative decision-makers and quasi-public institutions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.29173/alr2789 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>rmit_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_29173_alr2789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.T2024092400016191970834934</informt_id><sourcerecordid>10.3316/informit.T2024092400016191970834934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-e984b5a70d0249eb5389c8404740e17712510b212f19ef50a840283504b0c3693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUMtOwzAQtBBIlILEJ-TIJbDrR2JzQ1V5VJW4FK6W4zjFqIkrO6nUvye0lbhwWK12Z3Y0O4TcItxThSV7MJtIS6nOyAQVFblkojgnEwCgOZcUL8lVSt_jyAXnE7KYx5B86LLQZEPndy4m3-8zM_ShC-3-MVsMtbfebLI0bF3c-X_INnT1YPtrctGYTXI3pz4lH8_z1ew1X76_vM2elrmlDPvcKckrYUqogXLlKsGkspIDLzk4LEukAqGiSBtUrhFgRoyOXwCvwLJCsSm5O-ra0XqKrtHb6FsT9xpBHzLQpwxG6ueRGlvfa7P2advr5Ey0X9p3TTisQ1zrOvjfa8aw-ANWdHQIaiwALFChKkEyrhhnP-lhavg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Erosion of university autonomy: Judicial supervision of university conduct</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wong, Anna S.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, Anna S.P.</creatorcontrib><description>The university was once envisaged as an autonomous, self-governing institution where academic endeavours could flourish sans outside interference. It is a vision with diminishing correspondence to reality. This article explores the degree of autonomy afforded to universities when the university visitor was given a prominent role to play in adjudicating disputes in contrast to contemporary times when universities find themselves increasingly - and inconsistently - under the supervision of the judiciary. By examining universityfocused jurisprudence involving judicial review, civil litigation, and 'Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms' challenges, the article highlights instances where universities have fallen under the scrutiny of judicial oversight, and circumstances where the courts have chosen not to intervene. The article concludes that today's universities are subject to both public and private law as administrative decision-makers and quasi-public institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-4821</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1925-8356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.29173/alr2789</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Calgary AB, Canada: University of Calgary Law School</publisher><subject>Administrative law ; Judicial power ; Judicial review ; Public opinion ; Torts</subject><ispartof>Alberta law review, 2024-09, Vol.61 (4), p.881-910</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, Anna S.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Erosion of university autonomy: Judicial supervision of university conduct</title><title>Alberta law review</title><description>The university was once envisaged as an autonomous, self-governing institution where academic endeavours could flourish sans outside interference. It is a vision with diminishing correspondence to reality. This article explores the degree of autonomy afforded to universities when the university visitor was given a prominent role to play in adjudicating disputes in contrast to contemporary times when universities find themselves increasingly - and inconsistently - under the supervision of the judiciary. By examining universityfocused jurisprudence involving judicial review, civil litigation, and 'Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms' challenges, the article highlights instances where universities have fallen under the scrutiny of judicial oversight, and circumstances where the courts have chosen not to intervene. The article concludes that today's universities are subject to both public and private law as administrative decision-makers and quasi-public institutions.</description><subject>Administrative law</subject><subject>Judicial power</subject><subject>Judicial review</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Torts</subject><issn>0002-4821</issn><issn>1925-8356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptUMtOwzAQtBBIlILEJ-TIJbDrR2JzQ1V5VJW4FK6W4zjFqIkrO6nUvye0lbhwWK12Z3Y0O4TcItxThSV7MJtIS6nOyAQVFblkojgnEwCgOZcUL8lVSt_jyAXnE7KYx5B86LLQZEPndy4m3-8zM_ShC-3-MVsMtbfebLI0bF3c-X_INnT1YPtrctGYTXI3pz4lH8_z1ew1X76_vM2elrmlDPvcKckrYUqogXLlKsGkspIDLzk4LEukAqGiSBtUrhFgRoyOXwCvwLJCsSm5O-ra0XqKrtHb6FsT9xpBHzLQpwxG6ueRGlvfa7P2advr5Ey0X9p3TTisQ1zrOvjfa8aw-ANWdHQIaiwALFChKkEyrhhnP-lhavg</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Wong, Anna S.P.</creator><general>University of Calgary Law School</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Erosion of university autonomy: Judicial supervision of university conduct</title><author>Wong, Anna S.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-e984b5a70d0249eb5389c8404740e17712510b212f19ef50a840283504b0c3693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Administrative law</topic><topic>Judicial power</topic><topic>Judicial review</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Torts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, Anna S.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Alberta law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, Anna S.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Erosion of university autonomy: Judicial supervision of university conduct</atitle><jtitle>Alberta law review</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>881</spage><epage>910</epage><pages>881-910</pages><issn>0002-4821</issn><eissn>1925-8356</eissn><abstract>The university was once envisaged as an autonomous, self-governing institution where academic endeavours could flourish sans outside interference. It is a vision with diminishing correspondence to reality. This article explores the degree of autonomy afforded to universities when the university visitor was given a prominent role to play in adjudicating disputes in contrast to contemporary times when universities find themselves increasingly - and inconsistently - under the supervision of the judiciary. By examining universityfocused jurisprudence involving judicial review, civil litigation, and 'Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms' challenges, the article highlights instances where universities have fallen under the scrutiny of judicial oversight, and circumstances where the courts have chosen not to intervene. The article concludes that today's universities are subject to both public and private law as administrative decision-makers and quasi-public institutions.</abstract><cop>Calgary AB, Canada</cop><pub>University of Calgary Law School</pub><doi>10.29173/alr2789</doi><tpages>30</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-4821 |
ispartof | Alberta law review, 2024-09, Vol.61 (4), p.881-910 |
issn | 0002-4821 1925-8356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_29173_alr2789 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Administrative law Judicial power Judicial review Public opinion Torts |
title | Erosion of university autonomy: Judicial supervision of university conduct |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A51%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rmit_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Erosion%20of%20university%20autonomy:%20Judicial%20supervision%20of%20university%20conduct&rft.jtitle=Alberta%20law%20review&rft.au=Wong,%20Anna%20S.P.&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=881&rft.epage=910&rft.pages=881-910&rft.issn=0002-4821&rft.eissn=1925-8356&rft_id=info:doi/10.29173/alr2789&rft_dat=%3Crmit_cross%3E10.3316/informit.T2024092400016191970834934%3C/rmit_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.T2024092400016191970834934&rfr_iscdi=true |