Comparative Study of Two Semi-automated Forensic DNA Extraction Methods: Automate Express™ & Hamilton Microlab STAR™ System

Automation in forensic DNA analysis is crucial for analysts to reduce time, improve results, and decrease risk of contamination. With the variety of commercially available automated DNA extraction systems, comes the need for end-users to be informed of what they provide and what they might lack. Thu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arab journal of forensic sciences & forensic medicine 2023-12, Vol.5 (2), p.180-190
Hauptverfasser: Sanqoor, Afra Naqib, Altamimi, Fatma, Aljanahi, Naeema, Almheiri, Maryam, Almulla, Hanan, Sanqoor, Sheikha Hassan, AlGhanim, Hussein Jaffar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 190
container_issue 2
container_start_page 180
container_title Arab journal of forensic sciences & forensic medicine
container_volume 5
creator Sanqoor, Afra Naqib
Altamimi, Fatma
Aljanahi, Naeema
Almheiri, Maryam
Almulla, Hanan
Sanqoor, Sheikha Hassan
AlGhanim, Hussein Jaffar
description Automation in forensic DNA analysis is crucial for analysts to reduce time, improve results, and decrease risk of contamination. With the variety of commercially available automated DNA extraction systems, comes the need for end-users to be informed of what they provide and what they might lack. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of two semi-automated DNA extraction systems used for forensic DNA analysis: Automate Express™ and Hamilton Microlab STAR™ system, for four parameters; reproducibility, stability, sensitivity and contamination. Overall, the results indicated that both semi-automated systems performed similarly in providing robust and reproducible DNA results while maintaining good capability to overcome PCR inhibition with low risk of contamination. The two semi-automated systems showed higher DNA recovery than organic extraction using phenol-chloroform by 22% for semen and 7% for blood samples. In addition, three sample types, blood, saliva, semen were tested to compare the two systems (total samples n=100). Overall, the data showed the average DNA recovery for Hamilton was higher than the DNA recovery by Automate Express™ for the blood and semen sample types indicating better performance of the Hamilton Microlab STAR™ in terms of recovery and sensitivity level.
doi_str_mv 10.26735/YSKR7711
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_26735_YSKR7711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_26735_YSKR7711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a130t-859a5591bbede172052862bdfa6aa10df6db00a1be94d45fd01a15e2749345853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kLtOwzAUQC0EElXpwB94ZQj4OvFrrEofiAISKQNTdBPbIojUle0C_XskXtM50xkOIefALrlUpbh6rm8flQI4IiOQQhdSmer437U8JZOUXhljoAU3lRiR5SwMO4yY-3dH67y3Bxo83XwEWruhL3Cfw4DZWboI0W1T39Hr-ymdf-aIXe7Dlt65_BJsOiMnHt-Sm_xyTJ4W881sVawfljez6bpAKFkutDAohIG2ddaB4kxwLXlrPUpEYNZL2zKG0DpT2Up4ywBBOK4qU1ZCi3JMLn66XQwpReebXewHjIcGWPM9ofmbUH4BiNNOkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Study of Two Semi-automated Forensic DNA Extraction Methods: Automate Express™ &amp; Hamilton Microlab STAR™ System</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Sanqoor, Afra Naqib ; Altamimi, Fatma ; Aljanahi, Naeema ; Almheiri, Maryam ; Almulla, Hanan ; Sanqoor, Sheikha Hassan ; AlGhanim, Hussein Jaffar</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanqoor, Afra Naqib ; Altamimi, Fatma ; Aljanahi, Naeema ; Almheiri, Maryam ; Almulla, Hanan ; Sanqoor, Sheikha Hassan ; AlGhanim, Hussein Jaffar</creatorcontrib><description>Automation in forensic DNA analysis is crucial for analysts to reduce time, improve results, and decrease risk of contamination. With the variety of commercially available automated DNA extraction systems, comes the need for end-users to be informed of what they provide and what they might lack. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of two semi-automated DNA extraction systems used for forensic DNA analysis: Automate Express™ and Hamilton Microlab STAR™ system, for four parameters; reproducibility, stability, sensitivity and contamination. Overall, the results indicated that both semi-automated systems performed similarly in providing robust and reproducible DNA results while maintaining good capability to overcome PCR inhibition with low risk of contamination. The two semi-automated systems showed higher DNA recovery than organic extraction using phenol-chloroform by 22% for semen and 7% for blood samples. In addition, three sample types, blood, saliva, semen were tested to compare the two systems (total samples n=100). Overall, the data showed the average DNA recovery for Hamilton was higher than the DNA recovery by Automate Express™ for the blood and semen sample types indicating better performance of the Hamilton Microlab STAR™ in terms of recovery and sensitivity level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1658-6786</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1658-6794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26735/YSKR7711</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Arab journal of forensic sciences &amp; forensic medicine, 2023-12, Vol.5 (2), p.180-190</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a130t-859a5591bbede172052862bdfa6aa10df6db00a1be94d45fd01a15e2749345853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanqoor, Afra Naqib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altamimi, Fatma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aljanahi, Naeema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almheiri, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almulla, Hanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanqoor, Sheikha Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AlGhanim, Hussein Jaffar</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Study of Two Semi-automated Forensic DNA Extraction Methods: Automate Express™ &amp; Hamilton Microlab STAR™ System</title><title>Arab journal of forensic sciences &amp; forensic medicine</title><description>Automation in forensic DNA analysis is crucial for analysts to reduce time, improve results, and decrease risk of contamination. With the variety of commercially available automated DNA extraction systems, comes the need for end-users to be informed of what they provide and what they might lack. