Legal ethics for government lawyers: Confronting doctrinal gaps
Despite the recent growth in the Canadian literature on legal ethics for government lawyers, the leading conceptual models have yet to be applied to resolve many of the most important legal questions facing government lawyers. In this article I identify four key situations where the obligations of g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Alberta law review 2022-09, Vol.60 (1), p.169-203 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 203 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 169 |
container_title | Alberta law review |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Martin, Andrew Flavelle |
description | Despite the recent growth in the Canadian literature on legal ethics for government lawyers, the leading conceptual models have yet to be applied to resolve many of the most important legal questions facing government lawyers. In this article I identify four key situations where the obligations of government lawyers as lawyers appear to clash with their obligations as public servants. I provide both a doctrinal analysis of how the current law applies in those situations and proposals for how the law can be clarified and improved. This analysis both provides much needed guidance to government lawyers and promotes a greater understanding by law societies as regulators, as well as other key stakeholders, of the unique challenges facing government lawyers and the need for legislative and regulatory reform. |
doi_str_mv | 10.29173/alr2714 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>rmit_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_29173_alr2714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20230124082471</informt_id><sourcerecordid>10.3316/agispt.20230124082471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c981-4428f452467c459e1f298edef53c9d993a233ac1a1c5b474d7eb7ab054efee8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j01LAzEURYMoWKvgT5ilm9F8vDQTNyLFWqHgpvuQZl6mkWlSkkHpv3dq6-pxH-deOITcM_rINVPiyfaZKwYXZMI0l3Uj5OySTCilvIaGs2tyU8rXGEECTMjLCjvbVzhsgyuVT7nq0jfmuMM4VL39OWAuz9U8RZ9THELsqja5IYc4ljq7L7fkytu-4N35Tsl68baeL-vV5_vH_HVVO92wGoA3HiSHmXIgNTLPdYMteimcbrUWlgthHbPMyQ0oaBVulN1QCegRGy-m5OE063IqJaM3-xx2Nh8Mo-bP25y9R3R5QvMuDMZ2oewHU9BmtzUhjobHd8qdaVM4toVgs3-MUy4o40AbDoqJX71EZD0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Legal ethics for government lawyers: Confronting doctrinal gaps</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Martin, Andrew Flavelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, Andrew Flavelle</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the recent growth in the Canadian literature on legal ethics for government lawyers, the leading conceptual models have yet to be applied to resolve many of the most important legal questions facing government lawyers. In this article I identify four key situations where the obligations of government lawyers as lawyers appear to clash with their obligations as public servants. I provide both a doctrinal analysis of how the current law applies in those situations and proposals for how the law can be clarified and improved. This analysis both provides much needed guidance to government lawyers and promotes a greater understanding by law societies as regulators, as well as other key stakeholders, of the unique challenges facing government lawyers and the need for legislative and regulatory reform.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-4821</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1925-8356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.29173/alr2714</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Civil service ; Confidential communications ; Government attorneys ; Lawyers ; Legal ethics ; Practice of law</subject><ispartof>Alberta law review, 2022-09, Vol.60 (1), p.169-203</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, Andrew Flavelle</creatorcontrib><title>Legal ethics for government lawyers: Confronting doctrinal gaps</title><title>Alberta law review</title><description>Despite the recent growth in the Canadian literature on legal ethics for government lawyers, the leading conceptual models have yet to be applied to resolve many of the most important legal questions facing government lawyers. In this article I identify four key situations where the obligations of government lawyers as lawyers appear to clash with their obligations as public servants. I provide both a doctrinal analysis of how the current law applies in those situations and proposals for how the law can be clarified and improved. This analysis both provides much needed guidance to government lawyers and promotes a greater understanding by law societies as regulators, as well as other key stakeholders, of the unique challenges facing government lawyers and the need for legislative and regulatory reform.</description><subject>Civil service</subject><subject>Confidential communications</subject><subject>Government attorneys</subject><subject>Lawyers</subject><subject>Legal ethics</subject><subject>Practice of law</subject><issn>0002-4821</issn><issn>1925-8356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1j01LAzEURYMoWKvgT5ilm9F8vDQTNyLFWqHgpvuQZl6mkWlSkkHpv3dq6-pxH-deOITcM_rINVPiyfaZKwYXZMI0l3Uj5OySTCilvIaGs2tyU8rXGEECTMjLCjvbVzhsgyuVT7nq0jfmuMM4VL39OWAuz9U8RZ9THELsqja5IYc4ljq7L7fkytu-4N35Tsl68baeL-vV5_vH_HVVO92wGoA3HiSHmXIgNTLPdYMteimcbrUWlgthHbPMyQ0oaBVulN1QCegRGy-m5OE063IqJaM3-xx2Nh8Mo-bP25y9R3R5QvMuDMZ2oewHU9BmtzUhjobHd8qdaVM4toVgs3-MUy4o40AbDoqJX71EZD0</recordid><startdate>20220907</startdate><enddate>20220907</enddate><creator>Martin, Andrew Flavelle</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220907</creationdate><title>Legal ethics for government lawyers: Confronting doctrinal gaps</title><author>Martin, Andrew Flavelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c981-4428f452467c459e1f298edef53c9d993a233ac1a1c5b474d7eb7ab054efee8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Civil service</topic><topic>Confidential communications</topic><topic>Government attorneys</topic><topic>Lawyers</topic><topic>Legal ethics</topic><topic>Practice of law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Andrew Flavelle</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Alberta law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Andrew Flavelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Legal ethics for government lawyers: Confronting doctrinal gaps</atitle><jtitle>Alberta law review</jtitle><date>2022-09-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>169-203</pages><issn>0002-4821</issn><eissn>1925-8356</eissn><abstract>Despite the recent growth in the Canadian literature on legal ethics for government lawyers, the leading conceptual models have yet to be applied to resolve many of the most important legal questions facing government lawyers. In this article I identify four key situations where the obligations of government lawyers as lawyers appear to clash with their obligations as public servants. I provide both a doctrinal analysis of how the current law applies in those situations and proposals for how the law can be clarified and improved. This analysis both provides much needed guidance to government lawyers and promotes a greater understanding by law societies as regulators, as well as other key stakeholders, of the unique challenges facing government lawyers and the need for legislative and regulatory reform.</abstract><doi>10.29173/alr2714</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-4821 |
ispartof | Alberta law review, 2022-09, Vol.60 (1), p.169-203 |
issn | 0002-4821 1925-8356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_29173_alr2714 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Civil service Confidential communications Government attorneys Lawyers Legal ethics Practice of law |
title | Legal ethics for government lawyers: Confronting doctrinal gaps |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A10%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rmit_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Legal%20ethics%20for%20government%20lawyers:%20Confronting%20doctrinal%20gaps&rft.jtitle=Alberta%20law%20review&rft.au=Martin,%20Andrew%20Flavelle&rft.date=2022-09-07&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=169-203&rft.issn=0002-4821&rft.eissn=1925-8356&rft_id=info:doi/10.29173/alr2714&rft_dat=%3Crmit_cross%3E10.3316/agispt.20230124082471%3C/rmit_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20230124082471&rfr_iscdi=true |