Legal ethics for government lawyers: Confronting doctrinal gaps

Despite the recent growth in the Canadian literature on legal ethics for government lawyers, the leading conceptual models have yet to be applied to resolve many of the most important legal questions facing government lawyers. In this article I identify four key situations where the obligations of g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alberta law review 2022-09, Vol.60 (1), p.169-203
1. Verfasser: Martin, Andrew Flavelle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 203
container_issue 1
container_start_page 169
container_title Alberta law review
container_volume 60
creator Martin, Andrew Flavelle
description Despite the recent growth in the Canadian literature on legal ethics for government lawyers, the leading conceptual models have yet to be applied to resolve many of the most important legal questions facing government lawyers. In this article I identify four key situations where the obligations of government lawyers as lawyers appear to clash with their obligations as public servants. I provide both a doctrinal analysis of how the current law applies in those situations and proposals for how the law can be clarified and improved. This analysis both provides much needed guidance to government lawyers and promotes a greater understanding by law societies as regulators, as well as other key stakeholders, of the unique challenges facing government lawyers and the need for legislative and regulatory reform.
doi_str_mv 10.29173/alr2714
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>rmit_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_29173_alr2714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20230124082471</informt_id><sourcerecordid>10.3316/agispt.20230124082471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c981-4428f452467c459e1f298edef53c9d993a233ac1a1c5b474d7eb7ab054efee8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j01LAzEURYMoWKvgT5ilm9F8vDQTNyLFWqHgpvuQZl6mkWlSkkHpv3dq6-pxH-deOITcM_rINVPiyfaZKwYXZMI0l3Uj5OySTCilvIaGs2tyU8rXGEECTMjLCjvbVzhsgyuVT7nq0jfmuMM4VL39OWAuz9U8RZ9THELsqja5IYc4ljq7L7fkytu-4N35Tsl68baeL-vV5_vH_HVVO92wGoA3HiSHmXIgNTLPdYMteimcbrUWlgthHbPMyQ0oaBVulN1QCegRGy-m5OE063IqJaM3-xx2Nh8Mo-bP25y9R3R5QvMuDMZ2oewHU9BmtzUhjobHd8qdaVM4toVgs3-MUy4o40AbDoqJX71EZD0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Legal ethics for government lawyers: Confronting doctrinal gaps</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Martin, Andrew Flavelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, Andrew Flavelle</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the recent growth in the Canadian literature on legal ethics for government lawyers, the leading conceptual models have yet to be applied to resolve many of the most important legal questions facing government lawyers. In this article I identify four key situations where the obligations of government lawyers as lawyers appear to clash with their obligations as public servants. I provide both a doctrinal analysis of how the current law applies in those situations and proposals for how the law can be clarified and improved. This analysis both provides much needed guidance to government lawyers and promotes a greater understanding by law societies as regulators, as well as other key stakeholders, of the unique challenges facing government lawyers and the need for legislative and regulatory reform.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-4821</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1925-8356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.29173/alr2714</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Civil service ; Confidential communications ; Government attorneys ; Lawyers ; Legal ethics ; Practice of law</subject><ispartof>Alberta law review, 2022-09, Vol.60 (1), p.169-203</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, Andrew Flavelle</creatorcontrib><title>Legal ethics for government lawyers: Confronting doctrinal gaps</title><title>Alberta law review</title><description>Despite the recent growth in the Canadian literature on legal ethics for government lawyers, the leading conceptual models have yet to be applied to resolve many of the most important legal questions facing government lawyers. In this article I identify four key situations where the obligations of government lawyers as lawyers appear to clash with their obligations as public servants. I provide both a doctrinal analysis of how the current law applies in those situations and proposals for how the law can be clarified and improved. This analysis both provides much needed guidance to government lawyers and promotes a greater understanding by law societies as regulators, as well as other key stakeholders, of the unique challenges facing government lawyers and the need for legislative and regulatory reform.</description><subject>Civil service</subject><subject>Confidential communications</subject><subject>Government attorneys</subject><subject>Lawyers</subject><subject>Legal ethics</subject><subject>Practice of law</subject><issn>0002-4821</issn><issn>1925-8356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1j01LAzEURYMoWKvgT5ilm9F8vDQTNyLFWqHgpvuQZl6mkWlSkkHpv3dq6-pxH-deOITcM_rINVPiyfaZKwYXZMI0l3Uj5OySTCilvIaGs2tyU8rXGEECTMjLCjvbVzhsgyuVT7nq0jfmuMM4VL39OWAuz9U8RZ9THELsqja5IYc4ljq7L7fkytu-4N35Tsl68baeL-vV5_vH_HVVO92wGoA3HiSHmXIgNTLPdYMteimcbrUWlgthHbPMyQ0oaBVulN1QCegRGy-m5OE063IqJaM3-xx2Nh8Mo-bP25y9R3R5QvMuDMZ2oewHU9BmtzUhjobHd8qdaVM4toVgs3-MUy4o40AbDoqJX71EZD0</recordid><startdate>20220907</startdate><enddate>20220907</enddate><creator>Martin, Andrew Flavelle</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220907</creationdate><title>Legal ethics for government lawyers: Confronting doctrinal gaps</title><author>Martin, Andrew Flavelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c981-4428f452467c459e1f298edef53c9d993a233ac1a1c5b474d7eb7ab054efee8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Civil service</topic><topic>Confidential communications</topic><topic>Government attorneys</topic><topic>Lawyers</topic><topic>Legal ethics</topic><topic>Practice of law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Andrew Flavelle</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Alberta law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Andrew Flavelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Legal ethics for government lawyers: Confronting doctrinal gaps</atitle><jtitle>Alberta law review</jtitle><date>2022-09-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>169-203</pages><issn>0002-4821</issn><eissn>1925-8356</eissn><abstract>Despite the recent growth in the Canadian literature on legal ethics for government lawyers, the leading conceptual models have yet to be applied to resolve many of the most important legal questions facing government lawyers. In this article I identify four key situations where the obligations of government lawyers as lawyers appear to clash with their obligations as public servants. I provide both a doctrinal analysis of how the current law applies in those situations and proposals for how the law can be clarified and improved. This analysis both provides much needed guidance to government lawyers and promotes a greater understanding by law societies as regulators, as well as other key stakeholders, of the unique challenges facing government lawyers and the need for legislative and regulatory reform.</abstract><doi>10.29173/alr2714</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-4821
ispartof Alberta law review, 2022-09, Vol.60 (1), p.169-203
issn 0002-4821
1925-8356
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_29173_alr2714
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Civil service
Confidential communications
Government attorneys
Lawyers
Legal ethics
Practice of law
title Legal ethics for government lawyers: Confronting doctrinal gaps
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A10%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rmit_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Legal%20ethics%20for%20government%20lawyers:%20Confronting%20doctrinal%20gaps&rft.jtitle=Alberta%20law%20review&rft.au=Martin,%20Andrew%20Flavelle&rft.date=2022-09-07&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=169-203&rft.issn=0002-4821&rft.eissn=1925-8356&rft_id=info:doi/10.29173/alr2714&rft_dat=%3Crmit_cross%3E10.3316/agispt.20230124082471%3C/rmit_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20230124082471&rfr_iscdi=true