Erosion of university autonomy: Judicial supervision of university conduct

The university was once envisaged as an autonomous, self-governing institution where academic endeavours could flourish sans outside interference. It is a vision with diminishing correspondence to reality. This article explores the degree of autonomy afforded to universities when the university visi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alberta law review 2024-09, Vol.61 (4), p.881-910
1. Verfasser: Wong, Anna S.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 910
container_issue 4
container_start_page 881
container_title Alberta law review
container_volume 61
creator Wong, Anna S.P.
description The university was once envisaged as an autonomous, self-governing institution where academic endeavours could flourish sans outside interference. It is a vision with diminishing correspondence to reality. This article explores the degree of autonomy afforded to universities when the university visitor was given a prominent role to play in adjudicating disputes in contrast to contemporary times when universities find themselves increasingly - and inconsistently - under the supervision of the judiciary. By examining universityfocused jurisprudence involving judicial review, civil litigation, and 'Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms' challenges, the article highlights instances where universities have fallen under the scrutiny of judicial oversight, and circumstances where the courts have chosen not to intervene. The article concludes that today's universities are subject to both public and private law as administrative decision-makers and quasi-public institutions.
doi_str_mv 10.29173/alr2789
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>rmit_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_29173_alr2789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.T2024092400016191970834934</informt_id><sourcerecordid>10.3316/informit.T2024092400016191970834934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-e984b5a70d0249eb5389c8404740e17712510b212f19ef50a840283504b0c3693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUMtOwzAQtBBIlILEJ-TIJbDrR2JzQ1V5VJW4FK6W4zjFqIkrO6nUvye0lbhwWK12Z3Y0O4TcItxThSV7MJtIS6nOyAQVFblkojgnEwCgOZcUL8lVSt_jyAXnE7KYx5B86LLQZEPndy4m3-8zM_ShC-3-MVsMtbfebLI0bF3c-X_INnT1YPtrctGYTXI3pz4lH8_z1ew1X76_vM2elrmlDPvcKckrYUqogXLlKsGkspIDLzk4LEukAqGiSBtUrhFgRoyOXwCvwLJCsSm5O-ra0XqKrtHb6FsT9xpBHzLQpwxG6ueRGlvfa7P2advr5Ey0X9p3TTisQ1zrOvjfa8aw-ANWdHQIaiwALFChKkEyrhhnP-lhavg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Erosion of university autonomy: Judicial supervision of university conduct</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wong, Anna S.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, Anna S.P.</creatorcontrib><description>The university was once envisaged as an autonomous, self-governing institution where academic endeavours could flourish sans outside interference. It is a vision with diminishing correspondence to reality. This article explores the degree of autonomy afforded to universities when the university visitor was given a prominent role to play in adjudicating disputes in contrast to contemporary times when universities find themselves increasingly - and inconsistently - under the supervision of the judiciary. By examining universityfocused jurisprudence involving judicial review, civil litigation, and 'Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms' challenges, the article highlights instances where universities have fallen under the scrutiny of judicial oversight, and circumstances where the courts have chosen not to intervene. The article concludes that today's universities are subject to both public and private law as administrative decision-makers and quasi-public institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-4821</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1925-8356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.29173/alr2789</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Calgary AB, Canada: University of Calgary Law School</publisher><subject>Administrative law ; Judicial power ; Judicial review ; Public opinion ; Torts</subject><ispartof>Alberta law review, 2024-09, Vol.61 (4), p.881-910</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, Anna S.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Erosion of university autonomy: Judicial supervision of university conduct</title><title>Alberta law review</title><description>The university was once envisaged as an autonomous, self-governing institution where academic endeavours could flourish sans outside interference. It is a vision with diminishing correspondence to reality. This article explores the degree of autonomy afforded to universities when the university visitor was given a prominent role to play in adjudicating disputes in contrast to contemporary times when universities find themselves increasingly - and inconsistently - under the supervision of the judiciary. By examining universityfocused jurisprudence involving judicial review, civil litigation, and 'Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms' challenges, the article highlights instances where universities have fallen under the scrutiny of judicial oversight, and circumstances where the courts have chosen not to intervene. The article concludes that today's universities are subject to both public and private law as administrative decision-makers and quasi-public institutions.</description><subject>Administrative law</subject><subject>Judicial power</subject><subject>Judicial review</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Torts</subject><issn>0002-4821</issn><issn>1925-8356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptUMtOwzAQtBBIlILEJ-TIJbDrR2JzQ1V5VJW4FK6W4zjFqIkrO6nUvye0lbhwWK12Z3Y0O4TcItxThSV7MJtIS6nOyAQVFblkojgnEwCgOZcUL8lVSt_jyAXnE7KYx5B86LLQZEPndy4m3-8zM_ShC-3-MVsMtbfebLI0bF3c-X_INnT1YPtrctGYTXI3pz4lH8_z1ew1X76_vM2elrmlDPvcKckrYUqogXLlKsGkspIDLzk4LEukAqGiSBtUrhFgRoyOXwCvwLJCsSm5O-ra0XqKrtHb6FsT9xpBHzLQpwxG6ueRGlvfa7P2advr5Ey0X9p3TTisQ1zrOvjfa8aw-ANWdHQIaiwALFChKkEyrhhnP-lhavg</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Wong, Anna S.P.</creator><general>University of Calgary Law School</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Erosion of university autonomy: Judicial supervision of university conduct</title><author>Wong, Anna S.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-e984b5a70d0249eb5389c8404740e17712510b212f19ef50a840283504b0c3693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Administrative law</topic><topic>Judicial power</topic><topic>Judicial review</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Torts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, Anna S.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Alberta law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, Anna S.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Erosion of university autonomy: Judicial supervision of university conduct</atitle><jtitle>Alberta law review</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>881</spage><epage>910</epage><pages>881-910</pages><issn>0002-4821</issn><eissn>1925-8356</eissn><abstract>The university was once envisaged as an autonomous, self-governing institution where academic endeavours could flourish sans outside interference. It is a vision with diminishing correspondence to reality. This article explores the degree of autonomy afforded to universities when the university visitor was given a prominent role to play in adjudicating disputes in contrast to contemporary times when universities find themselves increasingly - and inconsistently - under the supervision of the judiciary. By examining universityfocused jurisprudence involving judicial review, civil litigation, and 'Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms' challenges, the article highlights instances where universities have fallen under the scrutiny of judicial oversight, and circumstances where the courts have chosen not to intervene. The article concludes that today's universities are subject to both public and private law as administrative decision-makers and quasi-public institutions.</abstract><cop>Calgary AB, Canada</cop><pub>University of Calgary Law School</pub><doi>10.29173/alr2789</doi><tpages>30</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-4821
ispartof Alberta law review, 2024-09, Vol.61 (4), p.881-910
issn 0002-4821
1925-8356
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_29173_alr2789
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Administrative law
Judicial power
Judicial review
Public opinion
Torts
title Erosion of university autonomy: Judicial supervision of university conduct
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A51%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rmit_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Erosion%20of%20university%20autonomy:%20Judicial%20supervision%20of%20university%20conduct&rft.jtitle=Alberta%20law%20review&rft.au=Wong,%20Anna%20S.P.&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=881&rft.epage=910&rft.pages=881-910&rft.issn=0002-4821&rft.eissn=1925-8356&rft_id=info:doi/10.29173/alr2789&rft_dat=%3Crmit_cross%3E10.3316/informit.T2024092400016191970834934%3C/rmit_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.T2024092400016191970834934&rfr_iscdi=true