Corruption in Bulgaria

Corruption in Bulgaria

There is a disparity between what international experts say about corruption in Bulgaria and the way the country's people see the problem. The European Union (EU) reports steady progress, but its view is not shared by Bulgaria's own monitors, scholars, and citizenry. This issue is explored...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public integrity 2006-01, Vol.8 (1), p.65-76
1. Verfasser: EMERSON, SANDRA M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 76
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title Public integrity
container_volume 8
creator EMERSON, SANDRA M.
description There is a disparity between what international experts say about corruption in Bulgaria and the way the country's people see the problem. The European Union (EU) reports steady progress, but its view is not shared by Bulgaria's own monitors, scholars, and citizenry. This issue is explored through public reports, papers, and interviews. The analysis suggests that the disparate views of corruption arise from differing definitions of democracy. The Western emphasis on institution building and markets over citizen participation and social welfare has undermined citizen support for democratic reform. As a result, efforts by the EU and the United States in Bulgaria may inadvertently sustain a tolerance for corruption.
doi_str_mv 10.2753/PIN1099-9922080105
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2753_PIN1099_9922080105</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_2753_PIN1099_9922080105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-736a1b5f990fa975ddbf74c4f1200dc90d2ef7440a936a72586fe3c90f61b1223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jz1PAzEMhiMEEqWwMjD1DxzYyeXuPDDAiUKlChhgjnIfQUHXS-W0Qv33BLWIjcnWaz-2HiGuEK5lqdXN6-IZgSgjkhIqQNBHYoJaVxlQRcep_52eirMYPwGkrnKciMs6MG_XGx_GmR9n99vhw7K35-LE2SH2F4c6Fe_zh7f6KVu-PC7qu2XWKsBNVqrCYqMdEThLpe66xpV5mzuUAF1L0Mk-BTlYSptl-lm4XqXcFdiglGoq5P5uyyFG7p1Zs19Z3hkE82NmDmbmzyxBt3vIjy7wyn4FHjqzsbshsGM7tj4a9Q__DVTeUxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Corruption in Bulgaria</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>EMERSON, SANDRA M.</creator><creatorcontrib>EMERSON, SANDRA M.</creatorcontrib><description>There is a disparity between what international experts say about corruption in Bulgaria and the way the country's people see the problem. The European Union (EU) reports steady progress, but its view is not shared by Bulgaria's own monitors, scholars, and citizenry. This issue is explored through public reports, papers, and interviews. The analysis suggests that the disparate views of corruption arise from differing definitions of democracy. The Western emphasis on institution building and markets over citizen participation and social welfare has undermined citizen support for democratic reform. As a result, efforts by the EU and the United States in Bulgaria may inadvertently sustain a tolerance for corruption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-9922</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0989</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2753/PIN1099-9922080105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><ispartof>Public integrity, 2006-01, Vol.8 (1), p.65-76</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2006</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-736a1b5f990fa975ddbf74c4f1200dc90d2ef7440a936a72586fe3c90f61b1223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-736a1b5f990fa975ddbf74c4f1200dc90d2ef7440a936a72586fe3c90f61b1223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>EMERSON, SANDRA M.</creatorcontrib><title>Corruption in Bulgaria</title><title>Public integrity</title><description>There is a disparity between what international experts say about corruption in Bulgaria and the way the country's people see the problem. The European Union (EU) reports steady progress, but its view is not shared by Bulgaria's own monitors, scholars, and citizenry. This issue is explored through public reports, papers, and interviews. The analysis suggests that the disparate views of corruption arise from differing definitions of democracy. The Western emphasis on institution building and markets over citizen participation and social welfare has undermined citizen support for democratic reform. As a result, efforts by the EU and the United States in Bulgaria may inadvertently sustain a tolerance for corruption.</description><issn>1099-9922</issn><issn>1558-0989</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9jz1PAzEMhiMEEqWwMjD1DxzYyeXuPDDAiUKlChhgjnIfQUHXS-W0Qv33BLWIjcnWaz-2HiGuEK5lqdXN6-IZgSgjkhIqQNBHYoJaVxlQRcep_52eirMYPwGkrnKciMs6MG_XGx_GmR9n99vhw7K35-LE2SH2F4c6Fe_zh7f6KVu-PC7qu2XWKsBNVqrCYqMdEThLpe66xpV5mzuUAF1L0Mk-BTlYSptl-lm4XqXcFdiglGoq5P5uyyFG7p1Zs19Z3hkE82NmDmbmzyxBt3vIjy7wyn4FHjqzsbshsGM7tj4a9Q__DVTeUxA</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>EMERSON, SANDRA M.</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Corruption in Bulgaria</title><author>EMERSON, SANDRA M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-736a1b5f990fa975ddbf74c4f1200dc90d2ef7440a936a72586fe3c90f61b1223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>EMERSON, SANDRA M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Public integrity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>EMERSON, SANDRA M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Corruption in Bulgaria</atitle><jtitle>Public integrity</jtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>65-76</pages><issn>1099-9922</issn><eissn>1558-0989</eissn><abstract>There is a disparity between what international experts say about corruption in Bulgaria and the way the country's people see the problem. The European Union (EU) reports steady progress, but its view is not shared by Bulgaria's own monitors, scholars, and citizenry. This issue is explored through public reports, papers, and interviews. The analysis suggests that the disparate views of corruption arise from differing definitions of democracy. The Western emphasis on institution building and markets over citizen participation and social welfare has undermined citizen support for democratic reform. As a result, efforts by the EU and the United States in Bulgaria may inadvertently sustain a tolerance for corruption.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.2753/PIN1099-9922080105</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1099-9922
ispartof Public integrity, 2006-01, Vol.8 (1), p.65-76
issn 1099-9922
1558-0989
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2753_PIN1099_9922080105
source Political Science Complete
title Corruption in Bulgaria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T05%3A41%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Corruption%20in%20Bulgaria&rft.jtitle=Public%20integrity&rft.au=EMERSON,%20SANDRA%20M.&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=65-76&rft.issn=1099-9922&rft.eissn=1558-0989&rft_id=info:doi/10.2753/PIN1099-9922080105&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_2753_PIN1099_9922080105%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true