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of two semi-automated DNA extraction systems used for forensic DNA analysis: Automate Express™ and Hamilton Microlab STAR™ system, for four parameters; reproducibility, stability, sensitivity and contamination. Overall, the results indicated that both semi-automated systems performed similarly in providing robust and reproducible DNA results while maintaining good capability to overcome PCR inhibition with low risk of contamination. The two semi-automated systems showed higher DNA recovery than organic extraction using phenol-chloroform by 22% for semen and 7% for blood samples. In addition, three sample types, blood, saliva, semen were tested to compare the two systems (total samples n=100). Overall, the data showed the average DNA recovery for Hamilton was higher than the DNA recovery by Automate Express™ for the blood and semen sample types indicating better performance of the Hamilton Microlab STAR™ in terms of recovery and sensitivity level.</description><issn>1658-6786</issn><issn>1658-6794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kLtOwzAUQC0EElXpwB94ZQj4OvFrrEofiAISKQNTdBPbIojUle0C_XskXtM50xkOIefALrlUpbh6rm8flQI4IiOQQhdSmer437U8JZOUXhljoAU3lRiR5SwMO4yY-3dH67y3Bxo83XwEWruhL3Cfw4DZWboI0W1T39Hr-ymdf-aIXe7Dlt65_BJsOiMnHt-Sm_xyTJ4W881sVawfljez6bpAKFkutDAohIG2ddaB4kxwLXlrPUpEYNZL2zKG0DpT2Up4ywBBOK4qU1ZCi3JMLn66XQwpReebXewHjIcGWPM9ofmbUH4BiNNOkw</recordid><startdate>20231231</startdate><enddate>20231231</enddate><creator>Sanqoor, Afra Naqib</creator><creator>Altamimi, Fatma</creator><creator>Aljanahi, Naeema</creator><creator>Almheiri, Maryam</creator><creator>Almulla, Hanan</creator><creator>Sanqoor, Sheikha Hassan</creator><creator>AlGhanim, Hussein Jaffar</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231231</creationdate><title>Comparative Study of Two Semi-automated Forensic DNA Extraction Methods</title><author>Sanqoor, Afra Naqib ; Altamimi, Fatma ; Aljanahi, Naeema ; Almheiri, Maryam ; Almulla, Hanan ; Sanqoor, Sheikha Hassan ; AlGhanim, Hussein Jaffar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a130t-859a5591bbede172052862bdfa6aa10df6db00a1be94d45fd01a15e2749345853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanqoor, Afra Naqib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altamimi, Fatma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aljanahi, Naeema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almheiri, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almulla, Hanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanqoor, Sheikha Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AlGhanim, Hussein Jaffar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Arab journal of forensic sciences &amp; forensic medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanqoor, Afra Naqib</au><au>Altamimi, Fatma</au><au>Aljanahi, Naeema</au><au>Almheiri, Maryam</au><au>Almulla, Hanan</au><au>Sanqoor, Sheikha Hassan</au><au>AlGhanim, Hussein Jaffar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Study of Two Semi-automated Forensic DNA Extraction Methods: Automate Express™ &amp; Hamilton Microlab STAR™ System</atitle><jtitle>Arab journal of forensic sciences &amp; forensic medicine</jtitle><date>2023-12-31</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>180-190</pages><issn>1658-6786</issn><eissn>1658-6794</eissn><abstract>Automation in forensic DNA analysis is crucial for analysts to reduce time, improve results, and decrease risk of contamination. With the variety of commercially available automated DNA extraction systems, comes the need for end-users to be informed of what they provide and what they might lack. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of two semi-automated DNA extraction systems used for forensic DNA analysis: Automate Express™ and Hamilton Microlab STAR™ system, for four parameters; reproducibility, stability, sensitivity and contamination. Overall, the results indicated that both semi-automated systems performed similarly in providing robust and reproducible DNA results while maintaining good capability to overcome PCR inhibition with low risk of contamination. The two semi-automated systems showed higher DNA recovery than organic extraction using phenol-chloroform by 22% for semen and 7% for blood samples. In addition, three sample types, blood, saliva, semen were tested to compare the two systems (total samples n=100). Overall, the data showed the average DNA recovery for Hamilton was higher than the DNA recovery by Automate Express™ for the blood and semen sample types indicating better performance of the Hamilton Microlab STAR™ in terms of recovery and sensitivity level.</abstract><doi>10.26735/YSKR7711</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1658-6786
ispartof Arab journal of forensic sciences & forensic medicine, 2023-12, Vol.5 (2), p.180-190
issn 1658-6786
1658-6794
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_26735_YSKR7711
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
title Comparative Study of Two Semi-automated Forensic DNA Extraction Methods: Automate Express™ & Hamilton Microlab STAR™ System
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T17%3A55%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Study%20of%20Two%20Semi-automated%20Forensic%20DNA%20Extraction%20Methods:%20Automate%20Express%E2%84%A2%20&%20Hamilton%20Microlab%20STAR%E2%84%A2%20System&rft.jtitle=Arab%20journal%20of%20forensic%20sciences%20&%20forensic%20medicine&rft.au=Sanqoor,%20Afra%20Naqib&rft.date=2023-12-31&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=180-190&rft.issn=1658-6786&rft.eissn=1658-6794&rft_id=info:doi/10.26735/YSKR7711&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_26735_YSKR7711%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true